Róbert Gábor Kiss

ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Table 1. Classes of recommendation Table 2. Levels of evidence Table 3. Estimated fetal and maternal effective doses for various diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures Table 4. Predictors of maternal cardiovascular events and risk score from the CARPREG study Table 5. Predictors of maternal cardiovascular events identified in congential heart diseases in the ZAHARA and Khairy study Table 6. Modified WHO classification of maternal cardiovascular risk: principles Table 7. Modified WHO classification of maternal cardiovascular risk: application Table 8. Maternal predictors of neonatal events in women with heart disease Table 9. General recommendations Table 10. Recommendations for the management of congenital heart disease Table 11. Recommendations for the management of aortic disease Table 12. Recommendations for the management of valvular heart disease Table 13. Recommendations for the management of coronary artery disease Table 14. Recommendations for the management of cardiomyopathies and heart failure Table 15. Recommendations for the management of arrhythmias Table 16. Recommendations for the management of hypertension Table 17. Check list for risk factors for venous thrombo-embolism Table 18. Prevalence of congenital thrombophilia and the associated risk of venous thrombo-embolism during pregnancy Table 19. Risk groups according to risk factors: definition and preventive measures Table 20. Recommendations for the prevention and management of venous thrombo-embolism in pregnancy and puerperium Table 21. Recommendations for drug use ABPM : ambulatory blood pressure monitoring ACC : American College of Cardiology ACE : angiotensin-converting enzyme ACS : acute coronary syndrome AF : atrial fibrillation AHA : American Heart Association aPTT : activated partial thromboplastin time ARB : angiotensin receptor blocker AS : aortic stenosis ASD : atrial septal defect AV : atrioventricular AVSD : atrioventricular septal defect BMI : body mass index BNP : B-type natriuretic peptide BP : blood pressure CDC : Centers for Disease Control CHADS : congestive heart failure, hypertension, age (>75 years), diabetes, stroke CI : confidence interval CO : cardiac output CoA : coarction of the aorta CT : computed tomography CVD : cardiovascular disease DBP : diastolic blood pressure DCM : dilated cardiomyopathy DVT : deep venous thrombosis ECG : electrocardiogram EF : ejection fraction ESC : European Society of Cardiology ESH : European Society of Hypertension ESICM : European Society of Intensive Care Medicine FDA : Food and Drug Administration HCM : hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ICD : implantable cardioverter-defibrillator INR : international normalized ratio i.v. : intravenous LMWH : low molecular weight heparin LV : left ventricular LVEF : left ventricular ejection fraction LVOTO : left ventricular outflow tract obstruction MRI : magnetic resonance imaging MS : mitral stenosis NT-proBNP : N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide NYHA : New York Heart Association OAC : oral anticoagulant PAH : pulmonary arterial hypertension PAP : pulmonary artery pressure PCI : percutaneous coronary intervention PPCM : peripartum cardiomyopathy PS : pulmonary valve stenosis RV : right ventricular SBP : systolic blood pressure SVT : supraventricular tachycardia TGA : complete transposition of the great arteries TR : tricuspid regurgitation UFH : unfractionated heparin VSD : ventricular septal defect VT : ventricular tachycardia VTE : venous thrombo-embolism WHO : World Health Organization Guidelines summarize and evaluate all available evidence, at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient, with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk–benefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no substitutes but are complements for textbooks and cover the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Core Curriculum topics. Guidelines and recommendations should help the …

Long-Term Use of Ticagrelor in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND The potential benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after a myocardial infarction has not been established. We investigated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor, a P2Y12 receptor antagonist with established efficacy after an acute coronary syndrome, in this context. METHODS We randomly assigned, in a double-blind 1:1:1 fashion, 21,162 patients who had had a myocardial infarction 1 to 3 years earlier to ticagrelor at a dose of 90 mg twice daily, ticagrelor at a dose of 60 mg twice daily, or placebo. All the patients were to receive low-dose aspirin and were followed for a median of 33 months. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The primary safety end point was Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding. RESULTS The two ticagrelor doses each reduced, as compared with placebo, the rate of the primary efficacy end point, with Kaplan-Meier rates at 3 years of 7.85% in the group that received 90 mg of ticagrelor twice daily, 7.77% in the group that received 60 mg of ticagrelor twice daily, and 9.04% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for 90 mg of ticagrelor vs. placebo, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.96; P=0.008; hazard ratio for 60 mg of ticagrelor vs. placebo, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95; P=0.004). Rates of TIMI major bleeding were higher with ticagrelor (2.60% with 90 mg and 2.30% with 60 mg) than with placebo (1.06%) (P<0.001 for each dose vs. placebo); the rates of intracranial hemorrhage or fatal bleeding in the three groups were 0.63%, 0.71%, and 0.60%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In patients with a myocardial infarction more than 1 year previously, treatment with ticagrelor significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke and increased the risk of major bleeding. (Funded by AstraZeneca; PEGASUS-TIMI 54 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01225562.).

Expert position paper on the role of platelet function testing in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Optimizing outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires balancing between the risks of thrombotic and bleeding events in individual patients.1–3 However, finding the optimal balance is not always straightforward since the risks of thrombotic and bleeding complications may differ extremely between individuals. In addition, the individual effects of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs are not uniform in patients.4 Recent European guidelines1,3 recommend the use of prasugrel or ticagrelor instead of clopidogrel in all PCI-treated acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients without contraindication, acknowledging that laboratory assessment of P2Y12-receptor inhibition may be considered only in selected cases when clopidogrel is used.1 However, there is no guidance with respect to the appropriate methodology and the suggested interpretation of results. The Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology aimed to review the available evidence and the clinical relevance of platelet function testing in order to reach a consensus regarding the methodology, evaluation, and clinical interpretation of platelet function in patients undergoing PCI. Regarding the choice between available P2Y12-inhibitors, the 2011 ESC guidelines on non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS)1 and the 2012 guidelines on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction3 recommend prasugrel and ticagrelor for all ACS patients without contraindication, and clopidogrel is only recommended if these agents are not available. Despite the restrictive recommendations for clopidogrel, it still holds a class I indication in ACS due to the large differences in the availability of the new-generation P2Y12-inhibitors among European countries. According to the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guidelines for PCI,5 a P2Y12-inhibitor should be given for ACS patients without preferring novel P2Y12-inhibitors over clopidogrel. Similarly, the 2012 ACCF/AHA unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction guidelines6 and the 2013 ACCF/AHA ST-elevation myocardial infarction guidelines …

Otamixaban for the treatment of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (SEPIA-ACS1 TIMI 42): a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND Otamixaban is an intravenous direct factor Xa inhibitor. We aimed to assess its efficacy and safety in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and to identify the optimum dose range for further assessment in a phase 3 study. METHODS In this double-blind, phase 2 trial undertaken in 196 sites in 36 countries, 3241 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes were randomly assigned via a central, telephone-based interactive voice response system to one of five doses of otamixaban (0.08 mg/kg bolus followed by infusions of 0.035 [n=125], 0.070 [676], 0.105 [662], 0.140 [658], or 0.175 [671] mg/kg/h) or to a control of unfractionated heparin (60 IU/kg intravenous bolus followed by an infusion of 12 IU/kg/h) plus eptifibatide (180 microg/kg intravenous bolus followed by an infusion of 1.0-2.0 microg/kg/min [n=449]). Both investigators and patients were unaware of treatment allocation. Enrolment into the lowest dose group was stopped early at the recommendation of the Data Monitoring Committee. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularisation, or bailout glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use up to 7 days. The primary safety endpoint was TIMI major or minor bleeding not related to coronary-artery bypass grafting. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat; safety analyses were in treated patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00317395. FINDINGS Rates of the primary efficacy endpoint in the five otamixaban doses were 7.2% (nine of 125) with 0.035 mg/kg/h, 4.6% (31/676) with 0.070 mg/kg/h, 3.8% (25/662) with 0.105 mg/kg/h, 3.6% (24/658) with 0.140 mg/kg/h, and 4.3% (29/671) with 0.175 mg/kg/h (p=0.34 for trend). In the control group, the rate was 6.2% (28/449), yielding relative risks for the five otamixaban doses of 1.16 (95% CI 0.56-2.38), 0.74 (0.45-1.21), 0.61 (0.36-1.02), 0.58 (0.34-1.00), and 0.69 (0.42-1.15), respectively. Rates of the primary safety endpoint in the five otamixaban doses were 1.6% (two of 122), 1.6% (11/669), 3.1% (20/651), 3.4% (22/651), and 5.4% (36/664), respectively (p=0.0001 for trend); the rate in the control group was 2.7% (12/448). INTERPRETATION In patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, otamixaban infusions of 0.100-0.140 mg/kg/h might reduce ischaemic events and have a safety profile similar to unfractionated heparin plus eptifibatide. Further testing in a phase 3 trial is warranted. FUNDING Sanofi-Aventis.

Combined delivery approach of bone marrow mononuclear stem cells early and late after myocardial infarction: the MYSTAR prospective, randomized study

Background Combined intracoronary and intramyocardial administration might improve outcomes for bone-marrow-derived stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We compared the safety and feasibility of early and late delivery of stem cells with combined therapy approaches.Methods Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 45% after AMI were randomly assigned stem cell delivery via intramyocardial injection and intracoronary infusion 3–6 weeks or 3–4 months after AMI. Primary end points were changes in infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction 3 months after therapy.Results A total of 60 patients were treated. The mean changes in infarct size at 3 months were −3.5 ± 5.1% (95% CI −5.5% to −1.5%, P = 0.001) in the early group and −3.9 ± 5.6% (95% CI −6.1% to −1.6%, P = 0.002) in the late group, and changes in ejection fraction were 3.5 ± 5.6% (95% CI 1.3–5.6%, P = 0.003) and 3.4 ± 7.0% (95% CI 0.7–6.1%, P = 0.017), respectively. At 9–12 months after AMI, ejection fraction remained significantly higher than at baseline in both groups. In the early and late groups, a mean of 200.3 ± 68.7 × 106 and 194.8 ± 60.4 × 106 stem cells, respectively, were delivered to the myocardium, and 1.30 ± 0.68 × 109 and 1.29 ± 0.41 × 109 cells, respectively, were delivered into the artery. A high number of cells was required for significant improvements in the primary end points.Conclusions Combined cardiac stem cell delivery induces a moderate but significant improvement in myocardial infarct size and left ventricular function.

Rivaroxaban in Patients Stabilized After a ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results From the ATLAS ACS-2–TIMI-51 Trial (Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction-51)

OBJECTIVES The present analysis reports on the pre-specified subgroup of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, in whom anticoagulant therapy has been of particular interest. BACKGROUND In ATLAS ACS-2-TIMI-51 (Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction-51), rivaroxaban reduced cardiovascular events across the spectrum of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS Seven thousand eight hundred seventeen patients in ATLAS ACS-2-TIMI 51 presented with a STEMI. After being stabilized (1 to 7 days), they underwent randomization to twice daily rivaroxaban 2.5 mg, rivaroxaban 5 mg, or placebo. Data are presented as 2-year Kaplan-Meier rates, and for intention-to-treat (ITT) and modified ITT (mITT) analyses. RESULTS Among STEMI patients, rivaroxaban reduced the primary efficacy endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, compared with placebo (ITT: 8.4% vs. 10.6%, hazards ratio [HR]: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67 to 0.97, p = 0.019; mITT: 8.3% vs. 9.7%, HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.03, p = 0.09). This reduction emerged by 30 days (ITT and mITT: 1.7% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.042) and was evident in analyses that included events while patients received background dual antiplatelet therapies (ITT: 7.9% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.010; mITT: 7.7% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.061). In terms of the individual doses, rivaroxaban 2.5 mg reduced cardiovascular death (ITT: 2.5% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.006; mITT: 2.2% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.006), which was not seen with 5 mg of rivaroxaban. Rivaroxaban versus placebo increased non-coronary artery bypass grafting Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding (2.2% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001) and intracranial hemorrhage (0.6% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.015) without a significant increase in fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS In patients with a recent STEMI, rivaroxaban reduced cardiovascular events. This benefit emerged early and persisted during continued treatment with background antiplatelet therapies. Rivaroxaban compared with placebo increased the rate of major bleeding, but there was no significant increase in fatal bleeding. (An Efficacy and Safety Study for Rivaroxaban in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome; NCT00809965).

Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (TROPICAL-ACS): A randomised, open-label, multicentre trial

BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend potent platelet inhibition with prasugrel or ticagrelor for 12 months after an acute coronary syndrome managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the greatest anti-ischaemic benefit of potent antiplatelet drugs over the less potent clopidogrel occurs early, while most excess bleeding events arise during chronic treatment. Hence, a stage-adapted treatment with potent platelet inhibition in the acute phase and de-escalation to clopidogrel in the maintenance phase could be an alternative approach. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of early de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment from prasugrel to clopidogrel guided by platelet function testing (PFT). METHODS In this investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, assessor-blinded, multicentre trial (TROPICAL-ACS) done at 33 sites in Europe, patients were enrolled if they had biomarker-positive acute coronary syndrome with successful PCI and a planned duration of dual antiplatelet treatment of 12 months. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an internet-based randomisation procedure with a computer-generated block randomisation with stratification across study sites to either standard treatment with prasugrel for 12 months (control group) or a step-down regimen (1 week prasugrel followed by 1 week clopidogrel and PFT-guided maintenance therapy with clopidogrel or prasugrel from day 14 after hospital discharge; guided de-escalation group). The assessors were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was net clinical benefit (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or bleeding grade 2 or higher according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC]) criteria) 1 year after randomisation (non-inferiority hypothesis; margin of 30%). Analysis was intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01959451, and EudraCT, 2013-001636-22. FINDINGS Between Dec 2, 2013, and May 20, 2016, 2610 patients were assigned to study groups; 1304 to the guided de-escalation group and 1306 to the control group. The primary endpoint occurred in 95 patients (7%) in the guided de-escalation group and in 118 patients (9%) in the control group (pnon-inferiority=0·0004; hazard ratio [HR] 0·81 [95% CI 0·62-1·06], psuperiority=0·12). Despite early de-escalation, there was no increase in the combined risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in the de-escalation group (32 patients [3%]) versus in the control group (42 patients [3%]; pnon-inferiority=0·0115). There were 64 BARC 2 or higher bleeding events (5%) in the de-escalation group versus 79 events (6%) in the control group (HR 0·82 [95% CI 0·59-1·13]; p=0·23). INTERPRETATION Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment was non-inferior to standard treatment with prasugrel at 1 year after PCI in terms of net clinical benefit. Our trial shows that early de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment can be considered as an alternative approach in patients with acute coronary syndrome managed with PCI. FUNDING Klinikum der Universität München, Roche Diagnostics, Eli Lilly, and Daiichi Sankyo.

Clinically significant bleeding with low-dose rivaroxaban versus aspirin, in addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in acute coronary syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial

BACKGROUND Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor, is the standard antithrombotic treatment following acute coronary syndromes. The factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban reduced mortality and ischaemic events when added to DAPT, but caused increased bleeding. The safety of a dual pathway antithrombotic therapy approach combining low-dose rivaroxaban (in place of aspirin) with a P2Y12 inhibitor has not been assesssed in acute coronary syndromes. We aimed to assess rivaroxaban 2·5 mg twice daily versus aspirin 100 mg daily, in addition to clopidogrel or ticagrelor (chosen at investigator discretion before randomisation), for patients with acute coronary syndromes started within 10 days after presentation and continued for 6-12 months. METHODS In this double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial (GEMINI-ACS-1) done at 371 clinical centres in 21 countries, eligible patients were older than 18 years with unstable angina, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), with positive cardiac biomarkers and either ischaemic electrocardiographic changes or an atherosclerotic culprit lesion identified during angiography. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) within 10 days after admission for the index acute coronary syndromes event to either aspirin or rivaroxaban based on a computer-generated randomisation schedule. Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks with size of four and was stratified based on the background P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) intended to be used at the time of randomisation. Investigators and patients were masked to treatment assignment. Patients received a minimum of 180 days of double-blind treatment with rivaroxaban 2·5 mg twice daily or aspirin 100 mg daily. The choice of clopidogrel or ticagrelor during trial conduct was not randomised and was based on investigator preference. The primary endpoint was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) clinically significant bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; major, minor, or requiring medical attention) up to day 390. Primary analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02293395. FINDINGS Between April 22, 2015, and Oct 14, 2016, 3037 patients with acute coronary syndromes were randomly assigned; 1518 to receive aspirin and 1519 to receive rivaroxaban. 1704 patients (56%) were in the ticagrelor and 1333 (44%) in the clopidogrel strata. Median duration of treatment was 291 days (IQR 239-354). TIMI non-CABG clinically significant bleeding was similar with rivaroxaban versus aspirin therapy (total 154 patients [5%]; 80 participants [5%] of 1519 vs 74 participants [5%] of 1518; HR 1·09 [95% CI 0·80-1·50]; p=0·5840). INTERPRETATION A dual pathway antithrombotic therapy approach combining low-dose rivaroxaban with a P2Y12 inhibitor for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes had similar risk of clinically significant bleeding as aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor. A larger, adequately powered trial would be required to definitively assess the efficacy and safety of this approach. FUNDING Janssen Research & Development and Bayer AG.

Adrenal cortex - a newly recognized peripheral site of action of enkephalins.

Summary Two naturally occuring enkephalins, Leu- and Met-enkephalin, were shown to inhibit adrenal corticosteroid biosynthesis. In isolated rat adrenal cell system corticosterone, desoxycorticosterone and aldosterone, and in isolated bovine adrenal cells cortisol, corticosterone and aldosterone production were markedly depressed in a dose-dependent fashion, both under basal conditions and following stimulation with ACTH 1–24 . The inhibitory action of enkephalins on corticosteroid synthesis could be augmented by increasing the Ca 2+ -concentration in the cell-containing medium. The demonstration that opioid peptides interfere with corticosteroidogenesis directly at the adrenal level points to the existence of a peripheral neuroendocrine relationship.

Effect of losmapimod on cardiovascular outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: A randomized clinical trial

IMPORTANCE p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-stimulated inflammation is implicated in atherogenesis, plaque destabilization, and maladaptive processes in myocardial infarction (MI). Pilot data in a phase 2 trial in non-ST elevation MI indicated that the p38 MAPK inhibitor losmapimod attenuates inflammation and may improve outcomes. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of losmapimod on cardiovascular outcomes in patients hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS LATITUDE-TIMI 60, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial conducted at 322 sites in 34 countries from June 3, 2014, until December 8, 2015. Part A consisted of a leading cohort (n = 3503) to provide an initial assessment of safety and exploratory efficacy before considering progression to part B (approximately 22,000 patients). Patients were considered potentially eligible for enrollment if they had been hospitalized with an acute MI and had at least 1 additional predictor of cardiovascular risk. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to either twice-daily losmapimod (7.5 mg; n = 1738) or matching placebo (n = 1765) on a background of guideline-recommended therapy. Patients were treated for 12 weeks and followed up for an additional 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or severe recurrent ischemia requiring urgent coronary revascularization with the principal analysis specified at week 12. RESULTS In part A, among the 3503 patients randomized (median age, 66 years; 1036 [29.6%] were women), 99.1% had complete ascertainment for the primary outcome. The primary end point occurred by 12 weeks in 123 patients treated with placebo (7.0%) and 139 patients treated with losmapimod (8.1%; hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.91-1.47; P = .24). The on-treatment rates of serious adverse events were 16.0% with losmapimod and 14.2% with placebo. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with acute MI, use of losmapimod compared with placebo did not reduce the risk of major ischemic cardiovascular events. The results of this exploratory efficacy study did not justify proceeding to a larger efficacy trial in the existing patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02145468.