Richard F. Bozak

Aeroacoustic Experiments with Twin Jets

While the noise produced by a single jet is azimuthally symmetric, multiple jets produce azimuthally varying far-field noise. The ability of one jet to shield another reduces the noise radiated in the plane of the jets, while often increasing the noise radiated out of the plane containing the jets. The present study investigates the shielding potential of twin jet configurations over subsonic and over-expanded supersonic jet conditions with simulated forward flight. The experiments were conducted with 2 inch throat diameter nozzles at four jet spacings from 2.6d to 5.5d in center-to-center distance, where d is the nozzle throat diameter. The current study found a maximum of 3 dB reduction in overall sound pressure level relative to two incoherent jets in the peak jet noise direction in the plane containing the jets. However, an increase of 3 dB was found perpendicular to the plane containing the jets. In the sideline direction, shielding is observed for all jet spacings in this study.

Experiments on Exhaust Noise of Tightly Integrated Propulsion Systems

A wide-ranging series of tests have been completed that seek to map the effects of installation, including jet by jet interaction effects, on exhaust noise from various nozzles in forward flight. The primary data was far-field acoustic spectral directivity. The goals of the test series were (i) to generate enough data for empirical models of the different effects, and (ii) to provide data for advanced computational noise predictions methods applied to simplified yet realistic configurations. Data is presented that demonstrate several checks on data quality and that provide an overview of trends observed to date. Among the findings presented here: (i) Data was repeatable between jet rigs for single nozzles with and without surfaces to within +/- 0.5 dB. (ii) The presence of a second jet caused a strong reduction of the summed noise in the plane of the two plumes and an increase over the expected source doubling in most other azimuthal planes. (iii) The impact of the second jet was reduced when the jets were unheated. (iv) The impact of adding a second isolated rectangular jet was relatively independent of the nozzle aspect ratio up to aspect ratio 8:1. (v) Forward flight had similar impact on a high aspect ratio (8:1) jet as on an axisymmetric jet, except at the peak noise angle where the impact was less. (vi) The effect of adding a second round jet to a tightly integrated nozzle where the nozzle lip was less than a diameter from the surface was very dependent upon the length of the surface downstream of the nozzle. (vii) When the nozzles were rectangular and tightly integrated with the airframe surface the impact of a second jet was very dependent upon how close together the two jets were. This paper serves as an overview of the test; other papers presented in the same conference will give more detailed analysis of the results.

Twin Jet Effects on Noise of Round and Rectangular Jets: Experiment and Model

Many subsonic and supersonic aircraft concepts proposed by NASA’s Fundamental Aeronautics Program have asymmetric, integrated propulsion systems. The asymmetries in the exhaust of these propulsion systems create an asymmetric acoustic field. The asymmetries investigated in the current study are from twin jets and rectangular nozzles. Each effect produces its own variation of the acoustic field. An empirical model was developed to predict the acoustic field variation from round twin jets with twin jet spacing from 2.6 to 5.6, where s is the center-to-center spacing over the jet diameter. The model includes parameters to account for the effects of twin jet spacing, jet static temperature ratio, flight Mach number, frequency, and observer angle (both polar and azimuthal angles). The model was then applied to twin 2:1 and 8:1 aspect ratio nozzles to determine the impact of jet aspect ratio. For the round and rectangular jets, the use of the model reduces the average magnitude of the error over all frequencies, observation angles, and jet spacings by approximately 0.5dB when compared against the assumption of adding two jets incoherently.

The Aerodynamic Performance of an Over-the-Rotor Liner With Circumferential Grooves on a High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Rotor

Abstract While liners have been utilized throughout turbofanduct s to attenuate fan noise, additional attenuation is obtainable by placing an acoustic liner over-the-rotor. Previous experiments have shown significant fan performance losses when acoustic liners are installed over-the-rotor. The fan blades induce an oscillating flow in the acoustic liners which results in a performance loss near . An overthe blade tip-the-rotor liner was designed with circumferential grooves between the fan blade tips and the acoustic liner to reduce the oscillating flow in the acoustic liner. An experiment was conducted in the W-8 Single-Stage Axial Compressor Facility at NASA Glenn Research Center on a 1.5 pressure ratio fan to evaluate the impact of this over-the-rotor treatment design on fan aerodynamic performance. The addition of circumfa erentially grooved over-the-rotor design between the fan blades and the acoustic liner reduced the performance loss, in terms of fan adiabatic efficiency, to less than 1 percent which is within the repeatability of this experiment.

Measurement of Noise Reduction from Acoustic Casing Treatments Installed Over a Subscale High Bypass Ratio Turbofan Rotor

NASA is continuing to develop over-the-rotor acoustic liners for turbofan applications. A series of low Technology Readiness Level experiments were conducted to better understand the acoustic and aerodynamic effects of these acoustic liners. The final experiment included the evaluation of four acoustic casing treatment concepts and two baseline configurations in an internal flow axial compressor facility with a 1.5 pressure-ratio high-bypass turbofan rotor. An inlet in-duct array was utilized to extract sound power levels propagating forward from the turbofan rotor. The effect of a circumferentially grooved relative to a hardwall fan case was found to reduce the in-duct sound power level by about 1.5dB for frequencies less than 2kHz while increasing noise from 4 to 8kHz by as much as 7.5dB at low fan speeds. The four acoustic treatment concepts were incorporated into the bottoms of the circumferential grooves and found to provide an additional 1 to 2dB sound power level reduction under 2kHz. The sound power level reduction was found to be even greater, 2.5 to 3.5dB, when evaluating the reduction on rotor alone duct modes (co-rotating modes). The acoustic treatments also appeared to reduce multiple pure tone noise at transonic fan speeds. Depending on the acoustic treatment concept, the high-frequency noise created by the circumferential grooves was reduced by 1.5 to 5 dB. The total noise reduction from acoustic treatments embedded into the bottoms of circumferential grooves relative to a hardwall baseline was found to be 2.5 to 3.5dB sound power level. The sound power level reduction for rotor alone (co-rotating) modes was found to be 3.5 to 4.5dB. These results show the potential for significant turbofan noise reduction by incorporating acoustic treatments over-the-rotor.

Two-Dimensional Modal Beamforming in Wavenumber Space for Duct Acoustics

As turbofan bypass ratio continues to increase, civilian aircraft noise is increasingly dominated by fan noise. Fan noise propagating from its rotor and stator origins to the community passes through the inlet or aft flow duct, where its confined situation makes it susceptible to characterization by wall-mounted microphone arrays. Recently, the NASAGlenn Research Center adapted its W-8 Single Stage Axial Compressor Facility to this type of measurement. OptiNav, Inc. took the opportunity to improve and simplify the duct mode processing in its Beamform Interactive computer program. A new approach to in-duct beamforming with a 2D wall-mounted array of microphones was developed. The purpose of this paper is to document the beamforming approach and provide some sample results from the W-8 facility.

Evaluating the Acoustic Benefits of Over-the-Rotor Acoustic Treatments Installed on the Advanced Noise Control Fan

Over the last 15 years, over-the-rotor acoustic treatments have been evaluated by NASA with varying success. Recently, NASA has been developing the next generation of over-the-rotor acoustic treatments for fan noise reduction. The NASA Glenn Research Center’s Advanced Noise Control Fan was used as a Low Technology Readiness Level test bed. A rapid prototyped in-duct array consisting of 50 microphones was employed, and used to correlate the in-duct analysis to the far-field acoustic levels and to validate an existing beam-former method. The goal of this testing was to improve the Technology Readiness Level of various over-the-rotor acoustic treatments by advancing the understanding of the physical mechanisms and projecting the far-field acoustic benefit. Nomenclature AAPL = Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory ADP = Advanced Ducted Propulsor ANCF = Advanced Noise Control Fan CFANS = Configurable Fan Artificial Source FML = Foam-Metal-Liner HW = Hardwall LSWT = Low-Speed Wind-Tunnel OTR = Over-the-rotor OASPL = Over-all Sound Power Level PWL = Acoustic Sound Power Level RPMC = Revolutions-Per-Minute (Corrected) SDT = Source Diagnostic Test 1 Aerospace Engineer, High Speed Systems Division, AIAA Student Member. 2 Postdoctoral Research Associate, Notre Dame Turbomachinery Laboratory, AIAA Student Member. 3 Aerospace Engineer, Acoustics Branch, Associate Fellow, AIAA. 4 Aerospace Engineer, Acoustics Branch, AIAA Member. 5 Principal Research Fellow, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, AIAA Senior Member. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20170006851 2019-11-18T10:58:24+00:00Z