Robbee Wedow
University of Colorado Boulder
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robbee Wedow.
Nature Genetics | 2018
Patrick Turley; Raymond K. Walters; Omeed Maghzian; Aysu Okbay; James J. Lee; Mark Alan Fontana; Tuan Anh Nguyen-Viet; Robbee Wedow; Meghan Zacher; Nicholas A. Furlotte; Patrik K. E. Magnusson; Sven Oskarsson; Magnus Johannesson; Peter M. Visscher; David Laibson; David Cesarini; Benjamin M. Neale; Daniel J. Benjamin
We introduce multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG), a method for joint analysis of summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of different traits, possibly from overlapping samples. We apply MTAG to summary statistics for depressive symptoms (Neff = 354,862), neuroticism (N = 168,105), and subjective well-being (N = 388,538). As compared to the 32, 9, and 13 genome-wide significant loci identified in the single-trait GWAS (most of which are themselves novel), MTAG increases the number of associated loci to 64, 37, and 49, respectively. Moreover, association statistics from MTAG yield more informative bioinformatics analyses and increase the variance explained by polygenic scores by approximately 25%, matching theoretical expectations.MTAG is a new method for joint analysis of summary statistics from genome-wide association studies of different traits. Applying MTAG to summary statistics for depressive symptoms, neuroticism and subjective well-being increased discovery of associated loci as compared to single-trait analyses.
Nature Genetics | 2018
James J. Lee; Robbee Wedow; Aysu Okbay; Edward Kong; Omeed Maghzian; Meghan Zacher; Tuan Anh Nguyen-Viet; Peter Bowers; Julia Sidorenko; Richard Karlsson Linner; Mark Alan Fontana; Tushar Kundu; Chanwook Lee; Hui Li; Ruoxi Li; Rebecca Royer; Pascal Timshel; Raymond K. Walters; Emily Willoughby; Loic Yengo; Maris Alver; Yanchun Bao; David W. Clark; Felix R. Day; Nicholas A. Furlotte; Peter K. Joshi; Kathryn E. Kemper; Aaron Kleinman; Claudia Langenberg; Reedik Mägi
Here we conducted a large-scale genetic association analysis of educational attainment in a sample of approximately 1.1 million individuals and identify 1,271 independent genome-wide-significant SNPs. For the SNPs taken together, we found evidence of heterogeneous effects across environments. The SNPs implicate genes involved in brain-development processes and neuron-to-neuron communication. In a separate analysis of the X chromosome, we identify 10 independent genome-wide-significant SNPs and estimate a SNP heritability of around 0.3% in both men and women, consistent with partial dosage compensation. A joint (multi-phenotype) analysis of educational attainment and three related cognitive phenotypes generates polygenic scores that explain 11–13% of the variance in educational attainment and 7–10% of the variance in cognitive performance. This prediction accuracy substantially increases the utility of polygenic scores as tools in research.Gene discovery and polygenic predictions from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals.
Biodemography and Social Biology | 2016
Benjamin W. Domingue; Robbee Wedow; Dalton Conley; Matthew B. McQueen; Thomas J. Hoffmann; Jason D. Boardman
An increasing number of studies that are widely used in the demographic research community have collected genome-wide data from their respondents. It is therefore important that demographers have a proper understanding of some of the methodological tools needed to analyze such data. This article details the underlying methodology behind one of the most common techniques for analyzing genome-wide data, genome-wide complex trait analysis (GCTA). GCTA models provide heritability estimates for health, health behaviors, or indicators of attainment using data from unrelated persons. Our goal was to describe this model, highlight the utility of the model for biodemographic research, and demonstrate the performance of this approach under modifications to the underlying assumptions. The first set of modifications involved changing the nature of the genetic data used to compute genetic similarities between individuals (the genetic relationship matrix). We then explored the sensitivity of the model to heteroscedastic errors. In general, GCTA estimates are found to be robust to the modifications proposed here, but we also highlight potential limitations of GCTA estimates.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2018
Daniel W. Belsky; Benjamin W. Domingue; Robbee Wedow; Louise Arseneault; Jason D. Boardman; Avshalom Caspi; Dalton Conley; Jason M. Fletcher; Jeremy Freese; Pamela Herd; Terrie E. Moffitt; Richie Poulton; Kamil Sicinski; Jasmin Wertz; Kathleen Mullan Harris
Significance Genome-wide association study (GWAS) discoveries about educational attainment have raised questions about the meaning of the genetics of success. These discoveries could offer clues about biological mechanisms or, because children inherit genetics and social class from parents, education-linked genetics could be spurious correlates of socially transmitted advantages. To distinguish between these hypotheses, we studied social mobility in five cohorts from three countries. We found that people with more education-linked genetics were more successful compared with parents and siblings. We also found mothers’ education-linked genetics predicted their children’s attainment over and above the children’s own genetics, indicating an environmentally mediated genetic effect. Findings reject pure social-transmission explanations of education GWAS discoveries. Instead, genetics influences attainment directly through social mobility and indirectly through family environments. A summary genetic measure, called a “polygenic score,” derived from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of education can modestly predict a person’s educational and economic success. This prediction could signal a biological mechanism: Education-linked genetics could encode characteristics that help people get ahead in life. Alternatively, prediction could reflect social history: People from well-off families might stay well-off for social reasons, and these families might also look alike genetically. A key test to distinguish biological mechanism from social history is if people with higher education polygenic scores tend to climb the social ladder beyond their parents’ position. Upward mobility would indicate education-linked genetics encodes characteristics that foster success. We tested if education-linked polygenic scores predicted social mobility in >20,000 individuals in five longitudinal studies in the United States, Britain, and New Zealand. Participants with higher polygenic scores achieved more education and career success and accumulated more wealth. However, they also tended to come from better-off families. In the key test, participants with higher polygenic scores tended to be upwardly mobile compared with their parents. Moreover, in sibling-difference analysis, the sibling with the higher polygenic score was more upwardly mobile. Thus, education GWAS discoveries are not mere correlates of privilege; they influence social mobility within a life. Additional analyses revealed that a mother’s polygenic score predicted her child’s attainment over and above the child’s own polygenic score, suggesting parents’ genetics can also affect their children’s attainment through environmental pathways. Education GWAS discoveries affect socioeconomic attainment through influence on individuals’ family-of-origin environments and their social mobility.
bioRxiv | 2018
Richard Karlsson Linner; Pietro Biroli; Edward Kong; S. Fleur W. Meddens; Robbee Wedow; Mark Alan Fontana; Mael Lebreton; Abdel Abdellaoui; Anke R. Hammerschlag; Michel G. Nivard; Aysu Okbay; Cornelius A. Rietveld; Pascal Timshel; Stephen P Tino; Maciej Trzaskowski; Ronald de Vlaming; Christian L Zünd; Yanchun Bao; Laura Buzdugan; Ann H Caplin; Chia-Yen Chen; Peter Eibich; Pierre Fontanillas; Juan R. González; Peter K. Joshi; Ville Karhunen; Aaron Kleinman; Remy Z Levin; Christina M. Lill; Gerardus A. Meddens
Humans vary substantially in their willingness to take risks. In a combined sample of over one million individuals, we conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of general risk tolerance, adventurousness, and risky behaviors in the driving, drinking, smoking, and sexual domains. We identified 611 approximately independent genetic loci associated with at least one of our phenotypes, including 124 with general risk tolerance. We report evidence of substantial shared genetic influences across general risk tolerance and risky behaviors: 72 of the 124 general risk tolerance loci contain a lead SNP for at least one of our other GWAS, and general risk tolerance is moderately to strongly genetically correlated ( to 0.50) with a range of risky behaviors. Bioinformatics analyses imply that genes near general-risk-tolerance-associated SNPs are highly expressed in brain tissues and point to a role for glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission. We find no evidence of enrichment for genes previously hypothesized to relate to risk tolerance.Humans vary substantially in their willingness to take risks. In a combined sample of over one million individuals, we conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of general risk tolerance, adventurousness, and risky behaviors in the driving, drinking, smoking, and sexual domains. We identified 611 approximately independent genetic loci associated with at least one of our phenotypes, including 124 with general risk tolerance. We report evidence of substantial shared genetic influences across general risk tolerance and risky behaviors: 72 of the 124 general risk tolerance loci contain a lead SNP for at least one of our other GWAS, and general risk tolerance is moderately to strongly genetically correlated (|rˆ g | ~ 0.25 to 0.50) with a range of risky behaviors. Bioinformatics analyses imply that genes near general-risk-tolerance-associated SNPs are highly expressed in brain tissues and point to a role for glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission. We find no evidence of enrichment for genes previously hypothesized to relate to risk tolerance.
American Sociological Review | 2018
Robbee Wedow; Meghan Zacher; Brooke M. Huibregtse; Kathleen Mullan Harris; Benjamin W. Domingue; Jason D. Boardman
Sociologists interested in the effects of genes on complex social outcomes claim environmental conditions structure when and how genes matter, but they have only studied environmental moderation of genetic effects on single traits at a time (gene-by-environment interactions). In this article, we propose that the social environment can also transform the genetic link between two traits. Taking the relationship between educational attainment and smoking as an exemplary case, we use genome-wide methods to examine whether genetic variants linked to education are also linked to smoking, and whether the strength of this relationship varies across birth cohorts. Results suggest that the genetic relationship between education and smoking is stronger among U.S. adults born between 1974 and 1983 than among those born between 1920 and 1959. These results are supported by replication in additional data from the United Kingdom. Environmental conditions that differ across birth cohorts may result in the bundling of genetic effects on multiple outcomes, as anticipated by classic cohort theory. We introduce genetic correlation-by-environment interaction [(rG)xE] as a sociologically-informed model that will become especially useful as data for more well-powered analyses become available.
Sociology of Religion | 2017
Robbee Wedow; Landon Schnabel; Lindsey K D Wedow; Mary Ellen Konieczny
Behavior Genetics | 2017
Aysu Okbay; Robbee Wedow; Edward Kong; Patrick Turley; James Lee; Meghan Zacher; Kevin Thom; Anh Tuan Nguyen; Omeed Maghzian; Richard Karlsson Linner; Matthew R. Robinson; Peter M. Visscher; Daniel J. Benjamin; David Cesarini
Social Science & Medicine | 2016
Robbee Wedow; Daniel A. Briley; Susan E. Short; Jason D. Boardman
Archive | 2018
Robbee Wedow; Daniel A. Briley; Susan E. Short; Jason D. Boardman