Richard Furie

Anifrolumab, an Anti–Interferon‐α Receptor Monoclonal Antibody, in Moderate‐to‐Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

To assess the efficacy and safety of anifrolumab, a type I interferon (IFN) receptor antagonist, in a phase IIb, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of adults with moderate‐to‐severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Measurement of cell-bound complement activation products enhances diagnostic performance in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVEnTo determine the value of cell-bound complement activation products in combination with antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-double-stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA), and anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin antibody (anti-MCV) for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).nnnMETHODSnThis was a multicenter cross-sectional study in which 593 subjects were enrolled (210 SLE patients, 178 patients with other rheumatic diseases, and 205 healthy subjects). Complement receptor 1 levels on erythrocytes (ECR1) together with complement C4d levels on erythrocytes (EC4d), platelets (PC4d), and B cells (BC4d) were determined using fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Serologic markers were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Statistical analyses were performed using area under the curve (AUC), logistic regression, and calculations of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.nnnRESULTSnAnti-dsDNA was an insensitive (30%) but specific (>95%) marker for SLE. Levels of EC4d, BC4d, and PC4d were several times higher, and levels of ECR1 lower, in SLE patients compared to patients with other rheumatic diseases and healthy subjects. Among 523 anti-dsDNA-negative subjects, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that SLE was associated with ANA positivity (≥20 units), anti-MCV negativity (≤70 units), and elevated levels of both EC4d and BC4d (AUC 0.918, P < 0.001). A positive index score corresponding to the weighted sum of these 4 markers correctly categorized 72% of SLE patients. Specificity in relation to patients with other rheumatic diseases and healthy controls was >90%. The combination of anti-dsDNA and index score positivity yielded 80% sensitivity for SLE and 87% specificity against other rheumatic diseases.nnnCONCLUSIONnAn assay panel combining anti-dsDNA, ANA, anti-MCV, EC4d, and BC4d is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of SLE.

Safety and Efficacy of Belimumab to Treat Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Academic Clinical Practices.

Objective. To evaluate the use and efficacy of belimumab in academic practices. Belimumab is a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits soluble B lymphocyte stimulator and has been approved for the treatment of adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods. Invitations to participate and complete a 1-page questionnaire for each patient prescribed belimumab were sent to 16 physicians experienced in SLE phase III clinical trials. The outcome was defined as the physician’s impression of improvement in the initial manifestation(s) being treated without worsening in other organ systems. Results. Of 195 patients treated with belimumab at 10 academic centers, 96% were taking background medications for SLE at initiation of belimumab, with 74% taking corticosteroids. The main indications for initiation of belimumab were arthritis, rash, and/or worsening serologic activity, with 30% of patients unable to taper corticosteroids. Of the 120 patients taking belimumab for at least 6 months, 51% responded clinically and 67% had ≥ 25% improvement in laboratory values. While numbers are limited, black patients showed improvement at 6 months. In a subset of 39 patients with childhood-onset SLE, 65% responded favorably at 6 months, and 35% discontinued corticosteroids. Conclusion. Our data demonstrate favorable clinical and laboratory outcomes in patients with SLE at 6 months across all racial and ethnic groups, with similar improvement seen among patients with childhood-onset SLE.

Cell-bound complement activation products in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison with anti-double-stranded DNA and standard complement measurements

Objective To compare the performance characteristics of cell-bound complement (C4d) activation products (CBCAPS) on erythrocyte (EC4d) and B cells (BC4d) with antibodies to double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) and complement C3 and C4 in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods The study enrolled 794 subjects consisting of 304 SLE and a control group consisting of 285 patients with other rheumatic diseases and 205 normal individuals. Anti-dsDNA and other autoantibodies were measured using solid-phase immunoassays while EC4d and BC4d were determined using flow cytometry. Complement proteins were determined using immunoturbidimetry. Disease activity in SLE was determined using a non-serological Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index SELENA Modification. A two-tiered methodology combining CBCAPS with autoantibodies to cellular and citrullinated antigens was also developed. Statistical analyses used area under receiver operating characteristic curves and calculations of area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity. Results AUC for EC4d (0.82±0.02) and BC4d (0.84±0.02) was higher than those yielded by C3 (0.73±0.02) and C4 (0.72±0.02) (p<0.01). AUC for CBCAPS was also higher than the AUC yielded by anti-dsDNA (0.79±0.02), but significance was only achieved for BC4d (p<0.01). The combination of EC4d and BC4d in multivariate testing methodology with anti-dsDNA and autoantibodies to cellular and citrullinated antigens yielded 80% sensitivity for SLE and specificity ranging from 70% (Sjogrens syndrome) to 92% (rheumatoid arthritis) (98% vs. normal). A higher proportion of patients with SLE with higher levels of disease activity tested positive for elevated CBCAPS, reduced complement and anti-dsDNA (p<0.03). Conclusions CBCAPS have higher sensitivity than standard complement and anti-dsDNA measurements, and may help with the differential diagnosis of SLE in combination with other autoantibodies.

OP0291 Anifrolumab, An Anti-Interferon-Alpha Receptor Monoclonal Antibody, in Moderate To Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

Background Increased activity of the type I interferon (IFN) pathway is central to the pathogenesis of SLE. Blocking the type I receptor may reduce SLE activity more effectively than inhibiting IFN-α alone. Objectives Efficacy and safety of anifrolumab were assessed in a Phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of adults with moderate to severe SLE (the MUSE study). Methods 305 patients were treated for 48 weeks with intravenous anifrolumab (300 mg or 1000 mg) or placebo, in addition to standard-of-care medications. Randomization was stratified by SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score (<10 or ≥10), oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose (<10 or ≥10 mg/day), and IFN gene signature status (high vs. low) based on a 4-gene expression assay. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving an SLE Responder Index [SRI(4)] response at Day 169 with sustained reduction of OCS (<10 mg/day and ≤Day 1 dose from Day 85 to 169). Results The primary endpoint was met by more anifrolumab-treated patients [placebo vs. 300 mg vs. 1000 mg: 17.6%, 34.3% (p=0.014), 28.8% (p=0.063)] with greater effect sizes observed in the 75% of patients who had a high baseline IFN signature [13.2%, 36.0% (p=0.004), 28.2% (p=0.029)]. At Day 365 more anifrolumab-treated patients achieved SRI(4) responses [40.2%, 62.6%, (p<0.001), 53.8%, (p=0.043)], BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) [25.7%, 53.5% (p<0.001), 41.2% (p=0.018)], modified SRI(6) [28.4%, 49.5% (p=0.002), 44.7% (p=0.015)], and SLEDAI-2K ≤2 [17.6%, 35.4% (p=0.004), 32.7% (p=0.012)]. Major clinical response (BILAG “C” or better in all domains at Day 169 maintained to Day 365) was achieved by 6.9%, 19.2% (p=0.012), and 17.3% (p=0.025) of patients. BILAG “A” flares were reported in more placebo- vs. anifrolumab-treated patients (16.7%, 9.1%, 10.6%). In patients with baseline Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index activity score ≥10, more anifrolumab-treated patients attained a ≥50% reduction by Day 365 [30.8%, 63.0% (p=0.013), 58.3% (p=0.077)]. In patients with ≥8 swollen and ≥8 tender joints at baseline more anifrolumab-treated patients achieved ≥50% decrease in joint count [48.6%, 69.6% (p=0.038), 64.6% (p=0.156)]. Although steroid tapering was not mandated, OCS reduction to ≤7.5 mg/d at Day 365 was achieved by 26.6%, 56.4%, and 31.7% of patients. The observed benefits were driven by results in the IFN-high subpopulation (figure). Median suppression of 21 IFN-regulated genes was ∼90% for both doses of anifrolumab. Patients in the placebo group had the lowest incidence of Herpes zoster (2.0%, 5.1%, 9.5%) and cases reported as influenza (2.0%, 6.1%, 7.6%); there were no differences in the incidence of serious adverse events (18.8%, 16.2%, 17.1%). The incidence of infusion-related reactions was similar (5.9%, 2.0%, 3.8%). Conclusions Anifrolumab significantly reduced disease activity across all clinical endpoints. Enhanced effects in IFN-high patients support the pathobiology of this treatment strategy. Acknowledgement Funded by MedImmune. Editorial assistance: K Alexander, QXV Comms, an Ashfield business, UK Disclosure of Interest R. Furie Consultant for: MedImmune, J. Merrill Grant/research support from: MedImmune; Genentech/Roche, Consultant for: Medimmune, Genentech/Roche, Neovacs, V. Werth Consultant for: MedImmune, M. Khamashta: None declared, K. Kalunian Grant/research support from: MedImmune, Consultant for: AstraZeneca, P. Brohawn Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: MedImmune, G. Illei Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: MedImmune, J. Drappa Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: MedImmune, L. Wang Employee of: MedImmune, S. Yoo Shareholder of: AstraZeneca; Regenx Bio, Consultant for: Regenx Bio

Lessons Learned From the Clinical Trials of Novel Biologics and Small Molecules in Lupus Nephritis

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a ripe area for drug development. There are great unmet needs, especially for those with lupus nephritis, in which good responses occur only in the minority of treated patients. An expanded understanding of immunopathogenesis of SLE coupled with the availability of sophisticated bioengineering technologies has resulted in the ability to supply the lupus community with the reagents needed to perform clinical trials. However, drug development in SLE has proven to be particularly challenging. Only one drug, belimumab, has been approved for patients with SLE through the traditional route of randomized controlled trials. The basis for our failures is unknown, but most assuredly relates to trial design issues, confounding by background medicines, and the multiplicity of active biologic pathways in this disease. Off-label use of failed trial drugs such as mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab paradoxically has become routine in many parts of the world. Despite the obstacles, there currently is unprecedented clinical trial activity in lupus nephritis, which most likely will lead to at least one drug approval in years to come.

Efficacy and tolerability of repository corticotropin injection in patients with persistently active SLE: results of a phase 4, randomised, controlled pilot study.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a prolonged-release formulation of a porcine adrenocorticotropic hormone analogue (repository corticotropin injection (RCI)) added to standard of care in patients requiring moderate-dose corticosteroids for symptomatic SLE. Methods This prospective, randomised, double-blind, phase 4, pilot study (NCT01753401) enrolled 38 patients with persistently active SLE involving skin and/or joints. Enrolled patients received RCI, 40u2005U daily or 80u2005U every other day, or volume-matched placebo gel, for 8u2005weeks, with dose tapering to twice weekly during weeks 5–8. Efficacy endpoints included proportion of responders at week 4 based on a novel composite measure that included resolution of rash or arthritis measured using the hybrid SLE Disease Activity Index (hSLEDAI) without worsening British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) scores in other organ systems at week 4 (primary), as well as improvements in total hSLEDAI and BILAG scores and other measures of skin and joint disease activity over the 8-week treatment period. Results Response, as defined for the primary endpoint, did not differ significantly between the combined placebo and RCI-treated groups at week 4. At week 8, the proportion of responders was higher in RCI-treated patients but did not statistically differ between groups (RCI 40u2005U (53.8%), RCI 80u2005U (33.3%), combined placebo (27.3%)). However, RCI treatment was associated with statistically significant improvements in several secondary endpoints, including total hSLEDAI, total BILAG and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity scores within 8u2005weeks. Treatment was well tolerated. Conclusions Although the primary endpoint was not met in this pilot study, secondary and post hoc analyses suggested that RCI was associated with improvements in SLE disease activity in a select patient population with steroid-dependent persistent disease. Trial registration number NCT01753401; results.

Belimumab Is Approved by the FDA: What More Do We Need to Know to Optimize Decision Making?

The March 2011 approval of belimumab (Benlysta) by the US Food and Drug Administration has left rheumatologists in a bit of a quandary regarding its use. It is officially intended for adult patients with autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus whose disease remains active despite receipt of standard-of-care therapy. The approved indication is broad and leaves interpretation to individual rheumatologists. Analyses of the phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of belimumab help answer some of the commonly asked questions, such as the following: 1) Who is the appropriate patient for belimumab? 2) How does one measure response? 3) When should results be expected in a patient newly treated with belimumab? 4) When should belimumab be discontinued?

Reduction in erythrocyte-bound complement activation products and titres of anti-C1q antibodies associate with clinical improvement in systemic lupus erythematosus

Background The relationship between cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs: EC4d, EC3d), anti-C1q, soluble complement C3/C4 and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was evaluated. Methods Per protocol, at baseline all SLE subjects enrolled in this longitudinal study presented with active disease and elevated CB-CAPs. At each monthly visit, the non-serological (ns) Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus: National Assessment (SELENA-SLEDAI) and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 index scores were determined as was a random urinary protein to creatinine ratio (uPCR). Short-form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires were also collected. All soluble markers were determined using immunoassays, while EC4d and EC3d were determined using flow cytometry. Statistical analysis consisted of linear mixed models with random intercept and fixed slopes. Results A total of 36 SLE subjects (mean age 34u2005years; 94% female) were enrolled and evaluated monthly for an average 11 visits per subject. Clinical improvements were observed during the study, with significant decreases in ns-SELENA-SLEDAI scores, BILAG-2004 index scores and uPCR, and increases in all domains of SF-36 (p<0.01). The longitudinal decrease in ns-SELENA-SLEDAI and BILAG-2004 index scores was significantly associated with reduced EC4d and EC3d levels, reduced anti-C1q titres and increased serum complement C3/C4 (p<0.05). The changes in uPCR significantly correlated with C3, C4, anti-C1q and EC4d, with EC4d outperforming C3/C4 by a multivariate analysis. The reduced EC4d or EC3d was associated with improvements in at least six out of the eight domains of SF-36 and outperformed C3/C4. Anti-dsDNA titres did not correlate with changes in disease activity. Conclusions These data indicate that CB-CAPs and anti-C1q are helpful in monitoring patients with SLE.

Baricitinib for systemic lupus erythematosus: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUNDnPatients with systemic lupus erythematosus have substantial unmet medical need. Baricitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2 inhibitor that we hypothesised might have therapeutic benefit in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.nnnMETHODSnIn this double-blind, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, 24-week phase 2 study, patients were recruited from 78 centres in 11 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, and had active disease involving skin or joints. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1) to receive once-daily baricitinib 2 mg, baricitinib 4 mg, or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving resolution of arthritis or rash at week 24, as defined by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K). Efficacy and safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02708095.nnnFINDINGSnBetween March 24, 2016, and April 27, 2017, 314 patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=105), baricitinib 2 mg (n=105), or baricitinib 4 mg (n=104). At week 24, resolution of SLEDAI-2K arthritis or rash was achieved by 70 (67%) of 104 patients receiving baricitinib 4 mg (odds ratio [OR] vs placebo 1·8, 95% CI 1·0-3·3; p=0·0414) and 61 (58%) of 105 patients receiving baricitinib 2 mg (OR 1·3, 0·7-2·3; p=0·39). Adverse events were reported in 68 (65%) patients in the placebo group, 75 (71%) patients in the baricitinib 2 mg group, and 76 (73%) patients in the baricitinib 4 mg group. Serious adverse events were reported in ten (10%) patients receiving baricitinib 4 mg, 11 (10%) receiving baricitinib 2 mg, and five (5%) receiving placebo; no deaths were reported. Serious infections were reported in six (6%) patients with baricitinib 4 mg, two (2%) with baricitinib 2 mg, and one (1%) with placebo.nnnINTERPRETATIONnThe baricitinib 4 mg dose, but not the 2 mg dose, significantly improved the signs and symptoms of active systemic lupus erythematosus in patients who were not adequately controlled despite standard of care therapy, with a safety profile consistent with previous studies of baricitinib. This study provides the foundation for future phase 3 trials of JAK1/2 inhibition with baricitinib as a new potential oral therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus.nnnFUNDINGnEli Lilly and Company.