Richard Kovach

Randomized Comparison of Distal Protection With a Filter-Based Catheter and a Balloon Occlusion and Aspiration System During Percutaneous Intervention of Diseased Saphenous Vein Aorto-Coronary Bypass Grafts

Background—The high rate of periprocedural complications resulting from atherothrombotic embolization after percutaneous intervention in diseased saphenous vein grafts is reduced by distal microcirculatory protection using a balloon occlusion and aspiration system. Whether filter-based catheters, which offer the inherent advantages of maintained perfusion and ease of use, are as effective for this purpose has not been established. Methods and Results—A total of 651 patients undergoing percutaneous intervention of 682 saphenous vein graft lesions were prospectively randomized to distal protection with the filter-based FilterWire EX versus the GuardWire balloon occlusion and aspiration system. Device success was 95.5% and 97.2% with the FilterWire EX and GuardWire, respectively (P =0.25). Postprocedural measures of epicardial flow and angiographic complications were similar between the 2 groups, although bailout IIb/IIIa inhibitors were required slightly less frequently in the FilterWire EX group (0% versus 1.5%, P =0.03). The primary end point, the composite incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization at 30 days, occurred in 9.9% of FilterWire EX patients and 11.6% of GuardWire patients (difference [95% CI]=−1.7% [−6.4%, 3.1%]; P for superiority=0.53, P for noninferiority=0.0008). Conclusions—Distal protection with the FilterWire EX may be safely used as an adjunct to percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein grafts and, compared with distal protection with the GuardWire balloon occlusion and aspiration system, results in similar rates of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days.

Wire-Interwoven Nitinol Stent Outcome in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries Twelve-Month Results of the SUPERB Trial

Background—Stent-based therapy in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in patients with peripheral artery disease is compromised by restenosis and risk of stent fracture or distortion. A novel self-expanding nitinol stent was developed that incorporates an interwoven-wire design (Supera stent, IDEV Technologies, Inc, Webster, TX) to confer greater radial strength, flexibility, and fracture resistance. Methods and Results—This prospective, multicenter, investigational device exemption, single-arm trial enrolled 264 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease undergoing percutaneous treatment of de novo or restenotic lesions of the superficial femoral or proximal popliteal (femoropopliteal) artery. Freedom from death, target lesion revascularization, or any amputation of the index limb at 30 days (+7 days) postprocedure was achieved in 99.2% (258/260) of patients (P<0.001). Primary patency at 12 months (360±30 days) was achieved in 78.9% (180/228) of the population (P<0.001). Primary patency by Kaplan–Meier analysis at 12 months (360 days) was 86.3%. No stent fracture was observed by independent core laboratory analysis in the 243 stents (228 patients) evaluated at 12 months. Clinical assessment at 12 months demonstrated improvement by at least 1 Rutherford–Becker category in 88.7% of patients. Conclusions—The SUPERB Trial, an investigational device exemption study using an interwoven nitinol wire stent in the femoropopliteal artery, achieved the efficacy and safety performance goals predesignated by the Food and Drug Administration. On the basis of the high primary patency rate, absence of stent fracture, and significant improvements in functional and quality-of-life measures, the Supera stent provides safe and effective treatment of femoropopliteal lesions in symptomatic patients with peripheral artery disease. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00933270.

830-2 Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition as adjunctive treatment during saphenous vein graft stenting: Differential effects after randomization to occlusion or filter-based embolic protection

AIMS Although embolic protection devices reduce complications during saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenting, adverse events still occur in approximately 10% of patients. IIb/IIIa antagonists have not been proven effective during SVG intervention. We hypothesized that adjunctive use of these agents might enhance the efficacy of embolic protection devices. METHODS AND RESULTS In the prospective, multicentre FilterWire EX Randomized Evaluation trial, 651 patients undergoing SVG stenting were randomized to either filter-based FilterWire EX or balloon occlusion/aspiration GuardWire embolic protection devices. IIb/IIIa inhibitor use was at the discretion of the investigator, with randomization stratified by intended use. Patients pre-selected for IIb/IIIa inhibitor use (n = 345) had higher baseline risk, with increased 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE, 13.0 vs. 8.0%, P = 0.03). GuardWire assigned patients treated with IIb/IIIa inhibitors had higher 30-day MACE compared with those not treated with IIb/IIIa inhibitors (16.0 vs. 6.3%, P = 0.007). In contrast, MACE in high-risk FilterWire patients treated with IIb/IIIa inhibitors were similar to their lower risk, untreated counterparts (9.9 vs. 9.5%, P = 0.89). Multivariable analysis detected a borderline significant (P = 0.056) interaction for lower MACE between FilterWire and IIb/IIIa inhibitor use. Adjustment by the propensity to use IIb/IIIa inhibitors resulted in a significant (P = 0.023) interaction for lower MACE rates. IIb/IIIa inhibition in conjunction with FilterWire was associated with less abrupt closure, no reflow, or distal embolization. CONCLUSION IIb/IIIa antagonists may improve procedural outcome during SVG stenting in high risk patients, utilizing filter-based embolic protection devices.