Robert I. Paulson
University of South Florida
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robert I. Paulson.
Harvard Review of Psychiatry | 2004
Robert D. Macy; Lenore Behar; Robert I. Paulson; Jonathan Delman; Lisa Schmid; Stefanie F. Smith
&NA; Much of todays psychological trauma can be identified as resulting from sudden and seemingly random events, and particularly from events that involve the loss of human life. This article presents a perspective on how behavioral health providers may approach the design, development, and implementation of community‐based psychological trauma interventions. These interventions allow those community members most affected by the trauma to play a central role in the resolution of, and community adaptation to, traumatic losses. After a brief discussion of “critical incident stress debriefing”—a common form of psychological “first aid” that is sometimes used following traumatic events that affect a community—the article turns to the description of a community‐based trauma‐response program that provides a continuum‐of‐care model for the care and management of individual and group reactions to shared, traumatic events. A recent evaluation of that program, which was developed by the Community Services Program of the Trauma Center in Boston, is presented as an important first step toward determining the types of community‐based responses that show promise in our efforts to ameliorate the impact of traumatic events in communities nationwide and internationally.
Psychiatric Services | 2013
Carla A. Green; Nancy Perrin; Michael C. Leo; Shannon L. Janoff; Bobbi Jo H. Yarborough; Robert I. Paulson
OBJECTIVE The objective was to identify trajectories of recovery from serious mental illnesses. METHODS A total of 177 members (92 women; 85 men) of a not-for-profit integrated health plan participated in a two-year mixed-methods study of recovery (STARS, the Study of Transitions and Recovery Strategies). Diagnoses included schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and affective psychosis. Data sources included self-reported standardized measures, interviewer ratings, qualitative interviews, and health plan data. Recovery was conceptualized as a latent construct, and factor analyses and factor scores were used to calculate recovery trajectories. Individuals with similar trajectories were identified through cluster analyses. RESULTS Four trajectories were identified-two stable (high and low levels of recovery) and two fluctuating (higher and lower). Few demographic or diagnostic factors differentiated clusters at baseline. Discriminant analyses for trajectories found differences in psychiatric symptoms, physical health, satisfaction with mental health clinicians, resources and strains, satisfaction with medications, and mental health service use. Those with higher scores on recovery factors had fewer psychiatric symptoms, better physical health, greater satisfaction with mental health clinicians, fewer strains and greater resources, less service use, better quality of care, and greater satisfaction with medication. Consistent predictors of trajectories included psychiatric symptoms, physical health, resources and strains, and use of psychiatric medications. CONCLUSIONS Having access to good-quality mental health care-defined as including satisfying relationships with clinicians, responsiveness to needs, satisfaction with psychiatric medications, receipt of services at needed levels, support in managing deficits in resources and strains, and care for general medical conditions-may facilitate recovery. Providing such care may improve recovery trajectories.
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research | 2004
Judith A. Cook; Genevieve Fitzgibbon; Jane K. Burke-Miller; Melissa Williams; Jong-Bae Kim; Craig Anne Heflinger; Christina W. Hoven; Kelly J. Kelleher; Virginia Mulkern; Robert I. Paulson; Al Stein-Seroussi
Although Medicaid-funded managed care arrangements are commonly used in the delivery of mental health and substance abuse services to low-income children and youth, little is known about the effectiveness of such efforts. This article examines differences in mental health services utilization between children and youth with severe emotional disturbance covered by Medicaid-funded managed care behavioral health plans and those covered by fee-for-service plans. Data are from a federally funded multi-site study. In multivariate analyses controlling for child and caregiver demographic and clinical factors, enrollment in a managed care behavioral health plan was associated with lower inpatient/residential, psychiatric medication, and nontraditional services utilization. No difference was found in outpatient services utilization. Medicaid-funded managed care behavioral health plans appear to reduce use of some types of mental health services, but it is important to address the question of whether low-income childrens enrollment in such programs deprives them of needed services.
Evaluation Review | 2004
Svetlana Yampolskaya; Robert I. Paulson; Mary I. Armstrong; Neil Jordan; Amy C. Vargo
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the development of safety, permanency, and child well-being indicators by using administrative data sets as well as by using these indicators as tools for evaluating Florida’s Community-Based Care (CBC) initiative. Longitudinal data from 37 counties including 4 counties that implemented community-based care were examined in this study. The results of the study indicated that the overall performance of CBC counties is at least as good as the performance of their comparison run by the state counties. The findings that emerged from this study may provide important lessons for developing a performance measurement system in the child welfare field.
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal | 2015
Scott P. Stumbo; Bobbi Jo H. Yarborough; Robert I. Paulson; Carla A. Green
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare effects of adverse childhood experiences and adverse adult experiences on recovery from serious mental illnesses. METHODS As part of a mixed-methods study of recovery from serious mental illnesses, we interviewed and administered questionnaires to 177 members of a not-for-profit health plan over a 2-year period. Participants had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, affective psychosis, schizophrenia, or schizoaffective disorder. Data for analyses came from standardized self-reported measures; outcomes included recovery, functioning, quality of life, and psychiatric symptoms. Adverse events in childhood and adulthood were evaluated as predictors. RESULTS Child and adult exposures to adverse experiences were high, at 91% and 82%, respectively. Cumulative lifetime exposure to adverse experiences (childhood plus adult experiences) was 94%. In linear regression analyses, adverse adult experiences were more important predictors of outcomes than adverse childhood experiences. Adult experiences were associated with lower recovery scores, quality of life, mental and physical functioning and social functioning and greater psychiatric symptoms. Emotional neglect in adulthood was associated with lower recovery scores. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Early and repeated exposure to adverse events was common in this sample of people with serious mental illnesses. Adverse adult experiences were stronger predictors of worse functioning and lower recovery levels than were childhood experiences. Focusing clinical attention on adult experiences of adverse or traumatic events may result in greater benefit than focusing on childhood experiences alone.
Psychiatric Services | 2013
Carla A. Green; Shannon L. Janoff; Bobbi Jo H. Yarborough; Robert I. Paulson
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a low-cost, strengths-based group intervention led jointly by peer counselors and professional counselors to foster recovery among adults with serious mental illnesses. METHODS Cohort 1 included development of materials and a feasibility pilot, with participants recruited from community mental health centers (CMHCs). Cohorts 2 and 3 included a small randomized controlled trial with participants recruited from members of a not-for-profit, integrated health plan. Cohorts 4 and 5 involved evaluation of the most appropriate length for the intervention with a pre-post design that allowed intervention length to vary between 12 and 18 sessions; participants and peer leaders were recruited from two CMHCs (N=82). RESULTS Participants were very satisfied with the recovery-focused group intervention, preferred a greater number of weekly sessions (17 or 18 sessions), and reported improved outcomes across multiple domains. CONCLUSIONS Using peer-developed materials and a combination of peer and professional counselors as group leaders is feasible to offer and valuable to participants. Outcomes measures suggest that the intervention has potential to facilitate recovery in multiple domains.
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal | 2008
Carla A. Green; Michael R Polen; Shannon L. Janoff; David K. Castleton; Jennifer P. Wisdom; Nancy Vuckovic; Nancy Perrin; Robert I. Paulson; Stuart L. Oken
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal | 2000
Robert D. Coursey; Laurie Curtis; Diane T. Marsh; Jean Campbell; Courtenay M. Harding; LeRoy Spaniol; Alicia Lucksted; John McKenna; Michael P. Kelley; Robert I. Paulson; Jim Zahniser
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal | 2000
Robert D. Coursey; Laurie Curtis; Diane T. Marsh; Jean Campbell; Courtenay M. Harding; LeRoy Spaniol; Alicia Lucksted; John McKenna; Michael P. Kelley; Robert I. Paulson; Jim Zahniser
The Psychiatric times | 2003
Robert I. Paulson; Mary I. Armstrong; Eric C. Brown; Neil Jordan; Mary Ann Kershaw; Amy C. Vargo