Ritva Karinen

Prevalence of synthetic cannabinoids in blood samples from Norwegian drivers suspected of impaired driving during a seven weeks period

From early year 2000 different herbal products containing synthetic cannabinoids (SC) have appeared on the drug market all over the world, and new substances are frequently introduced. The prevalence of SC use in different populations is however still mainly unknown, also in Norway. This information is difficult to obtain, but studies of drivers suspected of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID), might provide important information. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of SC in drivers suspected of being under the influence of drugs in Norway, and investigate if SCs impair driving performance. For two periods of three and four weeks all blood samples from drivers suspected of DUID in Norway were analyzed for the presence of 12 and 18 different SCs, respectively. A new ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method was developed. A total of 726 cases were analyzed during our study period, and SCs were detected in 16 cases (2.2%) in total. The mean age of these drivers was 29.6 years. High concentrations of other psychoactive drugs were detected in all the blood samples where a SC was found. AM-2201 and JWH-018 were the most frequently detected SCs, each found in five cases. In addition RSC-4, JWH-122, JWH-081 and JWH-250 were detected. None of the drivers had reported using SCs prior to driving. Despite the limited number of SCs investigated in this 7 week study period, a considerable percent of the cases were positive. Other psychoactive drugs of abuse were always found concomitant with the SCs, and the age of these drivers indicates that experienced drug users also ingest SCs. Since other drugs were found in all the samples, the psychomotor impairment caused by the SCs is difficult to estimate. Our study shows the importance of screening analyses of biological samples from different populations to assess the prevalence of drug use, since self-reporting might be encumbered with significant under-reporting.

Morphine to codeine concentration ratio in blood and urine as a marker of illicit heroin use in forensic autopsy samples.

A morphine to codeine ratio greater than unity (M/C>1) has been suggested as an indicator of heroin use in living individuals. The aim of this study was to examine the morphine to codeine ratio in a large population (N=2438) of forensically examined autopsy cases positive for 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM) and/or morphine in blood and/or urine. Blood and urine concentrations of 6-MAM, morphine and codeine were examined using GC-MS and LC-MS/MS methods. In 6-MAM positive samples, the M/C ratio was greater than unity in 98% (N=917) of the blood samples and 96% (N=665) of the urine samples. Stratification of 6-MAM negative cases by M/C above or below unity revealed similarities in morphine and codeine concentrations in cases where M/C>1 and 6-MAM positive cases. Median blood and urine morphine concentrations were 8-10 times greater than codeine for both groups. Similarly to 6-MAM positive cases, 25-44 year-old men prevailed in the M/C>1 group. In comparison to cases where M/C ≤ 1, the M/C ratio was a hundred times higher in both 6-MAM positive and M/C>1 cases. The range of morphine concentration between the lowest and the highest quintile of codeine in M/C>1 cases was similar to that in 6-MAM positive cases. This range was much higher than for M/C ≤ 1 cases. Moreover, linear regression analyses, adjusted for age and gender, revealed a strong positive association between morphine and codeine in 6-MAM positive and M/C>1 cases. The M/C ratio appeared to be a good marker of heroin use in post-mortem cases. Both blood and urine M/C>1 can be used to separate heroin users from other cases positive for morphine and codeine.

Lethal poisonings with AH-7921 in combination with other substances

AH-7921 is a synthetic μ-opioid agonist, approximately equipotent with morphine. We report the death of two young individuals after ingestion of AH-7921 in combination with other psychoactive drugs. In the first case a young man died shortly after ingesting Internet drugs. Toxicological analysis of post mortem peripheral blood revealed AH-7921 (0.43 mg/L), 2-FMA (0.0069 mg/L) and 3-MMC (0.0021 mg/L) as well as codeine (0.42 mg/L), codeine-6-glucuronide (0.77 mg/L) and acetaminophen (18.7 mg/L). The second case involved a young female found dead at home. The only positive finding at medicolegal autopsy was needle marks. Toxicological analysis revealed AH-7921 (0.33 mg/L), methoxetamine (MXE) (0.064 mg/L), etizolam (0.27 mg/L), phenazepam (1.33 mg/L), 7-aminonitrazepam (0.043 mg/L), diazepam (0.046 mg/L), nordiazepam (0.073 mg/L), and oxazepam (0.018 mg/L) in blood. In both cases intoxication with AH-7921 in combination with other psychoactive drugs was considered to be the cause of death.

Concentrations of APINACA, 5F-APINACA, UR-144 and its degradant product in blood samples from six impaired drivers compared to previous reported concentrations of other synthetic cannabinoids

A large number of new psychoactive substances are available at the illicit drug market and the synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) are among the substances that have led to serious side effects and death. Knowledge about common concentrations of these drugs are however sparse. Concentrations of APINACA and 5F-APINACA in biological matrixes have previously not been reported, and concentrations of UR-144 and its degradant product in blood samples from driving under the influence of drug (DUID) cases have not been published. The aims of this study were to report concentrations of APINACA, 5F-APINACA, UR-144 and UR-144 degradant from DUID cases analyzed at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), and also previously unpublished concentrations of AM-2201 in cases from our Institute. We have further summarized all the former published studies where concentrations of SCs have been reported, to compare with the results from these newer SCs. In whole blood from one driver we have found 5F-APINACA and from three drivers both APINACA and 5F-APINACA in concentrations from 0.24 to 24.5 and 0.9 to 6.5 μg/L, respectively, and UR-144 in two cases in concentrations of 0.22 and 0.47 μg/L. UR-144 degradant in a concentration of 0.15 μg/L was found in one of the cases. A summary of the literature reveals major deficiencies regarding concentrations of most of the SCs. The SCs most frequently detected in DUID cases were (n≥8) AM-2201, JWH-122, JWH-018 and JWH-210. In intoxication cases AM-2201 (n=517) was the most often detected SC, followed by JWH-122, JWH-210, UR-144, JWH-018, and MAM-2201 (n>100). Four studies regarding concentrations in autopsy cases have been published, and concentrations of four different SCs have been reported (JWH-018, JWH-073, JWH-210, AM-2201 and the metabolites of AM-2201; 4-OH-pentyl, JWH-018 5-OH-pentyl and JWH-018 pentanoic acid). Pharmacokinetic data are only available for JWH-018 (n=3), JWH-073 (n=1) and the metabolites of AM-2201; 4-OH-pentyl, 6-OH-indole, JWH-018 5-OH-pentyl and JWH-018 pentanoic acid (n=1).

Screening of synthetic cannabinoids in preserved oral fluid by UPLC–MS/MS

BACKGROUND The abuse of a rapidly changing range of synthetic cannabinoids is increasing worldwide. Oral fluid, which contains the parent compounds and is easily collected, could be a good alternative medium for drug screening for synthetic cannabinoids. RESULTS A method for screening of 18 synthetic cannabinoids in preserved oral fluid collected with the Intercept® collection device, using UPLC-MS/MS, was validated. Limits of quantification ranged from 0.2 to 2 ng/ml in oral fluid. In several real cases, AM-2201 and/or JWH-018 were found. CONCLUSION The presented method allowed rapid and sensitive screening of synthetic cannabinoids in preserved oral fluid collected with the Intercept collection device.

Blood GHB concentrations and results of medical examinations in 25 car drivers in Norway

PurposeInformation on the clinical effects associated with whole blood gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) concentrations is sparse. We have investigated possible relationships between GHB blood concentrations and clinical effects in car drivers.MethodsIn Norway, the police stop car drivers suspected of drug-driving. Medical doctors perform a clinical test of impairment (CTI) and blood samples are screened for drugs/medicines by immunological, enzymatic and chromatographic methods at the Division of Forensic Toxicology and Drug Abuse. GHB is a part of our extended drug-testing programme. GHB is standardly measured as GBL by gas chromatographic method. All the results were stored in a database. This database was searched between 2000 and 2007 for car drivers positive only for GHB, called GHB-drivers. A control group with a completely negative blood analysis, including GHB, called control-drivers, was included in the study.ResultsTwenty-five car drivers had only GHB in their blood. The police reported that 78% showed unsafe driving behaviour and seven were involved in car accidents, without serious injury. A total of 61% of the drivers were found to be sleepy or in an even more reduced state of consciousness. The median GHB blood concentration was 1,262 (range 592–2,191) μmol/L, measured a median of 69 min after the police had stopped the driver from driving. The GHB blood concentration tended to increase with increasing impairment and reduced consciousness. Clinical findings were normal- to large-sized pupils (86%), impairment as the final conclusion (84%), impaired balance/nystagmus (62 and 54%, respectively), congested/shiny conjunctiva (67%), apathetic, aggressive or abnormal behaviour (65%), reduced short-term memory (67%), reduced/absent pupillar reaction to light (65%), heart rate ≤ 70 beats/min (56%), and some level of reduced consciousness (56%). In the control-drivers, 15.6% were found by the medical doctors to have reduced consciousness or impaired.ConclusionsThe median GHB blood concentration of the 25 car drivers was high. Most drivers had clinical impairment that was not explainable by injuries, with depressive effects on the central nervous system and sympathomimetic effects on eyes. Effects on impairment and consciousness tended to be concentration-dependent. The number of drivers who were impaired or had reduced consciousness was highly increased in GHB-drivers compared to controls. Based on these results, we conclude that the GHB-drivers most probably drove in an unsafe manner due to impairment by GHB.

The effect of scheduling and withdrawal of carisoprodol on prevalence of intoxications with the drug

The centrally acting muscle relaxant carisoprodol has previously been shown to cause psychomotor impairment and to have a narrow therapeutic range. In Norway, carisoprodol was therefore reclassified to the highest scheduling level from 1 August 2007 and withdrawn from the market on 1 May 2008. The aim of this study was to examine to what extent this action resulted in reduced numbers of driving under the influence (DUI) cases and forensic autopsies concerning carisoprodol, as well as reduced numbers of contacts to the National Poisons Information Centre (NPIC) in Norway regarding carisoprodol. From 2004 to 2008, carisoprodol (and/or its metabolite meprobamate) was detected in a total of 1261 DUI cases, decreasing from 312 in 2004 to 47 in 2008. During the same period, carisoprodol was detected in 194 forensic autopsies, also here decreasing, from 53 cases in 2004 to 11 cases in 2008. The NPIC received 1180 contacts primarily concerning carisoprodol over this period, decreasing from 267 contacts in 2004 to 87 contacts in 2008. During the same period, the sales figures for carisoprodol decreased dramatically, and we observed a relation between the numbers of DUI cases, forensic autopsies and contacts to the NPIC concerning carisoprodol and the sales figures for the drug. This study showed that the rescheduling and withdrawal of carisoprodol from the Norwegian market had a positive effect on the prevalence of carisoprodol in impaired driving, deaths and contacts regarding intoxications. This, together with previous publications, indicates that the population reflected in our data uses regularly prescribed carisoprodol and, to a lesser degree, drug from an illegal street market.

Relationship between methadone and EDDP (2 -ethylidene -1,5 -dimethyl -3,3 -diphenylpyrrolidine) in urine samples from Norwegian prisons

BackgroundMethadone maintenance treatment is a widely used therapy in the rehabilitation of opioid addiction the world over. Methadone is metabolised in the body to a number of inactive metabolites, but primarily to 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP). The Division of Forensic Toxicology and Drug Abuse (DFTDA) of the Norwegian Institute of Public Health carries out drug analysis of urine samples from inmates of prisons throughout Norway. Methadone and EDDP in the urine are also tested for upon request. The results are stored in a secure database at the DFTDA.ObjectivesThe aims of the present study were (1) to observe variations in methadone and EDDP concentrations in urine in relation to urine pH in a large set of urine samples obtained from prison inmates and (2) to analyse samples testing methadone-positive/EDDP-negative and investigate whether such results could occur naturally, without sample tampering.MethodsAll urine samples that tested positive for methadone over the period 2004–2005 were collected from the DFTDA database, and the relation between methadone and EDDP excretion in urine, and urinary pH was determined. Samples that tested positive for methadone but negative for EDDP were picked out and studied individually.ResultsA total of 1539 urine samples (cases) had tested positive for methadone in our database for the period 2004–2005. There was a strong correlation between the concentration of methadone in urine and urine pH in these samples, with higher concentrations of methadone present at lower pH levels. Cases that tested positive for methadone but negative for EDDP were rare – a total of five (0.3% of all cases tested). These cases were studied in more detail.Conclusion Methadone excretion in urine is dependent on urinary pH. Methadone-positive/EDDP-negative results may suggest sample tampering in some, but not all, cases.

Bromadiolone Poisoning: LC–MS Method and Pharmacokinetic Data

Abstract:  Poisoning with superwarfarins, like bromadiolone, is a growing public health problem, and the mortality is high. Pharmacokinetic data on bromadiolone in humans are however scarce, and there are no reports following repeated exposures to bromadiolone. We have developed a method for quantification of bromadiolone in whole blood, using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC‐MS). The analytical method is reported. Limit of detection was 0.005 mg/L and limit of quantification was 0.01 mg/L. The concentrations of bromadiolone in whole blood and plasma in serial samples from a 62‐year‐old woman were measured. The half‐life of bromadiolone in blood was estimated to be about 6 days in the initial phase of elimination and about 10–13 days in the terminal phase. The mean plasma/blood ratio of bromadiolone was 1.7 ± 0.6. Stability testing of bromadiolone in whole blood samples after two cycles of freeze and thaw revealed that bromadiolone concentrations decreased.

Determination of a selection of synthetic cannabinoids and metabolites in urine by UHPSFC-MS/MS and by UHPLC-MS/MS

Two different analytical techniques, ultra-high performance supercritical fluid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPSFC-MS/MS) and reversed phase ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS), were used for the determination of two synthetic cannabinoids and eleven metabolites in urine; AM-2201 N-4-OH-pentyl, AM-2233, JWH-018 N-5-OH-pentyl, JWH-018 N-pentanoic acid, JWH-073 N-4-OH-butyl, JWH-073 N-butanoic acid, JWH-122 N-5-OH-pentyl, MAM-2201, MAM-2201 N-4-OH-pentyl, RCS-4 N-5-OH-pentyl, UR-144 degradant N-pentanoic acid, UR-144 N-4-OH-pentyl, and UR-144 N-pentanoic acid. Sample preparation included a liquid-liquid extraction after deconjugation with ß-glucuronidase. The UHPSFC-MS/MS method used an Acquity UPC(2 TM) BEH column with a mobile phase consisting of CO2 and 0.3% ammonia in methanol, while the UHPLC-MS/MS method used an Acquity UPLC® BEH C18 column with a mobile phase consisting of 5 mM ammonium formate (pH 10.2) and methanol. MS/MS detection was performed with positive electrospray ionization and two multiple reaction monitoring transitions. Deuterated internal standards were used for six of the compounds. Limits of quantification (LOQs) were between 0.04 and 0.4 µg/L. Between-day relative standard deviations at concentrations ≥ LOQ were ≤20%, with biases within ±19%. Recoveries ranged from 40 to 90%. Corrected matrix effects were within 100 ± 10%, except for MAM-2201 with UHPSFC-MS/MS, and for UR-144 N-pentanoic acid and MAM-2201 N-4-OH-pentyl with UHPLC-MS/MS. Elution order obtained by UHPSFC-MS/MS was almost opposite to that obtained by UHPLC-MS/MS, making this instrument setup an interesting combination for screening and confirmation analyses in forensic cases. The UHPLC-MS/MS method has, since August 2014, been successfully used for confirmation of synthetic cannabinoids in urine samples revealing a positive immunoassay screening result. Copyright