Richard M. Martin

Associations of lower urinary tract symptoms with prostate‐specific antigen levels, and screen‐detected localized and advanced prostate cancer: a case‐control study nested within the UK population‐based ProtecT (Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) study

To determine associations of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) levels and screen‐detected localized and advanced prostate cancer.

Electrical Conductivity of High-Pressure Liquid Hydrogen by Quantum Monte Carlo Methods

We compute the electrical conductivity for liquid hydrogen at high pressure using Monte Carlo techniques. The method uses coupled electron-ion Monte Carlo simulations to generate configurations of liquid hydrogen. For each configuration, correlated sampling of electrons is performed in order to calculate a set of lowest many-body eigenstates and current-current correlation functions of the system, which are summed over in the many-body Kubo formula to give ac electrical conductivity. The extrapolated dc conductivity at 3000 K for several densities shows a liquid semiconductor to liquid-metal transition at high pressure. Our results are in good agreement with shock-wave data.

Spin resolved energy parametrization of a quasi-one-dimensional electron gas

By carrying out extensive lattice regularized diffusion Monte Carlo calculations, we study the spin and density dependence of the ground-state energy for a quasi-one-dimensional electron gas, with harmonic transverse confinement and long-range 1/r interactions. We present a parametrization of the exchange–correlation energy suitable for spin density functional calculations, which fulfils exact low and high density limits.

Many-body perturbation theory: expansion in the interaction

We especially need imagination in science. aria Mitchell Summary The many-body problem consists of two parts: the first is the non-interacting system in a materials-specific external potential; the second is the Coulomb interaction that makes the problem so hard to solve. The most straightforward idea is to use perturbation theory, with the Coulomb interaction as perturbation. This is conceptually simple, but it turns out to be difficult in practice, since the Coulomb interaction is often not small compared with typical energy differences, it is long-ranged and in the thermodynamic limit there is an infinite number of particles, contributing with an infinite number of mutual interaction processes. The present chapter outlines how one can deal with this problem. It contains an overview of facts that one can also find in many standard textbooks on the many-body problem, but that are useful to keep in mind in order to look at later chapters from a sound and well-established perspective. The many-body problem is a tough one, and it has many facets. Sorting it out is like putting together a huge puzzle. The eight introductory chapters of this book provide pieces of the puzzle, and ideas on what one might do about it. In the present chapter we choose to go in one of the possible directions, in order to arrive at something tangible. The chapter gives the general framework and the main ideas; specific approximations are the topic of Chs. 10–15. The idea is to start from an independent-particle problem and add the Coulomb interaction as a perturbation. This is not easy: first, the interaction is responsible for a rich variety of phenomena that are completely absent otherwise, such as the finite lifetime of quasiparticles, or additional structures in spectra due to the fact that a quasi-particle excitation may transfer its energy to other elementary excitations, for example plasmons. Second, because of the two-body Coulomb interaction, the problem scales badly with the number of electrons, and straightforward perturbation theory for the many-body hamiltonian with the Coulomb interaction as perturbation rapidly becomes intractable or even useless, especially in large systems. To get started, Sec. 9.1 recalls why things are not so easy. The following sections try to solve one problem after the other, starting from Sec. 9.2 where the Greens function is reformulated in a way that is appropriate for a perturbation expansion.

Concepts and models for interacting electrons

The art of being wise is the art of knowing what to overlook. William James Summary This chapter is devoted to idealized models and theoretical concepts that underlie the topics in the rest of this book. Among the most dramatic effects are the Wigner and Mott transitions, exemplified by electrons in a homogeneous background of positive charge and by the Hubbard model of a crystal. Fermi liquid theory is the paradigm for understanding quasi-particles and collective excitations in metals, building on a continuous link between a non-interacting and an interacting system. The Luttinger theorem and Friedel sum rule are conservation laws for quantities that do not vary at all with the interaction. The Heisenberg and Ising models exemplify the properties of localized electronic states that act as spins. The Anderson impurity model is the paradigm for understanding local moment behavior and is used directly in dynamical mean-field theory. The previous chapters discuss examples of experimental observations where effects of interactions can be appreciated with only basic knowledge of physics and chemistry. The purpose of this chapter is to give a concise discussion of models that illustrate major characteristics of interacting electrons. These are prototypes that bring out features that occur in real problems, such as the examples in the previous chapter. They are also pedagogical examples for the theoretical methods developed later, with references to specific sections. The Wigner transition and the homogeneous electron system The simplest model of interacting electrons in condensed matter is the homogeneous electron system, also called homogeneous electron gas (HEG), an infinite system of electrons with a uniform compensating positive charge background. It was originally introduced as a model for alkali metals. Now the HEG is a standard model system for the development of density functionals and a widely used test system for the many-body perturbation methods in Chs. 10–15. It is also an important model for quantum Monte Carlo calculations, described in Chs. 23–25. To define the model, we take the hamiltonian in Eq. (1.1) and replace the nuclei by a rigid uniform positive charge with density equal to the electron charge density n .

Beyond the single-site approximation in DMFT

Summary The previous chapter is devoted to the formulation of DMFT and applications that are exact in the limit of infinite dimensions; however, in finite dimensions this is only a single-site approximation. The present chapter is devoted to clusters and other methods to treat correlation between sites. The equations are derived in a unified way, applicable to a single site or a cluster. For a cluster with more than one site there are various ways to choose the boundary conditions and the embedding procedure, and special care must be taken to satisfy causality and translation invariance. A few selected applications illustrate different techniques and results for Hubbard-type models. The essential features of DMFT are brought out in the previous chapter in the simplest form: the single-site approximation in which correlation between sites can be neglected. In this case the self-energy due to interactions can be calculated using an auxiliary system of a single site embedded in an effective medium that represents the surrounding crystal. The resulting many-body problem is equivalent to an Anderson impurity model that must be solved self-consistently. The results are exact for infinite dimensions d → ∞; however, in any finite dimension, i.e., real systems, this is just a mean-field approximation analogous to the Weiss mean field in magnetic systems or the CPA for disordered alloys. There are, however, many important properties and phenomena that require us to go beyond mean-field approximations. For example, basic questions concerning the nature of a metal–insulator transition can be established only by quantitative assessment of the correlations between different sites. Is a single site sufficient (the central idea in the arguments by Mott discussed in Sec. 3.2) or is correlation between sites (for example, an ordered antiferromagnetic state) essential for interactions to lead to an insulating state? A complete theory must establish the range of correlation needed to understand the mechanisms and to make quantitative calculations. A striking example that requires a k -dependent self-energy is the opening of a “pseudogap” in only part of the Brillouin zone in a high-temperature superconductor, as illustrated in Fig. 2.16. This chapter is devoted to methods that go beyond the single-site approximation to take into account interactions and correlations between electrons on sites.

Signatures of electron correlation

Real knowledge is to know the extent of ones ignorance. Confucius, 500 BCE Summary The topic of this chapter is a small selection of the vast array of experimentally observed phenomena chosen to exemplify crucial roles played by the electron– electron interaction. Examples in the present chapter bring out the effects of correlation in ground and excited states as well as in thermal equilibrium. These raise challenges for theory and quantitative many-body methods in treating interacting electrons, the topics of the following chapters. The title of this book is Interacting Electrons . Of course, there are no non-interacting electrons: in any system with more than one electron, the electron–electron interaction affects the energy and leads to correlation between the electrons. All first-principles theories deal with the electron–electron interaction in some way, but often they treat the electrons as independent fermions in a static mean-field potential that contains interaction effects approximately. As described in Ch. 4, the Hartree–Fock method is a variational approximation with a wavefunction for fermions that are uncorrelated, except for the requirement of antisymmetry. The Kohn–Sham approach to DFT defines an auxiliary system of independent fermions that is chosen to reproduce the ground-state density. It is exact in principle and remarkably successful in practice. However, many properties such as excitation energies are not supposed to be taken directly from the Kohn–Sham equations, even in principle. Various other methods attempt to incorporate some effect of correlation in the choice of the potential. This chapter is designed to highlight a few examples of experimentally observed phenomena that demonstrate qualitative consequences of electron–electron interactions beyond independent-particle approximations. Some examples illustrate effects that cannot be accounted for in any theory where electrons are considered as independent particles. Others are direct experimental measurements of correlation functions that would vanish if the electrons were independent. In yet other cases, a phenomenon can be explained in terms of independent particles in some effective potential, but it is deeply unsatisfying if one has to invent a different potential for every case, even for different properties in the same material. A satisfactory theory ultimately requires us to confront the problem of interacting, correlated electrons.

The RPA and the GW approximation for the self-energy

Besides the proof of a modified Luttinger–Ward–Klein variational principle and a related self-consistency idea, there is not much new in principle in this paper. L. Hedin, Phys. Rev . 139, A796–823 (1965) Summary In this chapter a set of equations is formulated that determine the self-energy and the one-body Greens function in terms of the screened Coulomb interaction between classical charges. The equations contain a correction to the classical picture in terms of a vertex function. The physical meaning of the various contributions is discussed. The simplest approximation for the vertex yields the random phase approximation for the polarizability and the GW approximation for the self-energy. Various aspects of the GWA are analyzed, with a focus on the physics that is added beyond Hartree– Fock. A brief summary of model cases illustrates the domain of validity and the limits of the GWA. In this chapter we elaborate in more detail on the question of how to calculate the onebody Greens function from a Dyson equation with a self-energy kernel. In the previous chapter a scheme was introduced to design approximations to the self-energy. However, the question of where to stop, which pieces of physics to include and which to neglect, is not yet settled. Of course, there is no unique answer, besides the exact solution, but different strategies can be more or less advantageous in practice. In a system with a few electrons, for example, different aspects will be important than in a system with many electrons. Here we are mostly interested in solids, or more generally in extended systems. In such systems, screening plays an essential role: the interaction between two charges is strongly modified, in general reduced, by the rearrangement of all the other charges. It is therefore most convenient to reformulate the equations such that screening appears explicitly. Some steps in this direction can be found in earlier chapters, in particular in Sec. 8.3, the formulation of the Ψ [ G , W ]-functional of the screened interaction W instead of the Ф[ G , v c ]-functional of the bare v c . In Sec. 10.5 the screened interaction approximation for the self-energy is derived, with the self-energy as a product of the one-body Greens function and the screened interaction W .