Robert Given

Quality of Life After Open or Robotic Prostatectomy, Cryoablation or Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE Health related quality of life concerns factor prominently in prostate cancer management. We describe health related quality of life impact and recovery profiles of 4 commonly used operative treatments for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Beginning in February 2000 all patients treated with open radical prostatectomy, robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, brachytherapy or cryotherapy were asked to complete the UCLA-PCI questionnaire before treatment, and at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months after treatment. Outcomes were compared across treatment types with statistical analysis using univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS A total of 785 patients treated between February 2000 and December 2008 were included in the analysis with a mean followup of 24 months. All health related quality of life domains were adversely affected by all treatments and recovery profiles varied significantly by treatment type. Overall urinary function and bother outcomes scored significantly higher after brachytherapy and cryotherapy compared to open radical prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Brachytherapy and cryotherapy had a 3-fold higher rate of return to baseline urinary function compared to open radical prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Sexual function and bother scores were highest after brachytherapy, with a 5-fold higher rate of return to baseline function compared to cryotherapy, open radical prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. All 4 treatments were associated with relatively transient and less pronounced impact on bowel function and bother. CONCLUSIONS In a study of sequential health related quality of life assessments brachytherapy and cryotherapy were associated with higher urinary function and bother scores compared to open radical prostatectomy and da Vinci prostatectomy. Brachytherapy was associated with higher sexual function and bother scores compared to open radical prostatectomy, robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and cryotherapy.

Clinical collection and protein properties of expressed prostatic secretions as a source for biomarkers of prostatic disease.

The prostate gland secretes many proteins in a prostatic fluid that combines with seminal vesicle derived fluids to promote sperm activation and function. Proximal fluids of the prostate that can be collected clinically are seminal plasma and expressed-prostatic secretion (EPS) fluids. EPS represents the fluid being secreted by the prostate following a digital rectal prostate massage, which in turn can be collected in voided urine post-exam. This collection is not disruptive to a standard urological exam, and it can be repeatedly collected from men across all prostatic disease states. A direct EPS fluid can also be collected under anesthesia prior to prostatectomy. While multiple genetic assays for prostate cancer detection are being developed for the shed epithelial cell fraction of EPS urines, the remaining fluid that contains many prostate-derived proteins has been minimally characterized. Approaches to optimization and standardization of EPS collection consistent with current urological exam and surgical practices are described, and initial proteomic and glycomic evaluations of the of EPS fluid are summarized for prostate specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase. Continued characterization of the prostate specific protein components of EPS urine combined with optimization of clinical collection procedures should facilitate discovery of new biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Single Center Experience with Third-Generation Cryosurgery for Management of Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Critical Evaluation of Short-Term Outcomes, Complications, and Patient Quality of Life

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Technical refinements such as improved ultrasonographic localization and the routine use of urethral warmers and small-gauge needle delivery systems have renewed interest in cryosurgical treatment as a minimally invasive option for selected patients with localized prostate cancer. Only three reports of quality of life (QoL) in prostate cryoablation exist, and none report on patients treated with third-generation cryoablative technology. We critically examine our initial series of consecutive patients at a single institution undergoing primary third-generation cryosurgical treatment of localized prostate cancer with respect to treatment outcome, morbidity profile, and QoL parameters. To our knowledge, this is the first QoL report on third-generation cryoablation of the prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively review the records of 89 consecutive patients with median followup of 11 months (1-32) who have undergone third-generation cryosurgical ablation of the prostate as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer with intention to cure. Patients were risk stratified according to preprocedural parameters of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, and Gleason score. PSA trends were recorded and treatment effectiveness was observed using different definitions of biochemical failure. Charts were reviewed for postprocedure complications. Quality of life was measured prospectively using the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index as well as American Urological Association symptom scores. We compare a percent of baseline score (%BS) for various domains between our series of patients treated with primary cryoablation with a series of patients undergoing brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. RESULTS Treatment success was defined by achievement of a PSA nadir of < or =0.1 ng/mL and by biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) assessed with both a PSA threshold of < or =0.4 ng/dL over time and the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition of three consecutive rises in PSA. According to risk stratification, 86%, 81.5%, and 78% of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively, achieved a PSA nadir of < or =0.1 ng/mL. Overall, at 12 months follow-up, 94% of patients achieved BDFS using ASTRO criteria while 70% achieved BDFS using a PSA threshold of < or =0.4 ng/mL. With risk stratification, 74%, 70%, and 60% of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively, achieved BDFS defined by PSA threshold of < or =0.4 ng/mL. Complications were rare. The response rate for Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) questionnaires was 71% for cryoablation patients and 51% for brachytherapy patients. At 12 months follow-up, patients undergoing cryoablation on average achieved urinary and bowel domain scores comparable to baseline, but sexual domains remained well below baseline. When compared with a brachytherapy series with better baseline sexual function (P = 0.04) and urinary function (P = 0.03), cryotherapy patients experienced more negative impact on sexual function steadily for up to 12 months (P = 0.02). Urinary function was similar between the groups until 18 months, at which time cryoablation patients fared better (P = 0.01); this was sustained up to 24 months (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Treatment success with cryosurgery varies with definition; however, our results are comparable to other series with regard to short-term cancer control. Complication rates in this series of third-generation cryosurgical patients are low. QoL characteristics of third-generation cryoablation are similar to those described in second-generation cryoablation series. Compared with brachytherapy, cryotherapy results in less irritative and obstructive voiding symptoms in the early post-treatment period and may improve urinary function up to 24 months after treatment. In a small group of older patients with baseline erectile dysfunction undergoing cryoablation, sexual function returns to 20% of its baseline value with up to 12 months follow-up.

Single Center Experience with Percutaneous and Laparoscopic Cryoablation of Small Renal Masses

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE While partial nephrectomy remains the gold standard for the management of most small renal masses, increasing experience with renal cryoablation has suggested a viable alternative with a favorable morbidity profile and good efficacy. We report intermediate-term oncologic outcomes from a single-center experience with laparoscopic and percutaneous renal cryoablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective review of our laparoscopic renal cryoablation (LRC) and percutaneous renal cryoablation (PRC) experience between January 2003 and April 2007. Patients with at least 12 months of follow-up were included in the analysis. Follow-up consisted of imaging and laboratory studies at regular intervals. Persistent mass enhancement or interval tumor growth was considered a treatment failure. RESULTS Sixty-six patients (44% women/56% men; 42% African-American/58% Caucasian/other; mean body mass index, 29.7) with 72 tumors underwent either LRC (n = 52) or PRC (n = 20) with a mean follow-up of 30 months (median 25.1 mos; range 13-63 mos). Average patient age was 66.5 years (range 34-82 yrs). Mean tumor size was 2.33 cm (range 1-4.6 cm). Comorbid conditions were prevalent: 76% hypertension, 36% hyperlipidemia, 24% chronic kidney disease, 29% diabetes mellitus, 36% tobacco use, and 32% heart disease. RESULTS of pretreatment biopsy were 62% renal-cell carcinoma and 38% benign or nondiagnostic. Overall cancer-specific and cancer-free survival were 100% and 97%, respectively. There were two treatment failures (3.8%) in the LRC group and five primary failures in the PRC group (25%) (P = 0.015), four of which were salvaged with repeated PRC with no evidence of recurrence at 6 to 36 months of follow-up. There has been no significant local or metastatic progression. CONCLUSIONS LRC and PRC achieved good oncologic control with minimal morbidity at a mean follow-up of 30 months in a patient cohort characterized by numerous comorbid conditions. PRC had a significantly higher primary treatment failure rate than LRC, but re-treatment offered salvage oncologic control with no significant complications.

Efficacy and Safety of MCNA in Patients with Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer at High Risk for Recurrence and Progression after Failed Treatment with bacillus Calmette-Guérin

PURPOSE Patients with high risk recurrences after bacillus Calmette-Guérin failure have limited options. We performed an open label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravesical MCNA in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were treated intravesically with 8 mg MCNA weekly for 6 weeks followed by 3 weekly instillations at months 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24. Cystoscopy and cytology were performed every 3 months for 2 years with mandatory biopsy at 6 months and as clinically indicated thereafter. The primary efficacy end point was the disease-free survival rate at 1 year. RESULTS A total of 129 patients were enrolled in study, including 91 with carcinoma in situ with or without papillary disease and 38 with papillary only tumors. Most patients had high risk disease. A total of 107 cases were bacillus Calmette-Guérin refractory and 2 or more prior bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction courses had been given in 68. Median followup in all patients was 34.7 months. The overall disease-free survival rate was 25.0% at 1 year and 19.0% at 2 years. In patients with papillary only tumors the disease-free survival rate was 35.1% and 32.2% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The median disease-free duration in the 30 responders was 32.7 months. The progression-free survival rate was 87.3%, 79.8% and 77.7% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively, with a progression event in 28 patients. MCNA was well tolerated and few adverse events led to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Intravesical MCNA achieved significant activity in patients at high risk with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer in whom bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment failed, especially those with papillary only tumors and those with bacillus Calmette-Guérin relapse. A durable response was seen, particularly in patients with a response at 1 year. MCNA offers an option for patients who are not candidates for or who refuse cystectomy.

Achieving the 'bifecta' using salvage cryotherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer: analysis of the Cryo On-Line Data (COLD) registry data.

Study Type – Outcomes (cohort)

Renal Functional Outcomes After Cryoablation of Small Renal Masses

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Renal function outcomes after renal cryosurgery have not been widely scrutinized. We report 2-year renal function outcomes from a single-center cohort of patients who were treated with cryoablation for small renal masses. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of our laparoscopic and percutaneous renal cryoablation experience between January 2003 and April 2007. Global renal function was assessed using measured serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (MDRD equation). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as a serum creatinine level >2.0 mg/dL or eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). RESULTS Sixty-two patients were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 30 months (range 13-63 mos). Mean tumor size was 2.33 cm (range 1-4.6 cm). Comorbid conditions were prevalent: 77% hypertension, 35% hyperlipidemia, 31% diabetes mellitus, 39% tobacco use, and 32% heart disease (coronary artery disease/congestive heart failure). Based on eGFR calculations, preoperative CKD was noted in 17 of 62 (27%) patients. De novo CKD was noted in 5 of 45 (11%) patients. Patients in whom de novo CKD developed had lower pretreatment eGFR (71.0 vs 98.4 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.03) and larger tumor size (2.94 vs 2.19 cm, P = 0.04) compared with patients who were maintaining normal renal function. When CKD was defined as creatinine level >2.0 mg/dL, only one and six patients were identified with preoperative and de novo CKD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of renal cryosurgery patients who were characterized by highly prevalent medical comorbidities, renal function was generally well maintained, with a low rate of de novo CKD based on eGFR calculations. A serum creatinine level >2.0 mg/dL was a less sensitive measure of CKD.

Primary Cryotherapy for High-Grade Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Oncologic and Functional Outcomes from the COLD Registry.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes of primary cryotherapy in men with clinically localized, high-grade prostate cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS We included all men with biopsy Gleason score ≥8, localized (cT1-2) disease with a serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤50 ng/mL from the Cryo On-Line Data (COLD) registry. The primary outcome was biochemical progression free survival (BPFS) as defined by the Phoenix criteria (nadir PSA +2 ng/mL). Secondary outcomes of continence (defined as strictly no leak) and potency (able to have intercourse) were patient reported. Factors influencing BPFS were evaluated individually using Kaplan Meier and in a multivariate model using Cox regression. RESULTS Altogether, 300 men were included for analysis. The median follow-up was 18.2 months (mean 28.4) and median BPFS was 69.8 months. Based on Kaplan-Meier analysis, the estimated 2- and 5-year BPFS rate was 77.2% and 59.1%, respectively. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy was administered to 41% of men and this tended to occur in men with larger prostates, likely as a technical consideration for downsizing before cryosurgery. At multivariate analysis, the presence of Gleason score 9 or 10 (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.9) and a posttreatment PSA nadir of ≥0.4 ng/mL (HR 5.7) were the only significant variables associated with biochemical progression using Cox regression. Complete continence was noted in 90.5% of men and potency in 17% of men at the 12-month follow-up. The incidence of rectourethral fistulae and urinary retention requiring intervention beyond temporary catheterization was 1.3% and 3.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION Primary cryotherapy appears to be effective and safe in the community setting for high-grade, clinically localized prostate cancer in the short term.

Cryoablation for locally advanced clinical stage T3 prostate cancer: a report from the Cryo‐On‐Line Database (COLD) Registry

To assess the oncological and functional outcomes of primary prostate cryoablation for men with clinical stage T3 (cT3) prostate cancer, as although radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) are the standard treatments for locally advanced cT3 prostate cancer some patients opt for nonextirpative prostate cryoablation instead.

Is there correlation of nerve-sparing status and return to baseline urinary function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Incontinence is a vital quality-of-life (QoL) concern for men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Using validated QoL instruments, we sought to determine if urinary function was affected by nerve-sparing status at prostatectomy and how this correlated with the three modalities of prostate cancer surgery practiced at our institution: Retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Percent of baseline urinary function (PBUF) score was calculated by dividing follow-up urinary function score by baseline urinary function score. Patients with a function score of <30 at baseline (n = 10, 2%) were excluded from analyses. PBUF was compared across categories of nerve-sparing surgery at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months. Survival analysis was conducted classifying a follow-up achievement of 75% percent of baseline score as a successful outcome. RESULTS Overall, 628 patients were available for analysis. Age, clinical stage, Gleason score, modality of surgery, mean baseline sexual function, and ability to have intercourse significantly affected PBUF. The significance of nerve-sparing status across groups was demonstrated only at 3 months postoperatively. Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant trend of returning to 75% of baseline urinary function in the bilateral nerve-sparing group. Multivariate analysis showed no correlation between type of nerve sparing, type of surgery, and PBUF. CONCLUSION Percent return of baseline urinary function is not significantly affected by nerve-sparing status after radical prostatectomy. RALRP demonstrates nonstatistically significant trends of patients returning to baseline urinary function when compared with other modalities.