Riikka Lund

Genome-wide Profiling of Interleukin-4 and STAT6 Transcription Factor Regulation of Human Th2 Cell Programming

Dissecting the molecular mechanisms by which T helper (Th) cells differentiate to effector Th2 cells is important for understanding the pathogenesis of immune-mediated diseases, such as asthma and allergy. Because the STAT6 transcription factor is an upstream mediator required for interleukin-4 (IL-4)-induced Th2 cell differentiation, its targets include genes important for this process. Using primary human CD4(+) T cells, and by blocking STAT6 with RNAi, we identified a number of direct and indirect targets of STAT6 with ChIP sequencing. The integration of these data sets with detailed kinetics of IL-4-driven transcriptional changes showed that STAT6 was predominantly needed for the activation of transcription leading to the Th2 cell phenotype. This integrated genome-wide data on IL-4- and STAT6-mediated transcription provide a unique resource for studies on Th cell differentiation and, in particular, for designing interventions of human Th2 cell responses.

Identification of Novel IL-4/Stat6-Regulated Genes in T Lymphocytes

IL-4, primarily produced by T cells, mast cells, and basophiles, is a cytokine which has pleiotropic effects on the immune system. IL-4 induces T cells to differentiate to Th2 cells and activated B lymphocytes to proliferate and to synthesize IgE and IgG1. IL-4 is particularly important for the development and perpetuation of asthma and allergy. Stat6 is the protein activated by signal transduction through the IL-4R, and studies with knockout mice demonstrate that Stat6 is critical for a number of IL-4-mediated functions including Th2 development and production of IgE. In the present study, novel IL-4- and Stat6-regulated genes were discovered by using Stat6−/− mice and Affymetrix oligonucleotide arrays. Genes regulated by IL-4 were identified by comparing the gene expression profile of the wild-type T cells induced to polarize to the Th2 direction (CD3/CD28 activation + IL-4) to gene expression profile of the cells induced to proliferate (CD3/CD28 activation alone). Stat6-regulated genes were identified by comparing the cells isolated from the wild-type and Stat6−/− mice; in this experiment the cells were induced to differentiate to the Th2 direction (CD3/CD28 activation + IL-4). Our study demonstrates that a number a novel genes are regulated by IL-4 through Stat6-dependent and -independent pathways. Moreover, elucidation of kinetics of gene expression at early stages of cell differentiation reveals several genes regulated rapidly during the process, suggesting their importance for the differentiation process.

Early Target Genes of IL-12 and STAT4 Signaling in Th Cells

IL-12 signaling through STAT4 is essential for induction of optimal levels of IFN-γ production and commitment of Th1 cells. The molecular mechanism that controls how IL-12 and STAT4 signaling induces Th1 differentiation is poorly described. To identify the early target genes of IL-12 and STAT4 signaling, oligonucleotide arrays were used to compare the gene expression profiles of wild-type and STAT4-knockout murine Th cells during the early Th1 differentiation. According to the results, 20 genes were regulated in an IL-12- and STAT4-dependent manner. Importantly, Ifnγ was clearly the first gene induced by IL-12 in a STAT4-dependent manner. Most of the other defects in gene expression in STAT4-knockout cells were seen after 48 h of Th1 polarization. In addition to IL-12 signaling mediated by STAT4, STAT4-independent induction of a number of genes was observed immediately in response to Th1 induction. This induction was at least in part driven by IFN-γ independently of STAT4. Importantly, addition of exogenous IFN-γ into Th1 cell cultures of STAT4-knockout cells restored the defect in IFN-γ production further demonstrating the critical role of IFN-γ in early Th1 differentiation.

Expression of human pim family genes is selectively up-regulated by cytokines promoting T helper type 1, but not T helper type 2, cell differentiation

Cytokines are the most important inducers of T helper (Th) cell differentiation. Interleukin‐12 (IL‐12) and interferon‐α (IFN‐α) are responsible for human Th1‐cell differentiation, while IL‐4 is the critical cytokine promoting Th2‐cell development. These two subsets of cells co‐ordinate immunological responses to pathogens as well as autoimmune or allergic reactions. The pim family of proto‐oncogenes encodes serine/threonine‐specific kinases involved in cytokine‐mediated signalling pathways in haematopoietic cells. Here we demonstrate that expression of pim‐1 and pim‐2 mRNAs is selectively up‐ or down‐regulated in human cord‐blood‐derived CD4+ cells freshly induced to polarize towards Th1 or Th2 cells, respectively, whereas their expression is inhibited in both cell types by the immunosuppressive transforming growth factor β (TGF‐β). Moreover, the Th1‐specific cytokines IL‐12 and IFN‐α, but not the Th2‐specific cytokine IL‐4, transiently up‐regulate pim‐1 and pim‐2 mRNA expression in human peripheral blood T cells and natural killer cells. In addition, the Pim‐1 protein levels are strongly up‐regulated by Th1‐specific cytokines in all of these cell types. Taken together, our results suggest that pim genes and their protein products are involved in the early differentiation process of T helper cells.

Identification of Novel Genes Regulated by IL-12, IL-4, or TGF-β during the Early Polarization of CD4+ Lymphocytes

Th1 and Th2 cells arise from a common precursor cell in response to triggering through the TCR and cytokine receptors for IL-12 or IL-4. This leads to activation of complex signaling pathways, which are not known in detail. Disturbances in the balance between type 1 and type 2 responses can lead to certain immune-mediated diseases. Thus, it is important to understand how Th1 and Th2 cells are generated. To clarify the mechanisms as to how IL-12 and IL-4 induce Th1 and Th2 differentiation and how TGF-β can inhibit this process, we have used oligonucleotide arrays to examine the early polarization of Th1 and Th2 cells in the presence and absence of TGF-β. In addition to genes previously implicated in the process, we have identified 20 genes with various known and unknown functions not previously associated with Th1/2 polarization. We have also further determined which genes are targets of IL-12, IL-4, and TGF-β regulation in the cells induced to polarize to Th1 and Th2 directions. Interestingly, a subset of the genes was coregulated by IL-12 or IL-4 and TGF-β. Among these genes are candidates that may modulate the balance between Th1 and Th2 responses.

Gut Microbiota as an Epigenetic Regulator: Pilot Study Based on Whole-Genome Methylation Analysis

ABSTRACT The core human gut microbiota contributes to the developmental origin of diseases by modifying metabolic pathways. To evaluate the predominant microbiota as an epigenetic modifier, we classified 8 pregnant women into two groups based on their dominant microbiota, i.e., Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria. Deep sequencing of DNA methylomes revealed a clear association between bacterial predominance and epigenetic profiles. The genes with differentially methylated promoters in the group in which Firmicutes was dominant were linked to risk of disease, predominantly to cardiovascular disease and specifically to lipid metabolism, obesity, and the inflammatory response. This is one of the first studies that highlights the association of the predominant bacterial phyla in the gut with methylation patterns. Further longitudinal and in-depth studies targeting individual microbial species or metabolites are recommended to give us a deeper insight into the molecular mechanism of such epigenetic modifications. IMPORTANCE Epigenetics encompasses genomic modifications that are due to environmental factors and do not affect the nucleotide sequence. The gut microbiota has an important role in human metabolism and could be a significant environmental factor affecting our epigenome. To investigate the association of gut microbiota with epigenetic changes, we assessed pregnant women and selected the participants based on their predominant gut microbiota for a study on their postpartum methylation profile. Intriguingly, we found that blood DNA methylation patterns were associated with gut microbiota profiles. The gut microbiota profiles, with either Firmicutes or Bacteroidetes as a dominant group, correlated with differential methylation status of gene promoters functionally associated with cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, differential methylation of gene promoters linked to lipid metabolism and obesity was observed. For the first time, we report here a position of the predominant gut microbiota in epigenetic profiling, suggesting one potential mechanism in obesity with comorbidities, if proven in further in-depth studies. Epigenetics encompasses genomic modifications that are due to environmental factors and do not affect the nucleotide sequence. The gut microbiota has an important role in human metabolism and could be a significant environmental factor affecting our epigenome. To investigate the association of gut microbiota with epigenetic changes, we assessed pregnant women and selected the participants based on their predominant gut microbiota for a study on their postpartum methylation profile. Intriguingly, we found that blood DNA methylation patterns were associated with gut microbiota profiles. The gut microbiota profiles, with either Firmicutes or Bacteroidetes as a dominant group, correlated with differential methylation status of gene promoters functionally associated with cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, differential methylation of gene promoters linked to lipid metabolism and obesity was observed. For the first time, we report here a position of the predominant gut microbiota in epigenetic profiling, suggesting one potential mechanism in obesity with comorbidities, if proven in further in-depth studies.

Identification of genes involved in the initiation of human Th1 or Th2 cell commitment

The differentiation of naïve T helper (Th) cells is induced by TCR activation and IL‐12/STAT4 or IL‐4/STAT6 signaling pathways, forming Th1 and Th2 cells, respectively. In this study, oligonucleotide arrays were used to identify genes regulated during the initiation of human Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation at 2 and 6 h in presence or absence of immunosuppressive TGF‐β. As a result the immediate targets of IL‐12, IL‐4 and TGF‐β were identified. The effects of IL‐12 at this early stage were minimal and consistent with the known kinetics of IL‐12Rβ2 expression. IL‐4, however, was observed to rapidly regulate 63 genes, 26 of which were differentially expressed at both the 2‐ and 6‐h time points. Of these IL‐4 regulated genes, one‐third have previously been observed to display expression changes in the later phases of the polarization process. Similarly to the key regulators, TBX21 and GATA3, the transcription factors SATB1, TCF7 and BCL6 were differentially regulated at the protein level during early Th1 and Th2 cell polarization. Moreover, the developing Th1 and Th2 cells were demonstrated to be responsive to the immunosuppressive TGF‐β and IL‐10. In this study, a panel of novel factors that may be important regulators of the differentiation process was identified.

Genome-Wide Identification of Novel Genes Involved in Early Th1 and Th2 Cell Differentiation

Th cell subtypes, Th1 and Th2, are involved in the pathogenesis or progression of many immune-mediated diseases, such as type 1 diabetes and asthma, respectively. Defining the molecular networks and factors that direct Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation will help to understand the pathogenic mechanisms causing these diseases. Some of the key factors regulating this differentiation have been identified, however, they alone do not explain the process in detail. To identify novel factors directing the early differentiation, we have studied the transcriptomes of human Th1 and Th2 cells after 2, 6, and 48 h of polarization at the genome scale. Based on our current and previous studies, 288 genes or expressed sequence tags, representing ∼1–1.5% of the human genome, are regulated in the process during the first 2 days. These transcriptional profiles revealed genes coding for components of certain pathways, such as RAS oncogene family and G protein-coupled receptor signaling, to be differentially regulated during the early Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation. Importantly, numerous novel genes with unknown functions were identified. By using short-hairpin RNA knockdown, we show that a subset of these genes is regulated by IL-4 through STAT6 signaling. Furthermore, we demonstrate that one of the IL-4 regulated genes, NDFIP2, promotes IFN-γ production by the polarized human Th1 lymphocytes. Among the novel genes identified, there may be many factors that play a crucial role in the regulation of the differentiation process together with the previously known factors and are potential targets for developing therapeutics to modulate Th1 and Th2 responses.

Global Chromatin State Analysis Reveals Lineage-Specific Enhancers during the Initiation of Human T helper 1 and T helper 2 Cell Polarization

Naive CD4⁺ T cells can differentiate into specific helper and regulatory T cell lineages in order to combat infection and disease. The correct response to cytokines and a controlled balance of these populations is critical for the immune system and the avoidance of autoimmune disorders. To investigate how early cell-fate commitment is regulated, we generated the first human genome-wide maps of histone modifications that reveal enhancer elements after 72 hr of in vitro polarization toward T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2) cell lineages. Our analysis indicated that even at this very early time point, cell-specific gene regulation and enhancers were at work directing lineage commitment. Further examination of lineage-specific enhancers identified transcription factors (TFs) with known and unknown T cell roles as putative drivers of lineage-specific gene expression. Lastly, an integrative analysis of immunopathogenic-associated SNPs suggests a role for distal regulatory elements in disease etiology.

Expression profiles of long non-coding RNAs located in autoimmune disease-associated regions reveal immune cell-type specificity

BackgroundAlthough genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified hundreds of variants associated with a risk for autoimmune and immune-related disorders (AID), our understanding of the disease mechanisms is still limited. In particular, more than 90% of the risk variants lie in non-coding regions, and almost 10% of these map to long non-coding RNA transcripts (lncRNAs). lncRNAs are known to show more cell-type specificity than protein-coding genes.MethodsWe aimed to characterize lncRNAs and protein-coding genes located in loci associated with nine AIDs which have been well-defined by Immunochip analysis and by transcriptome analysis across seven populations of peripheral blood leukocytes (granulocytes, monocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, B cells, memory T cells, naive CD4+ and naive CD8+ T cells) and four populations of cord blood-derived T-helper cells (precursor, primary, and polarized (Th1, Th2) T-helper cells).ResultsWe show that lncRNAs mapping to loci shared between AID are significantly enriched in immune cell types compared to lncRNAs from the whole genome (α <0.005). We were not able to prioritize single cell types relevant for specific diseases, but we observed five different cell types enriched (α <0.005) in five AID (NK cells for inflammatory bowel disease, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, primary biliary cirrhosis, and psoriasis; memory T and CD8+ T cells in juvenile idiopathic arthritis, primary biliary cirrhosis, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis; Th0 and Th2 cells for inflammatory bowel disease, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, primary biliary cirrhosis, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis). Furthermore, we show that co-expression analyses of lncRNAs and protein-coding genes can predict the signaling pathways in which these AID-associated lncRNAs are involved.ConclusionsThe observed enrichment of lncRNA transcripts in AID loci implies lncRNAs play an important role in AID etiology and suggests that lncRNA genes should be studied in more detail to interpret GWAS findings correctly. The co-expression results strongly support a model in which the lncRNA and protein-coding genes function together in the same pathways.