Richard A. Baum

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Angiographically Occult Runoff Vessels in Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

BACKGROUND Bypass grafting to arteries of the lower leg has become standard surgical management of advanced peripheral vascular disease. Its success depends on identifying suitable distal vessels. Preoperative preparation includes imaging of the arteries of the lower leg, usually by conventional contrast arteriography. An alternative procedure, magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, has been successfully employed in patients with various cardiovascular diseases, but its possible value in patients with peripheral vascular disease has received little attention. METHODS We used both conventional and MR angiography in preoperative studies of the lower-leg vessels of 23 patients (25 legs) with peripheral arteriosclerosis and arterial insufficiency, and developed independent therapeutic plans based on the information provided by each technique. When the plans differed, the interventional procedure judged more likely to save the limb was performed. The findings of conventional and MR angiography were verified by intraoperative arteriography, postinterventional arteriography, or direct operative exploration. RESULTS MR angiography detected all vessels identified by conventional angiography, whereas conventional arteriography failed to detect 22 percent of the runoff vessels identified by MR angiography. The detection by MR angiography of vessels not identified by conventional angiography altered the surgical management of the disorders of four patients (17 percent) and guided successful bypass procedures. CONCLUSIONS MR angiography is a noninvasive technique with greater sensitivity than conventional contrast arteriography for detecting distal runoff vessels in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

Magnetic resonance venography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis: Comparison with contrast venography and duplex Doppler ultrasonography

PURPOSE Contrast venography is the gold standard for diagnosis in deep venous thrombosis (DVT); however, this technique is invasive and requires the use of potentially hazardous contrast agents. Although duplex Doppler ultrasonography is accurate in the evaluation of lower extremity DVT, it is less accurate in the assessment of the pelvic and intraabdominal veins. Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) has recently been developed, and our purpose was to determine whether MRV could accurately demonstrated DVT when compared with duplex scanning and contrast venography. METHODS Eighty-five patients underwent contrast venography and MRV from the inferior vena cava to the popliteal veins to rule out DVT. Thirty-three of these patients also underwent duplex scanning. Blinded readings of these studies were compared for the presence or absence and extent of venous thrombosis. RESULTS DVT was documented by contrast venography in 27 (27%) venous systems. Results of MRV and contrast venography were identical in 98 (97%) of 101 venous systems, whereas results of duplex scanning and contrast venography were identical in 40 (98%) of 41 venous systems. All DVTs identified by contrast venography were detected by MRV and duplex scanning. The discrepancies were due to false-positive MRV (3) and duplex scanning (1) results. When compared with contrast venography, MRV had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 96%, positive predictive value of 90%, and negative predictive value of 100%. For duplex scanning the sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 96%, positive predictive value was 94%, and negative predictive value was 100%. CONCLUSIONS It is concluded that MRV is an accurate noninvasive venographic technique for the detection of DVT.

Peritoneovenous Shunting as Compared with Medical Treatment in Patients with Alcoholic Cirrhosis and Massive Ascites

The optimal management of severe ascites in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis has not been defined. in a 5 1/2-year study, we randomly assigned 299 men with alcoholic cirrhosis, who had persistent or recurrent severe ascites despite a standard medical regimen, to receive either intensive medical treatment or peritoneovenous (LeVeen) shunting. We identified three risk groups: Group 1 had normal or mildly abnormal results on liver-function tests, Group 2 had more severe liver dysfunction or previous complications, and Group 3 had severe prerenal azotemia without kidney disease. For the patients who received the medical treatment and those who received the surgical treatment combined, the median survival times were 1093 days in Group 1, 222 days in Group 2, and 37 days in Group 3 (P less than or equal to 0.01) for all comparisons). For all the groups combined, the median time to the resolution of ascites was 5.4 weeks for medical patients and 3.0 weeks for surgical patients (P less than 0.01). Within each risk group, mortality during the initial hospitalization and median long-term survival were similar among patients receiving either treatment. However, the median time to the recurrence of ascites in Group 1 was 4 months in medical patients, as compared with 18 months in surgical patients (P = 0.01); in Group 2 it was 3 months in medical patients as compared with 12 months in surgical patients (P = 0.04). The median duration of hospitalization was longer in medical patients than in surgical patients (6.1 vs. 2.4 weeks in Group 1 [P less than 0.001] and 5.0 vs. 3.1 weeks in Group 2 [P less than 0.01]). Group 3 was too small to permit a meaningful comparison. During the initial hospitalization, the incidence of infections, gastrointestinal bleeding, and encephalopathy was similar among the medical and surgical patients. We conclude that peritoneovenous shunting alleviated disabling ascites more rapidly than medical management. However, survival was closely related to the severity of the illness at the time of randomization and was not altered by shunting.

Risk Factors for Liver Abscess Formation after Hepatic Chemoembolization

PURPOSE To assess the frequency and risk factors for liver abscess after hepatic chemoembolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors performed retrospective analysis of 397 chemoembolization procedures in 157 patients. All patients received prophylactic intravenous antibiotics before the procedure and 5 days of oral antibiotics after the procedure. The association between abscess formation and risk factors was determined with use of chi(2) analysis and the Fisher exact test and expressed as an odds ratio. RESULTS Liver abscess occurred in seven of 157 patients (4.5%) after eight of 397 procedures (2.0%) at a mean of 19 d +/- 7 after chemoembolization. No patients had neutropenia. Organisms isolated reflected intestinal flora. Six patients required percutaneous drainage for 35 d +/- 29. The seventh patient required drainage for the remainder of life as a result of a nonhealing biliary fistula. Three of 24 patients with neuroendocrine tumors had abscesses (12.5%; odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 0.96-22.1; P =.07), as did three of 14 patients with gastrointestinal sarcomas (21%; odds ratio, 9.5; 95% CI, 1.9-47.8; P =.016), and one of two with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Six of the seven patients with abscesses underwent a Whipple procedure before chemoembolization. Only one patient with a history of a Whipple procedure did not develop an hepatic abscess. In the absence of a bilioenteric anastomosis, abscess occurred in only one of 150 patients (0.7%), or one of 383 procedures (0.3%). The odds ratio for liver abscess among patients with a bilioenteric anastomosis was 894 (95% CI, 50-16,000; P <.0001). CONCLUSION Earlier bilioenteric anastomosis is the major determinant of liver abscess formation after hepatic chemoembolization. The prophylaxis regimen used failed to prevent abscess formation in patients with earlier bilioenteric anastomosis.

Magnetic Resonance Angiography Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries

179. Hofman MB, Paschal CB, Li D, Haacke EM, van Rossum AC, Sprenger M. MRI of coronary arteries: 2D breath hold vs 3D respiratory-gated acquisition.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19:56–62. 180. Manning WJ, Li W, Boyle NG, Edelman RR. Fat-suppressed breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Circulation.Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has excited the interest of many physicians working in cardiovascular disease because of its ability to noninvasively visualize vascular disease. Its potential to replace conventional x-ray angiography (CA) that uses iodinated contrast has been recognized for many years, and this interest has been stimulated by the current emphasis on cost containment, outpatient evaluation, and minimally invasive diagnosis and therapy. In addition, recent advances in magnetic resonance (MR) technology resulting from fast gradients and use of contrast agents have allowed MRA to make substantial advances in many arterial beds of clinical interest. The goal of this scientific statement is to present the current state of MRA of the extracranial arteries and to suggest current as well as possible future clinical applications for MRA. For the purposes of this statement, MRA is defined as MR techniques that provide cross-sectional or projectional images of normal and diseased arterial anatomy. It does not deal with the equally important area of quantitative flow measurement with MR. The first section deals with the technical basis of MRA. Subsequent sections deal with individual vascular beds in which MRA has shown clinical promise. The “gold standard” for many manifestations of vascular disease, especially arterial occlusive disease, is CA, an invasive, costly, and potentially hazardous procedure. MRA could represent an alternative, noninvasive approach. Rather than a single technique, MRA actually represents a family of different techniques. As outlined below, contrast between blood and soft tissues is derived from completely different MR mechanisms in the various MR techniques. We will consider the basic principles underlying the MR imaging (MRI) appearance of flowing blood and the techniques used to image blood flow and render angiogram-like MRI scans. Depending on the imaging technique used, blood may appear bright or dark. On traditional spin-echo MR images, blood vessels usually …

Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and transcatheter embolotherapy: clinical and technical factors impacting success and survival.

PURPOSE To identify clinical and technical factors influencing the outcome of transcatheter embolotherapy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage and to quantify the impact of successful intervention on patient survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review was performed of all patients (n = 163) who underwent arterial embolization for acute upper GI hemorrhage at a university hospital over an 11.5-year period. Clinical success was defined as target area devascularization that resulted in the clinical cessation of bleeding and stabilization of hemoglobin level. The clinical condition of each patient at intervention was defined by history, laboratory examination, and two composite indicator variables. With use of logistic regression, the dependent variable, clinical success, was modeled on two categories of clinical and technical variables. A final model regressed patient survival on clinical success and other clinical variables. RESULTS None of the procedural variables analyzed had a significant influence on clinical success. Several clinical variables did impact clinical success, including multiorgan system failure (OR, 0.36; P =.030), coagulopathy (OR, 0.36; P =.026), and bleeding subsequent to trauma (OR, 7.1; P =.040) or invasive procedures (OR, 6.5; P =.009). Regardless of their clinical condition at intervention, patients who underwent clinically successful embolization were 13.3 times more likely to survive than those who had an unsuccessful procedure (CI, 4.54-39.2; P =.000). Nevertheless, patients with multiorgan system failure were 17.5 times more likely to die, independent of the outcome of the procedure (CI, 0.014-0.229; P =.000). CONCLUSION Arresting nonvariceal upper GI hemorrhage with transcatheter embolotherapy has a large positive effect on patient survival, independent of clinical condition or demonstrable extravasation at intervention. Aggressive treatment with transcatheter embolotherapy is advisable in patients with acute nonvariceal upper GI hemorrhage.

Peripheral vascular surgery with magnetic resonance angiography as the sole preoperative imaging modality

PURPOSE Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a developing technique that provides arteriograms without the risks associated with iodinated contrast and arterial puncture or the expense of hospitalization. Prior reports have demonstrated the accuracy of peripheral vessel MRA for evaluation of the aorta through pedal vessels. This study sought to determine whether vascular reconstructions could be planned and accomplished on the basis of MRA alone. METHODS Eighty consecutive candidates for bypass with ischemic rest pain or tissue loss were studied with preoperative outpatient MRA of the juxtarenal aorta through the foot. Confirmation of MRA findings was provided by intraoperative intraarterial pressure measurements for proximal vessels and postbypass arteriography for the runoff. Life-table analysis of graft patency and limb salvage was performed. RESULTS Two patients could not tolerate MRA and required contrast arteriography, but all others underwent reconstructive procedures on the basis of MRA alone (11 aortobifemoral, 67 infrainguinal). Intraoperative findings regarding suitability of inflow and outflow vessels confirmed the accuracy of the MRAs in every case. MRA indicated that none of the patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass had significant inflow occlusive disease, and this was confirmed at operation with pressure measurements of inflow vessels that were always within 10 mm Hg (peak systolic) of systemic pressure. The results of intraoperative completion arteriography and preoperative MRAs were identical for all but two patients who had minor discrepancies. All aortobifemoral reconstructions remained patent, and all limbs remained intact. The infrainguinal reconstructions had an 84% limb salvage rate and 78% primary graft patency rate at 21 months. Comparison of charges for patients undergoing preoperative MRA versus contrast angiography showed a cost savings of

Endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

1288 for each patient treated with preoperative MRA alone. CONCLUSIONS MRA is a noninvasive, cost-effective outpatient imaging technique that, if properly performed and interpreted, is sufficient for planning peripheral bypass procedures. Its use may supplant contrast arteriography in many patients.

Magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral runoff vessels

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms shows promising initial results. Endoleaks represent one of the unique causes of endovascular repair failure not seen with traditional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Endoleaks occur when there is blood flow outside the stent-graft lumen but within the aneurysm sac. They can be difficult to diagnose and treat, and their management is a source of continued controversy. This review further defines endoleaks and the clinical challenges that they create. Current methods for endoleak detection, classification, and management are reviewed.

Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Cisplatin, Doxorubicin, Mitomycin-C, Ethiodol, and Polyvinyl Alcohol: Prospective Evaluation of Response and Survival in a U.S. Population☆

Recent improvements in magnetic resonance imaging techniques have made magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) a very useful adjunct to invasive angiography. Fifty-five limbs in 51 patients with occlusive peripheral vascular disease were studied with both MRA and contrast arteriography. The magnetic resonance and contrast arteriograms were read by radiologists and surgeons and separate interventional plans were based on each study. The MRA findings differed significantly from those of conventional arteriography in 26 limbs (48%). In every case MRA visualized all of the same vessels and hemodynamic stenoses seen on the contrast arteriogram. In 48% of the cases, however, MRA revealed additional findings. Thus the discrepancies in the two studies were always the result of the failure of the arteriogram to reveal all of the patent vessels seen on MRA. The additional information provided by MRA resulted in alteration of the interventional plan in 11 cases (22%). In nine cases (18%) target vessels suitable for use in a limb-salvage procedure were identified by MRA, although they had been missed by conventional arteriography. In all of these cases, intraoperative arteriograms confirmed the suitability of these vessels for use in technically successful bypass procedures. In two cases (4%) additional information provided by MRA identified a target runoff vessel for bypass grafting that proved to be a better alternative than the one that would have been chosen on the basis of contrast arteriography.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)