Richard A. Wesley
Agricultural Research Service
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Richard A. Wesley.
Soil & Tillage Research | 1993
Richard A. Wesley; Lowrey A. Smith; Stan R. Spurlock
Abstract A 5-year study (1987–1991) was conducted on a Tunica clay (clayey over loamy, montmorillonitic, non-acid, thermic Vertic Haplaquept) to determine effects of irrigation and deep tillage on soybean yields and economic returns. Irrigation increased average yield of the conventional check treatment (disked) by 57% (3020 vs. 1924 kg ha −1 ). Under irrigation, yields from all deep-tilled treatments and the conventional check treatment were similar and averaged 3066 kg ha −1 . Under non-irrigated conditions, yields from all deep-tilled treatments were similar, averaged 2829 kg ha −1 , and were higher than the conventional check treatment that averaged 1924 kg ha −1 . Average yields from the non-irrigated deep-tilled treatments were 92% as high as yields from comparable treatments with irrigation. Irrigation increased the average net returns of the conventional check treatment 75% (
Soil & Tillage Research | 1990
L.G. Hearherly; C.D. Elmore; Richard A. Wesley
206 vs.
Agronomy Journal | 2001
Richard A. Wesley; Carroll D. Elmore; Stan R. Spurlock
118 ha −1 . Over the 5-year study, average net returns to all irrigated treatments were similar and ranged from
Journal of Production Agriculture | 1994
Richard A. Wesley; Larry G. Heatherly; C. D. Elmore; Stan R. Spurlock
194 to
Weed Technology | 1993
Larry G. Heatherly; Richard A. Wesley; C.D. Elmore; Stan R. Spurlock
206 ha −1 . Net returns to the non-irrigated deep-tilled treatments averaged 156% higher than returns from the non-irrigated conventional check treatment (
Crop Science | 1990
Larry G. Heatherly; Richard A. Wesley; C. D. Elmore
302 vs.
Weed Technology | 1989
C. Dennis Elmore; Larry G. Heatherly; Richard A. Wesley
118 ha −1 ) and was attributed to the higher yields of the deep-tilled treatments (2829 vs. 1924 kg ha −1 ). Net returns to the non-irrigated deep-tilled treatments also averaged 47% higher than returns from the irrigated conventional check treatment (
Archive | 1998
Larry G. Heatherly; Alan Blaine; Harry Hodges; Richard A. Wesley; Normie Buehring
302 vs.
Weed Technology | 1992
Larry G. Heatherly; C. Dennis Elmore; Richard A. Wesley
206 ha −1 ). This difference was attributed to the similarity of yields (2829 vs. 3020 kg ha −1 ) and the sizeable difference in specified costs of production (
Agronomy Journal | 2000
Richard A. Wesley; Lowrey A. Smith; Stan R. Spurlock
335 vs.