Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert J. Gatchel is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert J. Gatchel.


Psychological Bulletin | 2007

The Biopsychosocial Approach to Chronic Pain: Scientific Advances and Future Directions.

Robert J. Gatchel; Yuan Bo Peng; Madelon L. Peters; Perry N. Fuchs; Dennis C. Turk

The prevalence and cost of chronic pain is a major physical and mental health care problem in the United States today. As a result, there has been a recent explosion of research on chronic pain, with significant advances in better understanding its etiology, assessment, and treatment. The purpose of the present article is to provide a review of the most noteworthy developments in the field. The biopsychosocial model is now widely accepted as the most heuristic approach to chronic pain. With this model in mind, a review of the basic neuroscience processes of pain (the bio part of biopsychosocial), as well as the psychosocial factors, is presented. This spans research on how psychological and social factors can interact with brain processes to influence health and illness as well as on the development of new technologies, such as brain imaging, that provide new insights into brain-pain mechanisms.


Psychosomatic Medicine | 2002

Chronic pain and psychopathology: research findings and theoretical considerations.

Jeffrey Dersh; Peter B. Polatin; Robert J. Gatchel

Objective Numerous studies have documented a strong association between chronic pain and psychopathology. Previous research has shown that chronic pain is most often associated with depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, somatoform disorders, substance use disorders, and personality disorders. The primary objective of this review article is to describe the nature of the relationship between chronic pain and each of these types of psychopathology. In addition, this article will explore how each of these disorders are expressed within the context of chronic pain, with a consideration of both diagnostic and treatment issues. Methods Medline and PsychLit searches of the chronic pain/psychopathology literature from 1980 through 2000 were conducted using the keywords chronic pain, psychopathology, psychiatric disorders, and psychological disorders. Results The relationship between chronic pain and psychopathology has generated substantial empirical and theoretical interest, with depressive disorders receiving much of the attention. Conclusions Although no single theoretical model can fully explain the causal relationship between chronic pain and psychopathology, a diathesis-stress model is emerging as the dominant overarching theoretical perspective. In this model, diatheses are conceptualized as preexisting, semidormant characteristics of the individual before the onset of chronic pain that are then activated and exacerbated by the stress of this chronic condition, eventually resulting in diagnosable psychopathology.


Spine | 1993

Psychiatric Illness and Chronic Low-back Pain: The Mind and the Spine—which Goes First?

Peter B. Polatin; Regina K. Kinney; Robert J. Gatchel; Erin Lillo; Tom G. Mayer

Two hundred chronic low-back pain patients entering a functional restoration program were assessed for current and lifetime psychiatric syndromes using a structured psychiatric interview to make DSM-III-R diagnoses. Results showed that, even when the somewhat controversial category of somatoform pain disorder was excluded, 77% of patients met lifetime diagnostic criteria and 59% demonstrated current symptoms for at least one psychiatric diagnosis. The most common of these were major depression, substance abuse, and anxiety disorders. In addition, 51% met criteria for at least one personality disorder. All of the prevalence rates were significantly greater than the base rate for the general population. Finally, and most importantly, of these patients with a positive lifetime history for psychiatric syndromes, 54% of those with depression, 94% of those with substance abuse, and 95% of those with anxiety disorders had experienced these syndromes before the onset of their back pain. These are the first results to indicate that certain psychiatric syndromes appear to precede chronic iow-back pain (substance abuse and anxiety disorders), whereas others (specifically, major depression) develop either before or after the onset of chronic low-back pain. Such findings substantially add to our understanding of causality and predisposition in the relationship between psychiatric disorders and chronic low-back pain. They also clearly reveal that clinicians should be aware of potentially high rates of emotional distress syndromes in chronic low-back pain and enlist mental health professionals to help maximize treatment outcomes.


Spine | 1985

1985 volvo award in clinical sciences objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury a prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up

Tom G. Mayer; Robert J. Gatchel; Nancy D. Kishino; Janice Keeley; Patricia Capra; Holly Mayer; Jim Barnett; Vert Mooney

Objective functional capacity measurement techniques were used to guide a treatment program for a group of 66 chronic back pain patients. These patients were compared with a group of 38 chronic patients who were not administered the treatment program. Outcome data were collected by telephone survey at an average 1 year follow-up. In addition, functional capacity measures were collected for treatment group patients on admission and follow-up evaluations. Results demonstrated that the functional capacity measures collected for the treatment group improved in approximately 80% of the patients. These changes were also accompanied by positive changes in psychologic measures. In addition, at 1 year follow-up, the treatment group had approximately twice the rate of patients who returned to work, relative to the comparison group. Additional surgery rates were comparable for both groups (6% in the treatment and 7% in the comparison group), but the frequency of additional health-care professional visits was substantially higher in the comparison group. The findings suggest that quantitative functional capacity measures can give objective evidence of patient physical abilities and degree of effort and can significantly guide the clinician in administering an effective treatment program


American Psychologist | 2004

Comorbidity of Chronic Pain and Mental Health Disorders: The Biopsychosocial Perspective

Robert J. Gatchel

An exciting period in mental and physical health research is beginning, resulting from a paradigm shift from an outdated biomedical reductionism approach to a more comprehensive biopsychosocial model, which emphasizes the unique interactions among biological, psychological, and social factors required to better understand health and illness. This biopsychosocial perspective is important in evaluating the comorbidity of mental and physical health problems. Psychiatric and medical pathologies interface prominently in pain disorders. Important topics in the biopsychosocial approach to comorbid chronic mental and physical health disorders, focusing primarily on pain, are presented. Though this biopsychosocial model has produced dramatic advances in health psychology over the past 2 decades, important challenges to moving the field forward still remain.


Spine | 1989

Comparison of Ct Scan Muscle Measurements and Isokinetic Trunk Strength in Postoperative Patients

Tom G. Mayer; Heikki Vanharanta; Robert J. Gatchel; Vert Mooney; Dennis Barnes; Linda Judge; Susan Smith; Arthur Terry

The present study compared the computed tomography (CT) scan muscle area/muscle density and isokinetic trunk strength of a group of spinal surgery patients (35 males and 11 females) 3 months postoperatively. Analyses showed trunk strength means to be below 50% of gender-specific “normal” values obtained by evaluating a normative sample. Extensor strength was more significantly affected than flexors. Single-cut CT scans performed at the time of isokinetic trunk strength assessment demonstrated psoas and erector spinae atrophy through a significant decrease in muscle density, with only a trend towards decreased cross-sectional area. Findings also indicated that there was a significant correlation between increased mechanical trunk strength performance and greater muscle density on CT scan. Strength was significantly lower for the male patients undergoing spinal fusion compared with those undergoing disc excision. However, no significant difference was found in strength measures between: males with high versus low pain level and working versus nonworking males at the time of evaluation.


Health Psychology | 1995

Predicting Outcome of Chronic Back Pain Using Clinical Predictors of Psychopathology: A Prospective Analysis

Robert J. Gatchel; Peter B. Polatin; Regina K. Kinney

This study evaluated whether a comprehensive assessment of psychosocial measures is useful in characterizing those acute low back pain patients who subsequently develop chronic pain disability problems. A cohort of 324 patients was evaluated, with all patients being administered a standard battery psychological assessment tests. A structured telephone interview was conducted 6 months after the psychological assessment to evaluate return-to-work status. Analyses, conducted to differentiate between those patients who were back at work at 6 months versus those who were not because of the original back injury, revealed the importance of 3 measures: self-reported pain and disability, the presence of a personality disorder, and scores on Scale 3 of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. These results demonstrate the presence of a psychosocial disability variable that is associated with those injured workers who are likely to develop chronic disability problems.


Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | 2005

Integrating Psychosocial and Behavioral Interventions to Achieve Optimal Rehabilitation Outcomes

Michael J. L. Sullivan; Michael Feuerstein; Robert J. Gatchel; Steven J. Linton; Glenn Pransky

Introduction: Psychosocial factors are important contributors to work disability associated with musculoskeletal conditions. The primary objectives of this paper were 1) to describe different psychosocial interventions that have been developed to prevent prolonged work disability, and 2) to identify future research directions that might enhance the impact of programs targeting psychosocial risk factors for work disability. Methods: Selective review of scientific literature on psychosocial and behavioral interventions and work disability. Results: Most prior interventions focused on psychosocial risk factors that exist primarily within the individual (e.g., pain catastrophizing, beliefs, expectancies). Successful disability prevention will require methods to assess and target psychosocial risk factors “outside” of the individual (e.g., interpersonal conflict in the workplace, job stress, etc.) using cost-effective, multipronged approaches. Research to explore interactions among different domains of psychosocial risk factors in relation to RTW outcomes is needed. Challenges to effective secondary prevention of work disability include developing competencies to enable a range of providers to deliver interventions, standardization of psychosocial interventions, and maximizing adherence to intervention protocols. Conclusion: Effective secondary prevention of work disability will require research to develop cost-effective, multipronged approaches that concurrently target both worker-related and workplace psychosocial risk factors.


Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | 2003

Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: A one-year prospective study

Robert J. Gatchel; Peter B. Polatin; Carl Noe; Margaret A. Gardea; Carla Pulliam; Judy Thompson

In an attempt to prevent acute low-back pain from becoming a chronic disability problem, an earlier study developed a statistical algorithm which accurately identified those acute low-back pain patients who were at high risk for developing such chronicity. The major goal of the present study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of employing an early intervention program with these high-risk patients in order to prevent the development of chronic disability at a 1-year follow-up. Approximately 700 acute low-back pain patients were screened for their high-risk versus low-risk status. On the basis of this screening, high-risk patients were then randomly assigned to one of two groups: a functional restoration early intervention group (n = 22), or a nonintervention group (n = 48). A group of low-risk subjects (n = 54) who did not receive any early intervention was also evaluated. All these subjects were prospectively tracked at 3-month intervals starting from the date of their initial evaluation, culminating in a 12-month follow-up. During these follow-up evaluations, pain disability and socioeconomic outcomes (such as return-to-work and healthcare utilization) were assessed. Results clearly indicated that the high-risk subjects who received early intervention displayed statistically significant fewer indices of chronic pain disability on a wide range of work, healthcare utilization, medication use, and self-report pain variables, relative to the high-risk subjects who do not receive such early intervention. In addition, the high-risk nonintervention group displayed significantly more symptoms of chronic pain disability on these variables relative to the initially low-risk subjects. Cost-comparison savings data were also evaluated. These data revealed that there were greater cost savings associated with the early intervention group versus the no early intervention group. The overall results of this study clearly demonstrate the treatment- and cost-effectiveness of an early intervention program for acute low-back pain patients.


Spine | 1988

Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation: I. A standardized protocol and normative database

Tom G. Mayer; Dennis Barnes; Nancy D. Kishino; Gerry Nichols; Robert J. Gatchel; Holly Mayer; Vert Mooney

Dynamic tests of trunk strength and lifting capacity have become more popular in recent years, offering certain advantages over static isometric tests in measuring patient progress in functional restoration programs for spinal disorders. However, equipment for performing such tests is expensive to buy, complex to run, and requires technical expertise and clinical volume unavailable in most physician offices. In this study, a new dynamic test known as Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE) is described, which draws upon prior psychophysical and isoinertial methods. An industrial sample of 61 male and 31 female incumbent workers were tested using the PILE, and a variety of anthropometric normalizing factors were evaluated. The isolation of an “Adjusted Weight” (AW) normalizing factor is documented, after which normative data are presented for male and female workers utilizing lumbar (0–30 inches) and cervical (30–54 inches) dynamic protocols.

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert J. Gatchel's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tom G. Mayer

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter B. Polatin

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Randy Neblett

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nancy D. Kishino

University of Texas at Arlington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard C. Robinson

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Meredith M. Hartzell

University of Texas at Arlington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donald D. McGeary

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anna W. Stowell

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emily Brede

University of Texas at Arlington

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge