Robert H. Heise
Mayo Clinic
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robert H. Heise.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings | 2009
Christina L. Wichman; Katherine M. Moore; Tara R. Lang; Jennifer L. St. Sauver; Robert H. Heise; William J. Watson
OBJECTIVEnTo determine the risk of congenital cardiac abnormalities associated with use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) during pregnancy.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnWe conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of all pregnant women presenting at Mayo Clinics site in Rochester, MN, from January 1, 1993, to July 15, 2005, and identified 25,214 deliveries. A total of 808 mothers were treated with SSRIs at some point during their pregnancy. We reviewed the medical records of the newborns exposed to SSRIs during pregnancy to analyze their outcomes, specifically for congenital heart disease and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn.nnnRESULTSnOf the study patients, 808 (3.2%) took an SSRI at some point during the antenatal period. Of the 25,214 deliveries, 208 newborns (0.8%) were diagnosed as having congenital heart disease. Of the 808 women exposed to SSRI during pregnancy, 3 (0.4%) had congenital heart disease compared with 205 (0.8%) of the 24,406 women not exposed to an SSRI (P=.23). Of the total number of deliveries, 16 newborns were diagnosed as having persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn, none of whom had exposure to SSRIs (P>.99).nnnCONCLUSIONnOur data are reassuring regarding the safety of using SSRIs during pregnancy.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings | 1993
Robert H. Heise; Jo T. Van Winter; Paul L. Ogburn
In this report, we describe a case of acute, massive fetomaternal hemorrhage that was detected during the 32nd week of pregnancy by maternal perception of decreased fetal movement and suggestion of a sinusoidal heart rate pattern. Additional evaluation revealed an abnormal biophysical profile (2 of 10) and intermittent late decelerations. Because of the substantially decreased fetal reserve, cesarean section was emergently performed. A 1,880-g female infant was delivered. She had an initial hemoglobin concentration of 1.9 g/dl and a hematocrit of 5.7% but did well after appropriate transfusion therapy. This case confirms the importance of daily counting of fetal movements in low-risk patients. In addition, it emphasizes that early diagnosis and treatment of massive fetomaternal hemorrhage can improve infant survival.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings | 1992
Robert H. Heise; Jo T. Van Winter; Timothy O. Wilson; Paul L. Ogburn
Colonic cancer during pregnancy is rare. Herein we describe a case of adenocarcinoma of the transverse colon in a 29-year-old pregnant patient. Early diagnosis is difficult because the initial symptoms of colorectal cancer, such as abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, constipation, and abdominal distention, are often attributed to a normal pregnancy. Management of colonic cancer during pregnancy depends on gestational age and operability of the tumor. Medical and surgical management considerations are discussed.
Journal of Maternal-fetal & Neonatal Medicine | 2003
Patrick S. Ramsey; Paul L. Ogburn; Denise Y. Harris; Robert H. Heise; C. S. DiMarco; Kirk D. Ramin
Objective: To evaluate whether vaginal pH alters the efficacy of the controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert (Cervidil®) for cervical ripening/labor induction. Methods: Thirty-four women with an unfavorable cervix undergoing labor induction were enrolled in this prospective, double-blind investigation. Vaginal pH and Bishop score assessments were made by an independent examiner. All women received preinduction with the dinoprostone vaginal insert 10 mg intravaginally for 12 h. Twelve hours later, oxytocin induction initiated according to the standardized protocol and outcome data were collected. Results: Mean (± SD) initial vaginal pH was 4.9 ± 0.5 for the study cohort. No significant differences were noted between women with a high vaginal pH (> 4.5, n = 18) and those with a low vaginal pH (≤ 4.5, n = 16) with respect to maternal age, parity, gestational age, or initial Bishop score. Similarly, Bishop score change over the preinduction interval (3.2 vs. 3.3), time to active labor (28.6 vs. 24.6 h) and time to delivery (33.7 vs. 31.4 h) were not significantly different between the low and the high pH groups, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed no significant association between vaginal pH and Bishop score change during the preinduction interval, time to active labor, time to complete dilatation, or time to delivery. Conclusion: Vaginal pH does not appear to influence the efficacy of the controlled-released dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening/labor induction.
Primary Care Update for Ob\/gyns | 1998
Patrick S. Ramsey; Denise Y. Harris; Paul L. Ogburn; Robert H. Heise; Paul M. Magtibay; Kirk D. Ramin
Objective: To compare the relative cost efficacy of three commercially available prostaglandin analogues, misoprostol (Cytotec(R), PGE(1)), dinoprostone gel (Prepidil(R), PGE(2)), and dinoprostone pessary (Cervidil(R), PGE(2)), as labor preinduction agents.Methods: The investigation was conducted as a prospective randomized, blinded phase III clinical trial. One hundred twelve gravid females undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score </=5) were enrolled and randomized to receive either Cytotec(R) 50 µg q6 hours x 2 doses, Prepidil(R) 0.5 mg q6 hours x 2 doses, or Cervidil(R) 10 mg x 1 intravaginally. Twelve hours after initial treatment, cervical Bishop score was reassigned by the same blinded initial examiner and oxytocin induction initiated per standardized protocol. Therapeutic efficacy and cost of the labor preinduction/induction with the study treatments were compared. Statistical comparisons between groups were made using ANOVA with Bonferroni post test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and chi(2) test.Results: The three study groups did not differ significantly with respect to parity, gestational age, indication for induction, or initial cervical Bishop score. A significantly greater proportion of patients had a favorable cervix (Bishop score >/=6) after the initial preinduction interval in the Cytotec(R) (79.0%) and Cervidil(R) groups (60.5%) as compared to Prepidil(R) (40.0%) (P <.05). The average relative cost per patient for prostaglandin preinduction was significantly less with Cytotec(R) (
JAMA | 1993
John W. Bachman; Robert H. Heise; James M. Naessens; Mark G. Timmerman
0.42) as compared to both Cervidil(R) (
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2003
Patrick S. Ramsey; Denise Y. Harris; Paul L. Ogburn; Robert H. Heise; Paul M. Magtibay; Kirk D. Ramin
168.00) and Prepidil(R) (
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 1996
Robert H. Heise; Preeti J. Srivatsa; Philip R. Karsell
184.17) (P <.0001). A greater percentage of patients treated with Cytotec(R) (42.1%) achieved active labor and delivered without the use of oxytocin when compared to Cervidil(R) (15.8%) or Prepidil(R) treatment groups (2.9%) (P <.05). Additionally, time to delivery (+/-SD) was significantly shorter in the Cytotec(R) group (24.0 +/- 10.8 h) as compared to the Cervidil(R) (32.2 +/- 14.7 h) or Prepidil(R) groups (33.9 +/- 16.2 h) (P <.05). This reduction in time resulted in a significantly lower overall mean cost per patient incurred by labor induction in the Cytotec(R) group (
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology | 2008
Christina L. Wichman; Amy Fothergill; Katherine M. Moore; Tara R. Lang; Robert H. Heise; William J. Watson
723.66) as compared to the Cervidil(R) (
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2000
Patrick S. Ramsey; Paul L. Ogburn; Denise Y. Harris; Robert H. Heise; Kirk D. Ramin
1058.90) or Prepidil(R) treatment (
Collaboration
Dive into the Robert H. Heise's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs