Robert A. Blum

Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in patients with various degrees of renal function.

The influence of age, protein binding, and renal function on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous vancomycin was evaluated in 37 adult patients with various degrees of renal function. Patients were categorized into three groups based on measured creatinine clearance (CLCR): groups 1, 2, and 3 had 24-h CLCRs of greater than 70, 40 to 70, and 10 to 39 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. After 1 h of intravenous infusion, concentrations of vancomycin in serum declined in a biexponential manner in all patients. Diminished renal function in groups 2 and 3 was accompanied by a lower total body vancomycin clearance (CL) (52.6 and 31.3, respectively, versus 98.4 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and a lower renal vancomycin clearance (CLR) (48.2 and 19.8, respectively, versus 88.0 ml/min per 1.73 m2) than in group 1. No significant differences in apparent distribution volume of the central compartment or apparent distribution volume at steady state were observed. Mean serum protein binding of vancomycin was 30% and was not significantly affected by renal function. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that CLCR was the strongest predictor of vancomycin CL (r = 0.77, P less than 0.001) and vancomycin CLR (r = 0.87, P less than 0.001). Age did not significantly improve these correlations once CLCR was included. The relationship of vancomycin CL and CLCR was utilized to develop the following equation to dose vancomycin in the majority of renally impaired patients: dose (milligrams per kilogram per 24 h) = 0.227CLCR + 5.67, where CLCR is standardized to milliliters per minute per 70 kg. The practical dosing intervals that the calculated dose can be divided into and administered include 8, 12, 24, and 48 h based on the CLCR of the patient.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamic Effects of the Oral DPP-4 Inhibitor Sitagliptin in Middle-Aged Obese Subjects

Sitagliptin (MK‐0431) is an oral, potent, and selective dipeptidyl peptidase‐IV (DPP‐4) inhibitor developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. This multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study examined the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of sitagliptin in obese subjects. Middle‐aged (45–63 years), nondiabetic, obese (body mass index: 30–40 kg/m2) men and women were randomized to sitagliptin 200 mg bid (n = 24) or placebo (n = 8) for 28 days. Steady‐state plasma concentrations of sitagliptin were achieved within 2 days of starting treatment, and >90% of the dose was excreted unchanged in urine. Sitagliptin treatment led to ∼90% inhibition of plasma DPP‐4 activity, increased active glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) levels by 2.7‐fold (P < .001), and decreased post—oral glucose tolerance test glucose excursion by 35% (P < .050) compared to placebo. In nondiabetic obese subjects, treatment with sitagliptin 200 mg bid was generally well tolerated without associated hypoglycemia and led to maximal inhibition of plasma DPP‐4 activity, increased active GLP‐1, and reduced glycemic excursion.

Increased Gastric pH and the Bioavailability of Fluconazole and Ketoconazole

Two orally active antifungal agents are currently available, ketoconazole and fluconazole. However, the absorption of ketoconazole depends on gastric pH for tablet disintegration and dissolution (1...

Biochemical Effects of Losartan, a Nonpeptide Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist, on the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in Hypertensive Patients

We investigated the effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor blockade with losartan on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in hypertensive patients (supine diastolic blood pressure, 95 to 110 mm Hg). Qualifying patients (n = 51) were allocated to placebo, 25 or 100 mg losartan, or 20 mg enalapril. Blood pressure, plasma drug concentrations, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system mediators were measured on 4 inpatient days: end of placebo run-in, after first dose, and 2 and 6 weeks of treatment. Plasma drug concentrations were similar after the first and last doses of losartan. At 6 weeks, 100 mg losartan and 20 mg enalapril showed comparable antihypertensive activity. Four hours after dosing, compared with the run-in day, 100 mg losartan increased plasma renin activity 1.7-fold and Ang II 2.5-fold, whereas enalapril increased plasma renin activity 2.8-fold and decreased Ang II 77%. Both drugs decreased plasma aldosterone concentration. For losartan, plasma renin activity and Ang II increases were greater at 2 than at 6 weeks. Effects of losartan were dose related. After the last dose of losartan, plasma renin activity and Ang II changes were similar to placebo changes by 36 hours. These results indicate that long-term blockade of the feedback Ang II receptor in hypertensive patients produces modest increases of plasma renin activity and Ang II that do not appear to affect the antihypertensive response to the antagonist.

Pharmacokinetics of gabapentin in subjects with various degrees of renal function

The pharmacokinetics of oral gabapentin (400 mg) was studied in normal subjects and in subjects with various degrees of renal function. Sixty subjects participated in this three‐center study. None of the subjects were receiving hemodialysis. Plasma and urine samples were collected for up to 264 hours after dosing, and concentrations of gabapentin were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Apparent oral plasma clearance (CL/F) and renal clearance (CLR) of gabapentin decreased and maximum plasma concentration, time to reach maximum concentration, and half‐life values increased as renal function diminished. Gabapentin CL/F and CLR were linearly correlated with creatinine clearance. Total urinary recovery of unchanged drug was comparable in all subjects, indicating that the extent of drug absorption was unaffected by renal function. There was no evidence of gabapentin metabolism even in subjects with severe renal impairment. In summary, impaired renal function results in higher plasma gabapentin concentrations, longer elimination half‐lives, and reduced CL/F and CLR values. Based on pharmacokinetic considerations, it appears that the dosing regimen of gabapentin in subjects with renal impairment may be adjusted on the basis of creatinine clearance.

Evaluation of Potential Inductive Effects of Aprepitant on Cytochrome P450 3A4 and 2C9 Activity

The NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant (EMEND®), developed for use in combination with a 5HT3 receptor antagonist and a corticosteroid to prevent highly emetogenic chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), has been shown to have a moderate inhibitory effect as well as a possible inductive effect on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Aprepitant has been noted to produce modest decreases in plasma S(−)‐warfarin concentrations, suggesting potential induction of CYP2C9. Because metabolism of some chemotherapeutic agents may involve CYP3A4, the potential inductive effect of the CINV dosing regimen of aprepitant on this metabolic pathway was evaluated using intravenous midazolam, a sensitive probe substrate of CYP3A4. The time course of induction of CYP2C9 by aprepitant was also evaluated using oral tolbutamide, a probe substrate of CYP2C9. In this double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, single‐center study, 24 healthy subjects were randomized (12 subjects per group) to receive either an aprepitant 3‐day regimen (aprepitant 125 mg p.o. on day 1 and aprepitant 80 mg p.o. on days 2 and 3) or matching placebo. All subjects also received probe drugs (midazolam 2 mg i.v. and tolbutamide 500 mg p.o.) once prior to aprepitant dosing (baseline) and again on days 4, 8, and 15. The ratio (aprepitant/placebo) of the geometric mean area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) fold‐change from baseline for midazolam was 1.25 on day 4 (p < 0.01), 0.81 on day 8 (p < 0.01), and 0.96 on day 15 (p = 0.646). The ratio (aprepitant/placebo) of the geometric mean AUC fold‐change from baseline for tolbutamide was 0.77 on day 4 (p < 0.01), 0.72 on day 8 (p < 0.001), and 0.85 on day 15 (p = 0.05). Assessed using intravenous midazolam as a probe, aprepitant 125/80 mg p.o. administered over days 1 to 3 produced clinically insignificant weak inhibition (day 4) and induction (day 8) of CYP3A4 activity and no effect on CYP3A4 activity on day 15. Assessed using oral tolbutamide as a probe, the aprepitant regimen also produced modest induction of CYP2C9 activity on days 4 and 8, which resolved nearly to baseline by day 15. Thus, the aprepitant regimen for CINV results in modest, transient induction of CYPs 3A4 and 2C9 in the 2 weeks following administration.

Effects of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron and granisetron in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND The neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist aprepitant, when given in combination with a corticosteroid and a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT(3))-receptor antagonist, has been shown to be effective for the prevention of acute and delated chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). OBJECTIVE Two studies were conducted to determine whether concomitant administration of aprepitant altered the pharmacokinetic profiles of ondansetron and granisetron, two 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists commonly used as antiemetic therapy for CINV. METHODS The 2 studies were randomized, open-label, crossover trials conducted in healthy subjects aged between 18 and 46 years. Study 1 involved the following 2 treatment regimens: aprepitant 375 mg PO, dexamethasone 20 mg PO, and ondansetron 32 mg IV on day 1, followed by aprepitant 250 mg PO and dexamethasone 8 mg PO on days 2 through 5; and dexamethasone 20 mg PO and ondansetron 32 mg IV on day 1, followed by dexamethasone 8 mg PO on days 2 through 5. Study 2 involved the following 2 treatment regimens: aprepitant 125 mg PO with granisetron 2 mg PO on day 1, followed by aprepitant 80 mg PO on days 2 and 3; and granisetron 2 mg PO on day 1 only. Individual plasma samples were used to estimate area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0- infinity )), peak plasma concentration, and apparent terminal elimination half-life (t(12)) of both ondansetron and granisetron. RESULTS Study 1 included 19 subjects (10 women, 9 men), and study 2 included 18 subjects (11 men, 7 women). Coadministration of aprepitant 375 mg produced a small but statistically significant increase in the AUC(0- infinity ) for intravenous ondansetron (from 1268.3 to 1456.5 ng.h/mL; P = 0.019), with no significant effect on peak concentration at the end of the infusion (360.8 ng/mL with aprepitant vs 408.4 ng/mL without) or t(12) (5.0 vs 4.5 hours, respectively). Coadministration of aprepitant 125 mg/80 mg did not alter the mean pharmacokinetic characteristics of oral granisetron (AUC(0- infinity ), 101.4 ng.h/mL with aprepitant vs 92.2 ng.h/mL without; maximum plasma concentration, 9.0 ng/mL with and without aprepitant; time to maximum plasma concentration, both 3.0 hours; t(12), 6.5 vs 6.9 hours, respectively). CONCLUSION Concomitant administration of aprepitant had no clinically significant effect on the mean pharmacokinetic characteristics of either ondansetron or granisetron in these healthy subjects.

Effect of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of eprosartan and losartan in healthy male volunteers

To investigate the effect of steady‐state fluconazole administration on the disposition of eprosartan, losartan, and E‐3174.

Pharmacokinetics of Rosiglitazone in Patients with Varying Degrees of Renal Insufficiency

This study investigated the effect of varying degrees of renal insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone. Subjects were stratified by estimated creatinine clearance: normal (> 80 mL/min; n = 12), mild renal insufficiency (60–80 mL/min; n = 15), moderate renal insufficiency (30–59 mL/min; n = 18), and severe renal insufficiency not requiring dialysis (≤ 29 mL/min; n = 12). Plasma rosiglitazone concentrations and protein binding were determined after a single oral 8‐mg dose of rosiglitazone. Total and unbound pharmacokinetic parameters were generated using noncompartmental methods. AUC, Cmax, and t1/2 data were analyzed separately by ANOVA to provide point estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. The pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone was not markedly affected by mild, moderate, or severe renal insufficiency. Slight increases (approximately 10%–20%) in mean unbound AUC0‐∞ values were observed for each insufficiency group compared to the normal group but were not considered to be clinically relevant. Patients with severe insufficiency exhibited a 38% increase in mean fraction unbound, leading to an increase in total clearance, which resulted in a 19% to 24% lower mean total AUC0‐∞ and Cmax values relative to the normal group. The rates of mild or moderate adverse events were similar for all groups; there were no severe adverse events. Impaired renal function does not markedly alter the pharmacokinetics of total or unbound rosiglitazone following a single dose of rosiglitazone. Therefore, the starting dose of rosiglitazone does not need to be adjusted in patients with renal impairment. Subsequent dose adjustments should be based on individual patient response.

Prednisolone Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Relation to Sex and Race

Prednisolone pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacyodynamics (PD) were investigated in relation to sex and race in white males, black males, white females, and black females (n = 8/group) after a single oral dose (0.27 mg/kg) of prednisone. The study consisted of baseline and prednisone phases with 32‐hour sampling in each phase. Women were studied during the luteal phase of their menstrual cycle. Total and free plasma prednisolone concentrations were assayed by HPLC and ultrafiltration, and pharmacokinetic data were analyzed by compartmental fitting using WinNonlin. Plasma cortisol concentrations were assayed by HPLC; T‐helper, T‐suppressor lymphocyte, and neutrophil cell counts were determined by FACS and hemocytometry, and these pharmacodynamic data were evaluated by basic and extended indirect response models using ADAPT II. Total body weight‐normalized free prednisolone oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were higher in men compared with women, regardless of race (by 22% in whites and 40% in blacks for oral clearance, p < 0.01; by 32% in whites and 38% in blacks for apparent volume of distribution, p < 0.01). The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for T‐suppressor cell‐trafficking inhibition were higher in whites than in blacks, regardless of sex (by 125% in men and 208% in women, p < 0.01). The IC50 or SC50 values for effects of prednisolone on cortisol secretion and T‐helper lymphocyte or neutrophil trafficking were not statistically different between men and women, blacks and whites. The findings of this study suggest that there are some prednisolone PK/PD differences related to sex and race. However, these differences do not suggest the need for dosage adjustments, and additional experiments with repeat dosing are needed to fully evaluate the clinical implication of these findings.