Richard A. Pircon

Prolonged bedrest during pregnancy: Does the risk of deep vein thrombosis warrant the use of routine heparin prophylaxis?

This is the first study to assess the risk of clinically apparent DVT in pregnant women placed in the hospital at prolonged bedrest. The outcome is discussed with reference to the risks associated with heparin. Information, including delivery data, length of hospital stay, and discharge diagnoses were extracted from a prospectively collected computerized data bank of all deliveries that occurred over a 5.5-year period at Long Beach Memorial Womens Hospital in Long Beach, California, and at St. Josephs Hospital in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. One group consisted of all pregnant women who had been hospitalized at prolonged antepartum bedrest, as defined by 3 weeks or more. The other group consisted of the remaining population of women whose deliveries occurred during the same time period. There were 48,525 deliveries during the study period, and 266 (0.5%) women were hospitalized at prolonged antepartum bedrest. The mean number of days in the hospital for these women was 34.6 +/- 14 (range 21-82 days). Of these women, one received prophylactic heparin for a prior history of DVT. There were no cases of DVT in the 265 women who did not receive heparin, risk = 0.0 (CI = 0.00-0.99). Of these 265 women, 234 were hospitalized up to the day of delivery. Of these 234 women, 154 (65.8%) underwent cesarean section and no case of DVT occurred in the postoperative period, risk = 0.0 (CI = 0.0-1.7). Out of the remaining 48,259 women who were not hospitalized at prolonged bedrest, there were 18 cases of clinically apparent DVT, and the longest antepartum hospitalization was 4 days. A conservative risk of complications with prophylactic heparin therapy is 1.0% or greater. Although the risk of DVT in pregnant women hospitalized at prolonged bedrest is not zero, our study indicates that it is very low (< 1.0%). Whereas a risk of DVT of at least 1.0% could warrant heparin prophylaxis, even with 265 patients at prolonged bedrest and 48,525 controls, this risk could not be demonstrated. Using a power analysis with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80% to demonstrate this risk, one would need 247 cases and approximately 49,000 controls, which were clearly achieved in this study. In view of the risks associated with heparin, routine antenatal prophylaxis is not recommended unless other risk factors for DVT are present.

Prenatal genotyping of the Duffy blood group system by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction

Maternal allo‐immunization to antigens of the Duffy blood group system can result in haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN), therefore, the application of allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction (ASPCR) for prenatal genotyping of the Duffy antigen system to identify pregnancies at risk for HDN was evaluated. Oligonucleotide primers were designed for ASPCR of FYA, FYB and nullFY alleles. A validation study was performed using DNA isolated from 94 serotyped whole blood samples and 8 amniocentesis samples. A concordance rate of 100 per cent was observed between serotyping and ASPCR detection of the FYA, FYB and nullFY alleles. This assay is particularly useful for rapid genotyping of fetal amniotic cells to identify pregnancies at risk for HDN due to maternal–fetal incompatibilities within the Duffy blood group system. Copyright

Prenatal genotyping of Jka and Jkb of the human Kidd blood group system by allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction

An allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction (ASPCR) assay for prenatal genotyping of the Kidd antigen system in order to identify pregnancies at risk for haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) was developed. Oligonucleotide primers were designed for ASPCR of JKA and JKB. A validation study was performed using DNA isolated from 54 serotyped whole blood samples and 8 amniocentesis samples. A concordance rate of 100 per cent was observed between serotyping and ASPCR detection of the JKA and JKB alleles. Experiments were conducted to quantify the maternal contamination that could be tolerated in Kidd ASPCR assays. The sensitivity of this assay ranged from 0·2 per cent when detecting the presence of JKB and JKA background, to 2 per cent for detecting the presence of JKA in a JKB background. This sensitive assay is particularly useful for rapid genotyping of fetal amniotic cells to identify pregnancies at risk for HDN due to incompatibilities within the Kidd blood group system. Copyright

The sensitivity of allele-specific polymerase chain reaction can obviate concern of maternal contamination when fetal samples are genotyped for immune cytopenic disorders

OBJECTIVE Fetuses at risk for immune cytopenic disorders can be identified by molecular genotyping assays. To better understand the impact of maternal contamination on genotyping results, the levels of contamination that are routinely encountered during prenatal testing of fetal samples and the sensitivity of allele-specific polymerase chain reaction in detecting paternal alloalleles were examined. STUDY DESIGN Reconstitution experiments were performed to define the sensitivity of allele-specific polymerase chain reaction assays. The sensitivities of allele-specific polymerase chain reactions and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism were compared for detection of the factor V Leiden mutation. RESULTS A quantitative analysis of variable-number tandem repeat loci revealed maternal contamination in 4 of 56 fetal samples. Contaminating deoxyribonucleic acid compromised genotyping results when it comprised between 94% and 99% of the total deoxyribonucleic acid. Allele-specific polymerase chain reaction was found to be the more sensitive technique (0.8% sensitivity vs 13% sensitivity). CONCLUSION These results illustrate that allele-specific polymerase chain reaction is well suited for reliable prenatal identification of fetuses at risk of immune cytopenic disorders.