Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robb B. Rutledge is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robb B. Rutledge.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2009

Dopaminergic Drugs Modulate Learning Rates and Perseveration in Parkinson's Patients in a Dynamic Foraging Task

Robb B. Rutledge; Stephanie C. Lazzaro; Brian Lau; Catherine E. Myers; Mark A. Gluck; Paul W. Glimcher

Making appropriate choices often requires the ability to learn the value of available options from experience. Parkinsons disease is characterized by a loss of dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra, neurons hypothesized to play a role in reinforcement learning. Although previous studies have shown that Parkinsons patients are impaired in tasks involving learning from feedback, they have not directly tested the widely held hypothesis that dopamine neuron activity specifically encodes the reward prediction error signal used in reinforcement learning models. To test a key prediction of this hypothesis, we fit choice behavior from a dynamic foraging task with reinforcement learning models and show that treatment with dopaminergic drugs alters choice behavior in a manner consistent with the theory. More specifically, we found that dopaminergic drugs selectively modulate learning from positive outcomes. We observed no effect of dopaminergic drugs on learning from negative outcomes. We also found a novel dopamine-dependent effect on decision making that is not accounted for by reinforcement learning models: perseveration in choice, independent of reward history, increases with Parkinsons disease and decreases with dopamine therapy.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2011

Choice from Non-Choice: Predicting Consumer Preferences from Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Signals Obtained during Passive Viewing

Ifat Levy; Stephanie C. Lazzaro; Robb B. Rutledge; Paul W. Glimcher

Decision-making is often viewed as a two-stage process, where subjective values are first assigned to each option and then the option of the highest value is selected. Converging evidence suggests that these subjective values are represented in the striatum and medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC). A separate line of evidence suggests that activation in the same areas represents the values of rewards even when choice is not required, as in classical conditioning tasks. However, it is unclear whether the same neural mechanism is engaged in both cases. To address this question we measured brain activation with functional magnetic resonance imaging while human subjects passively viewed individual consumer goods. We then sampled activation from predefined regions of interest and used it to predict subsequent choices between the same items made outside of the scanner. Our results show that activation in the striatum and MPFC in the absence of choice predicts subsequent choices, suggesting that these brain areas represent value in a similar manner whether or not choice is required.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2010

Testing the reward prediction error hypothesis with an axiomatic model

Robb B. Rutledge; Mark Dean; Andrew Caplin; Paul W. Glimcher

Neuroimaging studies typically identify neural activity correlated with the predictions of highly parameterized models, like the many reward prediction error (RPE) models used to study reinforcement learning. Identified brain areas might encode RPEs or, alternatively, only have activity correlated with RPE model predictions. Here, we use an alternate axiomatic approach rooted in economic theory to formally test the entire class of RPE models on neural data. We show that measurements of human neural activity from the striatum, medial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and posterior cingulate cortex satisfy necessary and sufficient conditions for the entire class of RPE models. However, activity measured from the anterior insula falsifies the axiomatic model, and therefore no RPE model can account for measured activity. Further analysis suggests the anterior insula might instead encode something related to the salience of an outcome. As cognitive neuroscience matures and models proliferate, formal approaches of this kind that assess entire model classes rather than specific model exemplars may take on increased significance.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2014

Phasic Dopamine Release in the Rat Nucleus Accumbens Symmetrically Encodes a Reward Prediction Error Term

Andrew S. Hart; Robb B. Rutledge; Paul W. Glimcher; Paul E. M. Phillips

Making predictions about the rewards associated with environmental stimuli and updating those predictions through feedback is an essential aspect of adaptive behavior. Theorists have argued that dopamine encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal that is used in such a reinforcement learning process. Recent work with fMRI has demonstrated that the BOLD signal in dopaminergic target areas meets both necessary and sufficient conditions of an axiomatic model of the RPE hypothesis. However, there has been no direct evidence that dopamine release itself also meets necessary and sufficient criteria for encoding an RPE signal. Further, the fact that dopamine neurons have low tonic firing rates that yield a limited dynamic range for encoding negative RPEs has led to significant debate about whether positive and negative prediction errors are encoded on a similar scale. To address both of these issues, we used fast-scan cyclic voltammetry to measure reward-evoked dopamine release at carbon fiber electrodes chronically implanted in the nucleus accumbens core of rats trained on a probabilistic decision-making task. We demonstrate that dopamine concentrations transmit a bidirectional RPE signal with symmetrical encoding of positive and negative RPEs. Our findings strengthen the case that changes in dopamine concentration alone are sufficient to encode the full range of RPEs necessary for reinforcement learning.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

A computational and neural model of momentary subjective well-being

Robb B. Rutledge; Nikolina Skandali; Peter Dayan; R. J. Dolan

Significance A common question in the social science of well-being asks, “How happy do you feel on a scale of 0 to 10?” Responses are often related to life circumstances, including wealth. By asking people about their feelings as they go about their lives, ongoing happiness and life events have been linked, but the neural mechanisms underlying this relationship are unknown. To investigate it, we presented subjects with a decision-making task involving monetary gains and losses and repeatedly asked them to report their momentary happiness. We built a computational model in which happiness reports were construed as an emotional reactivity to recent rewards and expectations. Using functional MRI, we demonstrated that neural signals during task events account for changes in happiness. The subjective well-being or happiness of individuals is an important metric for societies. Although happiness is influenced by life circumstances and population demographics such as wealth, we know little about how the cumulative influence of daily life events are aggregated into subjective feelings. Using computational modeling, we show that emotional reactivity in the form of momentary happiness in response to outcomes of a probabilistic reward task is explained not by current task earnings, but by the combined influence of recent reward expectations and prediction errors arising from those expectations. The robustness of this account was evident in a large-scale replication involving 18,420 participants. Using functional MRI, we show that the very same influences account for task-dependent striatal activity in a manner akin to the influences underpinning changes in happiness.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2015

Dopaminergic Modulation of Decision Making and Subjective Well-Being.

Robb B. Rutledge; Nikolina Skandali; Peter Dayan; R. J. Dolan

The neuromodulator dopamine has a well established role in reporting appetitive prediction errors that are widely considered in terms of learning. However, across a wide variety of contexts, both phasic and tonic aspects of dopamine are likely to exert more immediate effects that have been less well characterized. Of particular interest is dopamines influence on economic risk taking and on subjective well-being, a quantity known to be substantially affected by prediction errors resulting from the outcomes of risky choices. By boosting dopamine levels using levodopa (l-DOPA) as human subjects made economic decisions and repeatedly reported their momentary happiness, we show here an effect on both choices and happiness. Boosting dopamine levels increased the number of risky options chosen in trials involving potential gains but not trials involving potential losses. This effect could be better captured as increased Pavlovian approach in an approach–avoidance decision model than as a change in risk preferences within an established prospect theory model. Boosting dopamine also increased happiness resulting from some rewards. Our findings thus identify specific novel influences of dopamine on decision making and emotion that are distinct from its established role in learning.


Nature Communications | 2016

Computations of uncertainty mediate acute stress responses in humans.

A. O. de Berker; Robb B. Rutledge; Christoph Mathys; Louise Marshall; G. F. Cross; R. J. Dolan; Sven Bestmann

The effects of stress are frequently studied, yet its proximal causes remain unclear. Here we demonstrate that subjective estimates of uncertainty predict the dynamics of subjective and physiological stress responses. Subjects learned a probabilistic mapping between visual stimuli and electric shocks. Salivary cortisol confirmed that our stressor elicited changes in endocrine activity. Using a hierarchical Bayesian learning model, we quantified the relationship between the different forms of subjective task uncertainty and acute stress responses. Subjective stress, pupil diameter and skin conductance all tracked the evolution of irreducible uncertainty. We observed a coupling between emotional and somatic state, with subjective and physiological tuning to uncertainty tightly correlated. Furthermore, the uncertainty tuning of subjective and physiological stress predicted individual task performance, consistent with an adaptive role for stress in learning under uncertain threat. Our finding that stress responses are tuned to environmental uncertainty provides new insight into their generation and likely adaptive function.


PLOS ONE | 2014

Crowdsourcing for cognitive science--the utility of smartphones.

Harriet R. Brown; Peter Zeidman; Peter Smittenaar; Rick A. Adams; Fiona McNab; Robb B. Rutledge; R. J. Dolan

By 2015, there will be an estimated two billion smartphone users worldwide. This technology presents exciting opportunities for cognitive science as a medium for rapid, large-scale experimentation and data collection. At present, cost and logistics limit most study populations to small samples, restricting the experimental questions that can be addressed. In this study we investigated whether the mass collection of experimental data using smartphone technology is valid, given the variability of data collection outside of a laboratory setting. We presented four classic experimental paradigms as short games, available as a free app and over the first month 20,800 users submitted data. We found that the large sample size vastly outweighed the noise inherent in collecting data outside a controlled laboratory setting, and show that for all four games canonical results were reproduced. For the first time, we provide experimental validation for the use of smartphones for data collection in cognitive science, which can lead to the collection of richer data sets and a significant cost reduction as well as provide an opportunity for efficient phenotypic screening of large populations.


Trends in Cognitive Sciences | 2016

Mood as Representation of Momentum

Eran Eldar; Robb B. Rutledge; R. J. Dolan; Yael Niv

Experiences affect mood, which in turn affects subsequent experiences. Recent studies suggest two specific principles. First, mood depends on how recent reward outcomes differ from expectations. Second, mood biases the way we perceive outcomes (e.g., rewards), and this bias affects learning about those outcomes. We propose that this two-way interaction serves to mitigate inefficiencies in the application of reinforcement learning to real-world problems. Specifically, we propose that mood represents the overall momentum of recent outcomes, and its biasing influence on the perception of outcomes ‘corrects’ learning to account for environmental dependencies. We describe potential dysfunctions of this adaptive mechanism that might contribute to the symptoms of mood disorders.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2015

Age-related changes in working memory and the ability to ignore distraction

Fiona McNab; Peter Zeidman; Robb B. Rutledge; Peter Smittenaar; Harriet R. Brown; Rick A. Adams; R. J. Dolan

Significance We reveal a novel and highly significant change in how items are held in mind in healthy aging. Using smartphones, data were collected from 29,631 participants, between the ages of 18–69 y. We compare the ability to exclude distractors when items are entered into working memory (WM) (encoding distraction, ED) and when items are held in mind (delay distraction, DD). In older adults, WM in the absence of distraction was more similar to ED exclusion than DD exclusion. A greater reliance on focused attention during encoding may reflect compensation for the more pronounced deterioration we observed in DD exclusion in older age. This can inform other areas of cognition and strategies to ameliorate or manage debilitating age-related cognitive decline. A weakened ability to effectively resist distraction is a potential basis for reduced working memory capacity (WMC) associated with healthy aging. Exploiting data from 29,631 users of a smartphone game, we show that, as age increases, working memory (WM) performance is compromised more by distractors presented during WM maintenance than distractors presented during encoding. However, with increasing age, the ability to exclude distraction at encoding is a better predictor of WMC in the absence of distraction. A significantly greater contribution of distractor filtering at encoding represents a potential compensation for reduced WMC in older age.

Collaboration


Dive into the Robb B. Rutledge's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. J. Dolan

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Dayan

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Harriet R. Brown

Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Smittenaar

Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Zeidman

Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hans-Jochen Heinze

Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jürgen Voges

Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Max-Philipp Stenner

Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tino Zaehle

Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge