Rinat F. Salikov

Synthesis and cytotoxic properties of tryptamine derivatives

The cyclopropyliminium and subsequent Grandberg rearrangements of cyclopropylketone hydrozones lead to the formation of tryptamines, which were additionally substituted at either the aromatic ring atoms or the amino group. The products were tested for their cytotoxic properties against HepG2, Jurkat and HEK293 cell lines using MTT assay. The highest activity as well as the highest selectivity was found amongst the compounds derived with one benzyl substituent at the amino group. The flow cytometry technique revealed cell-type specificity in terms of the mechanism of viability inhibition. Thus, the compounds were found to induce mainly apoptosis in HEK293 and HepG2 cells, while Jurkat cells displayed late apoptotic and necrotic responses. The apoptosis pathway is most likely to include mitochondrial damage.

Synthesis of Branched Tryptamines via the Domino Cloke–Stevens/Grandberg Rearrangement

The rearrangement of cyclopropylketone arylhydrazones generated in situ from arylhydrazine hydrochlorides and ketones leads to formation of tryptamine derivatives. The use of (2-arylcyclopropyl)ethanones in the reactions with model 4-bromophenylhydrazine hydrochloride gives branched tryptamines with aryl groups in the α-position to the amino group, while (2-methylcyclopropyl)ethanone gives a mixture of α- and β-substituted products in a ratio of 1:3. The method was found effective in the synthesis of enantiomerically pure tryptamine. Thus, (R,R)-(2-phenylcyclopropyl)ethanone gives the (S)-α-phenyltryptamine derivative with an enantiomeric excess over 99%.

Branching tryptamines as a tool to tune their antiproliferative activity

The influence of a series of tryptamine derivatives on the viability of normal (HEK293) and tumor (HepG2, Jurkat and SH-SY5Y) cells has been evaluated. All tryptamines tested were three different substitution types: C- and N-branching, and indole benzylation. All the derivations enhance the activity of compounds separately, although the effects of different substitutions were not additive. Thus, combinations of C- and N-branchings as well as C-branching and indole benzylation gave little or no increase in activity.