Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert F. Owen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert F. Owen.


International Journal of Industrial Organization | 2003

Optimal incentives for income-generation in universities: the rule of thumb for the Compton tax

John Beath; Robert F. Owen; Joanna Poyago-Theotoky; David Ulph

Abstract In this paper we propose a novel framework to model one of the key links between universities and industry—the undertaking of applied research. We postulate that a basic objective of universities is to undertake fundamental research and that they receive public funding to do so. Nevertheless, faced with tight budget constraints, universities may have incentives to allow their staff to devote some of their time to income-generating activities such as applied research or consultancy. This opens up two channels by which universities can ease their budget constraint: (i) by allowing academics to supplement their income, universities may be able to hold down academic salaries; (ii) universities can effectively ‘tax’ the income that academics raise through applied research or consultancy—for example, through the imposition of ‘overhead charges’. By easing their budget constraint, universities may be able to take on sufficient extra staff to more than offset the time that existing staff are spending on non-fundamental research and thus increase the amount of fundamental research that they can achieve with a given public budget. We develop a model of this link between universities and firms and use it to determine the optimal ‘tax’ that universities should impose on applied-research income. The Compton tax, used at MIT in the 1930s, is an early example of the use of this instrument.


Review of International Economics | 2002

Sunk Costs, Market Access, Economic Integration, and Welfare

Robert F. Owen; David Ulph

The nature of the equilibrium that arises after economic integration is shown to depend crucially on how initial entry costs are divided along two separate dimensions: market access versus technology costs, and fixed versus sunk costs. There are three post-integration equilibrium regimes: a traditional trade theory regime which arises when both market access costs and fixed costs are small, a new trade theory regime which arises when market access costs are small but fixed costs are high, and a market access regime which arises when market access costs are high. While the first two regimes have already appeared in the literature, the third is new. The sign, magnitude, and qualitative behavior of the welfare effects of integration across all three regimes depend on the configuration of these costs. Copyright 2002 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.


Archive | 2010

ICT and Regional Economic Dynamics : A Literature Review

Charlie Karlsson; Gunther Maier; Michaela Trippl; Iulia Siedschlag; Robert F. Owen; Gavin Murphy

The objective of this report is to review the relevant theoretical and empirical literature to provide a conceptual and methodological background for the analysis of the consequences of ICT use and globalisation on the regional economies in the European Union. We highlight the key aspects of ICT as a general purpose technology, discuss the economic impacts of ICT diffusion from macro and micro perspectives, and examine the spatial consequences of ICT diffusion. We focus on regional innovation systems and globalisation in order to propose an organizing framework for the analysis of the impact of ICT diffusion on regional development.


Journal of Evolutionary Economics | 1994

Racing in Two Dimensions

David Ulph; Robert F. Owen

In this paper we study an industry in which there is an ongoing sequence of R&D races between two firms. Firms are engaged in product innovation. Products are horizontally and vertically differentiated. There are two key characteristics/dimensions to products, and the level at which these are embodied in products can be increased by R&D. At each time firms can spend R&D on improving their product in one or both dimensions. We allow the possibility of economies scope — so R&D undertaken in one dimension can spillover to the other. The question we are interested in is whether a firm that is ahead in a single dimension but behind in another will focus all its R&D effort in the area in which it is ahead (product specialisation), or whether it will try to do R&D in both dimensions in the hope that it might get ahead in both and end up with a superproduct that dominates in both characteristics. The outcome of this R&D competition determines a Markov transition probability matrix determining the evolution of the industry. We show that when the R&D technology is characterized by constant returns then the only steady-state outcome is one in which the economy stays forever in a position in which one firm produces a super-product and the other gives up doing R&D altogether. This outcome is unaffected by the degree of economies of scope. When the R&D technology is characterised by decreasing returns, then the industry will visit all states and so will exhibit both product specialisation and superproduct dominance at various times. Now the extent of economies of scope matters and we show that the greater the extent of economies of scope, the less likely is the industry to exhibit product dominance, and the more likely it is to exhibit product specialisation.


Archive | 2013

Governance and economic integration: Stakes for Asia

Robert F. Owen

This paper assesses the nexus between changes in governance structures—at national and cooperative international levels—and evolutionary processes of economic integration in light of regional policy targets in Asia. The analysis highlights the importance of improved governance as an essential condition for effectively attaining an “Asian Economic Community†while arguing that the experience of the European Union (EU) offers valuable insights regarding the process of integration.


Archive | 2017

A Model of International Entry and Exit with Endogenous Sunk Costs in Vertical Markets

Partha Gangopadhyay; Robert F. Owen

This chapter introduces the Cournot framework with endogenous sunk costs to extend traditional models of vertical markets in international trade. This is done by introducing market access costs as highlighted by Owen and Ulph (Rev Int Econ 1093:539–555, 2002). The authors develop a baseline and benchmark model to examine the strategic role of access costs as endogenous sunk costs by incumbents for forestalling entry. In the model, foreign entry in the downstream and domestic retail market under incomplete information is examined. Incumbent firms are fully informed about the cost of production as well as their chosen market access costs while the foreign (potential) entrant does not possess the full information on costs. The incumbents select a pre-entry price while potential entrant infers the cost conditions from price statistic.


Journal of Asian Economics | 2009

Regional integration in Asia and its effects on the EU and North America

Hiro Lee; Robert F. Owen; Dominique van der Mensbrugghe


Archive | 2000

Optimal Incentives for Income-Generation within Universities

John Beath; Robert F. Owen; Joanna Poyago-Theotoky; David Ulph


Post-Print | 2003

Fundamental R&D Spillovers and the Internationalization of a Firm's Research Activities

Bernard Franck; Robert F. Owen


Archive | 2008

ICT Diffusion, Innovation Systems, Globalisation and Regional Economic Dynamics: Theory and Empirical Evidence

Charlie Karlsson; Gunther Maier; Michaela Trippl; Iulia Siedschlag; Robert F. Owen; Gavin Murphy

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert F. Owen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Ulph

University of St Andrews

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gunther Maier

Vienna University of Economics and Business

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gavin Murphy

Economic and Social Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Iulia Siedschlag

Economic and Social Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bernard Franck

University of Caen Lower Normandy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Beath

University of St Andrews

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge