Robert E. Helm

Thyroid hormone treatment after coronary-artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUNDnThyroid hormone has many effects on the cardiovascular system. During and after cardiopulmonary bypass, serum triiodothyronine concentrations decline transiently, which may contribute to postoperative hemodynamic dysfunction. We investigated whether the perioperative administration of triiodothyronine (liothyronine sodium) enhances cardiovascular performance in high-risk patients undergoing coronary-artery bypass surgery.nnnMETHODSnWe administered triiodothyronine or placebo to 142 patients with coronary artery disease and depressed left ventricular function. The hormone was administered as an intravenous bolus of 0.8 microgram per kilogram of body weight when the aortic cross-clamp was removed after the completion of bypass surgery and then as an infusion of 0.113 microgram per kilogram per hour for six hours. Clinical and hemodynamic responses were serially recorded, as was any need for inotropic or vasodilator drugs.nnnRESULTSnThe patients preoperative serum triiodothyronine concentrations were normal (mean [+/- SD] value, 81 +/- 22 ng per deciliter [1.2 +/- 0.3 nmol per liter]), and they decreased by 40 percent (P < 0.001) 30 minutes after the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass. The concentrations in patients given intravenous triiodothyronine became supranormal and were significantly higher than those in patients given placebo (P < 0.001). However, the concentrations were once again similar in the two groups 24 hours after surgery. The mean postoperative cardiac index was higher in the triiodothyronine group (2.97 +/- 0.72 vs. 2.67 +/- 0.61 liters per minute per square meter of body-surface area, P = 0.007), and systemic vascular resistance was lower (1073 +/- 314 vs. 1235 +/- 387 dyn.sec.cm-5, P = 0.003). The two groups did not differ significantly in the incidence of arrhythmia or the need for therapy with inotropic and vasodilator drugs during the 24 hours after surgery, or in perioperative mortality and morbidity.nnnCONCLUSIONSnRaising serum triiodothyronine concentrations in patients undergoing coronary-artery bypass surgery increases cardiac output and lowers systemic vascular resistance, but does not change outcome or alter the need for standard postoperative therapy.

Triiodothyronine therapy lowers the incidence of atrial fibrillation after cardiac operations

BACKGROUNDnCardiopulmonary bypass results in a euthyroid sick state, and recent evidence suggests that perioperative triiodothyronine (T3) supplementation may have hemodynamic benefits. In light of the known effects of thyroid hormone on atrial electrophysiology, we investigated the effects of perioperative T3 supplementation on the incidence of postoperative arrhythmias.nnnMETHODSnOne hundred forty-two patients with depressed left ventricular function (ejection fraction < 0.40) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to either T3 or placebo treatment groups in a prospective, double-blind fashion. Triiodothyronine was administered as a 0.8 micrograms/kg intravenous bolus at the time of aortic cross-clamp removal followed by an infusion of 0.113 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 for 6 hours. Patients were monitored for the development of arrhythmias during the first 5 postoperative days.nnnRESULTSnThe incidence of sinus tachycardia and ventricular arrhythmias were similar between groups. Triiodothyronine-treated patients had a lower incidence of atrial fibrillation (24% versus 46%; p = 0.009), and fewer required cardioversion (0 versus 6; p = 0.012) or anticoagulation (2 versus 10; p = 0.013) during hospitalization. Six patients in the T3 group versus 16 in the placebo group required antiarrhythmic therapy at discharge (p = 0.019).nnnCONCLUSIONSnPerioperative T3 administration decreased the incidence and need for treatment of postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Comprehensive Multimodality Blood Conservation: 100 Consecutive CABG Operations Without Transfusion

BACKGROUNDnDespite the recent introduction of a number of technical and pharmacologic blood conservation measures, bleeding and allogeneic transfusion remain persistent problems in open heart surgical procedures. We hypothesized that a comprehensive multimodality blood conservation program applied algorithmically on the basis of bleeding and transfusion risk would provide a maximum, cost-effective, and safe reduction in postoperative bleeding and allogeneic blood transfusion.nnnMETHODSnOne hundred consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively enrolled in a risk factor-based multimodality blood conservation program (MMD group). To evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of this comprehensive approach, comparison was made with a similar group of 90 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting to whom the multimodality blood conservation program was not applied but in whom an identical set of transfusion guidelines was enforced (control group). To evaluate the cost effectiveness of the multimodality program, comparison was also made between patients in the MMD group and a consecutive series of contemporaneous, diagnostic-related group-matched patients.nnnRESULTSnOne hundred consecutive patients in the MMD group underwent coronary artery bypass grafting without allogeneic transfusion. This compared favorably with the control population in whom a mean of 2.2 +/- 6.7 units of allogeneic blood was transfused per patient (34 patients [38%] received transfusion). In addition, the volume of postoperative blood loss at 12 hours in the control group was almost double that of the MMD group (660 +/- 270 mL versus 370 +/- 180 mL [p < 0.001]). Total costs for the MMD group in each of the three major diagnostic-related groups were equivalent to or significantly less than those in the consecutive series of diagnostic-related group-matched patients.nnnCONCLUSIONSnComprehensive risk factor-based application of multiple blood conservation measures in an optimized, integrated, and algorithmic manner can significantly decrease bleeding and need of allogeneic transfusion in coronary artery bypass grafting in a safe and cost-effective manner.

Retrograde Autologous Priming For Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Safe And Effective Means Of Decreasing Hemodilution And Transfusion Requirements

OBJECTIVESnThe obligatory hemodilution resulting from crystalloid priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit represents a major risk factor for blood transfusion in cardiac operations. We therefore examined whether retrograde autologous priming of the bypass circuit would result in decreased hemodilution and red cell transfusion.nnnMETHODSnSixty patients having first-time coronary bypass were prospectively randomized to cardiopulmonary bypass with or without retrograde autologous priming. Retrograde autologous priming was performed at the start of bypass by draining crystalloid prime from the arterial and venous lines into a recirculation bag (mean volume withdrawal: 880 +/- 150 ml). Perfusion and anesthetic techniques were otherwise identical for the two groups. The hematocrit value was maintained at a minimum of 16% and 23% during and after cardiopulmonary bypass, respectively, in all patients. Patients were well matched for all preoperative variables, including established transfusion risk factors. Subsequent hemodynamic parameters, pressor requirements, and fluid requirements were equivalent in the two groups.nnnRESULTSnThe lowest hematocrit value during cardiopulmonary bypass was 22% +/- 3% versus 20% +/- 3% in patients subjected to retrograde autologous priming and in control patients, respectively (p = 0.002). One (3%) of 30 patients subjected to retrograde autologous priming had intraoperative transfusion, and seven (23%) of 30 control patients required transfusion during the operation (p = 0.03). The number of patients receiving any homologous red cell transfusions in the two groups during the entire hospitalization was eight of 30 (27%; retrograde autologous priming) versus 16 of 30 (53%; control) (p = 0.03).nnnCONCLUSIONSnThese data suggest that retrograde autologous priming is a safe and effective means of significantly decreasing hemodilution and the number of patients requiring red cell transfusion during cardiac operations.

Intraoperative autologous blood donation preserves red cell mass but does not decrease postoperative bleeding

BACKGROUNDnPostoperative bleeding and transfusion remain a source of morbidity and cost after open heart operations. The benefit of the acute removal and reinfusion of fresh autologous blood around the time of cardiopulmonary bypass-a technique known as intraoperative autologous donation (IAD)-has not been universally accepted. We sought to more clearly evaluate the effects of IAD on allogeneic transfusion and postoperative bleeding by removing, preserving, and reinfusing a calculated maximum volume of fresh autologous whole blood.nnnMETHODSnNinety patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or valvular operations were prospectively randomized to either have (IAD group) or not have (control group) calculated maximum volume IAD performed. Treatment was otherwise identical. Transfusion guidelines were uniformly applied to all patients.nnnRESULTSnAn average volume of 1,540 +/- 302 mL of fresh autologous blood was removed and reinfused in the IAD group. Postoperative hematocrits were significantly greater at 12 and 24 hours postoperatively in the IAD group versus the control group despite a significant decrease in both the percentage of patients in whom allogeneic red blood cells were transfused (17% versus 52%; p < 0.01) and the number of red blood cell units transfused per patient per group (0.28 +/- 0.66 and 1.14 +/- 1.19 units; p < 0.01). Conversely, chest tube output, incidence of excessive postoperative bleeding, postoperative prothrombin time, and platelet and coagulation factor transfusion requirement did not differ between groups.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThese results indicate that intraoperative autologous donation serves to preserve red blood cell mass. Its routine use in eligible patients is therefore justified. However, the removal and reinfusion of an individually calculated maximum volume of fresh autologous blood had no effect on postoperative bleeding or platelet and coagulation factor transfusion requirement. This lack of hemostatic effect belies the beliefs of many about the primary action of IAD, helps to delineate the optimal way in which to perform IAD, and carries implications regarding the use of allogeneic platelet and coagulation factors for the treatment of early postoperative bleeding.

Combined aprotinin and erythropoietin use for blood conservation: Results with Jehovah's Witnesses

Despite recent advances in blood conservation techniques, major risks persist for excessive bleeding and blood transfusion after open heart operations. We reviewed the records of 100 consecutive patients undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution to define these risks and develop a multimodality blood conservation program based on the results. This program was subsequently applied on a prospective basis to a select group of patients who refuse blood transfusion on religious grounds (Jehovahs Witnesses [JW]) (n = 15). Encouraging initial results with coronary artery bypass grafting in this group (n = 8) led to the application of the program to more complex operations (n = 7), including repeat bypass grafting with use of the internal mammary artery, repeat mitral valve replacement, aortic and mitral valve replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting, mitral valve replacement with bypass grafting, chronic type 1 dissection repair, aortic valve replacement, and atrial septal defect repair in 1 patient each. The blood conservation program employed in these patients included the use of (1) aprotinin (full Hammersmith regimen), (2) high-dose erythropoietin, (3) maximal-volume intraoperative autologous blood donation, (4) low-prime cardiopulmonary bypass, (5) exclusive use of intraoperative cell salvage, and (6) continuous reinfusion of shed mediastinal blood. There were no deaths in the JW group. Thromboembolic complications consisted of a transient posterior circulation stroke in only 1 patient (dissection repair). No blood or blood products were transfused compared with the transfusion of 5.1 +/- 7.8 units (mean +/- standard deviation) in the 100 primary coronary bypass patients in whom the blood conservation program was not employed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Erythropoietin in Cardiac Surgery

Abstract Erythropoietin is the primary growth factor for red blood cells. A glycoprotein hormone synthesized by the kidneys, erythropoietin serves to increase red blood cell production in response to tissue hypoxia. It exerts its effect by increasing the numbers of erythroid progenitor cells in the bone marrow, and by increasing the rate at which their development is accomplished. With the introduction of recombinant erythropoietin in 1987, an important pharmacological agent became available for the manipulation of erythropoiesis. While used primarily for the treatment of the anemia of renal failure, recombinant erythropoietin has also shown usefulness in treating other types of anemias in which the endogenous erythropoietin response is insufficient. Perioperative use of the drug grew as a natural extension of this, and erythropoietin has been applied to correct preoperative anemia, augment autologous blood donation, and improve postoperative red cell recovery. Analysis of these perioperative clinical studies reveals success in these areas, but it also reveals that closer attention to the physiology of the natural response, and to the pharmacology of the recombinant product, might significantly improve results. Such an improvement in efficacy is both desirable and necessary when use of the drug is viewed in the setting of todays changing health care environment. By optimizing dosing schedules and targeting the drug to those most at risk for red cell transfusion, recombinant erythropoietin will likely become an important tool in efforts to achieve the elusive goal of bloodless cardiac surgery.

Intraoperative Autologous Blood Donation Practices

Three general strategies are available for the procurement of autologous blood prior to cardiopulmonary bypass: (1) preoperative autologous donation of whole blood, (2) intraoperative autologous donation of whole blood, and (3) intraoperative platelet plasmapheresis. The first of these, preoperative autologous donation (PAD), was reviewed in Chapter 3. There it was seen that PAD can effectively reduce homologous blood use by allowing a simple unit-for-unit autologous-for-homologous blood substitution. Its role in cardiac surgery today, however, is necessarily limited by the changing characteristics of the patient pool, and the decreased preoperative time available to allow for appropriate red cell mass regeneration. Issues of cost-effectiveness, logistical complexity, administrative burden, and resource allocation in the rapidly adjusting health care environment place additional constraints on more widespread application of PAD. This trend will likely continue in the future.1

Assessment and Control of Postoperative Bleeding

Use of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) apparatus generates varying degrees of coagulopathic bleeding in all patients. In addition, open-heart procedures provide ample opportunity for incomplete mechanical he- mostasis. These two factors lead to an often realized potential for increased bleeding during the postoperative period. The true incidence of increased postoperative bleeding is difficult to determine because of the inherent variability in the surgeon and institutional definitions of what constitutes above-normal or “excessive” blood loss. At one institution excessive blood loss might be “microvascular” bleeding after separation from bypass; at another, bleeding above a predetermined quantity or rate; at a third, the need for platelet and coagulation factor transfusion. Regardless of the way in which it is defined, because allogeneic transfusion has served as the “gold standard” for the treatment of postoperative bleeding, such bleeding has traditionally been directly and indirectly responsible for a large portion of the allogeneic blood used in cardiac surgery. This situation still largely exists today, despite evidence that platelet and coagulation factor transfusion during the early postoperative period has limited effect, and despite the increasing availability of nontransfusion strategies to prevent and control postoperative bleeding. It is these nontransfusion strategies, combined with a rational and informed approach to the transfusions that are administered, that provides the key to decreasing both postoperative bleedingand allogeneic transfusion.

Indications for Red Cell Transfusion

This book describes the many methods and strategies available for decreasing the need for homologous transfusion in cardiac surgery. With respect to red cell transfusion, such techniques as preoperative autologous donation, intraoperative autologous blood donation, intraoperative salvage, and postoperative shed blood infusion clearly help to reduce homologous requirements, and are important components of a comprehensive blood conservation program. There exists, however, another fundamental and yet often overlooked technique that is simple, effective, inexpensive, and complementary to all other blood conservation measures: the technique of minimum safe transfusion.1 Minimum safe transfusion is the minimization of homologous red cell transfusion through correct application of a clear set of transfusion guidelines based on physiologic principles, experimental data, and clinical experience.2 By understanding the physiology of anemia, and then using this knowledge to transfuse the individual patient only when it is necessary to maintain adequate homeostatic function, homologous red cell transfusion can be markedly reduced. Because this reduction is achieved through elimination only of unnecessary transfusions, patient safety is in no way compromised; optimal patient care and minimal homologous blood use are simultaneously achieved.