Robert J. Grimer

Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO–EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of Oncological Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IFO, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany; Institut Curie, Paris, France; NORDIX, Athens, Greece; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Vienna General Hospital (AKH), Medizinische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria; Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio-CIBERONC, Seville, Spain; Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Aviano; Ospedale Regionale di Treviso “S.Maria di Cà Foncello”, Treviso, Italy; Integrated Unit ICO Hospitalet, HUB, Barcelona, Spain; Sarcoma Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK; Skane University Hospital-Lund, Lund, Sweden; N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation; Institute of Scientific Hospital Care (IRCCS), Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome; Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan; Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna; Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi Firenze, Florence, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam and Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; Turku University Hospital (Turun Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala), Turlu, Finland; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany; Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH), Helsinki, Finland; Royal Marsden Hospital, London; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; University Hospital Motol, Prague; Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Maria Skłodowska Curie Institute, Oncology Centre, Warsaw, Poland; Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (Ichilov), Tel Aviv, Israel; Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria, Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi Università di Bologna, Bologna; Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Cita della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Fundacio de Gestio Sanitaria de L’hospital de la SANTA CREU I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; YCRC Department of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK; Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Finland; Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Oncology of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; University College Hospital, London, UK; Gerhard-Domagk-Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre Leon Bernard and UCBL1, Lyon, France

Guidelines for the Management of Soft Tissue Sarcomas

These guidelines were drawn up following a consensus meeting of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group and are intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. The guidelines published by the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) were used as the basis for discussion and adapted according to UK clinical practice and local requirements. Note was also taken of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) improving outcomes guidance (IOG) for people with sarcoma and existing technology appraisals. The guidelines are not intended to challenge NICE guidance but discrepancies may exist where current guidance does not reflect an international standard of care owing to the ever-evolving nature of cancer treatment. It is acknowledged that these guidelines will require updating on a regular basis. An appendix lists the key recommendations which are summarised below. Any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a diagnostic centre and managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Surgical excision followed by post operative radiotherapy is the standard management of high grade limb sarcomas although occasionally amputation remains the only option. Pre-operative treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy should be considered for patients with borderline resectable tumours. Isolated limb perfusion may permit limb salvage in some cases where amputation is the only other option. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not routinely recommended but may be considered in certain specific situations. Regular follow up is recommended to assess local control and the development of metastatic disease. Single agent doxorubicin is the standard first line therapy for metastatic disease. Ifosfamide is an alternative if anthracyclines are contraindicated. Combination therapy may be considered in individual patients. Second line agents include ifosfamide, dacarbazine, trabectedin and the combination of gemcitabine + docetaxel. Surgical resection of local recurrence and pulmonary metastases should be considered in individual patients. There is specific guidance on the management of retroperitoneal and uterine sarcomas.

Results of the EICESS-92 Study: Two Randomized Trials of Ewing's Sarcoma Treatment—Cyclophosphamide Compared With Ifosfamide in Standard-Risk Patients and Assessment of Benefit of Etoposide Added to Standard Treatment in High-Risk Patients

PURPOSE The European Intergroup Cooperative Ewings Sarcoma Study investigated whether cyclophosphamide has a similar efficacy as ifosfamide in standard-risk (SR) patients and whether the addition of etoposide improves survival in high-risk (HR) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS SR patients (localized tumors, volume <100 mL) were randomly assigned to receive four courses of vincristine, dactinomycin, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin (VAIA) induction therapy followed by 10 courses of either VAIA or vincristine, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (VACA; cyclophosphamide replacing ifosfamide). HR patients (volume >or=100 mL or metastases) were randomly assigned to receive 14 courses of either VAIA or VAIA plus etoposide (EVAIA). Outcome measures were event-free survival (EFS; defined as the time to first recurrence, progression, second malignancy, or death) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 647 patients were randomly assigned: 79 SR patients were assigned to VAIA, 76 SR patients were assigned to VACA, 240 HR were assigned to VAIA, and 252 HR patients were assigned to EVAIA. The median follow-up was 8.5 years. In the SR group, the hazard ratios (VACA v VAIA) for EFS and OS were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.55 to 1.53) and 1.08 (95% CI, 0.58 to 2.03), respectively. There was a higher incidence of hematologic toxicities in the VACA arm. In the HR group, the EFS and OS hazard ratios (EVAIA v VAIA) indicated a 17% reduction in the risk of an event (95% CI, -35% to 5%; P = .12) and 15% reduction in dying (95% CI, -34% to 10%), respectively. The effect seemed greater among patients without metastases (hazard ratio = 0.79; P = .16) than among those with metastases (hazard ratio = 0.96; P = .84). CONCLUSION Cyclophosphamide seemed to have a similar effect on EFS and OS as ifosfamide in SR patients but was associated with increased toxicity. In HR patients, the addition of etoposide seemed to be beneficial.

Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia.

We have performed endoprosthetic replacement after resection of tumours of the proximal tibia on 151 patients over a period of 20 years. During this period limb-salvage surgery was achieved in 88% of patients with tumours of the proximal tibia. Both the implant and the operative technique have been gradually modified in order to reduce complications. An initial rate of infection of 36% has been reduced to 12% by the use of a flap of the medial gastrocnemius, to which the divided patellar tendon is attached. Loosening and breakage of the implant have been further causes of failure. We found that the probability of further surgical procedures being required was 70% at ten years and the risk of amputation, 25%. The development of a new rotating hinge endoprosthesis may lower the incidence of mechanical problems. Limb salvage for tumours of the proximal tibia is fraught with complications, but the good functional outcome in successful cases justifies its continued use.

Osteosarcoma over the age of forty

The European Musculo Skeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS) has carried out a retrospective review of patients over the age of 40 years with osteosarcoma. 481 patients from 12 centres or multicentric groups were included. 42 patients had osteosarcoma arising in Pagets disease, median survival was 9 months. Patients with axial or metastatic tumours also did badly whilst 41 patients with radiation-induced osteosarcoma had a prognosis paralleling conventional osteosarcoma matched for patient age and site of the tumour. 238 patients had high grade non-metastatic osteosarcoma and had a survival of 46% at 5 years. Older patients had less chemotherapy and fared worse. Osteosarcoma in the elderly is a curable condition and warrants intensive treatment with chemotherapy and surgical resection.

Does curettage without adjuvant therapy provide low recurrence rates in giant-cell tumors of bone?

Adjuvant treatment or filling agents have been recommended for reducing recurrence rates of giant-cell tumors of bone. However, reports of low recurrence rates without either caused us to question this concept. We retrospectively reviewed 193 patients treated during a 27-year period, comparing our results with historic controls. One hundred thirty-seven patients had curettage as a primary treatment, and of these, 26 (19%) had local recurrences. The local recurrence rate of giant-cell tumors confined to bone (Campanacci Grades I and II) was only 7% compared with 29% in tumors with extraosseous extension (Campanacci Grade III). Six patients (4%) had a fracture after curettage. Twenty-nine patients who were referred to us with local recurrences after treatment elsewhere had curettage, and 10 (34%) of these patients had local recurrences develop. Twenty-seven patients had excision as their primary treatment, and two (7%) of these patients had local recurrence develop. We recommend primary curettage for intraosseous giant-cell tumors without adjuvant treatment or filling agents, but tumors with soft tissue extension or with local recurrence require more aggressive treatment. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series-no, or historical control group). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prosthetic replacement of the distal femur for primary bone tumours

Over a 16-year period, 135 custom-made distal femoral prostheses, based on a fully constrained Stanmore-type knee replacement, were used in the treatment of primary malignant or aggressive benign tumours. Survivorship analysis showed a cumulative success rate of 72% at five years and 64% at seven years. Intact prostheses in 91% of the surviving patients gave good or excellent functional results. Deep infection was the major complication, occurring in 6.8% of cases; clinical aseptic loosening occurred in 6.0%. Revision surgery was carried out for loosening and infection, and the early results are encouraging. We conclude that prosthetic replacement of the distal femur can meet the objectives of limb salvage surgery.

Osteosarcoma of the pelvis

AIMS Osteosarcoma of the pelvis is a particularly difficult tumour to treat as it often presents late, may be of considerable size and/or associated with metastases when it presents, and is frequently chondroid in origin and resistant to chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to review our experience of managing this group of patients and to identify features predictive of a poor outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1983 and 2014, 121 patients, (74 females and 47 males) were treated at a single hospital: 74 (61.2%) patients had a primary osteosarcoma and 47 (38.8%) had an osteosarcoma which was secondary either to Pagets disease (22; 18.2%) or to previous pelvic irradiation (25; 20.7%). The mean age of those with a primary osteosarcoma was 29.3 years (nine to 76) and their mean follow-up 2.9 years (0 to 29). The mean age of those with a secondary sarcoma was 61.9 years (15 to 85) and their mean follow-up was one year (0 to 14). A total of 22 patients with a primary sarcoma (52.4%) and 20 of those with a secondary sarcoma (47.6%) had metastases at the time of presentation. RESULTS The disease-specific survival at five years for all patients was 27.2%. For those without metastases at the time of diagnosis, the five-year survival was 32.7%. Factors associated with a poor outcome were metastases at diagnosis and secondary tumours. In primary osteosarcoma, sacral location, surgical margin and a diameter > 10 cm were associated with a poor outcome. CONCLUSION In this, the largest single series of patients with an osteosarcoma of the pelvis treated in a single hospital, those with secondary tumours and those with metastases at presentation had a particularly poor outcome. For those with a primary sarcoma, sacral location, an intralesional margin and a diameter of > 10 cm were poor prognostic indicators.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor: A Therapeutic Target for Tumors of the Ewing's Sarcoma Family

Purpose: We have reported previously that intratumoral microvessel density (MVD) is a significant prognostic indicator of event-free survival in the Ewings sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT). Here, the angiogenic growth factor expression profile and its relationship with MVD has been investigated in ESFT. Experimental Design and Results: Using ESFT model systems, the potential of these factors as therapeutic targets has been evaluated. A significant correlation (P = 0.02) was observed between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and MVD, consistent with the hypothesis that VEGF regulates the development of microvessels in ESFT. There was no correlation between MVD and any of the other growth factors studied. All six ESFT cell lines studied produced and secreted VEGF; five of six cell lines also secreted placental growth factor, one cell line (A673) at high levels. Tumor conditioned medium induced proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Expression of VEGF receptors Flt-1 and Flk-1/KDR was heterogeneous across the cell lines. Both receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors SU6668 (targets Flk-1/KDR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β, and fibroblast growth factor receptor 1) and SU5416 (targets Flk-1/KDR) as well as anti-VEGF agents rhuMAb-VEGF (bevacizumab) and VEGF Trap delayed s.c. growth of ESFT in mice compared with untreated groups: SU6668 (100 mg/kg/d), SU5416 (25 mg/kg/d), rhuMAb-VEGF (10 mg/kg twice weekly), and VEGF Trap (2.5 or 25 mg/kg twice weekly). Conclusions: These data suggest that VEGF is the single most important regulator of angiogenesis in ESFT and may be exploited for therapeutic advantage.

Reconstruction of the Hemipelvis after the Excision of Malignant Tumours

We treated 35 patients with primary malignant tumours of the periacetabular area by resection and prosthetic reconstruction of the defect. At a mean follow-up of 84 months, 15 patients (43%) were free from disease. The most common complications were deep infection (26%), local recurrence (24%) and recurrent dislocation of the hip (17%). The surviving patients achieved an average of 70% of their premorbid function. This method of reconstruction has a high morbidity and should be performed only at specialist centres, but the functional and oncological outcomes are satisfactory.