Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Richard E. Power is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Richard E. Power.


BJUI | 2005

Delayed graft function: a dilemma in renal transplantation

Padraig J. Daly; Richard E. Power; Declan A. Healy; David P. Hickey; John M. Fitzpatrick; R. William G. Watson

than 10% per day immediately after surgery during three consecutive days for > 1 week [7]. (e) A rising serum creatinine level above that before surgery, or urine output of < 300 mL within 6 h of transplantation, despite diuretics and adequate volume [8]. (f) Urine output of < 1 L in the first 24 h or a decrease in serum creatinine of < 20–30%, reflected in a poor GFR [9]. (g) Calculating the creatinine reduction ratio on post-transplant day 2 (serum creatinine on day 1 minus serum creatinine on day 2, multiplied by 100, and divided by serum creatinine on day 1) where £ 30% was deemed poor [10].


BJUI | 2007

Renal transplantation in patients with an augmentation cystoplasty

Richard E. Power; Kiaran O'Malley; M. S. Khan; Denis M. Murphy; David P. Hickey

Objective To retrospectively review our experience over a 10‐year period of renal transplantation in patients with augmented bladders and thus assess the safety of this procedure.


BJUI | 2016

European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators significantly outperform the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) 2.0 in the prediction of prostate cancer: a multi-institutional study.

R. Foley; Robert M. Maweni; Laura Gorman; K. Murphy; Dara Lundon; Garrett Durkan; Richard E. Power; Frank O'Brien; Kieran J. O'Malley; D. Galvin; T. Brendan Murphy; R. William G. Watson

To analyse the performance of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPT‐RC) and two iterations of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Risk Calculator, one of which incorporates prostate volume (ERSPC‐RC) and the other of which incorporates prostate volume and the prostate health index (PHI) in a referral population (ERSPC‐PHI).


The Journal of Urology | 2002

LONG-TERM FOLLOWUP OF CADAVERIC RENAL TRANSPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH SPINA BIFIDA

Richard E. Power; Kiaran J. O’Malley; Dilly M. Little; M.G. Donovan; Tom Creagh; Denis M. Murphy; David P. Hickey

PURPOSE Access related problems in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are increased in cases of spina bifida due to vascular and body habitus limitations. Reports of renal transplantation in this patient group are exceedingly rare. We report long-term followup data on cadaveric renal transplantation for end stage renal failure in cases of spina bifida. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between February 1986 and April 2000, 17 cadaveric renal transplants were performed in 11 females and 5 males with spina bifida. Mean age at transplantation was 20.2 years (range 10 to 35). Of the patients 11 were wheelchair bound and 5 were independently mobile. Before transplantation surgical management of the urological tract included clean intermittent self-catheterization in 3 cases, enterocystoplasty and clean intermittent self-catheterization in 8, and ileal conduit urinary diversion in 5. A total of 14 patients were on renal replacement therapy before receiving the graft. Cyclosporine based triple therapy was administered to maintain immunosuppression in all cases and antithymocytic globulin was given for induction in 7. RESULTS Six grafts have failed, including 1 in a patient who underwent successful re-transplantation. Median graft survival was 7.23 years. Two patients died after graft nephrectomy. At a mean followup of 52.8 months (range 1 month to 14 years) 11 of 17 grafts are functioning with a mean serum creatinine of 112.7 +/- 29.4 mmol./l. CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate the feasibility of cadaveric renal transplantation in patients with spina bifida and end stage renal failure. We currently recommend that these patients should not be deprived of the benefits of renal transplantation.


The Journal of Urology | 2009

Dual kidney transplantation with organs from extended criteria cadaveric donors.

Frank T. D'Arcy; Kevin M. O'Connor; William P. Shields; Jose A. Zimmerman; Ponnusamy Mohan; Molly Eng; Dilly M. Little; Richard E. Power; Anthony Dorman; David P. Hickey

PURPOSE The critical shortage of kidneys available for transplantation has led to alternate strategies to expand the pool. Transplantation of the 2 kidneys into a single recipient using organs suboptimal for single kidney transplantation was suggested. We assessed results in 24 grafts allocated for dual kidney transplantation vs those in a control group of 44 designated for single kidney transplantation. Each group underwent pretransplant biopsy and recipients were age matched. MATERIALS AND METHODS Dual kidney transplantation was done in 24 of 1,091 transplants (2.1%) from 2001 to 2008. In patients with dual kidney transplant vs single kidney transplant mean recipient age was 60.6 vs 60.8 years, mean HLA-A, B and DR mismatches were 3.3 vs 2.9, and average patient waiting time was 15.6 vs 13.9 months. All grafts were perfused with University of Wisconsin solution with a mean cold ischemia time of 17.9 hours. On donor dual kidney biopsy in the dual kidney transplant vs single kidney transplant group the average fibrosis rate was 30% (range 25% to 45%) vs 25% (range 3% to 40%) and the glomerulosclerosis rate was 17.9% (range 3.2% to 40.7%) vs 7.1% (range 0% to 50%). RESULTS Good postoperative renal function was noted in 14 dual kidney transplantation cases. Acute tubular necrosis requiring dialysis developed in 5 patients as well as acute rejection in 1. Two dual kidney recipients (8%) died in the postoperative period with no single kidney deaths. One patient underwent bilateral transplantectomy. Mean anesthesia time was longer in the dual group (371 vs 212 minutes). Patient and graft survival was equivalent to that in the control group at 36 months. CONCLUSIONS Careful selection of marginal kidneys based on clinical and histological criteria allows the use of organs that would not ordinarily be sufficient for transplantation with acceptable outcomes. This is a valid strategy to address the organ shortage.


Surgeon-journal of The Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland | 2013

A review of inpatient urology consultations in an Irish tertiary referral centre

J.F. Sullivan; J.C. Forde; Tom Creagh; M.G. Donovan; Molly Eng; David P. Hickey; P. Mohan; Richard E. Power; Gordon Smyth; Dilly M. Little

INTRODUCTION Our institution is a 680-bed tertiary referral centre with broad medical and surgical subspecialty services. We retrospectively audited the pattern of inpatient consultations from all specialities within our institution to the urology department over a 1-year period. METHODS All consultations to the urology service were identified from our computerised inpatient consultation system from July 2010 to June 2011. Follow up data on investigations, interventions and subsequent outpatient appointments were also identified by review of individual patient discharge letters. RESULTS Seven hundred and twenty five inpatient consultations were received over the period. The male to female ratio was 7:3. Mean age of patients was 66 (15-96) years. Seventy three percent of referrals were from medical sub-specialities, most commonly nephrology (17%), gastroenterology (11%) and respiratory medicine (9%). The remainder were from general surgery (16%) and other surgical sub specialities (11%). Interns (66%) and senior house officers (SHO) (28%) communicated the majority of consults. Male lower urinary tract/benign prostate related issues resulted in 25% of all consultations. Less than half of consults (47%) resulted in interventions initiated by urology, most commonly of which were catheter insertions (48%) and endoscopic procedures (35%). Only 43% of consultations were followed up in the outpatients setting. CONCLUSIONS Inpatient consultations constitute a significant workload for urology services. The majority of these referrals did not require any urological intervention and could have been seen routinely in the outpatient setting. Providing structured referral guidelines and achieving better communication with referring teams may help to optimise this service.


Clinical Transplantation | 2013

Incidence and long-term outcomes of squamous cell bladder cancer after deceased donor renal transplantation

Niall F. Davis; Louise C. McLoughlin; Catherine M. Dowling; Richard E. Power; P. Mohan; David P. Hickey; Gordon Smyth; Molly Eng; Dilly M. Little

To review the incidence and long‐term outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the bladder in patients after kidney transplantation.


Clinical Transplantation | 2014

Outcome of deceased donor renal transplantation in patients with an ileal conduit

Louise C. McLoughlin; Niall F. Davis; Catherine M. Dowling; Richard E. Power; P. Mohan; David P. Hickey; Gordon Smyth; Molly Eng; Dilly M. Little

Renal transplantation in recipients with an ileal conduit is uncommon and occasionally controversial as it has been associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. We report on 17 patients with an ileal conduit who received a deceased donor renal transplant at our institution between January 1986 and December 2012. We retrospectively reviewed their allograft and surgical outcome. There were four mortalities at five, five, 39, and 66 months post‐transplant. Sixteen of 17 grafts functioned immediately; one patient had primary non‐function secondary to vascular thrombosis. Thirteen of 17 (76.5%) grafts were functioning at a mean follow‐up period of 105 months. The mean serum creatinine at follow‐up was 111 μM (±38.62). Five patients had seven episodes of urosepsis requiring hospital admission, and five patients received treatment for renal stone disease. We conclude that given improvements in immunosuppression, surgical technique, infection treatment, and selection criteria, we believe that renal transplantation in the patient with an ileal conduit yields excellent graft survival, although there is a high morbidity rate in this cohort of patients in the long term.


The Journal of Urology | 2001

A NEAR FATAL CASE OF RENAL COLIC

Richard E. Power; D.C. Winter; C.J. Kelly

Currently, renal artery aneurysms are more frequently identified due to the wider use of angiography. However, they rarely spontaneously rupture. The kidney is usually not salvageable in most cases of spontaneous rupture or the rupture can result in death. We report on a patient with an acute abdomen and hypotension, and recommend that an aneurysm be considered a differential diagnosis in similar cases.


Transplant International | 2014

Ex vivo reconstruction of the donor renal artery in renal transplantation: a case-control study.

Louise C. McLoughlin; Niall F. Davis; Catherine M. Dowling; Richard E. Power; Ponnusamy Mohan; David P. Hickey; Gordon Smyth; Molly Eng; Dilly M. Little

Transplantation of renal allografts with anatomic variability or injured vasculature poses a challenge to the transplanting surgeon but can be salvaged for transplantation with ex vivo bench reconstruction of the vasculature. We investigated whether renal allograft function is impaired in these reconstructed allografts; compared to the donor‐matched, un‐reconstructed allograft. Reconstructed allografts were transplanted into 60 patients at our institution between 1986 and 2012. A control group was selected from the matched pair of the recipient in deceased donor transplantation. We found no significant difference in the overall graft and patient survival rates (P = 1.0, P = 0.178). Serum creatinine levels were not significantly higher in the study group at 1, 3 and 12 months postoperatively. There were two cases of vascular thrombosis in the study group that were not related to the ex vivo reconstruction. A significantly greater proportion of reconstructed patients were investigated with a colour duplex ultrasound postoperatively (0.007). Although we have demonstrated a higher index of suspicion of transplant failure in patients with a reconstructed allograft, this practice has proven to be a safe and useful technique with equivocal outcome when compared to normal grafts; increasing the organ pool available for transplantation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Richard E. Power's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Galvin

University College Dublin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. Murphy

University College Dublin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge