Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert E. Bartels is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert E. Bartels.


AIAA Journal | 2008

Aeroelastic and Aerothermoelastic Behavior in Hypersonic Flow

Jack J. McNamara; Peretz P. Friedmann; Kenneth G. Powell; Biju Thuruthimattam; Robert E. Bartels

The testing of aeroelastically and aerothermoelastically scaled wind-tunnel models in hypersonic flow is not feasible; thus, computational aeroelasticity and aerothermoelasticity are essential to the development of hypersonic vehicles. Several fundamental issues in this area are examined by performing a systematic computational study of the hypersonic aeroelastic and aerothermoelastic behavior of a three-dimensional configuration. Specifically, the flutter boundary of a low-aspect-ratio wing, representative of a fin or control surface on a hypersonic vehicle, is studied over a range of altitudes using third-order piston theory and Euler and Navier-Stokes aerodynamics. The sensitivity of the computational-fluid-dynamics-based aeroelastic analysis to grid resolution and parameters governing temporal accuracy are considered. In general, good agreement at moderate-to-high altitudes was observed for the three aerodynamic models. However, the wing flutters at unrealistic Mach numbers in the absence of aerodynamic heating. Therefore, because aerodynamic heating is an inherent feature of hypersonic flight and the aeroelastic behavior of a vehicle is sensitive to structural variations caused by heating, an aerothermoelastic methodology is developed that incorporates the heat transfer between the fluid and structure based on computational-fluid-dynamics-generated aerodynamic heating. The aerothermoelastic solution procedure is then applied to the low-aspect-ratio wing operating on a representative hypersonic trajectory. In the latter study, the sensitivity of the flutter margin to perturbations in trajectory angle of attack and Mach number is considered. Significant reductions in the flutter boundary of the heated wing are observed. The wing is also found to be susceptible to thermal buckling.


Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference | 2004

Hypersonic Aerothermoelastic Studies for Reusable Launch Vehicles

Jack J. McNamara; Biju Thuruthimattam; Peretz P. Friedmann; Kenneth G. Powell; Robert E. Bartels

An aeroelastic and aerothermoelastic analysis of a three-dimensional low aspect ratio wing, representative of a fin on hypersonic vehicles, is carried out using piston theory, and Euler aerodynamics. Studies on grid convergence are used to determine the appropriate computational domain and resolution for this wing in hypersonic flow, using both Euler and Navier-Stokes aerodynamics. Hypersonic computational aeroelastic responses are then generated, using Euler aerodynamics in order to obtain frequency and damping characteristics for comparison with those from first and third order piston theory solutions. Results indicate that the aeroelastic behavior is comparable when using Euler and third order piston theory aerodynamics. The transonic aeroelastic behavior of the wing is also analyzed using Euler aerodynamics. The aerothermoelastic behavior of the wing, using piston theory aerodynamics, is studied by incorporating material property degradation and thermal stresses due to non-uniform temperature distributions. Results indicate that aerodynamic heating can substantially reduce aeroelastic stability. Finally, hypersonic aeroelastic behavior of a generic vehicle resembling a reusable launch vehicle is performed using piston theory. The results presented serve as a partial validation of the CFL3D code for the hypersonic flight regime.


43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference | 2002

Development of Reduced-Order Models for Aeroelastic Analysis and Flutter Prediction Using the CFL3Dv6.0 Code

Walter A. Silva; Robert E. Bartels

ARLY mathematical models of unsteady aerody namic response capitalized on the efficiency and power of superposition of scaled and time shifted fun damental responses, also known as convolution. Chs sical models of two dimensional airfoils in incompress ible flow s include Wagners function2(response to a unit step variation in angle of attack), Kussners func tiona(response to a sharp edged gust), Theodorsens function4(frequency response to sinusoidal pitching motion), and Seats function (frequency response to a sinusoidal gust). As geometric complexity increased from airfoils to wings to complete configurations, the analytical derivation of these types of response func tions became impractical and the numerical computa tion of linear unsteady aerodynamic responses, in the frequency domain, became the method of choice. 5


Journal of Fluids and Structures | 2003

Numerical investigation of transonic limit cycle oscillations of a two-dimensional supercritical wing

L. Tang; Robert E. Bartels; P.-C. Chen; Danny D. Liu

Abstract CFD-based aeroelastic computations are performed to investigate the effect of nonlinear aerodynamics on transonic limit cycle oscillation (LCO) characteristics of the NLR7301 airfoil section. It is found that the LCO solutions from Navier–Stokes computations deviate less from the experiment than an Euler solution but strongly depend on the employed turbulence model. The Degani–Schiff modification to the Baldwin–Lomax turbulence model provokes spurious vorticity spots causing multiple shocks which might be unphysical, while the Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model yields physically reasonable unsteady shocks. In the cases examined, smaller initial perturbations lead to larger LCO amplitudes and vice versa, in contradiction to what one might expect. The amplitude of the initial perturbation is also found to have an impact on the mean position of LCO. Also addressed in the paper are aspects of multiblock message passing interface (MPI) parallel computation techniques as related to the present problem.


46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference | 2005

Three-dimensional Aeroelastic and Aerothermoelastic Behavior in Hypersonic Flow

Jack J. McNamara; Peretz P. Friedmann; Kenneth G. Powell; Biju Thuruthimattam; Robert E. Bartels

The aeroelastic and aerothermoelastic behavior of three-dimensional configurations in hypersonic flow regime are studied. The aeroelastic behavior of a low aspect ratio wing, representative of a fin or control surface on a generic hypersonic vehicle, is examined using third order piston theory, Euler and Navier-Stokes aerodynamics. The sensitivity of the aeroelastic behavior generated using Euler and Navier-Stokes aerodynamics to parameters governing temporal accuracy is also examined. Also, a refined aerothermoelastic model, which incorporates the heat transfer between the fluid and structure using CFD generated aerodynamic heating, is used to examine the aerothermoelastic behavior of the low aspect ratio wing in the hypersonic regime. Finally, the hypersonic aeroelastic behavior of a generic hypersonic vehicle with a lifting-body type fuselage and canted fins is studied using piston theory and Euler aerodynamics for the range of 2.5 M 28, at altitudes ranging from 10,000 feet to 80,000 feet. This analysis includes a study on optimal mesh selection for use with Euler aerodynamics. In addition to the aeroelastic and aerothermoelastic results presented, three time domain flutter identification techniques are compared, namely the moving block approach, the least squares curve fitting method, and a system identification technique using an Auto-Regressive model of the aeroelastic system. In general, the three methods agree well. The system identification technique, however, provided quick damping and frequency estimations with minimal response record length, and therefore oers significant reductions in computational cost. In the present case, the computational cost was reduced by 75%. The aeroelastic and aerothermoelastic results presented illustrate the applicability of the CFL3D code for the hypersonic flight regime.


Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets | 2012

Computational Aeroelastic Analysis of the Ares Launch Vehicle During Ascent

Robert E. Bartels; Pawel Chwalowski; Steven J. Massey; Jennifer Heeg; Carol D. Wieseman; Raymond E. Mineck

This paper presents the static and dynamic computational aeroelastic (CAE) analyses of the Ares crew launch vehicle (CLV) during atmospheric ascent. The influence of launch vehicle flexibility on the static aerodynamic loading and integrated aerodynamic force and moment coefficients is discussed. The ultimate purpose of this analysis is to assess the aeroelastic stability of the launch vehicle along the ascent trajectory. A comparison of analysis results for several versions of the Ares CLV will be made. Flexible static and dynamic analyses based on rigid computational fluid dynamic (CFD) data are compared with a fully coupled aeroelastic time marching CFD analysis of the launch vehicle.


48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference | 2007

An Aeroelastic Analysis of a Thin Flexible Membrane

Robert C. Scott; Robert E. Bartels; Osama A. Kandil

utter onset. The purpose of this paper is to describe and begin addressing these issues. The paper includes a review of the literature associated with the structural analysis of membranes and membrane utter. Flow/structure analysis coupling and hypersonic ow solver options are also discussed. An approach is proposed for tackling this problem that starts with a relatively simple geometry and develops and evaluates analysis methods and procedures. This preliminary study considers a computationally manageable 2-dimensional problem. The membrane structural models used in the paper include a nonlinear nite-dierence model for static and dynamic analysis and a NASTRAN nite element membrane model for nonlinear static and linear normal modes analysis. Both structural models are coupled with a structured compressible ow solver for static aeroelastic analysis. For dynamic aeroelastic analyses, the NASTRAN normal modes are used in the structured compressible ow solver and 3rd order piston theories were used with the nite dierence membrane model to simulate utter onset. Results from the various static and dynamic aeroelastic analyses are compared.


44th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference | 2014

Computed and Experimental Flutter/LCO Onset for the Boeing Truss-Braced Wing Wind-Tunnel Model

Robert E. Bartels; Robert C. Scott; Christie J. Funk; Timothy J. Allen; Bradley W. Sexton

This paper presents high fidelity Navier-Stokes simulations of the Boeing Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research truss-braced wing wind-tunnel model and compares the results to linear MSC. Nastran flutter analysis and preliminary data from a recent wind-tunnel test of that model at the NASA Langley Research Center Transonic Dynamics Tunnel. The simulated conditions under consideration are zero angle of attack, so that structural nonlinearity can be neglected. It is found that, for Mach number greater than 0.78, the linear flutter analysis predicts flutter onset dynamic pressure below the wind-tunnel test and that predicted by the Navier-Stokes analysis. Furthermore, the wind-tunnel test revealed that the majority of the high structural dynamics cases were wing limit cycle oscillation (LCO) rather than flutter. Most Navier-Stokes simulated cases were also LCO rather than hard flutter. There is dip in the wind-tunnel test flutter/LCO onset in the Mach 0.76-0.80 range. Conditions tested above that Mach number exhibited no aeroelastic instability at the dynamic pressures reached in the tunnel. The linear flutter analyses do not show a flutter/LCO dip. The Navier-Stokes simulations also do not reveal a dip; however, the flutter/LCO onset is at a significantly higher dynamic pressure at Mach 0.90 than at lower Mach numbers. The Navier-Stokes simulations indicate a mild LCO onset at Mach 0.82, then a more rapidly growing instability at Mach 0.86 and 0.90. Finally, the modeling issues and their solution related to the use of a beam and pod finite element model to generate the Navier-Stokes structure mode shapes are discussed.


28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference | 2010

FUN3D Grid Refinement and Adaptation Studies for the Ares Launch Vehicle

Robert E. Bartels; Veer Vasta; Jan-Renee Carlson; Mike Park; Raymond E. Mineck

This paper presents grid refinement and adaptation studies performed in conjunction with computational aeroelastic analyses of the Ares crew launch vehicle (CLV). The unstructured grids used in this analysis were created with GridTool and VGRID while the adaptation was performed using the Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) code FUN3D with a feature based adaptation software tool. GridTool was developed by ViGYAN, Inc. while the last three software suites were developed by NASA Langley Research Center. The feature based adaptation software used here operates by aligning control volumes with shock and Mach line structures and by refining/de-refining where necessary. It does not redistribute node points on the surface. This paper assesses the sensitivity of the complex flow field about a launch vehicle to grid refinement. It also assesses the potential of feature based grid adaptation to improve the accuracy of CFD analysis for a complex launch vehicle configuration. The feature based adaptation shows the potential to improve the resolution of shocks and shear layers. Further development of the capability to adapt the boundary layer and surface grids of a tetrahedral grid is required for significant improvements in modeling the flow field.


Aeronautical Journal | 2009

Computational aeroelastic studies of a generic hypersonic vehicle

Biju Thuruthimattam; Peretz P. Friedmann; Kenneth G. Powell; Robert E. Bartels

The hypersonic aeroelastic problem of a generic hypersonic vehicle having a lifting-body type fuselage and canted fins is studied using third order piston theory and Euler aerodynamics. Computational aeroelastic response results are used to obtain frequency and damping characteristics, and compared with those from piston theory solutions for a variety of flight conditions. Aeroelastic behavior is studied for the range of 2·5 < M < 28, at altitudes ranging from 10,000ft to 80,000ft. Because of the significant computational resources required, a study on optimal mesh selection was first carried out for use with Euler aerodynamics. The three dimensional flow effects captured using Euler aerodynamics was found to lead to significantly higher flutter boundaries when compared to those based on nonlinear piston theory. The results presented here illustrate some of the more important three dimensional effects that can be encountered in hypersonic aeroelasticity of complex configurations.

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert E. Bartels's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bret Stanford

Air Force Research Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge