Richard E. Westfal

Superiority of Ipratropium Plus Albuterol Over Albuterol Alone in the Emergency Department Management of Adult Asthma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE The use of nebulized ipratropium in combination with beta-agonists for the treatment of acute asthma in adults is controversial. We wished to test the hypothesis that combined aerosol treatment results in a greater rate of airflow improvement and a lower proportion of hospital admission in adults with acute asthma. METHODS In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 55 adult asthmatic patients with peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) less than 200 L/min were randomly assigned to nebulization treatment with albuterol alone (2.5 mg initial dose followed by 2 more doses at 20-min intervals.), or the same albuterol regimen plus ipratropium (.5 mg combined with the initial dose of albuterol only). Patients were recruited from an emergency department at an urban academic medical center. The primary endpoints were changes in PEFR and in percent predicted PEFR over time (ie, treatment by time effect). PEFRs were assessed at baseline and at 20-minute intervals for a 1-hour period. The proportion of admissions in the two groups were examined as secondary endpoints. RESULTS The increases in PEFR and percent predicted PEFR over time were both significantly greater in the combined ipratropium plus albuterol treatment group (P < or = .001). In addition, the proportion admitted patients was less in this group (3/27) than the proportion in the albuterol-only group (10/28). The 95% confidence interval for the absolute difference of 25% in the proportion admitted was 3% to 46%, P = .03. Most of the baseline clinical and historical features in the two groups were similar. CONCLUSION These data suggest that ipratropium should be combined with initial albuterol nebulization in the ED treatment of acute asthma in adults, especially those with PEFRs less than 200 L/min.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: an 8-year New York City experience.

A retrospective study was conducted to determine the outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests by one prehospital system in New York City from January, 1986, through December, 1993. The results were recorded consistent with the Utstein Style. Of 481 attempted patient resuscitations 406 were of cardiac etiology, with 382 patients having arrested prior to EMS arrival; their overall survival rate was 2.1% (8/382). Cardiac arrests were witnessed in 246 patients. Of the witnessed arrest patients found in ventricular fibrillation (96/246), the overall survival rate was 7.3% (7/96). Of the 7 survivors who were discharged from the hospital, 71.4% (5/7) had a good cerebral performance/good overall performance. Of 24 patients who arrested in the presence of EMS, the survival rate was 12.5% (3/24). This study confirms a poor survival rate for patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in New York City.

Hanging-induced status epilepticus

Survival from hanging is associated with a variety of neuropsychiatric consequences, including amnesia, localized muscle spasms, transient hemiplegia, central cord syndrome, and multiple transient neurologic findings. This report describes a near-hanging episode in a patient who subsequently had status epilepticus requiring 40 mg of diazepam and 1,200 mg of phenytoin for control in the prehospital and emergency department stabilization period. This is the first well-documented report of hanging with subsequent status epilepticus in an adult. The patient survived with an abnormal electroencephalogram consistent with anoxic injury and was discharged on anticonvulsant therapy, although the rationale for medication in such patients is unclear and requires further study.