Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert J. McKenna is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert J. McKenna.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1995

Concurrent cisplatin/etoposide plus chest radiotherapy followed by surgery for stages IIIA (N2) and IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: mature results of Southwest Oncology Group phase II study 8805.

Kathy S. Albain; Valerie W. Rusch; John Crowley; Thomas W. Rice; Andrew T. Turrisi; James K. Weick; Vassyl A. Lonchyna; Cary A. Presant; Robert J. McKenna; David R. Gandara; Helen Fosmire; Sarah A. Taylor; Keith J. Stelzer; Kristen R. Beasley; Robert B. Livingston

PURPOSE To assess the feasibility of concurrent chemotherapy and irradiation (chemoRT) followed by surgery in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a cooperative group setting, and to estimate response, resection rates, relapse patterns, and survival for stage subsets IIIA(N2) versus IIIB. PATIENTS AND METHODS Biopsy proof of either positive N2 nodes (IIIAN2) or of N3 nodes or T4 primary lesions (IIIB) was required. Induction was two cycles of cisplatin and etoposide plus concurrent chest RT to 45 Gy. Resection was attempted if response or stable disease occurred. A chemoRT boost was given if either unresectable disease or positive margins or nodes was found. RESULTS The median follow-up time for 126 eligible patients [75 stage IIIA(N2) and 51 IIIB] was 2.4 years. The objective response rate to induction was 59%, and 29% were stable. Resectability was 85% for the IIIA(N2) group eligible for surgery and 80% for the IIIB group. Reversible grade 4 toxicity occurred in 13% of patients. There were 13 treatment-related deaths (10%) and 19 others (15%) died of causes not related to toxicity or tumor. Of 65 relapses, 11% were only locoregional and 61% were only distant. There were 26 brain relapses, of which 19 were the sole site or cause of death. There was no survival difference (P = .81) between stage IIIA(N2) versus stage IIIB (median survivals, 13 and 17 months; 2-year survival rates, 37% and 39%; 3-year survival rates, 27% and 24%). The strongest predictor of long-term survival after thoracotomy was absence of tumor in the mediastinal nodes at surgery (median survivals, 30 v 10 months; 3-year survival rates, 44% v 18%; P = .0005). CONCLUSION This trimodality approach was feasible in this Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study, with an encouraging 26% 3-year survival rate. An Intergroup study is currently being conducted to determine whether surgery adds more to the risk or to the benefit of chemoRT.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2007

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy: Report of CALGB 39802—A Prospective, Multi-Institution Feasibility Study

Scott J. Swanson; James E. Herndon; Thomas A. D'Amico; Todd L. Demmy; Robert J. McKenna; Mark R. Green; David J. Sugarbaker

PURPOSE To evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for small lung cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Cancer and Leukemia Group B 39802 trial was a prospective, multi-institutional study designed to elucidate the technical feasibility of VATS in early non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a standard definition for VATS lobectomy (one 4- to 8-cm access and two 0.5-cm port incisions) that mandated videoscopic guidance and a traditional hilar dissection without rib spreading. Between 1998 and 2001, 128 patients with peripheral lung nodules < or = 3 cm in size with suspected NSCLC were prospectively registered for VATS lobectomy. RESULTS One hundred twenty-seven patients (66 males and 61 females; median age, 66 years; range, 37 to 86 years), with a performance status of 0 (74%) or 1 (26%), underwent surgery. Patients with lymph nodes more than 1 cm by computed tomography scan underwent mediastinal lymph node sampling to rule out N2 disease. One hundred eleven patients (87%) had stage I lung cancer, and 96 (86.5%) of these 111 patients underwent successful VATS lobectomies. The median procedure length was 130 minutes (range, 47 to 428 minutes), and median chest tube duration was 3 days (range, 1 to 14 days). Fifty-eight (60%) of 97 patients underwent diagnostic biopsy at lobectomy. Within 30 days, three (2.7%) of 111 patient deaths occurred, none of which were directly related to VATS technique; seven (7.4%) of 95 patients had grade 3 or greater complications, with only one case of bleeding. CONCLUSION A standardized approach to VATS lobectomy as specifically defined with avoidance of rib spreading is feasible.


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2011

Randomized trial of mediastinal lymph node sampling versus complete lymphadenectomy during pulmonary resection in the patient with N0 or N1 (less than hilar) non-small cell carcinoma: Results of the American College of Surgery Oncology Group Z0030 Trial

Gail Darling; Mark S. Allen; Paul A. Decker; Karla V. Ballman; Richard A. Malthaner; Richard Inculet; David R. Jones; Robert J. McKenna; Rodney J. Landreneau; Valerie W. Rusch; Joe B. Putnam

OBJECTIVE To determine whether mediastinal lymph node dissection improves survival compared with mediastinal lymph node sampling in patients undergoing resection for N0 or nonhilar N1, T1, or T2 non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS Patients with non-small cell lung cancer underwent sampling of 2R, 4R, 7, and 10R for right-sided tumors and 5, 6, 7, and 10L for left-sided tumors. If all tumors were negative for malignancy, patients were randomized to no further lymph node sampling (mediastinal lymph node sampling) or complete mediastinal lymph node dissection. RESULTS Of 1111 patients randomized, 1023 (mediastinal lymph node sampling in 498, mediastinal lymph node dissection in 525) were eligible and evaluable. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of demographics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, histology, cancer location, type or extent of resection, and pathologic stage. Occult N2 disease was found in 21 patients in the mediastinal lymph node dissection group. At a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 435 patients (43%) have died: mediastinal lymph node sampling in 217 (44%) and mediastinal lymph node dissection in 218 (42%). The median survival is 8.1 years for mediastinal lymph node sampling and 8.5 years for mediastinal lymph node dissection (P = .25). The 5-year disease-free survival was 69% (95% confidence interval, 64-74) in the mediastinal lymph node sampling group and 68% (95% confidence interval, 64-73) years in the mediastinal lymph node dissection group (P = .92). There was no difference in local (P = .52), regional (P = .10), or distant (P = .76) recurrence between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS If systematic and thorough presection sampling of the mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes is negative, mediastinal lymph node dissection does not improve survival in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer, but these results are not generalizable to patients staged radiographically or those with higher stage tumors.


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 1996

A randomized prospective trial of stapled lung reduction versus laser bullectomy for diffuse emphysema

Robert J. McKenna; Matthew Brenner; Arthur F. Gelb; Michael Mullin; Narindar Singh; Harold Peters; John Panzera; Jane Calmese; Mark J. Schein

Two procedures (laser bullectomy and lung reduction surgery with staples) are currently available for the surgical treatment of patients with diffuse emphysema. We compared the efficacy of these two surgical approaches in 72 patients, aged 67 +/- 7 years (mean +/- standard deviation), who had diffuse emphysema scored as severe on computed tomography and severe fixed expiratory airflow obstruction. The patients were prospectively randomized to undergo either neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet contact laser surgery (n = 33) or stapled lung reduction surgery (n = 39) by unilateral thoracoscopy. The operative mortalities were 0% and 2.5%, respectively. No significant differences were noted between the groups (p < 0.05) with respect to operating time, hospital days, or air leakage for more than 7 days. However, a delayed pneumothorax developed in six patients (18%) who had laser treatment (p = 0.005). The operations eliminated dependency on supplemental oxygen in 52% of the laser group and 87.5% of the stapled lung reduction group (p = 0.02). The mean postoperative improvement in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second at 6 months was significantly greater for the patients undergoing the staple technique (32.9% vs 13.4%, p = 0.01) than for the laser treatment group.


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 1996

Should lung volume reduction for emphysema be unilateral or bilateral

Robert J. McKenna; Matthew Brenner; Richard J. Fischel; Arthur F. Gelb

Both unilateral and bilateral lung volume reduction procedures are being advocated for treatment of severe, generalized emphysema. We analyzed the results of 166 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral (n = 87) or bilateral (n = 79) thoracoscopic stapled lung volume reductions to help define the role for these procedures. There was no statistically significant difference in the operative mortality (3.5% vs 2.5%), mean length of stay (11.4 +/- 1 vs 10.9 +/- 1 days), or morbidity for the unilateral and bilateral groups, respectively (p not significant for all variables). Oxygen dependence was eliminated in 18 (36%) of 50 patients who had unilateral procedures and 30 (68%) of 44 of those who had bilateral procedures (p < 0.01). Prednisone was eliminated for 38 (54%) of 51 unilateral-procedure patients, compared with 30 (85%) of 35 bilateral-procedure patients (p = 0.02). Overall, bilateral procedures produced a mean improvement in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 57%, compared with 31% for unilateral reduction procedures (p < 0.01). Our bilateral staple procedure produced a 72.8% mean increase in the FEV1 for patients who had upper lobe emphysema. Especially compromised patients (age > or = 75, with preoperative room air Po2 < or = 50 mm Hg or FEV1 < or = 500 ml) had the same morbidity and operative mortality with unilateral or bilateral procedures, but they had a higher 1-year mortality (17% vs 5%), primarily because of respiratory failure after the unilateral operation (p < .001). Although unilateral staple lung volume reduction may produce an excellent result in a given patient, the bilateral procedure appears to be the procedure of choice, because it provides better overall results at no increased morbidity or mortality compared with the unilateral procedure. The results of bilateral staple lung volume reduction by thoracoscopy appear to be comparable to those of median sternotomy.


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 1998

Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation?

Robert J. McKenna; Randall K. Wolf; Matthew Brenner; Richard J. Fischel; Peter Wurnig

BACKGROUND Although the public perceives video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) as advantageous because it is less invasive than a thoracotomy, the medical community has questioned the safety of VATS lobectomy and its adequacy as a cancer operation. Reported series have not been able to address these issues because follow-up has been only short-term. METHODS A multiinstitutional, retrospective review was performed in 298 consecutive patients who underwent VATS for a standard anatomic lobectomy with lymph node dissection for lung cancer. Pathologic staging was I in 233 (78%), II in 27 (9%), and IIIA in 38 (13%) patients. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed. RESULTS The conversion rate from VATS lobectomy to thoracotomy was 6%, but none were for massive intraoperative bleeding. The only death (0.3%) was because of mesenteric venous thrombosis. Forty minor complications occurred in 38 patients (12.8%) undergoing VATS. The mean and median lengths of stay were 5+/-3.39 and 4 days, respectively. Recurrence in an incision occurred in 1 patient (0.3%). The Kaplan Meier 4-year survival for stage I was 70%+/-5%. CONCLUSION The VATS lobectomy for bronchogenic carcinoma appears to be a safe operation, with the same survival as expected for a lobectomy done by thoracotomy.


Chest | 2009

Treatment of Persistent Pulmonary Air Leaks Using Endobronchial Valves

John M. Travaline; Robert J. McKenna; Tiziano De Giacomo; Federico Venuta; Steven R. Hazelrigg; Mark Boomer; Gerard J. Criner

BACKGROUND Prolonged pulmonary air leaks are a significant source of frustration for patients and physicians. When conventional therapy fails, an alternative to prolonged chest tube drainage or surgery is needed. Bronchoscopic blockage of a bronchus can be performed with the hope of accelerating closure of the air leak by reducing the flow of air through the leak. To our knowledge, this article presents the largest series of patients with prolonged air leaks treated with an endobronchial valve. METHODS With Internal Review Board approval, endobronchial valves were compassionately placed using flexible bronchoscopy in patients with prolonged air leaks at 17 international sites. RESULTS Between December 2002 and January 2007, 40 patients (15 women; mean age +/- SD, 60 +/- 14 years) were treated with one to nine endobronchial valves per patient. The air leaks had recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax (n = 21), postoperative (n = 7), iatrogenic (n = 6), first-time spontaneous pneumothorax (n = 4), bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (n = 1), and trauma (n = 1) etiologies. Nineteen patients (47.5%) had a complete resolution of the air leak, 18 (45%) had a reduction, 2 had no change, and 1 had no reported outcome. The mean time from valve insertion to chest tube removal was 21 days (median, 7.5 days; interquartile range [IQR], 3 to 29 days) and from valve procedure to hospital discharge was 19 +/- 28 days (median, 11 days; IQR, 4 to 27 days). CONCLUSIONS Use of endobronchial valves is an effective, nonsurgical, minimally invasive intervention for patients with prolonged pulmonary air leaks.


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2012

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Is Less Costly and Morbid Than Open Lobectomy: A Retrospective Multiinstitutional Database Analysis

Scott J. Swanson; Bryan F. Meyers; Candace Gunnarsson; Matthew Moore; John A. Howington; Michael A. Maddaus; Robert J. McKenna; Daniel L. Miller

BACKGROUND The Premier Perspective Database (Premier Inc, Charlotte, NC) was used to compare hospital costs and perioperative outcomes for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open lobectomy procedures in the United States. METHODS Eligible patients underwent a lobectomy for cancer by a thoracic surgeon, by VATS or open thoracotomy and were captured in the database between third quarter of 2007 and through 2008. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for binary outcomes. Ordinary least-squares regressions were used to estimate continuous outcomes. All models were adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS A total of 3,961 patients underwent a lobectomy by a thoracic surgeon by open (n = 2,907) or VATS (n = 1,054) approach. Hospital costs were higher for open versus VATS;


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 1997

Patient selection criteria for lung volume reduction surgery

Robert J. McKenna; Matthew Brenner; Richard J. Fischel; Narinder Singh; Ben Yoong; Arthur F. Gelb; Kathryn Osann

21,016 versus


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2008

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Sleeve Lobectomy: A Case Series

Ali Mahtabifard; Clark Fuller; Robert J. McKenna

20,316 (p = 0.027). Adjustment for surgeon experience with VATS over the 6 months prior to each operation showed a significant association between surgeon experience and cost. Average costs ranged from

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert J. McKenna's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arthur F. Gelb

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clark Fuller

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott J. Swanson

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ali Mahtabifard

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Malcolm M. DeCamp

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge