Robert C. Grumet

Recurrent shoulder instability: current concepts for evaluation and management of glenoid bone loss.

Recurrent instability of the glenohumeral joint is usually associated with a Bankart tear—a soft-tissue injury of the glenoid labrum attachment. However, patients with recurrent shoulder instability often present with osseous injury to the glenoid and humeral head as well. Understanding and appropriately addressing irregularities in the osseous architecture of the glenohumeral joint are critical to the overall success of surgical repair for the treatment of glenohumeral instability1. The integrity of the osseous architecture of the glenoid has recently been highlighted as one of the most important factors related to the success of surgical repair2,3. After the initial traumatic shoulder dislocation, an associated glenoid rim fracture or attritional bone injury may compromise the static restraints of the glenohumeral joint, making further instability more likely. With recurrent instability, there can be further attritional glenoid bone loss. Glenoid bone deficiency with recurrent shoulder instability is an increasingly recognized cause of failed shoulder stabilization surgery. It is critical to evaluate all patients with recurrent shoulder instability for the presence of osseous injuries to the glenoid. Specific findings in the history and the physical examination provide important clues to the presence of glenoid bone loss, and a careful preoperative evaluation to diagnose and quantify anterior glenoid deficiency is crucial for the success of surgical treatment. Appropriate preoperative imaging is essential for detection and quantification of osseous abnormalities in patients with recurrent shoulder instability. The apical oblique view described by Garth et al.4, the West Point view5, and the Didiee view6 are recognized as being the most sensitive radiographs for detecting osseous abnormalities of the glenoid. Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography may be used, but they are primarily employed to assess the surrounding soft tissues. If any osseous lesion is discovered on radiographs, …

Does the Literature Confirm Superior Clinical Results in Radiographically Healed Rotator Cuffs After Rotator Cuff Repair

PURPOSE Because recurrent or persistent defects in the rotator cuff after repair are common, we sought to clarify the correlation between structural integrity of the rotator cuff and clinical outcomes through a systematic review of relevant studies. METHODS Medline, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for all literature published from January 1966 to December 2008 that used the key words shoulder, rotator cuff, rotator cuff tear, rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic, integrity, healed, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography arthrography (CTA), and ultrasound. The inclusion criteria were studies (Levels I to IV) that reported outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in healed and nonhealed repairs based on ultrasound, CTA, and/or MRI. Exclusionary criteria were studies that included open repair or subscapularis repair and studies that did not define outcomes based on healed versus nonhealed but rather used another variable (i.e., repair technique). Data were abstracted from the studies including patient demographics, tear characteristics, surgical procedure, rehabilitation, strength, range of motion, clinical scoring systems, and imaging studies. RESULTS Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis: 5 used ultrasound, 4 used MRI, 2 used CTA, and 2 used combined CTA/MRI for diagnosis of a recurrent tear. Statistical improvement in patients who had an intact cuff at follow-up was seen in Constant scores in 6 of 9 studies; in University of California, Los Angeles scores in 1 of 2 studies; in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores in 0 of 3 studies; and in Simple Shoulder Test scores in 0 of 2 studies. Increased range of motion in forward elevation was seen in 2 of 5 studies and increased strength in forward elevation in 5 of 8 studies. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that some important differences in clinical outcomes likely exist between patients with healed and nonhealed rotator cuff repairs. Further study is needed to conclusively define this difference and identify other important prognostic factors related to clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, systematic review.

Does the Literature Support Double-Row Suture Anchor Fixation for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair? A Systematic Review Comparing Double-Row and Single-Row Suture Anchor Configuration

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of single-row (SR) and double-row (DR) suture anchor fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a systematic review of the published literature. METHODS We searched all published literature from January 1966 to December 2008 using Medline, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for the following key words: shoulder, rotator cuff, rotator cuff tear, rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic, arthroscopic-assisted, single row, double row, and transosseous equivalent. The inclusion criteria were cohort studies (Levels I to III) that compared SR and DR suture anchor configuration for the arthroscopic treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. The exclusion criteria were studies that lacked a comparison group, and, therefore, case series were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS There were 5 studies that met the criteria and were included in the final analysis: 5 in the SR group and 5 in the DR group. Data were abstracted from the studies for patient demographics, rotator cuff tear characteristics, surgical procedure, rehabilitation, range of motion, clinical scoring systems, and imaging studies. CONCLUSIONS There are no clinical differences between the SR and DR suture anchor repair techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. At present, the data in the published literature do not support the use of DR suture anchor fixation to improve clinical outcome, but there are some studies that report that DR suture anchor fixation may improve tendon healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, systematic review of Levels I to III studies.

Arthroscopic Stabilization for First-Time Versus Recurrent Shoulder Instability

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to systematically review the evidence on the outcomes of arthroscopic repair for anterior shoulder instability in first-time dislocators when compared with patients with recurrent instability. METHODS We designed a systematic review with a specific methodology to investigate the outcomes of surgery for those with only a first-time dislocation versus those who underwent surgery after multiple instability events. We performed a literature search from January 1966 to December 2008 using Medline, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Key words included the following: first time, primary shoulder, or recurrent shoulder instability, shoulder dislocation, Bankart repair, arthroscopic Bankart repair, and labral repair. The inclusion criteria were cohort studies (Level I to II) that evaluated the outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic stabilization after the first dislocation or multiple recurrent episodes. Studies that lacked a comparison group or were retrospective (Level III studies or higher) were excluded. RESULTS There were 15 studies that met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis: 5 in the first-time dislocation group and 10 in the recurrent instability group. Study design, patient demographics, mean number of dislocations, surgical technique, and rehabilitation protocol, as well as subjective and objective outcome measures, were recorded. CONCLUSIONS There were no differences in recurrence or complication rate among patients undergoing surgery after the primary dislocation when compared with those undergoing surgery after multiple recurrent episodes. Clinical outcome measures significantly improved within all independent studies from preoperatively to postoperatively. However, because of variation in the outcome measurement tools used, no direct comparison between the study groups could be performed. Additional randomized controlled studies are needed to compare the functional outcome, quality of life, and ability to return to preinjury activity level among patients undergoing early versus delayed repair for anterior shoulder instability.

Articular and Meniscal Pathology Associated with Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND The abnormal kinematics, contact pressures, and repeated episodes of instability observed in chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency suggest that these patients may be predisposed to early degenerative changes and associated pathologies such as meniscal tears and chondral injury. Injury to the cartilage and associated structures at the time of ACL rupture, in combination with the inflammatory mediators released at the time of injury, may create irreversible damage to the knee despite restoration of normal knee kinematics with an ACL reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS Patients undergoing acute ACL reconstruction have a higher incidence of lateral meniscal tears and less severe chondral changes when compared with patients undergoing late ACL reconstruction. Older patients likely have a higher incidence of chondral and meniscal pathology compared with younger patients. METHODS A retrospective chart review of a single surgeons ACL practice over 20 years was performed. A surgical data packet was used to record patient demographics, location, grade, and number of chondral injuries as well as location and pattern of meniscal injuries at the time of ACL reconstruction. Patients (N = 709) were divided into three subgroups according to their time from injury to surgery; acute (less than 4 weeks, N = 121), subacute (4 to 8 weeks, N = 146), and chronic (8 weeks or more, N = 442). RESULTS Older patients had a higher incidence of more severe chondral grade and number of chondral injuries at the time of ACL reconstruction. Patients undergoing surgery more than 8 weeks after injury had a statistically significant more severe chondral grade in the medial compartment when compared with those that had surgery less than 8 weeks after injury. A similar observation was not found in the lateral compartment. With regard to meniscal pathology, full-thickness medial meniscal tears were likely to be bucket-type tears regardless of the chronicity of the injury. Similarly, full-thickness lateral meniscal tears were more often flap-type tears independent of the time interval between injury and surgery. Partial-thickness tears were common both medially and laterally. CONCLUSIONS Patients age and chronicity of ACL tear greater than 8 weeks are both significant factors in medial compartment chondral pathology. Patients with delayed reconstruction may have greater associated pathology.

Lateral hip pain in an athletic population: differential diagnosis and treatment options.

Context: Posterior hip pain is a relatively uncommon but increasingly recognized complaint in the orthopaedic community. Patient complaints and presentations are often vague or nonspecific, making diagnosis and subsequent treatment decisions difficult. The purposes of this article are to review the anatomy and pathophysiology related to posterior hip pain in the athletic patient population. Evidence Acquisition: Data were collected through a thorough review of the literature via a MEDLINE search of all relevant articles between 1980 and 2010. Results: Many patients who complain of posterior hip pain actually have pain referred from another part of the body—notably, the lumbar spine or sacroiliac joint. Treatment options for posterior hip pain are typically nonoperative; however, surgery is warranted in some cases. Conclusions: Recent advancements in the understanding of hip anatomy, pathophysiology, and treatment options have enabled physicians to better diagnosis athletic hip injuries and select patients for appropriate treatment.

Interval Arthrometric Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft Versus Allograft Do Grafts Attenuate Within the First Year Postoperatively?

Background: There is little information regarding the incremental changes in the postoperative laxity of patellar tendon (PT) autografts versus allografts in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Hypotheses: (1) There would be no significant increase in laxity between 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively with PT autografts or allografts, (2) there would be no significant difference in laxity between PT autografts and allografts, (3) there would not be a significant difference in laxity between nonirradiated and low dose–irradiated PT allograft tissues, and (4) the physical examination findings would correlate with the instrumented laxity outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review of 238 ACL-deficient patients who underwent single-incision endoscopic ACL reconstruction with a PT autograft (n = 132) or allograft (n = 106; 58 irradiated and 48 nonirradiated) from a single surgeon was made looking at data from preoperatively and from 6 weeks to 1 year postoperatively. The objective measurements of ligament integrity included range of motion, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-1000 arthrometer instrumented laxity examination. Failure was defined as arthrometric side-to-side differences (maximum manual difference) ≥3 mm or a positive pivot shift. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. Results: There were no differences in postoperative examination findings or instrumented laxity between PT autografts and allografts (irradiated or nonirradiated) in either subgroup. The postoperative improvement based on the Lachman examination, pivot-shift test, and arthrometric data in all study groups was significant (P < .001) in 98% (autograft: n = 130; allograft: n = 104) of patients, and arthrometric failure correlated with failure by physical examination. There was no significant change in graft laxity, as measured by KT-1000 arthrometer, from 6 weeks to 1 year postoperatively for 98% of patients. Finally, there was no statistical correlation in instrumented laxity results for either the autograft or allograft group with reference to age, gender, concurrent meniscectomy, meniscal repairs, interval to surgery, postoperative patellar pain, time to surgery, or irradiated versus nonirradiated allograft. Conclusion: Laxity is not increased after the initial 6 weeks for either PT allograft or autograft constructs during the first postoperative year. There was no correlation between age, gender, concomitant injury, interval to surgery, or radiation of the graft with instrumented laxity results. Furthermore, our arthrometric data paralleled our clinical findings of stability at follow-up.

Lateral Hip Pain in an Athletic Population

Context: Historically, the term greater trochanteric pain syndrome has been used to describe a spectrum of conditions that cause lateral-sided hip pain, including greater trochanteric bursitis, snapping iliotibial band, and/or strains or tendinopathy of the abductor mechanism. Diagnosis of these conditions may be difficult because clinical presentations are variable and sometimes inconclusive. Especially difficult is differentiating intrinsic pain from pain referred to the greater trochanteric region. The purposes of this article are to review the relevant anatomy and pathophysiology of the lateral hip. Evidence Acquisition: Data were collected through a thorough review of the literature conducted through a MEDLINE search of all relevant papers between 1980 and January 2010. Results: Recent advances in imaging and an improved understanding of pathomechanics have helped to guide the evaluation, diagnosis, and appropriate treatment for patients presenting with lateral hip pain. Conclusion: Various diagnostic tools and treatment modalities can be used to effectively manage the athletic patient presenting with lateral hip pain.

Bony avulsion of the medial ulnar collateral ligament in a gymnast: a case report.

The risk of injury in gymnastics is higher during periods of rapid growth and is directly related to the level of competition. Gymnasts spend an estimated 29% of their season altering their training routine as a result of injury. Most injuries in these athletes are the result of overuse, with upper extremity injuries occurring more frequently in male gymnasts and lower extremity injuries more often in females. Elbow injuries are relatively common in gymnasts due to the repetitive compressive varus and valgus stresses applied. These super-physiologic loads likely contribute to the development of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum and medial epicondylitis or apophysitis. Catastrophic injury, such as an acute dislocation, is frequently seen as a result of a missed move, a fall from the apparatus, or an improper dismount. Several case studies have described the extreme of these injuries, such as bilateral elbow dislocations, in a gymnast. In high-level gymnasts, similar to the need of the medial elbow structures in a pitcher in an effort to withstand extreme valgus force, there is a significant valgus load imparted to the elbow with weight bearing and compressive activities such as a back handspring. These forces average 3% of body weight times body height (about 18 Nm). Therefore, the integrity of the ulnar collateral ligament is vital to perform these routines and protect the lateral elbow structures. We describe a case of a young competitive-level gymnast who sustained an injury to both elbows during an uneven bars routine. She had an acute elbow dislocation on her left elbow and an avulsion of the ulnar collateral ligament from the sublime tubercle of the ulna on the right

Salvage of contaminated osteochondral allografts: the effects of chlorhexidine on human articular chondrocyte viability.

Background: Because chondrocyte viability is imperative for successful osteochondral allograft transplantation, sterilization techniques must provide antimicrobial effects with minimal cartilage toxicity. Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is an effective disinfectant; however, its use with human articular cartilage requires further investigation. Purpose: To determine the maximal chlorhexidine concentration that does not affect chondrocyte viability in allografts and to determine whether this concentration effectively sterilizes contaminated osteoarticular grafts. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Osteochondral plugs were subjected to pulse lavage with 1-L solutions of 0.002%, 0.01%, 0.05%, and 0.25% CHG and cultured for 0, 1, 2, and 7 days in media of 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. Chondrocyte viability was determined via LIVE/DEAD Viability Assay. Plugs were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus and randomized to 4 treatment groups. One group was not contaminated; the 3 others were contaminated and received no treatment, saline pulse lavage, or saline pulse lavage with 0.002% CHG. Serial dilutions were plated and colony-forming units assessed. Results: The control group and the 0.002% CHG group showed similar cell viability, ranging from 67% ± 4% to 81% ± 22% (mean ± SD) at all time points. In the 0.01% CHG group, cell viability was reduced in comparison with control by 2-fold at day 2 and remained until day 7 (P < .01). The 0.05% and 0.25% CHG groups showed a 2-fold reduction in cell viability at day 1 (P < .01). At day 7, cell viability was reduced to 15% ± 18% (4-fold decrease) for the 0.05% CHG group and 10% ± 19% (6-fold decrease) for the 0.25% CHG group (P < .01). Contaminated grafts treated with 0.002% CHG demonstrated no colony-forming units. Conclusion: Pulse lavage with 0.002% CHG does not cause significant cell death within 7 days after exposure, while CHG at concentrations >0.002% significantly decreases chondrocyte viability within 1 to 2 days after exposure and should therefore not be used for disinfection of osteochondral allograft. Pulse lavage does not affect chondrocyte viability but cannot be used in isolation to sterilize contaminated fragments. Overall, 0.002% CHG was shown to effectively decontaminate osteoarticular fragments. Clinical Relevance: This study offers a scientific protocol for sterilizing osteochondral fragments that does not adversely affect cartilage viability.