Rick Gurnsey

Texture segmentation along the horizontal meridian: Nonmonotonic changes in performance with eccentricity.

In 3 experiments, subjects were required to detect the presence of a small region of disparate texture embedded in a larger background at a range of eccentricities. Detection performance always peaked several degrees from fixation. Experiment 1 showed that the location of the peak was not retinally specific; scaling the display changed the location of the performance peak. Experiment 2 showed that poor foveal performance could not be explained by cross-frequency interference; filtering out high spatial frequencies did not lead to improved foveal performance. Experiment 3 showed that the effect is not unique to textures comprising left and right oblique line segments. A parsimonious account of these data is that, at the fovea, there is a mismatch between the scale of the texture and the scale of the mechanisms responsible for encoding texture differences. This mismatch diminishes as the textures are moved further into the periphery.

Bilateral symmetry embedded in noise is detected accurately only at fixation.

Bilateral or mirror symmetry is a ubiquitous feature of biological forms that the visual system could exploit for segmenting an object from a cluttered background. If this is so, the visual system may be prepared to detect symmetry at all retinal locations in parallel. Indeed, a biologically plausible model that responds optimally at axes of symmetry is quite easy to construct. Our data show, however, that if such a mechanism exists, it works with high efficiency only at the fovea. The detection of vertical bilateral symmetry embedded in random noise is very poor unless the axis of symmetry is very close to the point of fixation. This leads to the conclusion that symmetry does not play an important role in image segmentation and that it is important to the visual system only after it is fixated.

Parallel discrimination of subjective contours defined by offset gratings

Recent physiological studies (von der Heydt & Peterhans, 1989) suggest that the orientation of subjective contours is encoded very early in the visual system (V2 in monkey). This result is seemingly at odds with existing psychophysical data which suggest that the detection of subjective contours involves selective attention. It is argued that certain subjective contours are registered in a reflexive (bottom-up) manner by the visual system but that selective attention may be needed to gain access to this representation. To assess this suggestion, a visual-search task was used in which subjects were to detect the presence of a horizontal (vertical) subjective contour (defined by offset gratings) in a variable number of vertical (horizontal) subjective contours (also defined by offset gratings). When there were no competing organizations within the display, detection was indeed independent of the number of nontarget distractors, that is, selective attention was unnecessary. In a second experiment, we found that a curved form (a crescent defined by subjective contours) was easier to detect in a background of vertical bars (also defined by subjective contours) than vice versa, namely, a search asymmetry paralleling those found by Treisman and Gormican (1988). A final experiment showed that when the horizontal and vertical bars of the first experiment formed textured regions, they could be discriminated at very brief display durations (30–120 msec), However, when the line terminations aligned along the subjective contour were tapered rather than abrupt, discrimination dropped off with the degree of tapering. The latter result is consistent with the assumption that the registration of subjective contours in V2 involves the integration of responses from aligned, end-stopped cells found in VI (von der Heydt & Peterhans, 1989).

There is No Evidence That Kanizsa-Type Subjective Contours Can Be Detected in Parallel

Davis and Driver presented evidence suggesting that Kanizsa-type subjective contours could be detected in a visual search task in a time that is independent of the number of nonsubjective contour distractors. A linking connection was made between these psychophysical data and the physiological data of Peterhans and von der Heydt which showed that cells in primate area V2 respond to subjective contours in the same way that they respond to luminance-defined contours. Here in three experiments it is shown that there was sufficient information in the displays used by Davis and Driver to support parallel search independently of whether subjective contours were present or not. When confounding properties of the stimuli were eliminated search became slow whether or not subjective contours were present in the display. One of the slowest search conditions involved stimuli that were virtually identical to those used in the physiological studies of Peterhans and von der Heydt to which Davis and Driver wish to link their data. It is concluded that while subjective contours may be represented in the responses of very early visual mechanisms (eg in V2) access to these representations is impaired by high-contrast contours used to induce the subjective contours and nonsubjective figure distractors. This persistent control problem continues to confound attempts to show that Kanizsa-type subjective contours can be detected in parallel.

Second-order motions contribute to vection

First- and second-order motions differ in their ability to induce motion aftereffects (MAEs) and the kinetic depth effect (KDE). To test whether second-order stimuli support computations relating to motion-in-depth we examined the vection illusion (illusory self motion induced by image flow) using a vection stimulus (V, expanding concentric rings) that depicted a linear path through a circular tunnel. The set of vection stimuli contained differing amounts of first- and second-order motion energy (ME). Subjects reported the duration of the perceived MAEs and the duration of their vection percept. In Experiment 1 both MAEs and vection durations were longest when the first-order (Fourier) components of V were present in the stimulus. In Experiment 2, V was multiplicatively combined with static noise carriers having different check sizes. The amount of first-order ME associated with V increases with check size. MAEs were found to increase with check size but vection durations were unaffected. In general MAEs depend on the amount of first-order ME present in the signal. Vection, on the other hand, appears to depend on a representation of image flow that combines first- and second-order ME.

Increased sensitivity to mirror symmetry in autism.

Can autistic people see the forest for the trees? Ongoing uncertainty about the integrity and role of global processing in autism gives special importance to the question of how autistic individuals group local stimulus attributes into meaningful spatial patterns. We investigated visual grouping in autism by measuring sensitivity to mirror symmetry, a highly-salient perceptual image attribute preceding object recognition. Autistic and non-autistic individuals were asked to detect mirror symmetry oriented along vertical, oblique, and horizontal axes. Both groups performed best when the axis was vertical, but across all randomly-presented axis orientations, autistics were significantly more sensitive to symmetry than non-autistics. We suggest that under some circumstances, autistic individuals can take advantage of parallel access to local and global information. In other words, autistics may sometimes see the forest and the trees, and may therefore extract from noisy environments genuine regularities which elude non-autistic observers.

Stimulus magnification equates identification and discrimination of biological motion across the visual field

There is conflicting evidence about whether stimulus magnification is sufficient to equate the discriminability of point-light walkers across the visual field. We measured the accuracy with which observers could report the directions of point-light walkers moving +/-4 degrees from the line of sight, and the accuracy with which they could identify five different point-light walkers. In both cases accuracy was measured over a sevenfold range of sizes at eccentricities from 0 degrees to 16 degrees in the right visual field. In most cases observers (N=6) achieved 100% accuracy at the largest stimulus sizes (20 degrees height) at all eccentricities. In both tasks the psychometric functions at each eccentricity were shifted versions of each other on a log-size axis. Therefore, by dividing stimulus size at each eccentricity (E) by an appropriate F=1+E/E(2) (where E(2) represents the eccentricity at which stimulus size must double to achieve equivalent-to-foveal performance) all data could be fit with a single function. The average E(2) value was .91 (SEM=.19, N=6) in the walker-direction discrimination task and 1.34 (SEM=.21, N=6) in the walker identification task. We conclude that size scaling is sufficient to equate discrimination and identification of point-light walkers across the visual field.

Last but Not Least

Pinna and Brelstaff (2000) presented the fascinating motion illusion shown in figure 1. By fixating the centre of the image and moving the page toward the eyes, one experiences a compelling counter-rotation of the two rings of boxes (micropatterns) composing the display. (For many people the illusion is most vivid if the display remains stationary and the head is moved toward the page.) The experience induced by the inner ring is somewhat like that of looking at a Ferris wheel whose movement is linked to your movement. The Ferris wheel is stationary when you are stationary and rotates counterclockwise when you approach it. Consider a chair directly to the right of the centre of the hypothetical Ferris wheel. As you move toward the wheel, the retinal image of the chair will move in an up-to-the-right direction from its initial position. This local path represents a combination of the centrifugal flow caused by approaching the wheel and the counterclockwise rotation of the wheel itself. Unlike the chair on the Ferris wheel, however, the micropattern directly to the right of centre in the Pinna ^Brelstaff figure does not trace out an up-to-the-right path on the retina; as the distance from eye to the image decreases, the image expands on the retina and each micropattern moves along a straight-line path that connects it with the centre of the display. So, why does the illusory motion occur?

Symmetry detection across the visual field

Humans are extremely sensitive to symmetry when it is foveated but sensitivity drops as a symmetrical region of a fixed size is moved into the periphery. A psychophysical study was undertaken to determine if eccentricity dependent sensitivity loss could be overcome by magnifying stimuli at each eccentricity (E) by a factor F = 1 + E/E2, where E2 indicates the eccentricity at which the size of a stimulus must be doubled, relative to a foveal standard, to achieve equivalent performance. The psychophysical task required subjects to decide on each trial in which of two intervals a symmetrical stimulus had been presented. Stimuli were presented at a range of sizes and eccentricities (0 to 8 degrees) and the probability of a correct discrimination was computed for each condition. In Experiment 1, thresholds were measured with stimuli set to maximum available contrast and, in Experiment 2, stimuli were presented at a constant multiple of contrast detection threshold. In both experiments, a single scaling function removed most of the eccentricity dependent variation from the data. However, the E2 value recovered for one subject tested in both experiments was larger by about 65% when stimuli were not equated for visibility. We conclude that symmetry detection can be equated across a range of eccentricities by scaling stimuli with an E2 in the range of 0.88 to 1.38 degrees. Failure to equate for visibility across all viewing conditions may result in an inflated estimate of E2.

Detection of symmetry and anti-symmetry.

To assess the role of second-order channels in symmetry perception we measured the effects of check size, spatial frequency content, eccentricity and grey scale range on the detection of symmetrical and anti-symmetrical patterns. Thresholds for symmetrical stimuli were only moderately affected by these manipulations. Anti-symmetrical stimuli composed of large black and white checks elicited low thresholds. However, anti-symmetry became essentially undetectable at small check sizes. Removing low frequencies from large-check-size, anti-symmetrical stimuli had little effect on thresholds whereas removing high frequencies had a pronounced effect. Moving the stimuli from fixation to 8 degrees eccentricity caused a dramatic increase in thresholds for anti-symmetrical stimuli but not symmetrical stimuli. When the grey scale range was increased anti-symmetry was undetectable at any check size whereas symmetry was easily seen at all. We argue that these results and others in the literature suggest that anti-symmetry is only detected under conditions favourable to selective attention.