Richard S. Barclay
National Museum of Natural History
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Richard S. Barclay.
Microscopy Research and Technique | 2018
Michael A. Urban; Richard S. Barclay; Mayandi Sivaguru; Surangi W. Punyasena
Plant cuticle micromorphology is an invaluable tool in modern ecology and paleoecology. It has expanded our knowledge of systematic relationships among diverse plant groups and can be used to identify fossil plants. Furthermore, fossil plant leaf micromorphology is used for reconstructing past environments, most notably for estimating atmospheric CO2 concentration. Here we outline a new protocol for imaging plant cuticle for archival and paleoecological applications. Traditionally, both modern reference and fossil samples undergo maceration with subsequent imaging via environmental SEM, widefield fluorescence, or light microscopy. In this paper, we demonstrate the capabilities of alternative preparation and imaging methods using confocal and superresolution microscopy with intact leaf samples. This method produces detailed three‐dimensional images of surficial and subsurface structures of the intact leaf. Multiple layers are captured simultaneously, which previously required independent maceration and microtome steps. We compared clearing agents (chloral hydrate, KOH, and Visikol); mounting media (Eukitt and Hoyers); fluorescent stains (periodic acid Schiff, propidium iodide); and confocal vs. superresolution microscopes. We conclude that Eukitt is the best medium for long‐term preservation and imaging. Because of nontoxicity and ease of procurement, Visikol made for the best clearing agent. Staining improves contrast and under most circumstances PAS provided the clearest images. Supperresolution produced higher clarity images than traditional confocal, but the information gained was minimal. This new protocol provides the botanical and paleobotanical community an alternative to traditional techniques. Our proposed workflow has the net benefit of being more efficient than traditional methods, which only capture the surface of the plant epidermis. Microsc. Res. Tech. 81:129–140, 2018.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters | 2016
Richard S. Barclay; Scott L. Wing
Field Guides | 2004
Richard S. Barclay; Kirk R. Johnson
Cretaceous Research | 2015
Richard S. Barclay; Matthew Rioux; Laura B. Meyer; Samuel A. Bowring; Kirk R. Johnson; Ian M. Miller
Geology | 2017
Tekie Tesfamichael; Bonnie F. Jacobs; Neil J. Tabor; Lauren A. Michel; Ellen D. Currano; Mulugeta Feseha; Richard S. Barclay; John Kappelman; Mark D. Schmitz
Archive | 2018
Laura C. Soul; Richard S. Barclay; Amy Bolton; Scott L. Wing
GSA Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington, USA - 2017 | 2017
Rose Aubery; Michael A. Urban; Regan E. Dunn; Richard S. Barclay; Surangi W. Punyasena
GSA Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington, USA - 2017 | 2017
Laura C. Soul; Richard S. Barclay; Scott L. Wing; Amy Bolton; J. Patrick Megonigal
GSA Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington, USA - 2017 | 2017
Zev Brook; Richard S. Barclay; Scott L. Wing
GSA Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington, USA - 2017 | 2017
Richard S. Barclay; Laura C. Soul; Amy Bolton; Jonathan P. Wilson; J. Patrick Megonigal; Scott L. Wing