Rik Loijmans
University of Amsterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rik Loijmans.
Primary Care Respiratory Journal | 2013
Persijn J. Honkoop; Rik Loijmans; Evelien H. Termeer; Jiska B. Snoeck-Stroband; Gerben ter Riet; Tjard Schermer; Jacob K. Sont
Background: Online self-management programmes for asthma have recently become available. International guidelines suggest that the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) can be used in these programmes. In order to assess the current level of control and guide therapy, the same cut-off values are being used as in conventional asthma management. However, results might differ between different types of administration of the ACQ. Aims: To assess the agreement between an online self-administered version of the ACQ and an interviewer-administered version at a routine visit. Methods: Cross-sectional data from primary care asthma patients in the Asthma Control Cost Utility Randomized Trial Evaluation (ACCURATE) trial aged 18–50 years and prescribed inhaled steroids were analysed. We selected patients who self-administered an ACQ online and subsequently had an ACQ completed by a nurse practitioner within 7 days at a trial-related control visit. ACQ scores were calculated and agreement assessed by paired t-tests, Pearsons correlation coefficient and a Bland-Altman plot. Results: A total of 351 patients were eligible (68% female, mean age 40 years). The time interval between the two versions was 3.2 days. There was a significant difference of 0.14 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.20; p<0.001) between the results of the online self-administered ACQ (mean 1.04±0.04) and the interviewer-administered ACQ results (0.90±0.04). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.79. The limits of agreement (−0.86, 1.14) exceeded the predefined minimal clinically important difference between results (±0.5). The Bland-Altman plot therefore showed insufficient agreement. Conclusions: Assessment of asthma control by the ACQ is influenced by the type of administration. Our results suggest that better control of asthma is perceived when interacting with a caregiver than by online self-assessment.
European Respiratory Journal | 2013
Persijn J. Honkoop; Rik Loijmans; Evelien H. Termeer; Jiska B. Snoeck-Stroband; Pim Assendelft; Peter J. Sterk; Gerben ter Riet; Tjard Schermer; Jacob K. Sont
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine | 2017
Rishi Khusial; Jacob K. Sont; Rik Loijmans; Jiska B. Snoeck-Stroband; Pim Assendelft; Tjard Schermer; Persijn J. Honkoop
European Respiratory Journal | 2017
Persijn Honkoop; Suzanne Boer; Rik Loijmans; Tjard Schermer; J. B. Snoeck-Stroband; J.K. Sont
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice | 2018
Suzanne Boer; J.K. Sont; Rik Loijmans; Jiska B. Snoeck-Stroband; Gerben ter Riet; Tjard Schermer; Willem J. J. Assendelft; Persijn J. Honkoop
European Respiratory Journal | 2017
Rishi Khusial; Jacob K. Sont; Rik Loijmans; Tjard Schermer; Persijn J. Honkoop; Jiska B. Snoeck-Stroband
/data/revues/00916749/unassign/S0091674914009713/ | 2014
Persijn J. Honkoop; Rik Loijmans; Evelien H. Termeer; Jiska B. Snoeck-Stroband; Wilbert B. van den Hout; Moira J. Bakker; Willem J. J. Assendelft; Gerben ter Riet; Peter J. Sterk; Tjard Schermer; Jacob K. Sont
american thoracic society international conference | 2011
Rik Loijmans; Gerben ter Riet; Leo Beem; Patricia van Velzen; Peter J. Sterk
american thoracic society international conference | 2011
Patricia van Velzen; Marijke Amelink; Rik Loijmans; Jan Prins; Peter J. Sterk
European Respiratory Journal | 2011
P. van Velzen; Rik Loijmans; Marijke Amelink; M. Stommel; G ter Riet; Peter J. Sterk