Robert Bryce
Flinders Medical Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robert Bryce.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 1991
Robert Bryce; Fiona Stanley; J. Barry Garner
Objective— To test the effect of a programme of additional antenatal social support on the occurrence of preterm birth (a birth from 20 to 36 weeks gestation) in women at risk of preterm birth.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2015
C Wilkinson; Robert Bryce; Pamela Adelson; Deborah Turnbull
To compare clinical outcomes from outpatient with inpatient cervical prostaglandin E2 ripening for low risk labour induction.
Australian Health Review | 2013
Pamela Adelson; Garry R. Wedlock; Chris Wilkinson; Kirsten Howard; Robert Bryce; Deborah Turnbull
OBJECTIVE To compare the costs of inpatient (usual care) with outpatient (intervention) care for cervical priming for induction of labour in women with healthy, low-risk pregnancies who are being induced for prolonged pregnancies or for social reasons. METHODS Data from a randomised controlled trial at two hospitals in South Australia were matched with hospital financial data. A cost analysis comparing women randomised to inpatient care with those randomised to outpatient care was performed, with an additional analysis focusing on those who received the intervention. RESULTS Overall, 48% of women randomised into the trial did not receive the intervention. Women randomised to outpatient care had an overall cost saving of
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology | 2014
Peter Baghurst; Stephen J. Robson; Georgia Antoniou; Wendy Scheil; Robert Bryce
319 per woman (95% CI -
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care | 1991
Robert Bryce
104 to
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | 2014
Luke E. Grzeskowiak; Gustaaf A. Dekker; Karen S Rivers; Kate Roberts-Thomson; Anil Roy; Brian Smith; Jeffery Bowden; Robert Bryce; Michael J. Davies; Justin Beilby; Anne Wilson; Philippa Middleton; Richard E. Ruffin; Jonathan Karnon; Vicki L. Clifton
742) as compared with women randomised to usual care. When restricted to women who actually received the intervention, in-hospital cost savings of
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology | 2015
Robert Bryce; Stephen J. Robson
433 (95% CI -
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2014
C Wilkinson; Robert Bryce; Pamela Adelson; Deborah Turnbull
282 to
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology | 1996
Stephen Robson; Craig S. Anderson; Robert Bryce
1148) were demonstrated in the outpatient group. However, these savings were partially offset by the cost of an outpatient priming clinic, reducing the overall cost savings to
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology | 1999
Caroline A Crowther; Janet E. Hiller; Brian Pridmore; Robert Bryce; Paul Duggan; William M. Hague; Jeffrey S. Robinson
156 per woman. CONCLUSIONS Overall cost savings were not statistically significant in women who were randomised to or received the intervention. However, the trend in cost savings favoured outpatient priming.