Richard Shell
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Richard Shell.
Pediatric Pulmonology | 2011
Samuel M. Moskowitz; Julia Emerson; Sharon McNamara; Richard Shell; David M. Orenstein; Daniel B. Rosenbluth; Marcia Katz; Richard C. Ahrens; Douglas B. Hornick; Patricia M. Joseph; Ronald L. Gibson; Moira L. Aitken; Wade W. Benton; Jane L. Burns
In cystic fibrosis (CF), conventional antibiotic susceptibility results correlate poorly with clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that biofilm testing would more accurately reflect the susceptibilities of bacteria infecting CF airways.
Annals of clinical and translational neurology | 2016
Stephen J. Kolb; Christopher S. Coffey; Jon W. Yankey; Kristin J. Krosschell; W. David Arnold; Seward B. Rutkove; Kathryn J. Swoboda; Sandra P. Reyna; Ai Sakonju; Basil T. Darras; Richard Shell; Nancy L. Kuntz; Diana Castro; Susan T. Iannaccone; Julie Parsons; Anne M. Connolly; Claudia A. Chiriboga; Craig M. McDonald; W. Bryan Burnette; Klaus Werner; Mathula Thangarajh; Perry B. Shieh; Erika Finanger; Merit Cudkowicz; Michelle McGovern; D. Elizabeth McNeil; Richard S. Finkel; Edward M. Kaye; Allison Kingsley; Samantha R. Renusch
This study prospectively assessed putative promising biomarkers for use in assessing infants with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).
Hemoglobin | 2008
Erin Dainer; Richard Shell; Randy Miller; Joan F. Atkin; Matt Pastore; Abdullah Kutlar; Lina Zhuang; Leslie Holley; Debra H. Davis; F. Kutlar
Neonatal cyanosis can result from a multitude of acquired and inherited causes. Cyanosis resulting from fetal M hemoglobin (Hb) variants is very rare. Only two Gγ variants causing methemoglobinemia and cyanosis in the newborn have been reported to date. Here we describe a novel fetal Hb variant, Hb F-Circleville [Gγ63(E7)His→Leu], associated with methemoglobinemia and cyanosis in the newborn. The patients sister also had neonatal cyanosis at birth.
Pediatrics | 2018
Daniel W. Sheehan; David J. Birnkrant; Joshua O. Benditt; Michelle Eagle; Jonathan D. Finder; John T. Kissel; Richard M. Kravitz; Hemant Sawnani; Richard Shell; Michael D. Sussman; Lisa Wolfe
Building on the 2018 DMD Care Considerations, we provide detailed guidance on respiratory management of patients with DMD. In 2010, Care Considerations for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was published in Lancet Neurology, and in 2018, these guidelines were updated. Since the publication of the first set of guidelines, survival of individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy has increased. With contemporary medical management, survival often extends into the fourth decade of life and beyond. Effective transition of respiratory care from pediatric to adult medicine is vital to optimize patient safety, prognosis, and quality of life. With genetic and other emerging drug therapies in development, standardization of care is necessary to accurately assess treatment effects in clinical trials. This revision of respiratory recommendations preserves a fundamental strength of the original guidelines: namely, reliance on a limited number of respiratory tests to guide patient assessment and management. A progressive therapeutic strategy is presented that includes lung volume recruitment, assisted coughing, and assisted ventilation (initially nocturnally, with the subsequent addition of daytime ventilation for progressive respiratory failure). This revision also stresses the need for serial monitoring of respiratory muscle strength to characterize an individual’s respiratory phenotype of severity as well as provide baseline assessments for clinical trials. Clinical controversies and emerging areas are included.
Contemporary clinical trials communications | 2018
Amy Bartlett; Stephen J. Kolb; Allison Kingsley; Kathryn J. Swoboda; Sandra P. Reyna; Ai Sakonju; Basil T. Darras; Richard Shell; Nancy L. Kuntz; Diana Castro; Susan T. Iannaccone; Julie Parsons; Anne M. Connolly; Claudia A. Chiriboga; Craig M. McDonald; W. Bryan Burnette; Klaus Werner; Mathula Thangarajh; Perry B. Shieh; Erika Finanger; Christopher S. Coffey; Jon W. Yankey; Merit Cudkowicz; Michelle McGovern; D. Elizabeth McNeil; W. David Arnold; John T. Kissel
Background/Aims Recruitment and retention of research participants are challenging and critical components of successful clinical trials and natural history studies. Infants with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have been a particularly challenging population to study due to their fragile and complex medical issues, poor prognosis and, until 2016, a lack of effective therapies. Recruitment of healthy infants into clinical trials and natural history studies is also challenging and sometimes assumed to not be feasible. Methods In 2011, our group initiated a two-year, longitudinal natural history study of infants with SMA and healthy infant controls to provide data to assist in the analysis and interpretation of planned clinical trials in infants with SMA. The recruitment goal was to enroll 27 infants less than 6 months of age with SMA and 27 age-matched healthy infants within the two-year enrollment period. A detailed recruitment and retention plan was developed for this purpose. In addition, a survey was administered to participant families to understand the determinants of participation in the study. Results All healthy infants were recruited within the studys first year and 26 SMA infants were recruited within the two-year recruitment period. Thirty-eight participant families responded to the recruitment determinants survey. Nearly half of respondents (18/38, 48%) reported that they first heard of the study from their physician or neurologist. The most common reason to decide to enroll their infant (22/38, 58%) and to remain in the study (28/38, 74%) was their understanding of the importance of the study. Thematic recruitment tools such as a study brochure, video on social media, and presentations at advocacy meetings were reported to positively influence the decision to enroll. Conclusions A proactive, thematic and inclusive recruitment and retention plan that effectively communicates the rationale of a clinical study and partners with patients, advocacy groups and the local communities can effectively recruit participants in vulnerable populations. Recommendations for the proactive integration of recruitment and retention plans into clinical trial protocol development are provided.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2018
Megan A. Waldrop; Felecia Gumienny; Daniel R. Boué; Emily de los Reyes; Richard Shell; Robert B. Weiss; Kevin M. Flanigan
Vici syndrome is a multisystem disorder characterized by agenesis of the corpus callosum, oculocutaneous hypopigmentation, cataracts, cardiomyopathy, combined immunodeficiency, failure to thrive, profound developmental delay, and acquired microcephaly. Most individuals are severely affected and have a markedly reduced life span. Here we describe an 8‐year‐old boy with a history of developmental delay, agenesis of the corpus callosum, failure to thrive, myopathy, and well‐controlled epilepsy. He was initially diagnosed with a mitochondrial disorder, based in part upon nonspecific muscle biopsy findings, but mitochondrial DNA mutation analysis revealed no mutations. Whole exome sequencing revealed compound heterozygosity for two EPG5 variants, inherited in trans. One was a known pathogenic mutation in exon 13 (c.2461C > T, p.Arg821X). The second was reported as a variant of unknown significance found within intron 16, six nucleotides before the exon 17 splice acceptor site (c.3099‐6C > G). Reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction of the EPG5 mRNA showed skipping of exon 17—which maintains an open reading frame—in 77% of the transcript, along with 23% expression of wild‐type mRNA suggesting that intronic mutations may affect splicing of the EPG5 gene and result in symptoms. However, the expression of 23% wild‐type mRNA may result in a significantly attenuated Vici syndrome phenotype.
Pediatric Cardiology | 2013
Nazire Ozcelik; Richard Shell; Melissa Holtzlander; Clifford L. Cua
Neurology | 2017
Douglas M. Sproule; S. Al-Zaidy; Richard Shell; W. David Arnold; L. Rodino-Klapac; Thomas W. Prior; Linda Lowes; Lindsay Alfano; K. Berry; Kathleen Church; John T. Kissel; Sukumar Nagendran; James L’Italien; Minna Du; Jessica Cardenas; Arthur H.M. Burghes; Kevin D. Foust; Kathrin Meyer; Shibi Likhite; Brian K. Kaspar
Neurology | 2017
S. Al-Zaidy; Richard Shell; W. David Arnold; L. Rodino-Klapac; Thomas W. Prior; Linda Lowes; Lindsay Alfano; K. Berry; Kathleen Church; John T. Kissel; Sukumar Nagendran; James L’Italien; Doug M. Sproule; Minna Du; Jessica Cardenas; Arthur H.M. Burghes; Kevin D. Foust; Kathrin Meyer; Shibi Likhite; Brian K. Kaspar
Neurology | 2017
Linda Lowes; S. Al-Zaidy; Richard Shell; W. David Arnold; L. Rodino-Klapac; Thomas W. Prior; Lindsay Alfano; K. Berry; Kathleen Church; John T. Kissel; Sukumar Nagendran; James L’Italien; Douglas M. Sproule; Minna Du; Jessica Cardenas; Arthur H.M. Burghes; Kevin D. Foust; Kathrin Meyer; Shibi Likhite; Brian K. Kaspar