Richard Zhang

3-Year Study of Donepezil Therapy in Alzheimer’s Disease: Effects of Early and Continuous Therapy

Delays in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, and, therefore, delays in treatment, may have a detrimental effect on a patient’s long-term well-being. This studyassessed the effects of postponing donepezil treatment for 1 year by comparing patients treated continuously for 3 years with those who received placebo for 1 year followed by open-label donepezil for 2 years. Patients (n = 286) with possible or probable Alzheimer’s disease (according to DSM-IV, NINCDS-ADRDA, and Mini-Mental State Examination criteria; see text) were randomized to receive donepezil (5 mg/day for 4 weeks, 10 mg/day thereafter) or placebo (delayed-start group) for 1 year. Of the 192 completers, 157 began a 2-year, open-label phase of donepezil treatment. Outcome measures were the Gottfries-Bråne-Steen scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Global Deterioration Scale, the Progressive Deterioration Scale, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and safety (adverse events). Mixed regression analysis was used to compare changes between the groups over 3 years on the efficacy measures. There was a trend for patients receiving continuous therapy to have less global deterioration (Gottfries-Bråne-Steen scale) than those who had delayed treatment (p = 0.056). Small but statistically significant differences between the groups were observed for the secondary measures of cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination; p = 0.004) and cognitive and functional abilities (Global Deterioration Scale; p = 0.0231) in favor of continuous donepezil therapy. Over 90% of the patients in both cohorts experienced one treatment-emergent adverse event; most were considered mild or moderate. In conclusion, patients in whom the start of treatment is delayed may demonstrate slightly reduced benefits as compared with those seen in patients starting donepezil therapy early in the course of Alzheimer’s disease. These data support the long-term efficacy and safety of donepezil.

An economic evaluation of donepezil in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: results of a 1-year, double-blind, randomized trial.

The costs and consequences of donepezil versus placebo treatment in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD) were evaluated as part of a 1-year prospective, double-blind, randomized, multinational clinical trial. Patients received either donepezil (n = 142; 5 mg/day for 28 days followed by 10 mg/day according to the clinician’s judgement) or placebo (n = 144). Unit costs were assessed in 1999 Swedish kronas (SEK) and converted to US dollars (USD). Donepezil-treated patients gained functional benefits relative to placebo on the Progressive Deterioration Scale (p = 0.042) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale (p = 0.025) at week 52. Caregivers of donepezil-treated patients spent an average of 400 h less annually providing care than caregivers of placebo-treated patients. Mean annual healthcare costs were SEK 137,752 (USD 16,438) per patient for the donepezil group and SEK 135,314 (USD 16,147) in the placebo group. With the average annual cost of donepezil at SEK 10,723 (USD 1,280) per patient, the SEK 2,438 (USD 291) cost difference represented a 77% cost offset. When caregiver time and healthcare costs were included, mean annual costs were SEK 209,244 (USD 24,969) per patient in the donepezil group and SEK 218,434 (USD 26,066) in the placebo group, a total saving associated with donepezil treatment of SEK 9,190 (USD 1,097) per patient [95% CI of SEK –43,959 (USD –5,246), SEK 25,581 (USD 3,053); p = 0.6]. The positive effects on the efficacy outcome measures combined with no additional costs from a societal perspective indicate that donepezil is a cost-effective treatment, representing an improved strategy for the management of patients with AD.

Efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease: results of a global, multinational, clinical experience study.

BackgroundDonepezil has consistently been shown to be effective and well tolerated in the symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer’s disease in placebo-controlled clinical trials. It has been shown to provide significant benefits in cognition, global function and activities of daily living in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. However, in order to control for confounding factors, some clinical trials of donepezil have excluded patients with comorbid illness and concomitant medication use.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of donepezil in a wider and more diverse sample of patients and centres than previous trials, reflecting routine clinical practice.MethodsIn this 12-week, open-label, multicentre trial, patients with probable mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease received donepezil 5 mg/day for 28 days, after which the dosage was increased to 10 mg/day according to the investigating clinician’s judgement. Patients were enrolled at 246 study centres in 18 countries worldwide. Cognition was assessed by a trained clinician using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at baseline, week 4 and week 12 (or last visit). Changes in patient activity and social interaction were evaluated using a caregiver diary. Each week, caregivers recorded their impression of change compared with baseline on three aspects of patient behaviour using a 5-point scale. Efficacy analyses were performed on the intent-to-treat population. Significance was determined using the paired t-test (0.05 significance level). Tolerability and safety were assessed by monitoring adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs, clinical laboratory test abnormalities and ECG findings throughout the study.ResultsA total of 1113 patients received donepezil (mean baseline MMSE score [±SD] 18.74 ± 5.21). 989 (88.9%) patients completed the study; 59 (5%) patients discontinued because of adverse events. Most patients were taking at least one concomitant medication (n = 802; 72%) and had at least one comorbid medical condition (n = 745; 67%) on study entry. Donepezil significantly improved cognition compared with baseline at weeks 4 and 12, and at week 12 using a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis (all p < 0.0001). Mean change from baseline MMSE score (±SE) at week 12-LOCF was +1.73 ± 0.10. Donepezil was also associated with significant improvements in patient social interaction, engagement and interest, and initiation of pleasurable activities at all weekly assessments and week 12-LOCF (all p < 0.0001). Donepezil was generally well tolerated; adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of donepezil.ConclusionDonepezil treatment resulted in statistically significant improvements in cognition and patient activity and social behaviour, and was generally well tolerated despite high levels of comorbid illness and concomitant medication use. The results of this open-label study in a large patient population are consistent with those from controlled trials and support that donepezil is effective in the treatment of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease in everyday practice.

Donepezil for treatment of cognitive dysfunction in children with Down syndrome aged 10–17

The objective of this 10‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled multicenter study was to assess the efficacy and safety of donepezil for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction exhibited by children with Down syndrome (DS). Intervention comprised donepezil (2.5–10 mg/day) in children (aged 10–17 years) with DS of mild‐to‐moderate severity. The primary measures were the Vineland‐II Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS‐II) Parent/Caregiver Rating Form (PCRF) the sum of nine subdomain standardized scores and standard safety measures. Secondary measures included the VABS‐II/PCRF scores on the following domains and their respective individual subdomains: Communication (receptive, expressive, and written); Daily Living Skills (personal, domestic, and community); Socialization (interpersonal relationships, play and leisure time, and coping skills), and scores on the Test of Verbal Expression and Reasoning, a subject‐performance‐based measure of expressive language. At baseline, 129 participants were assigned treatment with donepezil or placebo. During the double‐blind phase, VABS II/PCRF sum of the nine subdomain standardized scores, called v‐scores, improved significantly from baseline in both groups (P < 0.0001), with no significant between‐group differences. This trial failed to demonstrate any benefit for donepezil versus placebo in children and adolescents with DS, although donepezil appeared to be well tolerated.

Impact of donepezil treatment for Alzheimer's disease on caregiver time

SUMMARY Objective: To assess the impact of donepezil treatment compared with placebo on caregiver time spent assisting patients with Alzheimers disease (AD). Research design and methods: Patient and caregiver data were collected as part of a 1-year, prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) questionnaire was used to record caregiver time at study baseline and at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52. This analysis focuses solely on those caregivers who were actively (> 0 h/day reported on the RUD) providing care at study baseline. Main outcome measures: The change in time relative to baseline that caregivers spent assisting patients over the course of the study. Results: The active caregiver population was composed of 96 caregivers of donepezil-treated patients and 94 caregivers of patients receiving placebo. Over the course of the 1-year study, and as the condition of the AD patients deteriorated, it was expected that caregiver time would increase. As expected, after 52 weeks, caregivers of placebo patients were providing almost 2 h each day (106.8 min) more care than they had done at study baseline. For those caregivers of donepezil-treated patients, although they were spending more time caring than they had done at study baseline, their time burden had only increased by 42.6 min more each day. This difference in caring time between the 2 groups, relative to baseline at Week 52, was 1.1 h (64.2 min) each day, and was significant ( p = 0.03). Conclusion: Caregiver time devoted to helping an AD patient typically increases with the severity of the disease. By helping the patient maintain his/her ability to perform activities of daily living for longer, treatment with donepezil is not only beneficial to the patient, but also has positive time-burden implications for the caregiver.

Effect of donepezil on emergence of apathy in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease

To determine whether donepezil treatment (10 mg/day over 24 weeks) is associated with delayed emergence of apathy in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimers disease (AD) and to explore relationships between donepezils effects on apathy and other Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)–measured behavioural symptoms.

Gastrointestinal tolerability of NSAIDs in elderly patients: a pooled analysis of 21 randomized clinical trials with celecoxib and nonselective NSAIDs

Abstract Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability is an important treatment consideration for physicians when choosing a nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) for their elderly arthritis patients. The objective of this study was to compare the GI tolerability of the cyclooxygenase-2 selective NSAID celecoxib and nonselective NSAIDs in elderly patients with arthritis aged 65 years or older. Methods: This was a retrospective, pooled analysis of patients aged 65 years or older with osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) from randomized, parallel-group trials. Selected trials had a duration of ≥2 weeks and at least one celecoxib 200–400 mg/day and one nonselective NSAID (naproxen, ibuprofen, or diclofenac) arm. Patient-level data from the safety populations of the trials were pooled. Analysis included the combined incidence of the GI intolerability adverse events (AEs) (abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, dyspepsia, flatulence, nausea) and incidence and time to trial discontinuation due to these intolerability AEs. Results: A total of 21 trials were selected involving 9461 elderly patients (mean age 71.9 years). Of these, 5872 received celecoxib, 1104 naproxen, 151 ibuprofen, and 2334 diclofenac. The combined incidence of GI intolerability AEs were reported by significantly fewer patients treated with celecoxib (16.7%) than naproxen (29.4%; p < 0.0001), ibuprofen (26.5%; p = 0.0016), or diclofenac (21.0%; p < 0.0001). The discontinuation rate due to GI intolerability AEs was significantly lower for celecoxib (4.0%) versus naproxen (8.1%; p < 0.0001) and ibuprofen (7.3%; p < 0.05), but not diclofenac (4.2%; p = 0.75). Conclusions: Among elderly arthritis patients, the incidence of GI intolerability AEs was lower with celecoxib than with naproxen, ibuprofen, or diclofenac. Fewer elderly patients discontinued due to GI intolerability AEs with celecoxib than with either naproxen or ibuprofen.

Effects of donepezil on activities of daily living: integrated analysis of patient data from studies in mild, moderate and severe Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND We aimed to develop a standardization method to pool data recorded on different activities of daily living (ADL) scales in order to reduce variability of functional outcome data from Alzheimers disease (AD) clinical trials and to better evaluate the effect of donepezil treatment on function in patients with AD. METHODS Based on pre-specified criteria, six studies were selected from among all donepezil clinical trials in AD. Individual items from nine ADL scales used in these trials were mapped to a standardized functional scale comprising 12 domains (six basic, six instrumental); scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale. External validation of this scale yielded a concordance rate of 90.8%. For each domain, mean change from baseline to 24 weeks in the placebo and donepezil groups was compared for the total population and for subgroups stratified by baseline disease severity. Study settings included outpatient, assisted living, and skilled nursing facilities. Participants comprised 2183 patients (donepezil, 1261; placebo; 922) with baseline Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) scores 5-26. RESULTS Significant treatment differences favoring donepezil were observed for five items (two instrumental and three basic). Patients with moderate AD at baseline (MMSE 10-17) demonstrated the greatest treatment effect. CONCLUSION Functional data were successfully pooled using standardizing methodology. A beneficial effect of donepezil treatment on function was demonstrated using this standardized functional scale. Similar analyses from studies with other anti-dementia drugs may help to determine the generalizability of these findings and potentially encourage use of functional assessment as a clinical tool.

Safety and tolerability of donepezil at doses up to 20 mg/day: results from a pilot study in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

AbstractBackground: Donepezil is licensed for the treatment of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD) at doses of 5–10 mg/day and has recently been approved in the US for severe AD. Multiple studies have suggested that donepezil 10 mg/day provides additional cognitive and functional benefits over the 5 mg/day dose. Higher doses of donepezil, if safe and well tolerated, might provide further benefits for patients with AD. Objective: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of donepezil at doses of 15 and 20 mg/day. Method: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot study conducted at two investigational sites in the US. Enrolled patients (male and female; aged 50–86 years) had a diagnosis of probable AD at the mild-to-moderate stage (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score 10–26). All patients had been treated with donepezil 10 mg/day for 12–30 months prior to enrolment. Patients (n = 31) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either a standard dose of donepezil (donepezil 10 mg/day plus placebo 5 mg/day for weeks 1–12; donepezil 10 mg/day plus placebo 10 mg/day for weeks 13–24) or a higher dose of donepezil (donepezil 15 mg/day for weeks 1–12; donepezil 20 mg/day for weeks 13–24). Primary outcome measures were tolerability (as determined by monitoring of discontinuations, dose modifications and adverse events) and safety (as determined by adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, clinical laboratory tests and ECGs). Psychometric measures (Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale [ADAS-cog], MMSE and Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Change with caregiver information [CIBIC+]) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters were secondary outcomes. Results: No patients withdrew from the study and there were no serious adverse events or deaths. By week 24, 15 of 16 patients in the higher-dose group tolerated the maximum 20 mg/day dose; one patient had a permanent dose reduction to donepezil 15 mg/day. In the standard-dose group, 14 of 15 patients tolerated donepezil 10 mg/day plus placebo 10 mg/day by the end of the study; one patient had a permanent dose reduction to donepezil 10 mg/day plus placebo 5 mg/day. Temporary dose reductions occurred in two patients (one from each group). Adverse events reported were as expected for donepezil and were all mild to moderate in intensity. Adverse events considered to be possibly or probably related to treatment were reported for three patients in the standard-dose group and six patients in the higher-dose group. One patient in the higher-dose group had weight loss reported as possibly or probably treatment related. Mean changes on ECGs were not clinically significant in either group, and the incidence of bradycardia was comparable. No treatment difference on any of the psychometric measures was observed between the groups. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed that an increased donepezil dose was associated with an increase in donepezil plasma concentrations from baseline. Conclusion: In this small pilot study of patients with mild-to-moderate AD already stabilized on donepezil 10 mg/day, doses of 15 and 20 mg/day of donepezil appeared safe and well tolerated. These results justify initiation of larger clinical trials designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of doses of donepezil higher than 10 mg/day in patients with AD.

Comparing the effects of tofacitinib, methotrexate and the combination, on bone marrow oedema, synovitis and bone erosion in methotrexate-naive, early active rheumatoid arthritis: results of an exploratory randomised MRI study incorporating semiquantitative and quantitative techniques

Objectives To explore the effects of tofacitinib—an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)—with or without methotrexate (MTX), on MRI endpoints in MTX-naive adult patients with early active RA and synovitis in an index wrist or hand. Methods In this exploratory, phase 2, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily + MTX, tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily + placebo (tofacitinib monotherapy), or MTX + placebo (MTX monotherapy), for 1 year. MRI endpoints (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials RA MRI score (RAMRIS), quantitative RAMRIS (RAMRIQ) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI) were assessed using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures. Treatment differences with p<0.05 (vs MTX monotherapy) were considered significant. Results In total, 109 patients were randomised and treated. Treatment differences in RAMRIS bone marrow oedema (BME) at month 6 were −1.55 (90% CI −2.52 to −0.58) for tofacitinib + MTX and −1.74 (−2.72 to −0.76) for tofacitinib monotherapy (both p<0.01 vs MTX monotherapy). Numerical improvements in RAMRIS synovitis at month 3 were −0.63 (−1.58 to 0.31) for tofacitinib + MTX and −0.52 (−1.46 to 0.41) for tofacitinib monotherapy (both p>0.05 vs MTX monotherapy). Treatment differences in RAMRIQ synovitis were statistically significant at month 3, consistent with DCE MRI findings. Less deterioration of RAMRIS and RAMRIQ erosive damage was seen at months 6 and 12 in both tofacitinib groups versus MTX monotherapy. Conclusions These results provide consistent evidence using three different MRI technologies that tofacitinib treatment leads to early reduction of inflammation and inhibits progression of structural damage. Trial registration number NCT01164579.