Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Richard E. Scott is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Richard E. Scott.


Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare | 2003

The socio-economic impact of telehealth: A systematic review:

Penny A. Jennett; L. Affleck Hall; David Hailey; Arto Ohinmaa; C. Anderson; Roger E. Thomas; B. Young; Diane L. Lorenzetti; Richard E. Scott

We reviewed the socio-economic impact of telehealth, focusing on nine main areas: paediatrics, geriatrics, First Nations (i.e. indigenous peoples), home care, mental health, radiology, renal dialysis, rural/remote health services and rehabilitation. A systematic search led to the identification of 4646 citations or abstracts; from these, 306 sources were analysed. A central finding was that telehealth studies to date have not used socioeconomic indicators consistently. However, specific telehealth applications have been shown to offer significant socio-economic benefit, to patients and families, health-care providers and the health-care system. The main benefits identified were: increased access to health services, cost-effectiveness, enhanced educational opportunities, improved health outcomes, better quality of care, better quality of life and enhanced social support. Although the review found a number of areas of socio-economic benefit, there is the continuing problem of limited generalizability.


Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare | 2010

Home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis:

Julie Polisena; Khai Tran; Karen Cimon; Brian Hutton; Sarah McGill; Krisan Palmer; Richard E. Scott

We conducted a systematic review of the literature about home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with usual care. An electronic literature search identified 6241 citations. From these, nine original studies (10 references) relating to 858 patients were selected for inclusion in the review. Four studies compared home telemonitoring with usual care, and six randomized controlled trials compared telephone support with usual care. Clinical heterogeneity was present in many of the outcomes measured. Home telehealth (home telemonitoring and telephone support) was found to reduce rates of hospitalization and emergency department visits, while findings for hospital bed days of care varied between studies. However, the mortality rate was greater in the telephone-support group compared with usual care (risk ratio = 1.21; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.75). Home telehealth interventions were similar or better than usual care for quality of life and patient satisfaction outcomes.


Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare | 2010

Home telemonitoring for congestive heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Julie Polisena; Khai Tran; Karen Cimon; Brian Hutton; Sarah McGill; Krisan Palmer; Richard E. Scott

We conducted a systematic review of the literature about home telemonitoring compared with usual care. An electronic literature search was conducted to identify studies of home telemonitoring use in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. Twenty-one original studies on home telemonitoring for patients with CHF were included (3082 patients). A random effects model was used to compute treatment efficacy to measure the average effect of the intervention across all studies where the quantitative pooling of results was appropriate. Home telemonitoring reduced mortality (risk ratio = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.48–0.85) compared with usual care. Several studies suggested that home telemonitoring also helped to lower the number of hospitalizations and the use of other health services. Patient quality of life and satisfaction with home telemonitoring were similar or better than with usual care. More studies of higher methodological quality are required to give more precise information about the potential clinical effectiveness of home telehealth interventions.


Health Affairs | 2010

Global E-Health Policy: A Work In Progress

Maurice Mars; Richard E. Scott

E-health (information and communication technology that facilitates health and health care) is expanding in developed, developing, and least-developed countries. E-healths ability to transcend sociopolitical boundaries holds the potential to create a borderless world for health systems and health care delivery. But the policy needed to guide e-health development is limited and just now emerging in developed countries. Whats needed to foster e-health growth in the developing world is thoughtful policy to facilitate patient mobility and data exchange, across both international borders and regional boundaries within countries.


Telemedicine Journal and E-health | 2004

Policy Implications Associated with the Socioeconomic and Health System Impact of Telehealth: A Case Study from Canada

Penny A. Jennett; Richard E. Scott; L. Affleck Hall; David Hailey; Arto Ohinmaa; C. Anderson; Roger E. Thomas; B. Young; Diane L. Lorenzetti

This research was undertaken to inform future telehealth policy directions regarding the socioeconomic impact of telehealth. Fifty-seven sources were identified and analyzed through a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases, the Internet, journals, conference proceedings, as well as personal communication with consultants in the field. The review revealed a focus on certain socioeconomic indicators such as cost, access, and satisfaction. It also identified areas of opportunity for further research and policy analysis and development (e.g., social isolation, life stress, poverty), along with various barriers and challenges to the advancement of telehealth. These included confidentiality, reimbursement, and legal and ethical considerations. To become fully integrated into the health care system, telehealth must be viewed as more than an add-on service. This paper offers 19 general and 20 subject-specific telehealth recommendations, as well as seven policy strategies.


Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare | 2005

Striving for evidence in e-health evaluation: Lessons from health technology assessment

Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Richard E. Scott

Evaluation is crucial to the integration of e-health applications into the health-care system and their ultimate sustainability. However, e-health evaluation is often criticized for the poor quality of research design, the lack of common outcome indicators and the absence of an agreed theory. Health technology assessment (HTA) could offer a sound methodological basis for e-health evaluation. However, there have been major concerns about the applicability of the HTA approach to the evaluation of e-health initiatives. Evaluators - and decision makers - must accept that telehealth evaluation may serve different purposes for different stakeholders, and therefore concede that no single evaluation framework or methodology, even the randomized controlled trial, is totally objective. To address the complex environment of telehealth evaluation, a participatory strategy is useful, whereby stakeholders are involved in the study design and definition of evaluation questions at each phase. This will also build confidence between the evaluation team and the stakeholders, facilitating informed decision making through an integrated knowledge mobilization activity.


Telemedicine Journal and E-health | 2013

Conceptual framework for development of comprehensive e-Health evaluation tool

Shariq Khoja; Hammad Durrani; Richard E. Scott; Afroz Sajwani; Usha Piryani

OBJECTIVE The main objective of this study was to develop an e-health evaluation tool based on a conceptual framework including relevant theories for evaluating use of technology in health programs. This article presents the development of an evaluation framework for e-health programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was divided into three stages: Stage 1 involved a detailed literature search of different theories and concepts on evaluation of e-health, Stage 2 plotted e-health theories to identify relevant themes, and Stage 3 developed a matrix of evaluation themes and stages of e-health programs. RESULTS The framework identifies and defines different stages of e-health programs and then applies evaluation theories to each of these stages for development of the evaluation tool. This framework builds on existing theories of health and technology evaluation and presents a conceptual framework for developing an e-health evaluation tool to examine and measure different factors that play a definite role in the success of e-health programs. The framework on the horizontal axis divides e-health into different stages of program implementation, while the vertical axis identifies different themes and areas of consideration for e-health evaluation. CONCLUSIONS The framework helps understand various aspects of e-health programs and their impact that require evaluation at different stages of the life cycle. The study led to the development of a new and comprehensive e-health evaluation tool, named the Khoja-Durrani-Scott Framework for e-Health Evaluation.


Journal of Medical Internet Research | 2013

Principles and Framework for eHealth Strategy Development

Richard E. Scott; Maurice Mars

Significant investment in eHealth solutions is being made in nearly every country of the world. How do we know that these investments and the foregone opportunity costs are the correct ones? Absent, poor, or vague eHealth strategy is a significant barrier to effective investment in, and implementation of, sustainable eHealth solutions and establishment of an eHealth favorable policy environment. Strategy is the driving force, the first essential ingredient, that can place countries in charge of their own eHealth destiny and inform them of the policy necessary to achieve it. In the last 2 years, there has been renewed interest in eHealth strategy from the World Health Organization (WHO), International Telecommunications Union (ITU), Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), the African Union, and the Commonwealth; yet overall, the literature lacks clear guidance to inform countries why and how to develop their own complementary but locally specific eHealth strategy. To address this gap, this paper further develops an eHealth Strategy Development Framework, basing it upon a conceptual framework and relevant theories of strategy and complex system analysis available from the literature. We present here the rationale, theories, and final eHealth strategy development framework by which a systematic and methodical approach can be applied by institutions, subnational regions, and countries to create holistic, needs- and evidence-based, and defensible eHealth strategy and to ensure wise investment in eHealth.


Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare | 2005

An e-health needs assessment of medical residents in Cameroon

Richard E. Scott; Peter Ndumbe; Richard Wootton

Medical residents from Yaounde I University in Cameroon are required to spend periods of time in rural or remote locations to complete their training. To determine if e-health might lessen their isolation and enhance patient care, a needs assessment of the residents was performed using a brief questionnaire (five items) about the situation in which residents found themselves outside their medical school environment. We gave the questionnaires to 45 residents. Seventeen questionnaires had been returned at the time of the site visit, a response rate of 38%. Most residents indicated that the ability to contact a mentor would have either made them feel more confident (16, or 94%) or altered their handling of recent cases (15, or 88%). All residents had access to a mobile phone, and many (11, or 65%) had used it to contact a medical colleague for guidance. A low-cost and technologically simple telemedicine solution that maximized use of mobile phone capability, provided access to medical and health-care information, and permitted exchange of images would be an appropriate response to the identified needs.


Smart Homecare Technology and TeleHealth | 2015

Telehealth in the developing world: current status and future prospects

Richard E. Scott; Maurice Mars

License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php Smart Homecare Technology and TeleHealth 2015:3 25–37 Smart Homecare Technology and TeleHealth Dovepress

Collaboration


Dive into the Richard E. Scott's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maurice Mars

University of KwaZulu-Natal

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Malina Jordanova

Bulgarian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard Wootton

University Hospital of North Norway

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge