Robert E. Harbaugh

Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a common and frequently devastating condition, accounting for ≈5% of all strokes and affecting as many as 30 000 Americans each year.1,2 The American Heart Association (AHA) previously published “Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.”3 Since then, considerable advances have been made in endovascular techniques, diagnostic methods, and surgical and perioperative management paradigms. Nevertheless, outcome for patients with SAH remains poor, with population-based mortality rates as high as 45% and significant morbidity among survivors.4–9 Several multicenter, prospective, randomized trials and prospective cohort analyses have influenced treatment protocols for SAH. However, rapid evolution of newer treatment modalities, as well as other practical and ethical considerations, has meant that rigorous clinical scientific assessment of the treatment protocols has not been feasible in several important areas. To address these issues, the Stroke Council of the AHA formed a writing group to reevaluate the recommendations for management of aneurysmal SAH. A consensus committee reviewed existing data in this field and prepared the recommendations in 1994.3 In an effort to update those recommendations, a systematic literature review was conducted based on a search of MEDLINE to identify all relevant randomized clinical trials published between June 30, 1994, and November 1, 2006 (search terms: subarachnoid hemorrhage , cerebral aneurysm , trial ; Table 1). Each identified article was reviewed by at least 2 members of the writing group. Selected articles had to meet one of the following criteria to be included: randomized trial or nonrandomized concurrent cohort study. Case series and nonrandomized historical cohort studies were reviewed if no studies with a higher level of evidence were available for a particular topic covered in the initial guidelines. These were chosen on the basis of sample size and the relevance of the particular studies to subjects that …

Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: Co-Sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline.

The aim of this new statement is to provide comprehensive and timely evidence-based recommendations on the prevention of ischemic stroke among survivors of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Evidence-based recommendations are included for the control of risk factors, interventional approaches for atherosclerotic disease, antithrombotic treatments for cardioembolism, and the use of antiplatelet agents for noncardioembolic stroke. Further recommendations are provided for the prevention of recurrent stroke in a variety of other specific circumstances, including arterial dissections; patent foramen ovale; hyperhomocysteinemia; hypercoagulable states; sickle cell disease; cerebral venous sinus thrombosis; stroke among women, particularly with regard to pregnancy and the use of postmenopausal hormones; the use of anticoagulation after cerebral hemorrhage; and special approaches for the implementation of guidelines and their use in high-risk populations.

GUIDELINES FOR CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY: A STATEMENT FOR HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS FROM A SPECIAL WRITING GROUP OF THE STROKE COUNCIL, AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION

Since the 1950s carotid endarterectomy has been performed in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, based on suggestive but inconclusive evidence for its effectiveness. Only during the last 5 years have randomized studies clarified the indications for surgery. In preparing this report, panel members used the same rules of evidence used in the previous report1 2 (Table⇓). View this table: Table 1. Levels of Evidence and Grading of Recommendations Few studies have analyzed control of risk factors in a randomized, prospective manner following carotid endarterectomy. However, a wealth of data are available regarding the general relationship between risk factor control and stroke risk. These data provide some guidance for the care of endarterectomy patients. ### Hypertension Hypertension is the most powerful, prevalent, and treatable risk factor for stroke.3 Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure are independently related to stroke incidence. Isolated systolic hypertension, which is common in the elderly, also considerably increases risk of stroke. Reduction of elevated blood pressure significantly lowers risk of stroke. Meta-analyses of randomized trials found that an average reduction in diastolic blood pressure of 6 mm Hg produces a 42% reduction in stroke incidence.3 4 Treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in people older than 60 years also reduces stroke incidence by 36% without an excessive number of side effects such as depression or dementia.5 Long-term care of patients after endarterectomy should include careful control of hypertension (Grade A recommendation for treatment of hypertension in general; Grade C recommendation for postendarterectomy care). Perioperative treatment of hypertension after carotid endarterectomy represents a special situation. Poor control of blood pressure after endarterectomy increases risk of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome.6 7 8 9 This complication is characterized by unilateral headache, seizures, and occasionally altered mental status or focal neurological signs. Neuroimaging may show intracerebral hemorrhages10 11 12 or white …

Update to the AHA/ASA Recommendations for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack

The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) Writing Committee for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) has reviewed the results of recent trials that were published after our previous recommendations were issued.1 Our intention in the present statement is to provide a brief review of the new data, to update specific recommendations, and to provide the reasons for any modifications. The 2 areas in which major new clinical trials have been published are (1) the use of specific antiplatelet agents for stroke prevention in patients with a history of noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or TIA and (2) the use of statins in the prevention of recurrent stroke. Recently published trials have added to the evidence of the benefit of the use of specific antiplatelet agents for stroke prevention in patients with a history of noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or TIA. The secondary prevention guidelines1 have been updated to reflect this new evidence. ### Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin for Prevention of Vascular Events The Clopidogrel and Aspirin Versus Aspirin Alone for the Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events (CHARISMA) trial2 was a double-blinded study that randomized 15 603 subjects with cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease to either clopidogrel 75 mg plus low-dose aspirin (75 to 162 mg) or placebo plus aspirin (75 to 162 mg). Roughly 35% of subjects (n=4320) qualified on the basis of the presence of cerebrovascular disease within 5 years of enrollment; approximately a third experienced TIA. The median follow-up was 28 months. No significant differences were seen in the rates of nonfatal ischemic stroke between the 2 groups (1.7% versus 2.1%, P =0.07). The placebo plus aspirin group showed a higher rate of nonfatal stroke than did the clopidogrel group (1.9% versus 2.4%, P =0.03). The 2 groups experienced no differences in the rate of intracerebral hemorrhage …

Recommendations for Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Stroke is a common and serious disorder, with an incidence of ≈795 000 each year in the United States alone. Worldwide, stroke is a leading cause of death and disability. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) was approved a decade ago for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The guidelines for its use include stroke onset within 3 hours of intravenous drug administration, preceded by a computed tomographic (CT) scan to exclude the presence of hemorrhage, which is a contraindication to the use of the drug. Although randomized, controlled studies in Europe and North America demonstrated the efficacy of this treatment, it also was associated with an incidence of intracranial hemorrhage of 6.4%,1,2⇓ which was shown on subsequent studies to be even greater if there was not strict adherence to the administration protocol.3 The goal of these controlled studies was to evaluate patient outcome. There was no attempt to determine the site, or even the actual presence, of a vascular occlusion, the degree of tissue injury, or the amount of tissue at risk for further injury that might be salvageable. More than a decade later, progress for treating acute ischemic stroke has been slow,4,5⇓ yet the goals for treating this common disease have expanded. First, there is the need to extend the therapeutic window from 3 to ≥6 hours. Even with the rapid communication and transportation in our societies today, very few patients present for treatment within 3 hours.6 Second, there is the desire to improve the efficacy of treatment. It had been shown even before the randomized, controlled studies that intravenous rtPA works better in small peripheral vessels than in the large vessels at the skull base.7 Third, there is a need to decrease the complication rate, especially if patients are to be …

Guidelines for Carotid Endarterectomy A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association

Since the 1950s carotid endarterectomy has been performed in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, based on suggestive but inconclusive evidence for its effectiveness. Only during the last 5 years have randomized studies clarified the indications for surgery. In preparing this report, panel members used the same rules of evidence used in the previous report1 2 (Table⇓). View this table: Table 1. Levels of Evidence and Grading of Recommendations Few studies have analyzed control of risk factors in a randomized, prospective manner following carotid endarterectomy. However, a wealth of data are available regarding the general relationship between risk factor control and stroke risk. These data provide some guidance for the care of endarterectomy patients. ### Hypertension Hypertension is the most powerful, prevalent, and treatable risk factor for stroke.3 Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure are independently related to stroke incidence. Isolated systolic hypertension, which is common in the elderly, also considerably increases risk of stroke. Reduction of elevated blood pressure significantly lowers risk of stroke. Meta-analyses of randomized trials found that an average reduction in diastolic blood pressure of 6 mm Hg produces a 42% reduction in stroke incidence.3 4 Treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in people older than 60 years also reduces stroke incidence by 36% without an excessive number of side effects such as depression or dementia.5 Long-term care of patients after endarterectomy should include careful control of hypertension (Grade A recommendation for treatment of hypertension in general; Grade C recommendation for postendarterectomy care). Perioperative treatment of hypertension after carotid endarterectomy represents a special situation. Poor control of blood pressure after endarterectomy increases risk of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome.6 7 8 9 This complication is characterized by unilateral headache, seizures, and occasionally altered mental status or focal neurological signs. Neuroimaging may show intracerebral hemorrhages10 11 12 or white …

Expression of Angiogenic Factors and Structural Proteins in Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations

Little is known of the molecular mechanisms mediating the genesis and subsequent biological behavior of central nervous system vascular malformations. The role of angiogenic and permeability-inducing factors in the pathogenesis of these lesions has not bee previously explored. In this study, we subject specimens from 12 cases of excised vascular malformation to a battery of immunostaining for vascular endothelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and selected structural and matrix proteins. The lesions consisted of seven arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), including one angiographically occult AVM, one arterialized vein from a dural AVM, and five cavernous malformations (CMs). Vascular endothelial growth factor was expressed by all lesions and was localized predominantly in the subendothelial layer and in perivascular spaces. Four of seven AVMs and four of five CMs demonstrated faint basic fibroblast growth factor expression that was localized to the media of AVM vessels and the subendothelial layer and intercavernous matrix of CMs. This pattern of angiogenic factor immunostaining was correlated with the expression of structural and matrix proteins in the same lesions. Laminin was not expressed in any of the CMs, confirming previous reports from our laboratory. By contrast, fibronectin expression was more prominent in CMs than in AVMs. Collagen Type IV and alpha smooth muscle actin expression occurred in every lesion. We conclude that angiogenic growth factors are expressed in all types of vascular malformations of the central nervous system. The pattern of expression suggests diffuse activation of angiogenesis without specific relation to individual vessel types or recent clinical behavior. Defining the role of angiogenesis in vascular malformations might provide insight into their pathogenesis and suggest novel strategies for modification of their behavior.

Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of cerebral aneurysms.

The risk of rupture of cerebral aneurysms has been correlated with the size of the aneurysm sac. It is conceivable that geometrical shape, not just size may also be related to aneurysm rupture potential. Further, aneurysm shape may also be a factor in deciding on treatment modalities, i.e., to clip or coil. However, our ability to make use of available information on aneurysm shape remains poor. In this study, methods were developed to quantify the seemingly arbitrary three-dimensional geometry of the aneurysm sac, using differential and computational geometry techniques. From computed tomography angiography (CTA) data, the three-dimensional geometry of five unruptured human cerebral aneurysms was reconstructed. Various indices (maximum diameter, neck diameter, height, aspect ratio, bottleneck factor, bulge location, volume, surface area, Gaussian and mean curvatures, isoperimetric ratio, and convexity ratio) were utilized to characterize the geometry of these aneurysm surfaces and four size-matched hypothetical control aneurysms. The physical meanings of various indices and their possible role as prognosticators for rupture risk and presurgical planning were discussed.

Preliminary Report: Intracranial Cholinergic Drug Infusion in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease

After toxicity studies in dogs, a preliminary feasibility trial of the continuous intracranial infusion of a muscarinic agonist was begun in four patients with biopsy-documented Alzheimers disease. During the last 8 months, a totally implantable infusion system has been used to deliver bethanechol chloride into the cerebrospinal fluid of these patients at doses of 0.05 to 0.7 mg/day. Complications have been few and resolved spontaneously or were easily reversible. The subjective response to this treatment has been encouraging, with reports of improved cognitive and social function during drug infusion and a return to base line function with single-blind saline placebo infusions. Obviously, further evaluation will be necessary to demonstrate the efficacy of this treatment, and a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial is now being done. However, we think the preliminary results are encouraging and warrant the consideration of this approach as a potential treatment in patients with Alzheimers disease.

Misdiagnosis of Symptomatic Cerebral Aneurysm Prevalence and Correlation With Outcome at Four Institutions

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE It is not known what fraction of patients with symptomatic cerebral aneurysms are misdiagnosed at initial medical presentation. It is also not clear whether misdiagnosed patients more frequently deteriorate before definitive aneurysm diagnosis and therapy or achieve a poorer outcome than correctly diagnosed patients. METHODS We reviewed records of consecutive patients with symptomatic cerebral aneurysms managed by four tertiary-care neurosurgical services during a recent 19-month period. Clinical course and outcome were analyzed according to misdiagnosis or correct diagnosis at initial medical evaluation. RESULTS Fifty-four of 217 patients (25%) were misdiagnosed at initial medical evaluation, including 46 of 121 patients (38%) initially in good clinical condition (clinical grade 1 or 2). Forty-six of 54 patients (85%) in the misdiagnosis group were initially grade 1 or 2 compared with 75 of 163 patients (46%) with correct initial diagnosis (P < .01). Twenty-six of 54 misdiagnosed patients (48%) deteriorated or rebled before definitive aneurysm treatment compared with 4 of 165 correctly diagnosed patients (2%) (P < .001). Among patients initially presenting as clinical grade 1 or 2, overall good or excellent outcome was achieved in 91% of those with correct initial diagnosis and 53% of patients with initial misdiagnosis (P < .001). Deterioration before correct diagnosis accounted for 16 of 67 patients (24%) with poor or worse final outcome in this series. CONCLUSIONS Patients in good clinical condition with symptomatic cerebral aneurysms were commonly misdiagnosed. Misdiagnosed patients were more likely than correctly diagnosed patients to deteriorate clinically and had a worse overall outcome. Misdiagnosed cases accounted for a significant fraction of overall poor outcomes among consecutive cases of symptomatic aneurysms.