Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rita E. Weathers is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rita E. Weathers.


Radiation Research | 2010

Risk of Second Primary Thyroid Cancer after Radiotherapy for a Childhood Cancer in a Large Cohort Study: An Update from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Parveen Bhatti; Lene H. S. Veiga; Cécile M. Ronckers; Alice J. Sigurdson; Marilyn Stovall; Susan A. Smith; Rita E. Weathers; Wendy Leisenring; Ann C. Mertens; Sue Hammond; Debra L. Friedman; Joseph P. Neglia; Anna T. Meadows; Sarah S. Donaldson; Charles A. Sklar; Leslie L. Robison; Peter D. Inskip

Abstract Previous studies have indicated that thyroid cancer risk after a first childhood malignancy is curvilinear with radiation dose, increasing at low to moderate doses and decreasing at high doses. Understanding factors that modify the radiation dose response over the entire therapeutic dose range is challenging and requires large numbers of subjects. We quantified the long-term risk of thyroid cancer associated with radiation treatment among 12,547 5-year survivors of a childhood cancer (leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, central nervous system cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, kidney cancer, bone cancer, neuroblastoma) diagnosed between 1970 and 1986 in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study using the most current cohort follow-up to 2005. There were 119 subsequent pathologically confirmed thyroid cancer cases, and individual radiation doses to the thyroid gland were estimated for the entire cohort. This cohort study builds on the previous case-control study in this population (69 thyroid cancer cases with follow-up to 2000) by allowing the evaluation of both relative and absolute risks. Poisson regression analyses were used to calculate standardized incidence ratios (SIR), excess relative risks (ERR) and excess absolute risks (EAR) of thyroid cancer associated with radiation dose. Other factors such as sex, type of first cancer, attained age, age at exposure to radiation, time since exposure to radiation, and chemotherapy (yes/no) were assessed for their effect on the linear and exponential quadratic terms describing the dose–response relationship. Similar to the previous analysis, thyroid cancer risk increased linearly with radiation dose up to approximately 20 Gy, where the relative risk peaked at 14.6-fold (95% CI, 6.8–31.5). At thyroid radiation doses >20 Gy, a downturn in the dose–response relationship was observed. The ERR model that best fit the data was linear-exponential quadratic. We found that age at exposure modified the ERR linear dose term (higher radiation risk with younger age) (P < 0.001) and that sex (higher radiation risk among females) (P  =  0.008) and time since exposure (higher radiation risk with longer time) (P < 0.001) modified the EAR linear dose term. None of these factors modified the exponential quadratic (high dose) term. Sex, age at exposure and time since exposure were found to be significant modifiers of the radiation-related risk of thyroid cancer and as such are important factors to account for in clinical follow-up and thyroid cancer risk estimation among childhood cancer survivors.


Radiation Research | 2006

Dose Reconstruction for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Radiation Exposures: Use in Epidemiological Studies

Marilyn Stovall; Rita E. Weathers; Catherine E. Kasper; Susan A. Smith; Lois B. Travis; Elaine Ron; Ruth A. Kleinerman

Abstract Stovall, M., Weathers, R., Kasper, C., Smith, S. A., Travis, L., Ron, E. and Kleinerman, R. Dose Reconstruction for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Radiation Exposures: Use in Epidemiological Studies. Radiat. Res. 166, 141–157 (2006). This paper describes methods developed specifically for reconstructing individual organ- and tissue-absorbed dose of radiation from past exposures from medical treatments and procedures for use in epidemiological studies. These methods have evolved over the past three decades and have been applied to a variety of medical exposures including external-beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy for malignant and benign diseases as well as diagnostic examinations. The methods used for estimating absorbed dose to organs in and outside the defined treatment volume generally require archival data collection, abstraction and review, and phantom measurements to simulate past exposure conditions. Three techniques are used to estimate doses from radiation therapy: (1) calculation in three-dimensional mathematical computer models using an extensive database of out-of-beam doses measured in tissue-equivalent materials, (2) measurement in anthropomorphic phantoms constructed of tissue-equivalent material, and (3) calculation using a three-dimensional treatment-planning computer. For diagnostic exposures, doses are estimated from published data and software based on Monte Carlo techniques. We describe and compare these methods of dose estimation and discuss uncertainties in estimated organ doses and potential for future improvement. Seven epidemiological studies are discussed to illustrate the methods.


Lancet Oncology | 2013

Infertility, infertility treatment, and achievement of pregnancy in female survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort

Sara E. Barton; Julie Najita; Elizabeth S. Ginsburg; Wendy Leisenring; Marilyn Stovall; Rita E. Weathers; Charles A. Sklar; Leslie L. Robison; Lisa Diller

BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown decreased pregnancy rates and early menopause in female cancer survivors; however, infertility rates and reproductive interventions have not been studied. We investigated infertility and time to pregnancy in female childhood cancer survivors, and analysed treatment characteristics associated with infertility and subsequent pregnancy. METHODS The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) is a cohort study including 5 year cancer survivors from 26 Canadian and US institutions who were younger than 21 years at the time of diagnosis between Jan 1, 1970, and Dec 31, 1986, and a sibling control group. We included women aged 18-39 years who had ever been sexually active. We gathered demographic, medical, and reproductive data via a baseline questionnaire, and quantified exposure to alkylating agents and radiation therapy. Self-reported infertility, medical treatment for infertility, time to first pregnancy in survivors and siblings, and the risk of infertility in survivors by demographic, disease, and treatment variables were analysed. FINDINGS 3531 survivors and 1366 female sibling controls who enrolled between Nov 3, 1992, and April 4, 2004, were included. Compared with their siblings, survivors had an increased risk (relative risk [RR] 1·48 [95% CI 1·23-1·78]; p<0·0001) of clinical infertility (ie, >1 year of attempts at conception without success), which was most pronounced at early reproductive ages (RR 2·92 [95% CI 1·18-7·20], p=0·020, in participants ≤24 years; 1·61 [1·05-2·48], p=0·029, in those aged 25-29 years; and 1·37 [1·11-1·69], p=0·0035, in those aged 30-40 years). Despite being equally likely to seek treatment for infertility, survivors were less likely than were their siblings to be prescribed drugs for treatment of infertility (0·57 [95% CI 0·46-0·70], p<0·0001). Increasing doses of uterine radiation and alkylating agent chemotherapy were strongly associated with infertility. Although survivors had an increased time to pregnancy compared with their siblings (p=0·032), 292 (64%) of 455 participants with self-reported clinical infertility achieved a pregnancy. INTERPRETATION A more comprehensive understanding of infertility after cancer is crucial for counselling and decision making about future conception attempts and fertility preservation. FUNDING National Cancer Institute, American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, Swim Across America.


The Lancet | 2010

Stillbirth and neonatal death in relation to radiation exposure before conception: a retrospective cohort study

Lisa B. Signorello; John J. Mulvihill; Daniel M. Green; Heather M. Munro; Marilyn Stovall; Rita E. Weathers; Ann C. Mertens; John Whitton; Leslie L. Robison; John D. Boice

BACKGROUND The reproductive implications of mutagenic treatments given to children with cancer are not clear. By studying the risk of untoward pregnancy outcomes, we indirectly assessed the risk of transmission of germline damage to the offspring of survivors of childhood cancer who were given radiotherapy and chemotherapy. METHODS We did a retrospective cohort analysis, within the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS), of the risk of stillbirth and neonatal death among the offspring of men and women who had survived childhood cancer. Patients in CCSS were younger than 21 years at initial diagnosis of an eligible cancer, were treated at 25 US institutions and one Canadian institution, and had survived for at least 5 years after diagnosis. We quantified the chemotherapy given to patients, and the preconception radiation doses to the testes, ovaries, uterus, and pituitary gland, and related these to the risk of stillbirth or neonatal death using Poisson regression analysis. FINDINGS Among 1148 men and 1657 women who had survived childhood cancer, there were 4946 pregnancies. Irradiation of the testes (16 [1%] of 1270; adjusted relative risk 0.8 [95% CI 0.4-1.6]; mean dose 0.53 Gy [SD 1.40]) and pituitary gland (17 [3%] of 510, 1.1 [0.5-2.4] for more than 20.00 Gy; mean dose 10.20 Gy [13.0] for women), and chemotherapy with alkylating drugs (26 [2%] of 1195 women, 0.9 [0.5-1.5]; ten [1%] of 732 men, 1.2 [0.5-2.5]) were not associated with an increased risk of stillbirth or neonatal death. Uterine and ovarian irradiation significantly increased risk of stillbirth and neonatal death at doses greater than 10.00 Gy (five [18%] of 28, 9.1 [3.4-24.6]). For girls treated before menarche, irradiation of the uterus and ovaries at doses as low as 1.00-2.49 Gy significantly increased the risk of stillbirth or neonatal death (three [4%] of 69, 4.7 [1.2-19.0]). INTERPRETATION Our findings do not support concern about heritable genetic changes affecting the risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in the offspring of men exposed to gonadal irradiation. However, uterine and ovarian irradiation had serious adverse effects on the offspring that were probably related to uterine damage. Careful management is warranted of pregnancies in women given high doses of pelvic irradiation before puberty. FUNDING Westlakes Research Institute, National Cancer Institute, and Childrens Cancer Research Fund.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015

Individual Prediction of Heart Failure Among Childhood Cancer Survivors

Eric J. Chow; Yan Chen; Leontien Kremer; Norman E. Breslow; Melissa M. Hudson; Gregory T. Armstrong; William L. Border; Elizabeth A.M. Feijen; Daniel M. Green; Lillian R. Meacham; Kathleen Meeske; Daniel A. Mulrooney; Kirsten K. Ness; Kevin C. Oeffinger; Charles A. Sklar; Marilyn Stovall; Helena J. van der Pal; Rita E. Weathers; Leslie L. Robison; Yutaka Yasui

PURPOSE To create clinically useful models that incorporate readily available demographic and cancer treatment characteristics to predict individual risk of heart failure among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) free of significant cardiovascular disease 5 years after cancer diagnosis (n = 13,060) were observed through age 40 years for the development of heart failure (ie, requiring medications or heart transplantation or leading to death). Siblings (n = 4,023) established the baseline population risk. An additional 3,421 survivors from Emma Childrens Hospital (Amsterdam, the Netherlands), the National Wilms Tumor Study, and the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study were used to validate the CCSS prediction models. RESULTS Heart failure occurred in 285 CCSS participants. Risk scores based on selected exposures (sex, age at cancer diagnosis, and anthracycline and chest radiotherapy doses) achieved an area under the curve of 0.74 and concordance statistic of 0.76 at or through age 40 years. Validation cohort estimates ranged from 0.68 to 0.82. Risk scores were collapsed to form statistically distinct low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, corresponding to cumulative incidences of heart failure at age 40 years of 0.5% (95% CI, 0.2% to 0.8%), 2.4% (95% CI, 1.8% to 3.0%), and 11.7% (95% CI, 8.8% to 14.5%), respectively. In comparison, siblings had a cumulative incidence of 0.3% (95% CI, 0.1% to 0.5%). CONCLUSION Using information available to clinicians soon after completion of childhood cancer therapy, individual risk for subsequent heart failure can be predicted with reasonable accuracy and discrimination. These validated models provide a framework on which to base future screening strategies and interventions.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2012

Congenital Anomalies in the Children of Cancer Survivors: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Lisa B. Signorello; John J. Mulvihill; Daniel M. Green; Heather M. Munro; Marilyn Stovall; Rita E. Weathers; Ann C. Mertens; John Whitton; Leslie L. Robison; John D. Boice

PURPOSE Children with cancer receive mutagenic treatments, which raises concern about the potential transmissibility of germline damage to their offspring. This question has been inadequately studied to date because of a lack of detailed individual treatment exposure assessment such as gonadal radiation doses. METHODS Within the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of validated cases of congenital anomalies among 4,699 children of 1,128 male and 1,627 female childhood cancer survivors. We quantified chemotherapy with alkylating agents and radiotherapy doses to the testes and ovaries and related these exposures to risk of congenital anomalies using logistic regression. RESULTS One hundred twenty-nine children had at least one anomaly (prevalence = 2.7%). For children whose mothers were exposed to radiation or alkylating agents versus neither, the prevalence of anomalies was 3.0% versus 3.5% (P = .51); corresponding figures were 1.9% versus 1.7% (P = .79) for the children of male survivors. Neither ovarian radiation dose (mean, 1.19 Gy; odds ratio [OR] = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.75 for 2.50+ Gy) nor testicular radiation dose (mean, 0.48 Gy; OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.36 to 2.83 for 0.50+ Gy) was related to risk of congenital anomalies. Treatment with alkylating agents also was not significantly associated with anomalies in the children of male or female survivors. CONCLUSION Our findings offer strong evidence that the children of cancer survivors are not at significantly increased risk for congenital anomalies stemming from their parents exposure to mutagenic cancer treatments. This information is important for counseling cancer survivors planning to have children.


Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2012

Chemotherapy and Thyroid Cancer Risk: A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Lene H. S. Veiga; Parveen Bhatti; Cécile M. Ronckers; Alice J. Sigurdson; Marilyn Stovall; Susan A. Smith; Rita E. Weathers; Wendy Leisenring; Ann C. Mertens; Sue Hammond; Joseph P. Neglia; Anna T. Meadows; Sarah S. Donaldson; Charles A. Sklar; Debra L. Friedman; Leslie L. Robison; Peter D. Inskip

Background: Although ionizing radiation is an established environmental risk factor for thyroid cancer, the effect of chemotherapy drugs on thyroid cancer risk remains unclear. We evaluated the chemotherapy-related risk of thyroid cancer in childhood cancer survivors and the possible joint effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Methods: The study included 12,547 five-year survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed during 1970 through 1986. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy information was obtained from medical records, and radiation dose was estimated to the thyroid gland. Cumulative incidence and relative risks were calculated with life-table methods and Poisson regression. Chemotherapy-related risks were evaluated separately by categories of radiation dose. Results: Histologically confirmed thyroid cancer occurred in 119 patients. Thirty years after the first childhood cancer treatment, the cumulative incidence of thyroid cancer was 1.3% (95% CI, 1.0–1.6) for females and 0.6% (0.4–0.8) for males. Among patients with thyroid radiation doses of 20 Gy or less, treatment with alkylating agents was associated with a significant 2.4-fold increased risk of thyroid cancer (95% CI, 1.3–4.5; P = 0.002). Chemotherapy risks decreased as radiation dose increased, with a significant decrease for patients treated with alkylating agents (Ptrend = 0.03). No chemotherapy-related risk was evident for thyroid radiation doses more than 20 Gy. Conclusions: Treatments with alkylating agents increased thyroid cancer risk, but only in the radiation dose range less than 20 Gy, in which cell sparing likely predominates over cell killing. Impact: Our study adds to the evidence for chemotherapy agent–specific increased risks of thyroid cancer, which to date, were mainly thought to be related to prior radiotherapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(1); 92–101. ©2011 AACR.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2013

Radiation, Atherosclerotic Risk Factors, and Stroke Risk in Survivors of Pediatric Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Sabine Mueller; Heather J. Fullerton; Kayla Stratton; Wendy Leisenring; Rita E. Weathers; Marilyn Stovall; Gregory T. Armstrong; Robert E. Goldsby; Roger J. Packer; Charles A. Sklar; Daniel C. Bowers; Leslie L. Robison; Kevin R. Krull

PURPOSE To test the hypotheses that (1) the increased risk of stroke conferred by childhood cranial radiation therapy (CRT) persists into adulthood; and (2) atherosclerotic risk factors further increase the stroke risk in cancer survivors. METHODS AND MATERIALS The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of 14,358 5-year survivors of childhood cancer and 4023 randomly selected sibling controls with longitudinal follow-up. Age-adjusted incidence rates of self-reported late-occurring (≥5 years after diagnosis) first stroke were calculated. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent stroke predictors. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 23.3 years, 292 survivors reported a late-occurring stroke. The age-adjusted stroke rate per 100,000 person-years was 77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 62-96), compared with 9.3 (95% CI 4-23) for siblings. Treatment with CRT increased stroke risk in a dose-dependent manner: hazard ratio 5.9 (95% CI 3.5-9.9) for 30-49 Gy CRT and 11.0 (7.4-17.0) for 50+ Gy CRT. The cumulative stroke incidence in survivors treated with 50+ Gy CRT was 1.1% (95% CI 0.4-1.8%) at 10 years after diagnosis and 12% (95% CI 8.9-15.0%) at 30 years. Hypertension increased stroke hazard by 4-fold (95% CI 2.8-5.5) and in black survivors by 16-fold (95% CI 6.9-36.6). CONCLUSION Young adult pediatric cancer survivors have an increased stroke risk that is associated with CRT in a dose-dependent manner. Atherosclerotic risk factors enhanced this risk and should be treated aggressively.


Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2011

Twenty-five year follow-up of childhood Wilms tumor: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study†‡

Amanda M. Termuhlen; Jean M. Tersak; Qi Liu; Yutaka Yasui; Marilyn Stovall; Rita E. Weathers; Melvin Deutsch; Charles A. Sklar; Kevin C. Oeffinger; G. T. Armstrong; Leslie L. Robison; Daniel M. Green

Treatment cures over 90% of children with Wilms tumor (WT) who subsequently risk late morbidity and mortality. This study describes the 25‐year outcomes of 5‐year WT survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS).


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2013

Stomach Cancer Risk After Treatment for Hodgkin Lymphoma

Lindsay M. Morton; Graça M. Dores; Rochelle E. Curtis; Charles F. Lynch; Marilyn Stovall; Per Hall; Ethel S. Gilbert; David C. Hodgson; Hans H. Storm; Tom Børge Johannesen; Susan A. Smith; Rita E. Weathers; Michael Andersson; Sophie D. Fosså; Michael Hauptmann; Eric J. Holowaty; Heikki Joensuu; Magnus Kaijser; Ruth A. Kleinerman; Frøydis Langmark; Eero Pukkala; Leila Vaalavirta; Alexandra W. van den Belt-Dusebout; Joseph F. Fraumeni; Lois B. Travis; Berthe M.P. Aleman; Flora E. van Leeuwen

PURPOSE Treatment-related stomach cancer is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among the growing number of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors, but risks associated with specific HL treatments are unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted an international case-control study of stomach cancer nested in a cohort of 19,882 HL survivors diagnosed from 1953 to 2003, including 89 cases and 190 matched controls. For each patient, we quantified cumulative doses of specific alkylating agents (AAs) and reconstructed radiation dose to the stomach tumor location. RESULTS Stomach cancer risk increased with increasing radiation dose to the stomach (Ptrend < .001) and with increasing number of AA-containing chemotherapy cycles (Ptrend = .02). Patients who received both radiation to the stomach ≥ 25 Gy and high-dose procarbazine (≥ 5,600 mg/m(2)) had strikingly elevated stomach cancer risk (25 cases, two controls; odds ratio [OR], 77.5; 95% CI, 14.7 to 1452) compared with those who received radiation < 25 Gy and procarbazine < 5,600 mg/m(2) (Pinteraction < .001). Risk was also elevated (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.3 to 6.4) among patients who received radiation to the stomach ≥ 25 Gy but procarbazine < 5,600 mg/m(2); however, no procarbazine-related risk was evident with radiation < 25 Gy. Treatment with dacarbazine also increased stomach cancer risk (12 cases, nine controls; OR, 8.8; 95% CI, 2.1 to 46.6), after adjustment for radiation and procarbazine doses. CONCLUSION Patients with HL who received subdiaphragmatic radiotherapy had dose-dependent increased risk of stomach cancer, with marked risks for patients who also received chemotherapy containing high-dose procarbazine. For current patients, risks and benefits of exposure to both procarbazine and subdiaphragmatic radiotherapy should be weighed carefully. For patients treated previously, GI symptoms should be evaluated promptly.

Collaboration


Dive into the Rita E. Weathers's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marilyn Stovall

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan A. Smith

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leslie L. Robison

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lindsay M. Morton

United States Department of Health and Human Services

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wendy Leisenring

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregory T. Armstrong

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles A. Sklar

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rochelle E. Curtis

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ruth A. Kleinerman

United States Department of Health and Human Services

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lois B. Travis

University of Rochester Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge