Rob H. Field
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rob H. Field.
Ecology and Evolution | 2014
Kelvin S.-H. Peh; Andrew Balmford; Rob H. Field; Anthony Lamb; Jennifer C. Birch; Richard B. Bradbury; Claire Brown; Stuart H. M. Butchart; Martin Lester; Ross Morrison; Isabel Sedgwick; Chris Soans; Alison J. Stattersfield; Peter Stroh; Ruth D. Swetnam; David H.L. Thomas; Matt Walpole; Stuart Warrington; Francine M.R. Hughes
Restoration of degraded land is recognized by the international community as an important way of enhancing both biodiversity and ecosystem services, but more information is needed about its costs and benefits. In Cambridgeshire, U.K., a long-term initiative to convert drained, intensively farmed arable land to a wetland habitat mosaic is driven by a desire both to prevent biodiversity loss from the nationally important Wicken Fen National Nature Reserve (Wicken Fen NNR) and to increase the provision of ecosystem services. We evaluated the changes in ecosystem service delivery resulting from this land conversion, using a new Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA) to estimate biophysical and monetary values of ecosystem services provided by the restored wetland mosaic compared with the former arable land. Overall results suggest that restoration is associated with a net gain to society as a whole of
Bird Study | 2008
Rob H. Field; Guy Q.A. Anderson; Derek J. Gruar
199 ha−1y−1, for a one-off investment in restoration of
Ecology and Society | 2016
Francine M.R. Hughes; William M. Adams; Stuart H. M. Butchart; Rob H. Field; Kelvin S.-H. Peh; Stuart Warrington
2320 ha−1. Restoration has led to an estimated loss of arable production of
Bird Study | 2007
Rob H. Field; Will B. Kirby; Richard B. Bradbury
2040 ha−1y−1, but estimated gains of
PLOS ONE | 2015
Phillip J. Blaen; Li Jia; Kelvin S.-H. Peh; Rob H. Field; Andrew Balmford; Michael A. MacDonald; Richard B. Bradbury
671 ha−1y−1 in nature-based recreation,
Journal of Ornithology | 2015
Malcolm D. Burgess; Jenny Bright; Antony J. Morris; Rob H. Field; Philip V. Grice; Andrew I. Cooke; Will J. Peach
120 ha−1y−1 from grazing,
Bird Study | 2014
Jennifer A. Bright; Rob H. Field; Antony J. Morris; Andrew I. Cooke; Jeremy Fern; Philip V. Grice; Will J. Peach
48 ha−1y−1 from flood protection, and a reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions worth an estimated
Bird Study | 2014
Jennifer A. Bright; Rob H. Field; Antony J. Morris; Andrew I. Cooke; Jeremy Fern; Philip V. Grice; Will J. Peach
72 ha−1y−1. Management costs have also declined by an estimated
Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science | 2017
Michael A. MacDonald; C de Ruyck; Rob H. Field; A Bedford; Richard B. Bradbury
1325 ha−1y−1. Despite uncertainties associated with all measured values and the conservative assumptions used, we conclude that there was a substantial gain to society as a whole from this land-use conversion. The beneficiaries also changed from local arable farmers under arable production to graziers, countryside users from towns and villages, and the global community, under restoration. We emphasize that the values reported here are not necessarily transferable to other sites.
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability | 2016
Rob H. Field; Rachel K. Hill; Matthew J. Carroll; Antony J. Morris
Capsule Chick diet varies seasonally and between wet and dry habitats, and there is little evidence for a link between habitat type and productivity. Aim To examine the influence of habitat composition and diversity on Tree Sparrow productivity and nestling diet in a wide variety of locations across the UK. Methods Productivity, chick diet and habitat data were collected from Tree Sparrow nestbox colonies by volunteer bird-ringers in 2002. Nestling diet was assessed by identification of invertebrate remains in faecal sacs. Results Clutch size was significantly higher for Tree Sparrows breeding in farmland than for those in wetland colonies. This did not translate into increased productivity. There was no other evidence of any effect of habitat or nestling diet composition on annual productivity. Diet composition varied seasonally, with habitat type and between individual sites. Conclusions Tree sparrows are capable of successful breeding in a range of habitats, where they utilize a wide range of invertebrate prey types. Lack of evidence for a relationship between habitat composition and productivity within this study may be the result of Tree Sparrows on farmland being restricted to areas providing adequate invertebrate food resources. To reduce the probability of Tree Sparrow populations on farmland being limited by chick food invertebrates, conservation measures aimed at population recovery should include the provision of habitats to support a range of high value invertebrate taxa throughout the protracted breeding season. Mechanisms to provide such habitats are already available within existing UK agri-environment schemes.