Robert D. Suh

Patient-specific models for lung nodule detection and surveillance in CT images

The purpose of this work is to develop patient-specific models for automatically detecting lung nodules in computed tomography (CT) images. It is motivated by significant developments in CT scanner technology and the burden that lung cancer screening and surveillance imposes on radiologists. We propose a new method that uses a patients baseline image data to assist in the segmentation of subsequent images so that changes in size and/or shape of nodules can be measured automatically. The system uses a generic, a priori model to detect candidate nodules on the baseline scan of a previously unseen patient. A user then confirms or rejects nodule candidates to establish baseline results. For analysis of follow-up scans of that particular patient, a patient-specific model is derived from these baseline results. This model describes expected features (location, volume and shape) of previously segmented nodules so that the system can relocalize them automatically on follow-up. On the baseline scans of 17 subjects, a radiologist identified a total of 36 nodules, of which 31 (86%) were detected automatically by the system with an average of 11 false positives (FPs) per case. In follow-up scans 27 of the 31 nodules were still present and, using patient-specific models, 22 (81%) were correctly relocalized by the system. The system automatically detected 16 out of a possible 20 (80%) of new nodules on follow-up scans with ten FPs per case.

High-Resolution CT Scan Findings in Patients With Symptomatic Scleroderma-Related Interstitial Lung Disease

BACKGROUND Lung disease has become the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in scleroderma (SSc) patients. The frequency, nature, and progression of interstitial lung disease seen on high-resolution CT (HRCT) scans in patients with diffuse SSc (dcSSc) compared with those with limited SSc (lcSSc) has not been well characterized. METHODS Baseline HRCT scan images of 162 participants randomized into a National Institutes of Health-funded clinical trial were compared to clinical features, pulmonary function test measures, and BAL fluid cellularity. The extent and distribution of interstitial lung disease HRCT findings, including pure ground-glass opacity (pGGO), pulmonary fibrosis (PF), and honeycomb cysts (HCs), were recorded in the upper, middle, and lower lung zones on baseline and follow-up CT scan studies. RESULTS HRCT scan findings included 92.9% PF, 49.4% pGGO, and 37.2% HCs. There was a significantly higher incidence of HCs in the three zones in lcSSc patients compared to dcSSc patients (p = 0.034, p = 0.048, and p = 0.0007, respectively). The extent of PF seen on HRCT scans was significantly negatively correlated with FVC (r = - 0.22), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (r = - 0.44), and total lung capacity (r = - 0.36). A positive correlation was found between pGGO and the increased number of acute inflammatory cells found in BAL fluid (r = 0.28). In the placebo group, disease progression was assessed as 30% in the upper and middle lung zones, and 45% in the lower lung zones. No difference in the progression rate was seen between lcSSc and dcSSc patients. CONCLUSIONS PF and GGO were the most common HRCT scan findings in symptomatic SSc patients. HCs were seen in more than one third of cases, being more common in lcSSc vs dcSSc. There was no relationship between progression and baseline PF extent or lcSSc vs dcSSc. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00004563.

Lung Cancer Staging Essentials: The New TNM Staging System and Potential Imaging Pitfalls

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with a dismal 5-year survival rate of 15%. The TNM (tumor-node-metastasis) classification system for lung cancer is a vital guide for determining treatment and prognosis. Despite the importance of accuracy in lung cancer staging, however, correct staging remains a challenging task for many radiologists. The new 7th edition of the TNM classification system features a number of revisions, including subdivision of tumor categories on the basis of size, differentiation between local intrathoracic and distant metastatic disease, recategorization of malignant pleural or pericardial disease from stage III to stage IV, reclassification of separate tumor nodules in the same lung and lobe as the primary tumor from T4 to T3, and reclassification of separate tumor nodules in the same lung but not the same lobe as the primary tumor from M1 to T4. Radiologists must understand the details set forth in the TNM classification system and be familiar with the changes in the 7th edition, which attempts to better correlate disease with prognostic value and treatment strategy. By recognizing the relevant radiologic appearances of lung cancer, understanding the appropriateness of staging disease with the TNM classification system, and being familiar with potential imaging pitfalls, radiologists can make a significant contribution to treatment and outcome in patients with lung cancer.

Radiofrequency Ablation of Lung Tumors: Imaging Features of the Postablation Zone

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is used to treat pulmonary malignancies. Although preliminary results are suggestive of a survival benefit, local progression rates are appreciable. Because a patient can undergo repeat treatment if recurrence is detected early, reliable post-RFA imaging follow-up is critical. The purpose of this article is to describe (a) an algorithm for post-RFA imaging surveillance; (b) the computed tomographic (CT) appearance, size, enhancement, and positron emission tomographic (PET) metabolic activity of the ablation zone; and (c) CT, PET, and dual-modality imaging with PET and CT (PET/CT) features suggestive of partial ablation or tumor recurrence and progression. CT is routinely used for post-RFA follow-up. PET and PET/CT have emerged as auxiliary follow-up techniques. CT with nodule densitometry may be used to supplement standard CT. Post-RFA follow-up was divided into three phases: early (immediately after to 1 week after RFA), intermediate (>1 week to 2 months), and late (>2 months). CT and PET imaging features suggestive of residual or recurrent disease include (a) increasing contrast material uptake in the ablation zone (>180 seconds on dynamic images), nodular enhancement measuring more than 10 mm, any central enhancement greater than 15 HU, and enhancement greater than baseline anytime after ablation; (b) growth of the RFA zone after 3 months (compared with baseline) and definitely after 6 months, peripheral nodular growth and change from ground-glass opacity to solid opacity, regional or distant lymph node enlargement, and new intrathoracic or extrathoracic disease; and (c) increased metabolic activity beyond 2 months, residual activity centrally or at the ablated tumor, and development of nodular activity.

Evaluating Cryoablation of Metastatic Lung Tumors in Patients—Safety and Efficacy The ECLIPSE Trial—Interim Analysis at 1 Year

Introduction: To assess the feasibility, safety and local tumor control of cryoablation for treatment of pulmonary metastases. Materials and Methods: This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant, IRB-approved, multicenter, prospective, single arm study included 40 patients with 60 lung metastases treated during 48 cryoablation sessions, with currently a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Patients were enrolled according to the following key inclusion criteria: 1 to 5 metastases from extrapulmonary cancers, with a maximal diameter of 3.5 cm. Local tumor control, disease-specific and overall survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Complications and changes in physical function and quality of life were also evaluated using Karnofsky performance scale, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status classification, and Short Form-12 health survey. Results: Patients were 62.6 ± 13.3 years old (26–83). The most common primary cancers were colon (40%), kidney (23%), and sarcomas (8%). Mean size of metastases was 1.4 ± 0.7 cm (0.3–3.4), and metastases were bilateral in 20% of patients. Cryoablation was performed under general anesthesia (67%) or conscious sedation (33%). Local tumor control rates were 56 of 58 (96.6%) and 49 of 52 (94.2%) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Patients quality of life was unchanged over the follow-up period. One-year overall survival rate was 97.5%. The rate of pneumothorax requiring chest tube insertion was 18.8%. There were three Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 procedural complications during the immediate follow-up period (pneumothorax requiring pleurodesis, noncardiac chest pain, and thrombosis of an arteriovenous fistula), with no grade 4 or 5 complications. Conclusion: Cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment for pulmonary metastases with preserved quality of life following intervention.

Evaluation of treatment response after nonoperative therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Nonsurgical management of early primary lung cancer has grown tremendously in recent years, and today, available options extend far beyond that of conventional radiation therapy (CRT) to include minimally invasive image-guided delivery of thermal energies, specifically radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation, and more conformal stereotactic body radiation therapy. Because the tumor is never resected with these nonoperative interventions, histopathological evaluation of tumor margins for the presence of residual tumor is impossible, and as such, tumor response after each of these therapies is largely based on imaging. To date, computerized tomography and computerized tomography-positron emission tomography remain the most readily available modalities for assessment of therapeutic efficacy, and to this end as detailed within this article, strict imaging survey and familiarity with the expected imaging characteristics of the treated tumor will aid in recognition of unexpected findings, specifically those of incomplete therapy and/or tumor recurrence.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Blunt Chest Trauma

Imaging is paramount in the setting of blunt trauma and is now the standard of care at any trauma center. Although anteroposterior radiography has inherent limitations, the ability to acquire a radiograph in the trauma bay with little interruption in clinical survey, monitoring, and treatment, as well as radiographys accepted role in screening for traumatic aortic injury, supports the routine use of chest radiography. Chest CT or CT angiography is the gold-standard routine imaging modality for detecting thoracic injuries caused by blunt trauma. There is disagreement on whether routine chest CT is necessary in all patients with histories of blunt trauma. Ultimately, the frequency and timing of CT chest imaging should be site specific and should depend on the local resources of the trauma center as well as patient status. Ultrasound may be beneficial in the detection of pneumothorax, hemothorax, and pericardial hemorrhage; transesophageal echocardiography is a first-line imaging tool in the setting of suspected cardiac injury. In the blunt trauma setting, MRI and nuclear medicine likely play no role in the acute setting, although these modalities may be helpful as problem-solving tools after initial assessment. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Workshop on imaging science development for cancer prevention and preemption

The concept of intraepithelial neoplasm (IEN) as a near-obligate precursor of cancers has generated opportunities to examine drug or device intervention strategies that may reverse or retard the sometimes lengthy process of carcinogenesis. Chemopreventive agents with high therapeutic indices, well-monitored for efficacy and safety, are greatly needed, as is development of less invasive or minimally disruptive visualization and assessment methods to safely screen nominally healthy but at-risk patients, often for extended periods of time and at repeated intervals. Imaging devices, alone or in combination with anticancer drugs, may also provide novel interventions to treat or prevent precancer.

Pulmonary 64-MDCT Angiography With 30 mL of IV Contrast Material: Vascular Enhancement and Image Quality

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to determine whether vascular enhancement and image quality can be preserved in pulmonary CT angiography (CTA) performed on a 64-MDCT scanner with 30 mL of IV contrast material. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective matched-cohort study compared image quality of pulmonary CTA performed using 30 mL of IV contrast material versus 100 mL of IV contrast material. CT images of 50 patients (46 men, four women; mean age, 66 years) who underwent pulmonary CTA on a 64-MDCT scanner using a low dose (30 mL) of iodixanol 320 and another 50 patients (49 men, one woman; mean age, 65 years) who underwent pulmonary CTA using a regular dose (100 mL) of contrast material during the same time period were selected for review. The 30- and 100-mL pulmonary CTA studies were retrospectively evaluated by two thoracic radiologists in random order. Attenuation values were recorded over the main, right main, selected lobar, segmental, and subsegmental pulmonary arteries. Image quality was also subjectively assessed using visual scores on a scale from 1 (nondiagnostic) to 5 (excellent). RESULTS The average attenuation measurements of the main, right main, selected lobar, segmental, and subsegmental pulmonary arteries were 260, 262, 280, 316, and 338 HU, respectively, on the 30-mL studies and 313, 301, 316, 344, and 349 HU, respectively, on the 100-mL studies. The average visual score was 4.0 for both the 30- and 100-mL groups. A visual score of 4 or 5 was given to 82% of studies in the 30-mL group and 78% of studies in the 100-mL group. CONCLUSION Contrast agent dose for pulmonary CTA using a 64-MDCT scanner can be significantly reduced without compromising diagnostic image quality.

ACR appropriateness Criteria ® rib

Rib fracture is the most common thoracic injury, present in 10% of all traumatic injuries and almost 40% of patients who sustain severe nonpenetrating trauma. Although rib fractures can produce significant morbidity, the diagnosis of associated complications (such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, pulmonary contusion, atelectasis, flail chest, cardiovascular injury, and injuries to solid and hollow abdominal organs) may have a more significant clinical impact. When isolated, rib fractures have a relatively low morbidity and mortality, and failure to detect isolated rib fractures does not necessarily alter patient management or outcome in uncomplicated cases. A standard posteroanterior chest radiograph should be the initial, and often the only, imaging test required in patients with suspected rib fracture after minor trauma. Detailed radiographs of the ribs rarely add additional information that would change treatment, and, although other imaging tests (eg, computed tomography, bone scan) have increased sensitivity for detection of rib fractures, there are little data to support their use. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review process include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.