Robert Goodkin

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Changes in Denervated Muscles after Peripheral Nerve Injury

The evaluation of peripheral nerve disorders has traditionally relied on a clinical history, physical examination, and electrodiagnostic studies. Recent studies have used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate a variety of both nerve and muscle disorders. In this article, we describe the use of MRI, using short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences, to evaluate muscle signal characteristics in a variety of peripheral nerve disorders. A total of 32 patients were studied, and 12 representative cases are discussed in detail. Increased STIR signal in muscle was seen in cases of severe axonotmetic injuries involving the transection of axons producing severe denervation changes on electromyography. The increased STIR signal in denervated muscles was seen as early as 4 days after the onset of clinical symptoms, which is significantly earlier than changes detected on electromyography. The MRI signal changes were reversible when the recovery of motor function occurred as a result of further muscle innervation. In cases of neurapraxic nerve injuries, characterized by conduction block without axonal loss, the STIR signal in muscle was normal. These findings show that MRI using STIR sequences provides a panoramic visual representation of denervated muscles useful in localizing and grading the severity of peripheral nerve injury secondary to either disease or trauma. MRI using STIR sequences may therefore play an important role in the prediction of clinical outcome and the formulation of appropriate therapy early after peripheral nerve injury.

Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow: Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging, clinical, electrodiagnostic, and intraoperative findings

The diagnosis of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow has relied primarily on clinical and electrodiagnostic findings. Recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used in the evaluation of peripheral nerve entrapment disorders to document signal and configuration changes in nerves. We performed a prospective study on a population of 31 elbows in 27 patients with ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. The study correlated MRI findings with clinical, electrodiagnostic, and operative findings. A control population consisting of 10 asymptomatic subjects also was studied by MRI. Electrodiagnostic evaluation confirmed ulnar neuropathy in 24 (77%) elbows of the 31, with localization to the elbow region in 21 (68%). MRI, using a short tau inversion recovery sequence, demonstrated increased signal of the ulnar nerve in 30 (97%) elbows of the 31 and enlargement of the ulnar nerve in 23 (74%). No MRI abnormalities were found in the control population. MRI signal increase of the ulnar nerve occurred an average of 27 mm proximal to the distal humerus and extended distally an average of 4 mm below the distal humerus. The mean total length of increased ulnar nerve signal was 34 mm. Ulnar nerve enlargement occurred an average of 19 mm proximal to the distal humerus and extended distally an average of 8 mm above the distal humerus. The mean total length of ulnar nerve enlargement was 12 mm. The 12 patients who underwent a surgical procedure for ulnar nerve entrapment were found to have ulnar nerve compression, with 9 (75%) having excellent and 3 (25%) having good postoperative results. In this study, MRI was both sensitive and specific in diagnosing ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow as defined by clinical, electrodiagnostic, and operative findings.

The utility of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating peripheral nerve disorders

The evaluation of peripheral nerve injuries has traditionally relied primarily on information gained from the clinical history, physical examination, and electrodiagnostic testing. Taken together, all of this clinical and diagnostic information often allows one to determine the location and severity of the underlying peripheral nerve problem. However, it may not be sufficient in diagnosing a focal entrapment neuropathy superimposed upon a more generalized peripheral neuropathy; localizing a focal lesion along a long segment of nerve which may be difficult to assess accurately with electrodiagnostic sutdies; distinguishing early between an axonotmetic grade of injury, which can recover through axonal regeneration, and a neurotmetic grade which cannot and therefore may benefit from a surgical exploration and repair procedure; and noninvasively diagnosing and determining the surgical resectability of peripheral nerve mass lesions such as tumors. The goal of this review is to illustrate how standard and evolving magnetic resonance imaging techniques can provide additional information in dealing with some of these problems.

Evaluation and surgical management of peripheral nerve problems.

OBJECTIVE To illustrate how an understanding of the basic biological responses of peripheral nerves to injury is important in formulating a rational treatment plan. METHODS Peripheral nerve anatomy and physiology are described in a context that is relevant to understanding the different grades of peripheral nerve injury. Methods of evaluating and treating peripheral nerve injuries both medically and surgically are reviewed. Relevant scientific studies with potential clinical impact are also discussed. RESULTS The clinical symptoms, physical findings, and electrodiagnostic and imaging test results relevant to the diagnosis of peripheral nerve problems are reviewed. Conventional and new medical or surgical strategies in the management of peripheral nerve injuries and mass lesions are described. CONCLUSION The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral nerve injuries follow logically from an understanding of the biological responses of peripheral nerves after injury and during recovery.

Magnetic resonance neurography of peripheral nerve lesions in the lower extremity

OBJECTIVE We describe the clinical application and utility of high-resolution magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) techniques to image the normal fascicular structure of peripheral nerves and its distortion by mass lesions or trauma in the lower extremity. METHODS MRN images were obtained using a standard 1.5 Tesla magnet and custom built phased-array coils. Patients were imaged using T1-weighted spin echo without and with gadolinium, T2-weighted fast spin echo with fat peripheral nerve tumors (three neurofibromas and one schwannoma), two with intraneural cysts, and three with traumatic peripheral nerve lesions. Six patients with peripheral nerve mass lesions underwent surgery, thereby allowing MRN images to be correlated with intraoperative and pathological findings. RESULTS Preoperative MRN accurately imaged the normal fascicular anatomy of peripheral nerves and precisely depicted its relation to tumor and cystic lesions. Increased signal on T2-weighted fast spin-echo and short tau inversion recovery fast spin-echo pulse sequences was seen in the peripheral nerve fascicles of patients with clinical and electrodiagnostic evidence of nerve injury. CONCLUSION MRN proved useful in the preoperative evaluation and planning of surgery in patients with peripheral nerve lesions.

Carpal tunnel syndrome: Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging, clinical, electrodiagnostic, and intraoperative findings

We undertook a prospective study of 43 wrists in 32 patients who had been clinically diagnosed as having carpal tunnel syndrome (study group) and 5 wrists in people who had no symptoms (control group), correlating the clinical, electrodiagnostic, intraoperative, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. MRI of the carpal tunnel and thenar eminence was performed, using coronal and axial T1- and T2-weighted, proton density, and short tau inversion recovery sequences. Abnormalities of the median nerve, as revealed by MRI, were found in 43 of 43 (100%) wrists in the study group and in 0 of 5 (0%) wrists in the control group. Increased signal of the median nerve was seen in 41 of 43 (95%) wrists, increased signal of the flexor tendon sheath in 41 of 43 (95%), volar bowing of the flexor retinaculum in 39 of 43 (91%), increased distance between the flexor tendons in 37 of 43 (86%), and abnormal nerve configuration in 28 of 43 (65%). Increased short tau inversion recovery signal of the thenar muscles was found in 5 of 43 (12%) wrists, all of which had undergone severe denervation changes, as revealed by electromyography. Operative release was performed for 27 of 43 (63%) wrists, and follow-up was obtained for 42 of 43 (98%). A good or excellent postoperative outcome resulted for 20 of 27 (74%) patients, a fair outcome for 2 of 27 (7%), and a poor outcome for 4 of 27 (15%), and 1 of 27 (4%) patients was lost to follow-up. For patients undergoing carpal tunnel release whose MRI revealed an abnormal nerve configuration, the outcome was improved, with good or excellent results in 15 of 18 (83%) patients. No association with outcome was seen with median nerve or flexor tendon signal changes, increased interspace between the flexor tendons, or flexor retinaculum bowing. Our results indicate that MRI is a sensitive diagnostic modality that can demonstrate signal and configurational abnormalities of the median nerve in patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome. Increased signal of the thenar muscles, as revealed by MRI, using short tau inversion recovery sequences, occurs only in muscles that have undergone severe denervation changes, as revealed by electromyography.

Clinical experience with dexmedetomidine for implantation of deep brain stimulators in Parkinson's disease

The pharmacologic profile of the α-2 agonist dexmedetomidine (Dex) suggests that it may be an ideal sedative drug for deep brain stimulator (DBS) implantation. We performed a retrospective chart review of anesthesia records of patients who underwent DBS implantation from 2001 to 2004. In 2003, a clinical protocol with Dex sedation for DBS implantation was initiated. Demographic data, use of antihypertensive medication, and duration of mapping were compared between patients who received Dex (11 patients/13 procedures) and patients who did not receive any sedation (controls: 8 patients/9 procedures). There were no differences in severity of illness between the two groups. Dex provided patient comfort and surgical satisfaction with mapping in all cases, and significantly reduced the use of antihypertensive medication (54% in the Dex group, versus 100% in controls, P = 0.048). In DBS implantation, sedation with Dex did not interfere with electrophysiologic mapping, and provided hemodynamic stability and patient comfort. Routine use of Dex in these procedures may be indicated.

Magnetic resonance neurography of peripheral nerve degeneration and regeneration

1To date, no study has shown that this technique can visualise the process of peripheral nerve degeneration and regeneration over time. We show how MRN signal changes during degeneration and regeneration of an injured peripheral nerve correlated with clinical and electrodiagnostic findings. A 29-year-old man had a traumatic laceration of the right sciatic nerve in the lower thigh resulting in an inability to dorsiflex and evert his right foot. Emergency surgery documented complete transection of the peroneal nerve which was surgically anastomosed. On referral 2 months later, clinical and electrodiagnostic examinations confirmed complete denervation of all muscles supplied by this nerve. Follow-up examinations 4 and 6 months after the injury showed no reinnervation of these muscles. MRN images were obtained on a 1·5-Tesla scanner (Signa; General Electric, Milwaukee, WI) with custom-designed phasedarray coils and imaging protocols previously described: 1

Towards standardized measurement of adverse events in spine surgery: conceptual model and pilot evaluation

BackgroundIndependent of efficacy, information on safety of surgical procedures is essential for informed choices. We seek to develop standardized methodology for describing the safety of spinal operations and apply these methods to study lumbar surgery. We present a conceptual model for evaluating the safety of spine surgery and describe development of tools to measure principal components of this model: (1) specifying outcome by explicit criteria for adverse event definition, mode of ascertainment, cause, severity, or preventability, and (2) quantitatively measuring predictors such as patient factors, comorbidity, severity of degenerative spine disease, and invasiveness of spine surgery.MethodsWe created operational definitions for 176 adverse occurrences and established multiple mechanisms for reporting them. We developed new methods to quantify the severity of adverse occurrences, degeneration of lumbar spine, and invasiveness of spinal procedures. Using kappa statistics and intra-class correlation coefficients, we assessed agreement for the following: four reviewers independently coding etiology, preventability, and severity for 141 adverse occurrences, two observers coding lumbar spine degenerative changes in 10 selected cases, and two researchers coding invasiveness of surgery for 50 initial cases.ResultsDuring the first six months of prospective surveillance, rigorous daily medical record reviews identified 92.6% of the adverse occurrences we recorded, and voluntary reports by providers identified 38.5% (surgeons reported 18.3%, inpatient rounding team reported 23.1%, and conferences discussed 6.1%). Trained observers had fair agreement in classifying etiology of 141 adverse occurrences into 18 categories (kappa = 0.35), but agreement was substantial (kappa ≥ 0.61) for 4 specific categories: technical error, failure in communication, systems failure, and no error. Preventability assessment had moderate agreement (mean weighted kappa = 0.44). Adverse occurrence severity rating had fair agreement (mean weighted kappa = 0.33) when using a scale based on the JCAHO Sentinel Event Policy, but agreement was substantial for severity ratings on a new 11-point numerical severity scale (ICC = 0.74). There was excellent inter-rater agreement for a lumbar degenerative disease severity score (ICC = 0.98) and an index of surgery invasiveness (ICC = 0.99).ConclusionComposite measures of disease severity and surgery invasiveness may allow development of risk-adjusted predictive models for adverse events in spine surgery. Standard measures of adverse events and risk adjustment may also facilitate post-marketing surveillance of spinal devices, effectiveness research, and quality improvement.

Development of an index to characterize the "invasiveness" of spine surgery: Validation by comparison to blood loss and operative time

Study Design. Prospective cohort study. Objective. To create and validate an index describing the extent of spine surgical intervention to allow fair comparisons of complication rates among patients treated by different surgeons, devices, or hospitals. Summary of Background Data. Safety comparisons in spine surgery are limited by lack of methods that adjust for important variations in the surgical “case-mix.” Among other factors, the magnitude of an operation is likely to have a substantial influence on the likelihood of complications. Methods. We created a spine surgery invasiveness index defined as the sum, across all vertebral levels, of 6 possible interventions on each operated vertebra: anterior decompression, anterior fusion, anterior instrumentation, posterior decompression, posterior fusion, and posterior instrumentation. We assessed the validity of this index by examining its association with blood loss and surgery duration in 1723 spine surgeries, adjusting for important factors including age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis, neurologic deficit, revision surgery, and vertebral level of surgery. Results. Blood loss increased by 11.5% and surgery duration increased by 12.8 minutes for each unit increase in the invasiveness index. The invasiveness index explained 44% of the variation in blood loss and 52% of the variation in surgery duration. For specific surgical components, blood loss increased by 9.4% and surgery duration by 11.4 minutes for each vertebral level of anterior decompression, 19.4% and 33.8 minutes for each segment of anterior instrumentation, 12.9% and 22.7 minutes for each level of posterior decompression, and 25.1% and 18.8 minutes for each segment of posterior instrumentation. Conclusion. An “invasiveness” index based on the number of vertebrae decompressed, fused, or instrumented showed the expected associations with both blood loss and surgery duration. This quantitative description of surgery invasiveness may be useful to adjust for surgical variations when making safety comparisons in spine surgery.