Robert Balshaw

Evaluation of renal function in liver transplant recipients receiving daclizumab (Zenapax), mycophenolate mofetil, and a delayed, low-dose tacrolimus regimen vs. a standard-dose tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil regimen: A multicenter randomized clinical trial

Posttransplant chronic renal failure, secondary to calcineurin inhibitor agents, is emerging as a major problem in liver transplantation. We report a randomized clinical trial comparing daclizumab, delayed low‐dose tacrolimus (target trough level 4‐8 ng/mL, starting day 4‐6), Investigational Arm (n = 72), to standard tacrolimus induction/maintenance dosing, Standard Arm (n = 76), with mycophenolate mofetil and tapering corticosteroids in both study arms. The end‐points were renal function indicated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD). There was no significant difference in patient survival (86.6% Investigational Arm vs. 92.9% Standard Arm; P = 0.21) or acute rejection (23.2% vs. 27.7%, respectively; P = 0.68). Statistically significant differences in median glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were found in favor of the Investigational Arm. With the CG equation, the GFR at the end of the first week was 110.7 vs. 89.6 mL/min (P = 0.019) without significant differences thereafter. With the MDRD, statistically significant differences extended to the first posttransplant month (86.8 vs. 70.1 mL/min/1.73 m2; P < 0.001) with and was seen at month 6 (75.4 vs. 69.5 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.038). In conclusion, delayed low‐dose tacrolimus, in combination with daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil, preserves early renal function post–liver transplantation without the cost of increased acute rejection. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:1064–1072.)

Proteomic Signatures in Plasma during Early Acute Renal Allograft Rejection

Acute graft rejection is an important clinical problem in renal transplantation and an adverse predictor for long term graft survival. Plasma biomarkers may offer an important option for post-transplant monitoring and permit timely and effective therapeutic intervention to minimize graft damage. This case-control discovery study (n = 32) used isobaric tagging for relative and absolute protein quantification (iTRAQ) technology to quantitate plasma protein relative concentrations in precise cohorts of patients with and without biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR). Plasma samples were depleted of the 14 most abundant plasma proteins to enhance detection sensitivity. A total of 18 plasma proteins that encompassed processes related to inflammation, complement activation, blood coagulation, and wound repair exhibited significantly different relative concentrations between patient cohorts with and without BCAR (p value <0.05). Twelve proteins with a fold-change ≥1.15 were selected for diagnostic purposes: seven were increased (titin, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, peptidase inhibitor 16, complement factor D, mannose-binding lectin, protein Z-dependent protease and β2-microglobulin) and five were decreased (kininogen-1, afamin, serine protease inhibitor, phosphatidylcholine-sterol acyltransferase, and sex hormone-binding globulin) in patients with BCAR. The first three principal components of these proteins showed clear separation of cohorts with and without BCAR. Performance improved with the inclusion of sequential proteins, reaching a primary asymptote after the first three (titin, kininogen-1, and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein). Longitudinal monitoring over the first 3 months post-transplant based on ratios of these three proteins showed clear discrimination between the two patient cohorts at time of rejection. The score then declined to baseline following treatment and resolution of the rejection episode and remained comparable between cases and controls throughout the period of quiescent follow-up. Results were validated using ELISA where possible, and initial cross-validation estimated a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 90% for classification of BCAR based on a four-protein ELISA classifier. This study provides evidence that protein concentrations in plasma may provide a relevant measure for the occurrence of BCAR and offers a potential tool for immunologic monitoring.

Peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients who failed previous interferon therapy

Background: The management of patients with chronic hepatitis C who have relapsed or failed to respond to interferon based therapies is an important issue facing hepatologists. Aims: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin in this population by conducting a multicentre open label study. Patients: Data from adults with detectable serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA who had not responded or had relapsed after previous conventional interferon or conventional interferon/ribavirin combination therapy were analysed. Methods: Patients were retreated with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) 180 µg/week plus ribavirin 800 mg/day for 24 or 48 weeks at the investigators’ discretion. The study was conceived before the optimal dose of ribavirin (1000/1200 mg/day) for patients with genotype 1 was known. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA (<50 IU/ml) after 24 weeks of follow up. The analysis was conducted by intention to treat. Results: A total of 312 patients (212 non-responders, 100 relapsers) were included. Of these, 28 patients were treated for 24 weeks and 284 for 48 weeks. Baseline characteristics between non-responders and relapsers were similar although more non-responders had genotype 1 infection (87% v 69%). Overall SVR rates were 23% (48/212) for non-responders and 41% (41/100) for relapsers. When data were analysed by genotype, SVR rates were 24% (61/253) in genotype 1 and 47% (28/59) in genotype 2/3. Conclusions: These results in a large patient cohort demonstrate that it is possible to cure a proportion of previous non-responders and relapsers by retreating with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin.

Immune response gene polymorphisms in renal transplant recipients.

Background. T-cell activation and regulation are under genetic control and vary between individuals. However, the influence of functional immune response gene polymorphisms on transplant outcomes remains controversial. Methods. A case-control design compared 100 white renal transplant recipients with or without acute graft rejection during the first year posttransplant and 50 normal controls. The polymorphic frequencies of the T-cell signaling genes CD45, CD40L and CTLA-4, and the cytokine genes TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-10 and TGF-β1 were studied. The primary analysis examined rejection risk, and subsidiary analyses graft failure and patient death. Results. Multivariate analysis showed no significant association between acute rejection and single nucleotide polymorphisms in CTLA-4, TGF-β1, IL-10 or TNF-α genes or dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms in IFN-γ and CD40L genes. Allele CD40L-147 was associated with reduced graft failure (P=0.004), and TGFb-25pro with increased graft failure (P=0.0007), although the latter showed a bidirectional dose effect. There was no significant association between patient death and any polymorphisms in the genes examined. The variant (G+77) allele of the CD45 gene was not detected in the study population. Minor differences in carriage rates observed by univariate analysis did not predict graft or patient outcome in multivariate analysis. Conclusion. The primary analysis demonstrated no significant association between the immune response gene polymorphisms examined and acute renal graft rejection in Caucasian patients receiving triple immunosuppression. Subsidiary analyses suggesting an influence of CD40L and TGFβ1 genes on graft survival require independent confirmation.

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF BASILIXIMAB IN RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1

Background. Basiliximab is a chimeric monoclonal directed against the &agr;-chain of the interleukin-2 receptor. International studies have shown that it is highly effective in preventing acute rejection in patients receiving Neoral, and causes no measurable incremental toxicity, but its economic value remains unknown. Methods. This study employed an economic model to examine the potential economic benefit of basiliximab. Parameter estimates were derived from a randomized, prospective, double-blind study conducted in 21 renal transplant centers in seven countries in which 380 adult primary allograft recipients were randomized within center to receive basiliximab (20 mg i.v.) on days 0 and 4 or placebo in addition to dual immunosuppression with Neoral and steroids. Key clinical events included primary hospitalization, immunosuppressive drug use, patient and graft survival, graft rejection, treatment of rejection, dialysis, and repeat hospitalization. Health resources were valued via a comprehensive electronic cost dictionary, based upon a detailed economic evaluation of renal transplantation in Canada. Medication costs were calculated from hospital pharmacy acquisition costs; basiliximab was assessed a zero cost. Results. The average estimated cost per patient for the first year after transplant was

Risk of weight gain associated with antipsychotic treatment: results from the Canadian National Outcomes Measurement Study in Schizophrenia.

55,393 (Canadian dollars) for placebo and

Hypoglycaemia in sulphonylurea-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes undergoing Ramadan fasting: a five-country observational study

50,839 for basiliximab, rising to

Whole Blood Genomic Biomarkers of Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejection

141,690 and

Probability, Predictors, and Prognosis of Posttransplantation Glomerulonephritis

130,592, respectively, after 5 years. A principal component of the cost in both groups was accrued during the initial transplant hospitalization (

Variation in RNA-Seq Transcriptome Profiles of Peripheral Whole Blood from Healthy Individuals with and without Globin Depletion

14,663 for standard therapy and