Richard Muga

Estimated risk of HIV transmission by blood transfusion in Kenya

BACKGROUND During the past decade, developing countries have received limited support for blood safety programmes. The Kenya Ministry of Health did a collaborative multicentre assessment to establish the risk of HIV transmission by transfusion in Kenya, to promote awareness of blood safety issues in this country with a mature HIV epidemic, and to identify methods to reduce the risk of HIV transmission by blood transfusion in Kenya. METHODS For 12 weeks, from April to July 1994, we collected information and blood samples from all blood donors, and pretransfusion samples were collected from all recipients in six government hospitals in Kenya. Blood donations were collected and screened for HIV according to standard practice in the hospital laboratories. Test results at a reference laboratory were compared with those of the hospital laboratories and risk of transfusion-associated HIV transmission was calculated. FINDINGS The prevalence of HIV among blood donors was 6.4% (120 of 1877) and varied by hospital (range 2-20%). HIV test results were available for 1290 donor-recipient pairs. Of these, 26 HIV-positive donations were given to HIV-negative patients. We estimate that 2.0% of transfusions transmitted HIV. Problems in the hospitals that contributed to transfusion risk included inconsistent refrigeration, data entry errors, equipment failure, and lack of a quality-assurance programme. INTERPRETATION A high proportion of blood transfusions transmitted HIV in this high-prevalence area of Africa, primarily because of erroneous laboratory practices. On the basis of these results, the Kenya Ministry of Health introduced a number of practical and inexpensive interventions to improve national blood safety.

Assessing the impact of a school‐based water treatment, hygiene and sanitation programme on pupil absence in Nyanza Province, Kenya: a cluster‐randomized trial

Objectives  There has been increased attention to access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) at schools in developing countries, but a dearth of empirical studies on the impact. We conducted a cluster‐randomized trial of school‐based WASH on pupil absence in Nyanza Province, Kenya, from 2007 to 2008.

Assessing The Impact Of A School-Based Latrine Cleaning And Handwashing Program On Pupil Absence In Nyanza Province, Kenya: A Cluster-Randomized Trial

Improving school water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) conditions reduces pupil absence and illness. However, these benefits may depend on the conditions of the latrines and availability of consumables. We sought to determine whether a low‐cost, policy‐relevant, environmental‐level latrine cleaning intervention could improve latrine cleanliness, increase its use and reduce absenteeism.

The Life-Cycle Costs of School Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Access in Kenyan Primary Schools

Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) programs in schools can increase the health, dignity and comfort of students and teachers. Understanding the costs of WASH facilities and services in schools is one essential piece for policy makers to utilize when budgeting for schools and helping to make WASH programs more sustainable. In this study we collected data from NGO and government offices, local hardware shops and 89 rural primary schools across three Kenyan counties. Current expenditures on WASH, from school and external (NGO, government, parent) sources, averaged 1.83 USD per student per year. After reviewing current expenditures, estimated costs of operations and maintenance for bringing schools up to basic WASH standards, were calculated to be 3.03 USD per student per year. This includes recurrent costs, but not the cost of installing or setting up WASH infrastructure, which was 18,916 USD per school, for a school of 400 students (4.92 USD per student, per year). These findings demonstrate the need for increases in allocations to schools in Kenya, and stricter guidance on how money should be spent on WASH inputs to enable all schools to provide basic WASH for all students.

Shaped by asymmetrical interdependence: a qualitative case study of the external influences on international non-governmental organizations´ implementation of equity principles in HIV/AIDS work

IntroductionAddressing inequities is a key role for international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) working in health and development. Yet, putting equity principles into practice can prove challenging. In-depth empirical research examining what influences INGOs´ implementation of equity principles is limited. This study examined the influences on one INGO´s implementation of equity principles in its HIV/AIDS programs.MethodsThis research employed a case study with nested components (an INGO operating in Kenya, with offices in North America). We used multiple data collection methods, including document reviews, interviews (with staff, partners and clients of the INGO in Kenya), and participant observation (with Kenyan INGO staff). Participant observation was conducted with 10 people over three months. Forty-one interviews were completed, and 127 documents analyzed. Data analysis followed Auerbach and Silverstein´s analytic process (2003), with qualitative coding conducted in multiple stages, using descriptive matrices, visual displays and networks (Miles and Huberman, 1994).ResultsThere was a gap between the INGO´s intent to implement equity principles and actual practice due to multiple influences from various players, including donors and country governments. The INGO was reliant on donor funding and needed permission from the Kenyan government to work in-country. Major influences included donor agendas and funding, donor country policies, and Southern country government priorities and legislation. The INGO privileged particular vulnerable populations (based on its reputation, its history, and the priorities of the Kenyan government and the donors). To balance its equity commitment with the influences from other players, the INGO aligned with the system as well as pushed back incrementally on the donors and the Kenyan government to influence these organizations´ equity agendas. By moving its equity agenda forward incrementally and using its reputational advantage, the INGO avoided potential negative repercussions that might result from pushing too fast or working outside the system.ConclusionsThe INGO aligned the implementation of equity principles in its HIV/AIDS initiatives by working within a system characterized by asymmetrical interdependence. Influences from the donors and Kenyan government contributed to an implementation gap between what the INGO intended to accomplish in implementing equity principles in HIV/AIDS work and actual practice.