Richard A. Guthrie

Changes in Cortical Functioning With Acute Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia in Type I Diabetes

In this study, 18 type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects aged 22–35 yr (mean age 29.3) and within 10 yr of diagnosis (mean 7.7) performed a battery of cognitive and psychomotor tasks under conditions of hypoglycemia (50 mg/dl), normoglycemia (100 mg/dl), and hyperglycemia (300 mg/dl). Blood glucose levels during testing were precisely maintained at the preselected level via a Biostator insulin/glucose-infusion system. The order of glycemic level was counterbalanced across subjects in a single-blinded design. Performance on tasks requiring visual tracking, visuomotor speed, concentration, and planning ability (pursuit rotor and trails B) were significantly impaired under conditions of hypoglycemia compared with normoglycemic levels. Visual reaction time was not significantly impaired under conditions of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia.

Pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus.

As we learn more about the pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus, we find that there is more yet to be learned. This may sound like a trite statement, but in reality it is true. The following article reviews the basic pathophysiology of both type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus as we understand it today. It continues on to reveal the “things that go wrong” when there is too much or too little glucose available to the body organs and especially to the brain. The article points out the signs and symptoms to be aware of when the person is in the acute state of diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperglycemic hyperosmolar nonketotic coma (or state), and severe hypoglycemia. It concludes with important considerations when the individual is in one of these acute states and contributes key points related to the control of diabetes when the person is in the state of compromise.

Prevalence of Hypertension in Patients with Type II Diabetes in Referral versus Primary Care Clinics

We compared the prevalence of hypertension in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) in referral and primary care practices using definitions of The Fifth Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-V), while controlling for other risk factors such as hypertension, obesity, smoking, and age. Patients (n = 1443) were enrolled consecutively from a large referral practice at the Jackson Diabetes Center and four primary care clinics in the vicinity. Blood pressures were measured at three clinic visits after a 5-min rest in a sitting position using a standard clinical sphygmomanometer. Charts were reviewed to determine diabetes duration, insulin usage, height, weight, smoking history, use of antihypertensive and oral hypoglycemic medications, socioeconomic status, and race. Patients were classified as hypertensive based on JNC-V definitions or if they were on antihypertensive medication. Hypertension was termed uncontrolled if blood pressure was JNC-V Stage 2 or higher while on antihypertensive medication. Seventy-eight percent of referral clinic and 55% of primary care clinic patients had either JNC-V State 1 or higher hypertension or were on antihypertensive medication. Actual blood pressures indicated that more patients had JNC-V Stage 1 (mild) or higher hypertension in referral compared to primary care clinics (62% versus 48% p = 0.01) but fewer had JNC-V Stage 2 or higher (moderate-severe) hypertension (12% versus 19% p = 0.002). Patients seen in the referral clinic were significantly more likely to have greater age, greater duration of diabetes, higher insulin dosage, longer smoking history, antihypertensive medication, and live outside the metropolitan area. By logistic regression, the odds of hypertension were significantly increased with age (OR 1.51/decade), BMI greater than 27 (OR 2.17), diabetes duration (OR 1.04/year), and insulin dosage (OR 1.74/U/kg). Current smoking and attending a referral clinic were not significantly related. The odds of moderate-severe hypertension were significantly increased with age (OR 1.23/ decade), decreased by attending a referral clinic (OR 0.45), and not significantly related to other confounders in the model. The prevalence of hypertension among patients with NIDDM was higher in referral than primary care clinics. The higher prevalence in the referral practice can be accounted for by the greater severity of associated risk factors in the referral practice patients; however, most patients will be diagnosed and treated for hypertension prior to referral. More patients in the referral practice were on hypertensive medication, which lowered the stage or severity of hypertension but still not to the normal range. The results suggest that the primary detection of hypertension in patients with type II diabetes resides with the primary care physician. Management of hypertension will require both a delineation and acceptance of responsibilities between the primary care physician and diabetes specialists.

Randomized Prospective Trial of Pure Porcine and Conventional Bovine/Porcine Insulin

Use of pure porcine insulin versus partially purified insulin of bovine/porcine origin might be expected to have certain clinical benefits, e. g., a lower incidence of skin reactions, a lower insulin dosage, better diabetes regulation, and greater preservation of endogenous insulin secretion. To test this hypothesis, we randomly assigned 112 newly diagnosed, untreated, insulin-dependent diabetic children to therapy with either pure porcine or partially purified bovine/porcine insulin. They were followed for 1 yr, data being available on at least 90 subjects at each visit. More skin reactions were found in the group treated with the bovine/porcine insulin. This insulin was of higher antigenicity, and binding of radiolabeled insulin (mean ± SE) by serum from bovine/porcine insulin treatment was 35.5 ± 2.6 versus 16.8 ± 1.4% (P < .001) for pure porcine insulin treatment 12 mo after initiation of insulin therapy. However, throughout the 12 mo of observation the levels of glycosylated hemoglobin, insulin dosage, fasting plasma glucose, and C-peptide concentration were similar for the groups. Reported incidences of hypoglycemia and nocturia were also similar. Thus, insulin-antibody formation and skin reactions were minimized by the use of pure porcine versus partially purified bovine/porcine insulin, but no other clinical advantages were apparent.

Insulin Autoantibodies at Diagnosis of Insulin-Dependent Diabetes: Effect on the Antibody Response to Insulin Treatment

Insulin autoantibodies (IAA) are frequently found in newly diagnosed untreated insulin-dependent diabetics. We evaluated whether the insulin antibody response over the first year of treatment with insulin was different in individuals with IAA v those without IAA. One hundred five previously untreated type I diabetics were randomly assigned to treatment with either pure porcine or mixed bovine/porcine insulin. Twenty-one in each group had detectable IAA at diagnosis. Percent binding rose in all patients after commencing insulin therapy and was significantly greater in those with IAA at diagnosis irrespective of the type of insulin administered. The elevated binding in the IAA positive patients at all time points was equivalent to the binding that could be attributed to the insulin autoantibodies. Two different mechanisms could explain this greater insulin antibody binding during insulin therapy in the IAA positive patients. First, there may be summation of binding due to insulin autoantibodies and binding due to insulin antibodies formed in response to the exogenous insulin. Alternatively, the insulin antibodies formed in response to exogenous insulin could replace the IAA, with those individuals positive for IAA at diagnosis having a proportionately greater antibody response to injected insulin. Irrespective of the mechanism, patients with IAA at diagnosis develop higher insulin antibody measurements when subsequently treated with exogenous insulin.

Forecast, Vol. 38 (2), 1985, pp 43-35, 73. Urine tests: still useful after all these years

Nursing’85, Vol. 15 (3), 1985, pp 50-58 Heeding the early warning signs of peripheral vascular disease By: Patricia L. Baum Earn CEU’s as you study the contents of this article. Some of the most devastating complications of diabetes mellitus start with peripheral vascular disease. The earlier it is caught the less chance of losing both life and limb, is the message of this article. Two key charts help the learner to differentiate between arterial and venous peripheral vascular disease (PVD) of the leg and how to examine the person with PVD. The mnemonic of &dquo;Remember the six P’s: Pain, Pallor, Pulselessness, Paresthesia, Poikilothermia (coldness), and Paralysis&dquo; and other associated helps, makes this article particularly useful. The reinforcement through the testing process, at the end of the article, aid the reader in completing the learning process and retaining information and potentially a skill that will be useful in actual practice.

The Infant of the Diabetic Mother

If a mother is hyperglycemic, the fetuss pancreas hypertrophies in response and produces excessive amounts of insulin.