Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Róbert Chlebo is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Róbert Chlebo.


Journal of Apicultural Research | 2012

Managed honey bee colony losses in Canada, China, Europe, Israel and Turkey, for the winters of 2008–9 and 2009–10

Romée van der Zee; Lennard Pisa; Sreten Andonov; Robert Brodschneider; Róbert Chlebo; Mary F Coffey; Karl Crailsheim; Bjørn Dahle; Anna Gajda; Marica M Drazic; Mariano Higes; Lassi Kauko; Aykut Kence; Meral Kence; Hrisula Kiprijanovska; Jasna Kralj; Preben Kristiansen; Raquel Martin Hernandez; Franco Mutinelli; Bach Kim Nguyen; Christoph Otten; Stephen F. Pernal; Gavin Ramsay; Violeta Santrac; Victoria Soroker; Flemming Vejsnæs; Shi Wei; Selwyn Wilkins; A. Hlinku; Camino de San Martín

Summary In 2008 the COLOSS network was formed by honey bee experts from Europe and the USA. The primary objectives set by this scientific network were to explain and to prevent large scale losses of honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. In June 2008 COLOSS obtained four years support from the European Union from COST and was designated as COST Action FA0803—COLOSS (Prevention of honey bee Colony Losses). To enable the comparison of loss data between participating countries, a standardized COLOSS questionnaire was developed. Using this questionnaire information on honey bee losses has been collected over two years. Survey data presented in this study were gathered in 2009 from 12 countries and in 2010 from 24 countries. Mean honey bee losses in Europe varied widely, between 7–22% over the 2008–9 winter and between 7–30% over the 2009–10 winter. An important finding is that for all countries which participated in 2008–9, winter losses in 2009–10 were found to be substantially higher. In 2009–10, winter losses in South East Europe were at such a low level that the factors causing the losses in other parts of Europe were absent, or at a level which did not affect colony survival. The five provinces of China, which were included in 2009–10, showed very low mean (4%) A. mellifera winter losses. In six Canadian provinces, mean winter losses in 2010 varied between 16–25%, losses in Nova Scotia (40%) being exceptionally high. In most countries and in both monitoring years, hobbyist beekeepers (1–50 colonies) experienced higher losses than practitioners with intermediate beekeeping operations (51–500 colonies). This relationship between scale of beekeeping and extent of losses effect was also observed in 2009–10, but was less pronounced. In Belgium, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland, 2008–9 mean winter losses for beekeepers who reported ‘disappeared’ colonies were significantly higher compared to mean winter losses of beekeepers who did not report ‘disappeared’ colonies. Mean 2008–9 winter losses for those beekeepers in the Netherlands who reported symptoms similar to “Colony Collapse Disorder” (CCD), namely: 1. no dead bees in or surrounding the hive while; 2. capped brood was present, were significantly higher than mean winter losses for those beekeepers who reported ‘disappeared’ colonies without the presence of capped brood in the empty hives. In the winter of 2009–10 in the majority of participating countries, beekeepers who reported ‘disappeared’ colonies experienced higher winter losses compared with beekeepers, who experienced winter losses but did not report ‘disappeared’ colonies.


Journal of Apicultural Research | 2014

Results of international standardised beekeeper surveys of colony losses for winter 2012-2013: analysis of winter loss rates and mixed effects modelling of risk factors for winter loss

Romée van der Zee; Robert Brodschneider; Valters Brusbardis; Jean-Daniel Charrière; Róbert Chlebo; Mary F Coffey; Bjørn Dahle; Marica M Drazic; Lassi Kauko; Justinas Kretavicius; Preben Kristiansen; Franco Mutinelli; Christoph Otten; Magnus Peterson; Aivar Raudmets; Violeta Santrac; Ari Seppälä; Victoria Soroker; Grażyna Topolska; Flemming Vejsnæs; Alison Gray

Summary This article presents results of an analysis of winter losses of honey bee colonies from 19 mainly European countries, most of which implemented the standardised 2013 COLOSS questionnaire. Generalised linear mixed effects models (GLMMs) were used to investigate the effects of several factors on the risk of colony loss, including different treatments for Varroa destructor, allowing for random effects of beekeeper and region. Both winter and summer treatments were considered, and the most common combinations of treatment and timing were used to define treatment factor levels. Overall and within country colony loss rates are presented. Significant factors in the model were found to be: percentage of young queens in the colonies before winter, extent of queen problems in summer, treatment of the varroa mite, and access by foraging honey bees to oilseed rape and maize. Spatial variation at the beekeeper level is shown across geographical regions using random effects from the fitted models, both before and after allowing for the effect of the significant terms in the model. This spatial variation is considerable.


Journal of Apicultural Research | 2011

A review of methods for discrimination of honey bee populations as applied to European beekeeping

Maria Bouga; Cédric Alaux; Malgorzata Bienkowska; Ralph Büchler; Norman Carreck; Eliza Cauia; Róbert Chlebo; Bjørn Dahle; Raffaele Dall'Olio; Pilar De la Rúa; Aleš Gregorc; Evgeniya Ivanova; Aykut Kence; Meral Kence; Nikola Kezić; Hrisula Kiprijanovska; Peter Kozmus; Per Kryger; Yves Le Conte; António Murilhas; A. Siceanu; Gabriele Soland; Aleksandar Uzunov; Jerzy Wilde

Summary Here, scientists from 19 European countries, most of them collaborating in Working Group 4: “Diversity and Vitality” of COST Action FA 0803 “Prevention of honey bee COlony LOSSes” (COLOSS), review the methodology applied in each country for discriminating between honey bee populations. Morphometric analyses (classical and geometric) and different molecular markers have been applied. Even if the approach has been similar, however, different methodologies regarding measurements, landmarks or molecular markers may have been used, as well as different statistical procedures. There is therefore the necessity to establish common methods in all countries in order to have results that can be directly compared. This is one of the goals of WG4 of the COLOSS project.


Journal of Apicultural Research | 2014

A review of methods used in some European countries for assessing the quality of honey bee queens through their physical characters and the performance of their colonies

Fani Hatjina; Malgorzata Bienkowska; Leonidas Charistos; Róbert Chlebo; Cecilia Costa; Marica Maja Dražić; Janja Filipi; Aleš Gregorc; Evgeniya Ivanova; Nikola Kezić; Jan Kopernicky; Per Kryger; Vesna Lokar; Mica Mladenovic; Beata Panasiuk; Plamen Petrov; Slađan Rašić; Maja Ivana Smodiš Škerl; Flemming Vejsnæs; Jerzy Wilde

Summary The term “quality” in relation to queens and drones refers to certain quantitative physical and/or behavioural characters. It is generally believed that a high quality queen should have the following physical characteristics: high live weight; high number of ovarioles; large size of spermatheca; high number of spermatozoa in spermatheca; and be free from diseases and pests. It is, however, also known that the performance of a honey bee colony is the result of its queens function as well as of that of the drones that mated with her. These two approaches are often considered together and give a general picture of the queen production technique and selection. Here we describe the most common and well known anatomical, physiological, behavioural and performance characters related to the queens, as measured in different European countries: the live weight of the virgin queen (Bulgaria); the live weight of the laying queen (Bulgaria, Italy); the diameter and volume of spermatheca (Bulgaria, Greece, Slovenia); the number of ovarioles (Greece, Italy, Slovenia); the weight of ovaries (Slovenia); the number of spermatozoa in spermatheca (Italy, Poland, Slovenia); the brood pattern (Bulgaria, Greece); the egg laying ability/fecundity (Bulgaria); the brood production (Croatia, Serbia); the colony population development (Croatia, Serbia, Slovakia); the honey production (Croatia, Denmark, Serbia, Slovakia); the hygienic behaviour (Croatia, Denmark, Serbia, Slovakia); the defence behaviour (Croatia); the calmness/sitting on the comb (Croatia, Denmark); and swarming (Croatia, Denmark). The data presented fit well with the findings of the same characters in the literature, and in general they support the argument for the term “quality characters”. Especially for the weight of the queen, the number of ovarioles, the volume of the spermatheca and the number of spermatozoa, data per country proved its own accuracy by repetition through the years. We also report that when instrumentally inseminated queens are kept under mass production conditions (in small cages in queen banks and with low number of attendants) they can transfer the semen to their spermatheca and clear their oviducts more efficiently when they have been inseminated with small amounts of semen in two or three sequences (but not four), compared to those inseminated with the same amount of semen at once (Poland). Furthermore, we had an inside view of the sanitary conditions of the colony: a. through the health status of the queen (nosema plus virus analysis) (Slovenia); and b. evaluating the nosema load of worker bees (Denmark) and of the queens (Greece). This is the first step to summarize this type of diverse data for such an important issue. The knowledge acquired can be used to fill in the existing gaps in the breeding or queen evaluation systems of each country in order to facilitate standardization of methodology for comparable results.


Journal of Apicultural Research | 2016

Preliminary analysis of loss rates of honey bee colonies during winter 2015/16 from the COLOSS survey

Robert Brodschneider; Alison Gray; Romée van der Zee; Noureddine Adjlane; Valters Brusbardis; Jean-Daniel Charrière; Róbert Chlebo; Mary F Coffey; Karl Crailsheim; Bjørn Dahle; Jiří Danihlík; Ellen L. Danneels; Dirk C. de Graaf; Marica Maja Dražić; Mariia Fedoriak; Ivan Forsythe; Miroljub Golubovski; Aleš Gregorc; Urszula Grzęda; Ian Hubbuck; Rahşan İvgin Tunca; Lassi Kauko; Ole Kilpinen; Justinas Kretavicius; Preben Kristiansen; Maritta Martikkala; Raquel Martín-Hernández; Franco Mutinelli; Magnus Peterson; Christoph Otten

In this short note we present comparable loss rates of honey bee colonies during winter 2015/16 from 29 countries, obtained with the COLOSS questionnaire. Altogether, we received valid answers from 19,952 beekeepers. These beekeepers collectively wintered 421,238 colonies, and reported 18,587 colonies with unsolvable queen problems and 32,048 dead colonies after winter. This gives an overall loss rate of 12.0% (95% confidence interval 11.8–12.2%) during winter 2015/16, with marked differences among countries. Beekeepers in the present study assessed 7.6% (95% CI 7.4–7.8%) of their colonies as dead or empty, and 4.4% (95% CI 4.3–4.5%) as having unsolvable queen problems after winter. The overall analysis showed that small operations suffered higher losses than larger ones. A table with detailed results and a map showing response and relative risks at regional level are presented.


Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes | 2011

Mycobiota and mycotoxins in bee pollen collected from different areas of Slovakia

Miroslava Kačániová; Miroslav Juráček; Róbert Chlebo; Vladimíra Kňazovická; Miriam Kádasi-Horáková; Simona Kunová; Jadža Lejková; Peter Haščík; Ján Mareček; Milan Šimko

Contamination by microscopic fungi and mycotoxins in different bee pollen samples, which were stored under three different ways of storing as freezing, drying and UV radiation, was investigated. During spring 2009, 45 samples of bee-collected pollen were gathered from beekeepers who placed their bee colonies on monocultures of sunflower, rape and poppy fields within their flying distance. Bee pollen was collected from bees’ legs by special devices placed at the entrance to hives. Samples were examined for the concentration and identification of microscopic fungi able to grow on Malt and Czapek-Dox agar and mycotoxins content [deoxynivalenol (DON), T-2 toxin (T-2), zearalenone (ZON) and total aflatoxins (AFL), fumonisins (FUM), ochratoxins (OTA)] by direct competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). The total number of microscopic fungi in this study ranged from 2.98 ± 0.02 in frozen sunflower bee pollen to 4.06 ± 0.10 log cfu.g−1 in sunflower bee pollen after UV radiation. In this study, 449 isolates belonging to 21 fungal species representing 9 genera were found in 45 samples of bee pollen. The total isolates were detected in frozen poppy pollen 29, rape pollen 40, sunflower pollen 80, in dried poppy pollen 12, rape pollen 36, sunflower 78, in poppy pollen after UV radiation treatment 54, rape 59 and sunflower 58. The most frequent isolates of microscopic fungi found in bee pollen samples of all prevalent species were Mucor mucedo (49 isolates), Alternaria alternata (40 isolates), Mucor hiemalis (40 isolates), Aspergillus fumigatus (33 isolates) and Cladosporium cladosporioides (31 isolates). The most frequently found isolates were detected in sunflower bee pollen frozen (80 isolates) and the lowest number of isolates was observed in poppy bee pollen dried (12 isolates). The most prevalent mycotoxin of poppy bee pollen was ZON (361.55 ± 0.26 μg.kg−1), in rape bee pollen T-2 toxin (265.40 ± 0.18 μg.kg−1) and in sunflower bee pollen T-2 toxin (364.72 ± 0.13 μg.kg−1) in all cases in frozen samples.


Chemical Papers | 2013

Characterisation of VOC composition of Slovak monofloral honeys by GC×GC-TOF-MS

Ivan Špánik; Antónia Janáčová; Zuzana Šusterová; Tibor Jakubík; Nikoleta Jánošková; Pavel Novák; Róbert Chlebo

Solid phase microextraction (SPME) followed by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to a time-of-flight mass spectrometer (GC×GC-TOF-MS) was used to characterise volatile organic compounds in honeys of different botanical origins. Rape, sunflower, acacia, lime, raspberry, and phacelia honeys from Slovakia were studied in detail. Up to 900 compounds were detected at the given S/N ratio of 200. The poorest VOC profiles were found for acacia and rape honeys while lime honey showed the richest VOC composition. Approximately 100 compounds were present in all honeys studied, independently of their botanical origin. They belong to various chemical classes (hydrocarbons, alcohols, aldehydes and ketones, terpenes, benzene derivatives, and compounds containing heteroatoms). The compounds found in only one type of honey were also successfully identified.


Research in Veterinary Science | 2013

The effects of bee pollen extracts on the broiler chicken's gastrointestinal microflora

Miroslava Kačániová; Katarína Rovná; Henrieta Arpášová; Lukáš Hleba; Jana Petrová; Peter Haščík; Juraj Čuboň; Adriana Pavelková; Róbert Chlebo; Alica Bobková; Michal Stričík

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of bee pollen ethanolic extracts on the in vivo gastrointestinal tract microflora colonization of broiler chickens. A completely randomized experiment based on six treatments (different concentrations of bee pollen - 0, 5, 15, 25, 35 and 45 g kg(-1) diet) was used during 7 weeks. The highest count of faecal Enterococci was found in the experimental group with the addition of 15 g of pollen (8.85 ± 0.87 log CFU g(-1)) per 1 kg of feed mixture. The highest count of Lactobacilli was detected in the experimental group with 35 g of pollen per 1 kg of feed mixture and the highest number of the Enterobacteriaceae genera count was found in the control group (8.43 ± 0.15 log CFU g(-1)). Moreover, the MALDI TOF MS Biotyper identified the following genera: Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella oxytoca, as well as Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. crispatus, L. fermentum and L. salivarius from the Lactobacilli group and Enterococcus avium, E. casseliflavus, E. cecorum, E. faecalis, E. faecium, E. gallinarum, E. hirae and E. malodoratus from the Enterococci group. Additionally, the in vitro antimicrobial activities of pollen against five bacteria species isolated from gastrointestinal tracts of chickens were tested. The best antimicrobial effect of the pollen extract was detected against K. oxytoca.


Chemistry & Biodiversity | 2016

The Tracing of VOC Composition of Acacia Honey during ripening stages by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography.

Olga Vyviurska; Róbert Chlebo; Solomiya Pysarevska; Ivan Špánik

In this study, VOC profiles of acacia flowers and honey samples at different processing stages and related comb wax samples were studied using comprehensive two‐dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry. It was found that some monoterpene compounds like α‐pinene, myrcene, cis‐β‐ocimene, and 4‐terpineol were common for acacia flower and all acacia honey samples, and the presence of verbenone and ocimene was first established in acacia honey. The most enriched VOC profile was obtained for raw honey before cell capping, where the final composition of lactones was achieved. On the contrary, number of alcohols, esters, and variety of terpenes, as well as their concentration in the honey samples decrease through ripening processes. Strained honey was characterized by the absence of camphor, α‐bisabolol, and 3‐carene, while isophorone and hexanoic acid were identified only in this type of honey. The composition of final VOC profile of honey was also influenced by the age of comb wax. The additional aromatic and lactone compounds, e.g., phenol, 1‐phenylethanol, δ‐hexalactone, and γ‐heptalactone were observed for honey maturated in old dark comb wax.


Journal of Apicultural Research | 2018

Multi-country loss rates of honey bee colonies during winter 2016/2017 from the COLOSS survey

Robert Brodschneider; Alison Gray; Noureddine Adjlane; Alexis Ballis; Valters Brusbardis; Jean-Daniel Charrière; Róbert Chlebo; Mary F Coffey; Bjørn Dahle; Dirk C. de Graaf; Marica Maja Dražić; Garth Evans; Mariia Fedoriak; Ivan Forsythe; Aleš Gregorc; Urszula Grzęda; Amots Hetzroni; Lassi Kauko; Preben Kristiansen; Maritta Martikkala; Raquel Martín-Hernández; Carlos Aurelio Medina-Flores; Franco Mutinelli; Aivar Raudmets; Vladimir Ryzhikov; Noa Simon-Delso; Jevrosima Stevanovic; Aleksandar Uzunov; Flemming Vejsnæs; Saskia Wöhl

In this short note we present comparable loss rates of honey bee colonies during winter 2016/2017 from 27 European countries plus Algeria, Israel and Mexico, obtained with the COLOSS questionnaire. The 14,813 beekeepers providing valid loss data collectively wintered 425,762 colonies, and reported 21,887 (5.1%, 95% confidence interval 5.0–5.3%) colonies with unsolvable queen problems and 60,227 (14.1%, 95% CI 13.8–14.4%) dead colonies after winter. Additionally we asked for colonies lost due to natural disaster, which made up another 6,903 colonies (1.6%, 95% CI 1.5–1.7%). This results in an overall loss rate of 20.9% (95% CI 20.6–21.3%) of honey bee colonies during winter 2016/2017, with marked differences among countries. The overall analysis showed that small operations suffered higher losses than larger ones (p < 0.001). Overall migratory beekeeping had no significant effect on the risk of winter loss, though there was an effect in several countries. A table is presented giving detailed results from 30 countries. A map is also included, showing relative risk of colony winter loss at regional level.

Collaboration


Dive into the Róbert Chlebo's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bjørn Dahle

Norwegian University of Life Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alison Gray

University of Strathclyde

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Miroslava Kačániová

Slovak University of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aykut Kence

Middle East Technical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Magnus Peterson

University of Strathclyde

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ivan Špánik

Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jana Petrová

Slovak University of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Juraj Čuboň

Slovak University of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge