Rita Selby

Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Venous Thromboembolism A Meta-Analysis

Background— The concept that venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atherosclerosis are 2 completely distinct entities has recently been challenged because patients with VTE have more asymptomatic atherosclerosis and more cardiovascular events than control subjects. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the association between cardiovascular risk factors and VTE. Methods and Results— Medline and EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies that evaluated the prevalence of major cardiovascular risk factors in VTE patients and control subjects. Studies were selected using a priori defined criteria, and each study was reviewed by 2 authors who abstracted data on study characteristics, study quality, and outcomes. Odds ratios or weighted means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were then calculated and pooled using a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated through the use of &khgr;2 and I2 statistics. Twenty-one case-control and cohort studies with a total of 63 552 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with control subjects, the risk of VTE was 2.33 for obesity (95% CI, 1.68 to 3.24), 1.51 for hypertension (95% CI, 1.23 to 1.85), 1.42 for diabetes mellitus (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.77), 1.18 for smoking (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.46), and 1.16 for hypercholesterolemia (95% CI, 0.67 to 2.02). Weighted mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly lower in VTE patients, whereas no difference was observed for total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Significant heterogeneity among studies was present in all subgroups except for the diabetes mellitus subgroup. Higher-quality studies were more homogeneous, and significant associations remained unchanged. Conclusions— Cardiovascular risk factors are associated with VTE. This association is clinically relevant with respect to individual screening, risk factor modification, and primary and secondary prevention of VTE. Prospective studies should further investigate the underlying mechanisms of this relationship.

Compression stockings to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a common and burdensome complication of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Previous trials suggesting benefit of elastic compression stockings (ECS) to prevent PTS were small, single-centre studies without placebo control. We aimed to assess the efficacy of ECS, compared with placebo stockings, for the prevention of PTS. METHODS We did a multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial of active versus placebo ECS used for 2 years to prevent PTS after a first proximal DVT in centres in Canada and the USA. Patients were randomly assigned to study groups with a web-based randomisation system. Patients presenting with a first symptomatic, proximal DVT were potentially eligible to participate. They were excluded if the use of compression stockings was contraindicated, they had an expected lifespan of less than 6 months, geographical inaccessibility precluded return for follow-up visits, they were unable to apply stockings, or they received thrombolytic therapy for the initial treatment of acute DVT. The primary outcome was PTS diagnosed at 6 months or later using Ginsbergs criteria (leg pain and swelling of ≥1 month duration). We used a modified intention to treat Cox regression analysis, supplemented by a prespecified per-protocol analysis of patients who reported frequent use of their allocated treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00143598, and Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN71334751. FINDINGS From 2004 to 2010, 410 patients were randomly assigned to receive active ECS and 396 placebo ECS. The cumulative incidence of PTS was 14·2% in active ECS versus 12·7% in placebo ECS (hazard ratio adjusted for centre 1·13, 95% CI 0·73-1·76; p=0·58). Results were similar in a prespecified per-protocol analysis of patients who reported frequent use of stockings. INTERPRETATION ECS did not prevent PTS after a first proximal DVT, hence our findings do not support routine wearing of ECS after DVT. FUNDING Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Oral vitamin K versus placebo to correct excessive anticoagulation in patients receiving warfarin: a randomized trial.

Context Vitamin K decreases the international normalized ratio (INR) in overanticoagulated patients who receive warfarin therapy, but its effect on clinical outcomes is less clear. Contribution Trial investigators detected no differences in the frequency of bleeding, thromboembolism, or death among overanticoagulated patients who received warfarin therapy and were randomly assigned to receive low-dose vitamin K or placebo. Caution The study was underpowered to detect differences in major bleeding. Implication Low-dose vitamin K corrects the INR in overanticoagulated patients who received warfarin therapy, but it has little effect on clinical outcomes. Withdrawal of warfarin may be all that is necessary to manage elevated INRs. The Editors Warfarin is a remarkably effective drug for primary and secondary prevention of arterial and venous thromboembolism. Among commonly used medications, warfarin is unique because its doseresponse characteristics are highly unpredictable, varying both among and within individuals over time. As a result, warfarin therapy requires ongoing monitoring using the international normalized ratio (INR), a value that reflects the degree to which warfarin has reduced coagulation factor levels and the coagulant potential of blood (1). For most indications, an INR range of 2.0 to 3.0 is targeted; INR values less than 2.0 are associated with an increased risk for thromboembolism, and INR values greater than 4.0 are associated with an increase in bleeding complications. The risk for bleeding, particularly intracranial bleeding, increases markedly as the INR exceeds 4.5 (13). Even in clinics dedicated to warfarin management, INRs are outside the therapeutic range one third to one half the time (4). When managing a patient with an INR greater than 4.5 who is not bleeding, clinicians generally either withhold warfarin treatment and allow the INR to decrease to the desired value or administer vitamin K (orally or intravenously) to more rapidly reduce the INR (1, 510). Small randomized trials have shown that a single dose of low-dose oral vitamin K (for example, 1 to 2.5 mg) effectively reduces the INR in otherwise-stable overanticoagulated patients within 24 hours of its administration; however, these studies were not large enough to determine whether low-dose vitamin K reduces bleeding without increasing the risk for thromboembolism (1115). A recent systematic review (16) supported this observation. To determine whether oral vitamin K is indicated in overanticoagulated patients who are not bleeding, we did a randomized trial in which we allocated oral vitamin K or placebo, 1.25 mg, to patients who presented with an INR of 4.5 to 10.0. The primary outcome measure was the frequency of all forms of bleeding events during the first 90 days. Our hypothesis that bleeding events would be reduced was based on our previously published, smaller studies of low-dose oral vitamin K administered to various patient groups. In these studies, we found a consistent and rapid decrease in the INR after low-dose vitamin K was administered (13, 15, 1722). Methods Study Patients We identified patients with INRs of 4.5 to 10.0 in participating outpatient anticoagulant therapy clinics. We screened patients as they presented for routine INR assessment and considered them for eligibility if they were receiving warfarin therapy with a target INR of 2.0 to 3.5, their most recent INR was between 4.5 and 10.0 in the past 24 hours, and they were not bleeding. We excluded patients if discontinuation of warfarin therapy was scheduled and if they were younger than 18 years, had a life expectancy less than 10 days, had an indication for acute normalization of their INR (such as imminent surgery), had a known severe liver disease, had a history of a major bleeding event within 1 month, had a known bleeding disorder, had received thrombolytic therapy within 48 hours, had a platelet count less than 50109 cells/L, could not take oral medications, had a known allergy to vitamin K, or could not return for laboratory or clinical monitoring. Study staff at each participating anticoagulant therapy clinic approached patients who met inclusion criteria for consent to participate. This study ran in parallel with a cohort study in which patients with INRs greater than 10.0 received oral vitamin K, 2.5 mg. Patients were otherwise identical to those enrolled in this study, and we followed them for similar outcome events. The results of the concurrent cohort study will be presented in a subsequent paper. Randomization and Treatment We instructed all eligible, consenting patients to withhold warfarin for 1 day and randomly assigned them to receive a capsule containing either vitamin K, 1.25 mg, or placebo. Randomization was done by using a computer-generated random-number table at the coordinating and methods center and was stratified by clinical center. Vitamin K capsules were compounded from 5-mg vitamin K tablets (Merck & Co., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey) by a commercial pharmacy with Health Canada approval (Clinical Trials Application control number 092635). Placebo capsules contained inert filler and were indistinguishable from the capsules that contained vitamin K. Random allocation of patients was accomplished when site-specific study personnel dispensed the next numbered study drug container at each clinical center; thus, patients, treating clinicians, and research coordinators were unaware of treatment allocation. In 2 centers, we monitored the INR of outpatients in clinics or laboratories outside the clinical center. In such centers, we obtained consent for the study by telephone, and the study drug was shipped within hours to the patients home by using a courier service. In all cases, we confirmed receipt and consumption of the study drug on the day of randomization by telephone. In the remaining centers, in which patients were seen in person, consent and study drug administration occurred at the same time that the elevated INR was detected. Follow-up and Outcome Measures At enrollment, we advised patients to promptly seek medical evaluation if they developed signs or symptoms of bleeding or thromboembolism. At minimum, we assessed patients by telephone or in person on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, and 90 after randomization. Additional contact and INR sampling necessary to manage the patients anticoagulant therapy were done at the discretion of the patients physician. At each follow-up, we sought signs and symptoms of bleeding and thromboembolism and collected details about all such events. We asked patients a focused series of questions to help them recall these events. We reviewed and abstracted medical records of all suspected bleeding episodes, thromboembolism, and deaths. Our primary outcome measure was the frequency of bleeding events during the 90 days after randomization. We defined major bleeding as fatal bleeding, bleeding requiring transfusion of 2 or more units of packed red blood cells, bleeding resulting in a therapeutic intervention (such as endoscopy), or objectively confirmed bleeding into an enclosed space. We defined minor bleeding as bleeding resulting in a medical assessment that did not meet criteria as a major bleeding event. We defined trivial bleeding as all patient-reported bleeding events that did not result in a medical assessment. We combined all reported bleeding events (major, minor, and trivial) for this analysis. We chose to combine these events because our clinical experience suggested that reducing medically unimportant but bothersome bleeding, such as epistaxis, bruising, and menorrhagia, was a clinically important goal for our patients; patients with a minor or trivial bleeding event may be at greater risk for subsequent major bleeding; and the frequency of major bleeding was likely to be very low, calling into question the feasibility of a study powered to detect differences in major bleeding events. Secondary outcome measures included the frequency of major bleeding events, objectively confirmed venous or arterial thromboembolism, and death during the 90 days after randomization. We chose the 90-day period on the basis of our previous studies wherein we found a significant reduction in bleeding events (90 days) after the administration of similar doses of oral vitamin K (13). We hypothesized that low-dose oral vitamin K might influence a bleeding event during this extended period, because even small doses of this highly lipophilic drug might have an extended influence on INR control (and thus the risk for bleeding and thrombosis). In post hoc analyses, we examined the frequency of all bleeding and major bleeding events in the first 7 days and the number of clinical events in patients who were older than 70 years at enrollment. An independent adjudication committee, blinded to treatment allocation and not otherwise involved in the study, reviewed all bleeding events, thromboembolism, and deaths. Confirmation of venous thromboembolism required a nononcompressible venous segment on ultrasonography, an intraluminal filling defect on venography or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography, or a segmental (or larger) mismatch defect on ventilationperfusion lung scan. Arterial thromboembolism required either direct surgical visualization of thrombus; an intraluminal filling defect on angiography; or clear evidence of a new ischemic event on an objective test, such as electrocardiography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. We advised clinics to reinstitute warfarin therapy once the INR was within the therapeutic reference interval after administration of the study drug. The clinicians who cared for the patients determined the warfarin dose when the drug was readministered. Target INR ranges for individual patients did not change as a result of the elevated INR that led to enrollment. Statistical Analysis Our primary analysis was an intention-to-treat comparison of the proportions of patien

Hypercoagulability after trauma: hemostatic changes and relationship to venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND Major trauma induces a hypercoagulable state, which is frequently complicated by pathological thrombosis. However the sequential changes in coagulation markers and their relationship to clinical thrombosis have been poorly characterized. METHODS We measured several markers of in vivo coagulation and fibrinolysis and their regulation serially for 2 weeks after multi-system trauma in a prospective cohort of patients who received no anticoagulant prophylaxis. Asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was assessed by routine bilateral venography between day 12 and 14. Clinically suspected DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) were investigated in a standardized manner. RESULTS Among the 135 cohort patients the overall venous thromboembolism (VTE) rate was 59%. Markers of thrombin generation were markedly increased within 24 hours of injury, remained persistently elevated for about 5 days and then decreased by day 14. No early compensatory increase in Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI) or the complex of Factor Xa and TFPI (FXa-TFPI) was seen; FXa-TFPI remained depressed throughout the study. There was no inverse relationship demonstrated between markers of thrombin generation and thrombin regulation. Acquired APC resistance and hypofibrinolysis did not appear to be important contributors to hypercoagulability after trauma. None of the coagulation markers were independently predictive of VTE. Increasing age was the only significant, independent predictor of VTE. CONCLUSION Major trauma leads to significantly increased and persistent thrombin generation with disruption of its regulation. Coagulation markers do not appear to add independent predictive value in detecting VTE. Increasing age is the most important clinical predictor of VTE after trauma.

Oral vitamin K effectively treats international normalised ratio (INR) values in excess of 10: results of a prospective cohort study.

Unanticipated elevation of the INR is common in patients receiving warfarin. We performed a prospective cohort study of 107 warfarin-treated patients with INR values of more than 10 who received a single 2.5 mg dose of oral vitamin K. During the first week, one patient experienced major bleeding, and one died. In the first 90 days after enrolment four patients had major bleeding (3.7%, 1.0% to 9.3%), eight patients (7.5%, 3.3% to 14.2%) died and two had objectively confirmed thromboembolism. Based on our low rate of observed major bleeding we conclude that 2.5 mg of oral vitamin K is a reasonable treatment for patients with INR values of more than 10 who are not actively bleeding.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism: consensus, controversies, and challenges

The last 50 years have witnessed a multitude of publications evaluating the efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of many different thromboprophylaxis interventions. There is widespread consensus that thromboprophylaxis safely reduces morbidity and mortality. More than 25 evidence-based guidelines, published since 1986, also recommend routine thromboprophylaxis in the majority of hospitalized patients. As a result, thromboprophylaxis is recognized as a key safety priority for hospitals. Some of the remaining areas of controversy that will be discussed in this paper include the role of individual risk assessments to determine thrombosis risk and prophylaxis, replacement of low-dose heparin by low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), the optimal duration of prophylaxis, the role of combined thromboprophylaxis modalities, the safety of anticoagulant prophylaxis with regional analgesia, the use of LMWHs in chronic renal insufficiency, and the emerging role of new oral anticoagulants as thromboprophylactic agents. Despite the overwhelming evidence supporting thromboprophylaxis, rates of thromboprophylaxis use remain far from optimal. Successful implementation strategies to bridge this knowledge:care gap are the most important current challenges in this area. These strategies must be multifaceted, utilizing local, systems-based approaches as well as legislation and incentives that reinforce best practices.

Graduated compression stockings to treat acute leg pain associated with proximal DVT. A randomised controlled trial.

Acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) causes leg pain. Elastic compression stockings (ECS) have potential to relieve DVT-related leg pain by diminishing the diameter of distended veins and increasing venous blood flow. It was our objective to determine whether ECS reduce leg pain in patients with acute DVT. We performed a secondary analysis of the SOX Trial, a multicentre randomised placebo controlled trial of active ECS versus placebo ECS to prevent the post-thrombotic syndrome.The study was performed in 24 hospital centres in Canada and the U.S. and included 803 patients with a first episode of acute proximal DVT. Patients were randomised to receive active ECS (knee length, 30-40 mm Hg graduated pressure) or placebo ECS (manufactured to look identical to active ECS, but lacking therapeutic compression). Study outcome was leg pain severity assessed on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale (0, no pain; 10, worst possible pain) at baseline, 14, 30 and 60 days after randomisation. Mean age was 55 years and 60% were male. In active ECS patients (n=409), mean (SD) pain severity at baseline and at 60 days were 5.18 (3.29) and 1.39 (2.19), respectively, and in placebo ECS patients (n=394) were 5.38 (3.29) and 1.13 (1.86), respectively. There were no significant differences in pain scores between groups at any assessment point, and no evidence for subgroup interaction by age, sex or anatomical extent of DVT. Results were similar in an analysis restricted to patients who reported wearing stockings every day. In conclusion, ECS do not reduce leg pain in patients with acute proximal DVT.

Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: impact of an avoid-heparin program

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction occurring in up to 5% of patients exposed to unfractionated heparin (UFH). We examined the impact of a hospital-wide strategy for avoiding heparin on the incidence of HIT, HIT with thrombosis (HITT), and HIT-related costs. The Avoid-Heparin Initiative, implemented at a tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, since 2006, involved replacing UFH with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Consecutive cases with suspected HIT from 2003 through 2012 were reviewed. Rates of suspected HIT, adjudicated HIT, and HITT, along with HIT-related expenditures were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and the avoid-heparin (2007-2012) phases. The annual rate of suspected HIT decreased 42%, from 85.5 per 10 000 admissions in the pre-intervention phase to 49.0 per 10 000 admissions in the avoid-heparin phase ( ITALIC! P< .001). The annual rate of patients with a positive HIT assay decreased 63% from 16.5 to 6.1 per 10 000 admissions ( ITALIC! P< .001), adjudicated HIT decreased 79% from 10.7 to 2.2 per 10 000 admissions ( ITALIC! P< .001), and HITT decreased 91% from 4.6 to 0.4 per 10 000 admissions ( ITALIC! P< .001). Hospital HIT-related expenditures decreased by

Inflammation markers and their trajectories after deep vein thrombosis in relation to risk of post-thrombotic syndrome

266 938 per year in the avoid-heparin phase. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the success and feasibility of a hospital-wide HIT prevention strategy.

The Direct Medical Costs Associated with Suspected Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Post‐thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a frequent chronic complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).