Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert J. Orth is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert J. Orth.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2009

Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems

Michelle Waycott; Carlos M. Duarte; Tim J. B. Carruthers; Robert J. Orth; William C. Dennison; Suzanne V. Olyarnik; Ainsley Calladine; James W. Fourqurean; Kenneth L. Heck; A. Randall Hughes; Gary A. Kendrick; W. Judson Kenworthy; Frederick T. Short; Susan L. Williams

Coastal ecosystems and the services they provide are adversely affected by a wide variety of human activities. In particular, seagrass meadows are negatively affected by impacts accruing from the billion or more people who live within 50 km of them. Seagrass meadows provide important ecosystem services, including an estimated


BioScience | 2006

A Global Crisis for Seagrass Ecosystems

Robert J. Orth; Tim J. B. Carruthers; William C. Dennison; Carlos M. Duarte; James W. Fourqurean; Kenneth L. Heck; A. Randall Hughes; Gary A. Kendrick; W. Judson Kenworthy; Suzanne V. Olyarnik; Frederick T. Short; Michelle Waycott; Susan L. Williams

1.9 trillion per year in the form of nutrient cycling; an order of magnitude enhancement of coral reef fish productivity; a habitat for thousands of fish, bird, and invertebrate species; and a major food source for endangered dugong, manatee, and green turtle. Although individual impacts from coastal development, degraded water quality, and climate change have been documented, there has been no quantitative global assessment of seagrass loss until now. Our comprehensive global assessment of 215 studies found that seagrasses have been disappearing at a rate of 110 km2 yr−1 since 1980 and that 29% of the known areal extent has disappeared since seagrass areas were initially recorded in 1879. Furthermore, rates of decline have accelerated from a median of 0.9% yr−1 before 1940 to 7% yr−1 since 1990. Seagrass loss rates are comparable to those reported for mangroves, coral reefs, and tropical rainforests and place seagrass meadows among the most threatened ecosystems on earth.


BioScience | 2001

The Identification, Conservation, and Management of Estuarine and Marine Nurseries for Fish and Invertebrates

Michael W. Beck; Kenneth L. Heck; Kenneth W. Able; Daniel L. Childers; David B. Eggleston; Bronwyn M. Gillanders; Benjamin S. Halpern; Cynthia G. Hays; Kaho Hoshino; Thomas J. Minello; Robert J. Orth; Peter F. Sheridan; Michael P. Weinstein

ABSTRACT Seagrasses, marine flowering plants, have a long evolutionary history but are now challenged with rapid environmental changes as a result of coastal human population pressures. Seagrasses provide key ecological services, including organic carbon production and export, nutrient cycling, sediment stabilization, enhanced biodiversity, and trophic transfers to adjacent habitats in tropical and temperate regions. They also serve as “coastal canaries,” global biological sentinels of increasing anthropogenic influences in coastal ecosystems, with large-scale losses reported worldwide. Multiple stressors, including sediment and nutrient runoff, physical disturbance, invasive species, disease, commercial fishing practices, aquaculture, overgrazing, algal blooms, and global warming, cause seagrass declines at scales of square meters to hundreds of square kilometers. Reported seagrass losses have led to increased awareness of the need for seagrass protection, monitoring, management, and restoration. However, seagrass science, which has rapidly grown, is disconnected from public awareness of seagrasses, which has lagged behind awareness of other coastal ecosystems. There is a critical need for a targeted global conservation effort that includes a reduction of watershed nutrient and sediment inputs to seagrass habitats and a targeted educational program informing regulators and the public of the value of seagrass meadows.


Estuaries | 1984

Faunal communities in seagrass beds : a review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator-prey relationships

Robert J. Orth; Jacques van Montfrans

Michael W. Beck, Kenneth L. Heck, Jr., Kenneth W. Able, Daniel L. Childers, David B. Eggleston, Bronwyn M. Gillanders, Benjamin Halpern, Cynthia G. Hays, Kaho Hoshino, Thomas J. Minello, Robert J. Orth, Peter F. Sheridan and Michael P. Weinstein


BioScience | 1993

Assessing Water Quality with Submersed Aquatic Vegetation

William C. Dennison; Robert J. Orth; Kenneth A. Moore; J. Court Stevenson; Virginia Carter; Stan Kollar; Peter Bergstrom; Richard A. Batiuk

When compared with nearby unvergetated areas, seagrass meadows contain a dense and strikingly rich assemblage of vertebrates and invertebrates. Most recent literature has focused on evaluating the role of predation in structuring seagrass faunal communities; however, habitat complexity, abundance of food and sediment stability may also be important. This paper summarizes studies relating predator-prey relationships to different features of the seagrass system. This review suggests that the abundance of many species, both epifauna and infauna, is positively correlated with two distinct aspects of plant morphology: 1) the root-rhizome mat, and 2) the plant canopy. A scheme was developed that defines the conditions under which any particular species will be abundant or rare in a seagrass assemblage. This scheme is based on prey and predator characteristics (e.g., epifaunal vs. infaunal, tube-dweller vs. nontube dweller, burrowers vs. nonburrowers, and large vs. small as adult) and on characteristics of the seagrasses (e.g., leaf morphology, shoot density, shoot biomass, structural complexity of the meadow, and root-rhizome density and standing crop).


Estuarine Perspectives | 1980

SEAGRASS HABITATS: THE ROLES OF HABITAT COMPLEXITY, COMPETITION AND PREDATION IN STRUCTURING ASSOCIATED FISH AND MOTILE MACROINVERTEBRATE ASSEMBLAGES

Kenneth L. Heck; Robert J. Orth

Estuaries throughout the world are experiencing water quality problems as the result of human population growth in coastal areas. By establishing the habitat requirements of critical submerged aquatic vegetation, water quality can be evaluated and restoration goals can be made. This study used submerged vegetation in Chesapeake Bay to examine the habitat and health of the Bay. Both natural distributions and transplant survival in different studies were analyzed. The five habitat requirements used were light attenuation, total suspended solids, chlorophyll, dissolved inorganic nitrogen, and dissolved inorganic phosphorus. Water-quality conditions supporting vegetation growth to one meter depth was used. This study represents the first attempt at linking habitat requirements of a living resource to water quality standards in an estuarine system. It allows for predictive capability without detailed knowledge of the precise nature of vegetation/water quality interactions.


Ecology | 1994

Seed Dispersal in a Marine Macrophyte: Implications for Colonization and Restoration

Robert J. Orth; Mark Luckenbach; Kenneth A. Moore

Seagrass meadows represent a distinct habitat in shallow coastal and estuarine ecosystems. We examine the role of seagrass meadows as an important habitat for fishes and large mobile invertebrates. In particular, we emphasize the importance of the structural complexity of the vegetation and associated algal components. Based on data from a variety of geographical localities we consider how vegetation density, plant morphology and associated sessile colonial animals can influence abundance and diversity of predator and prey species in vegetated areas on both local and regional geographical scales. In so doing we generate hypotheses that lead to predictions concerning: size of populations and the amplitude of their fluctuations in vegetated habitats at different latitudes; success rate of predators using different foraging strategies in vegetation of different densities; and resultant diversity and abundance of invertebrate prey, juvenile fish and adult fish in different densities of vegetation.


Oecologia | 1993

Relative effects of nutrient enrichment and grazing on epiphyte-macrophyte (Zostera marina L.) dynamics

Hilary A. Neckles; Richard L. Wetzel; Robert J. Orth

Seagrasses rely on both vegetative (rhizome elongation) and sexual (seeds) propagation for maintenance of existing beds and colonization of new areas. Yet mecha- nisms of seed dispersal and survival of seeds in new areas remain poorly described. We conducted seed dispersal experiments in the field and laboratory to better describe seed dispersal characteristics in one species, Zostera marina L. (eelgrass), the dominant seagrass species in the temperate zone of the United States, Japan, and Europe. Seeds were broadcast by hand into unvegetated 5 m diameter plots at three locations over 3 yr (1989-1991) in the York River, Virginia (Chesapeake Bay). These sites had been previously vegetated but were devoid of any vegetation prior to (since 1972) and during the course of the experiments. Resultant seedling distributions closely matched broadcast patterns, with 80% of all seedlings found within the 5 m diameter plots, despite the fact that geophysical processes would appear sufficient to transport seeds greater distances. Wind records for the 2-mo period between seed broadcasting and germination revealed time-averaged wind speeds in excess of 40 km/h on 12 d in each of the 3 yr and gale- force winds (72 km/h) in 2 of 3 yr. A three-dimensional hydrographic computer simulation model of the York River provided instantaneous current velocity estimates from which maximum bottom shear velocities (u.) in the study area were approximated (flood tide: 1.26 cm/s, ebb tide: 1.20 cm/s). These estimates exceeded the critical erosion threshold (ucrit = 0.7 cm/s) for Z. marina seeds determined from laboratory flume experiments. We postulate that small-scale topographic features on the bottom (burrows, pits, mounds, ripples) shield the seeds from the flow. Our results suggest that seeds settle rapidly, dispersing only up to a few metres under the influence of currents and become rapidly incorporated into the sediment. The limited dispersal capabilities of seeds underscore the need to address restoration goals and questions of seagrass ecology in the context of landscape-scale distributional patterns and metapopula- tion analyses.


Aquatic Botany | 1984

Epiphyte-seagrass relationships with an emphasis on the role of micrograzing: A review

Robert J. Orth; Jacques van Montfrans

The independent and interactive effects of nutrient concentration and epiphyte grazers on epiphyte biomass and macrophyte growth and production were examined in Zostera marina L. (eelgrass) microcosms. Experiments were conducted during early summer, late summer, fall, and spring in a greenhouse on the York River estuary of Chesapeake Bay. Nutrient treatments consisted of ambient or enriched (3× ambient) concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (ammonium nitrate) and phosphate. Grazer treatments consisted of the presence or absence of field densities of isopods, amphipods, and gastropods. epiphyte biomass increased with both grazer removal and nutrient enrichment during summer and spring experiments. The effect of grazers was stronger than that of nutrients. There was little epiphyte response to treatment during the fall, a result possibly of high ambient nutrient concentrations and low grazing pressure. Under low grazer densities of early summer, macrophyte production (g m−2 d−1) was reduced by grazer removal and nutrient enrichment independently. Under high grazer densities of late summer, macrophyte production was reduced by enrichment only with grazers absent. During spring and fall there were no macrophyte responses to treatment. The relative influence of epiphytes on macrophyte production may have been related to seasonally changing water temperature and macrophyte requirements for light and inorganic carbon.


Ecosystems | 2008

Trophic Transfers from Seagrass Meadows Subsidize Diverse Marine and Terrestrial Consumers

Kenneth L. Heck; Tim J. B. Carruthers; Carlos M. Duarte; A. Randall Hughes; Gary A. Kendrick; Robert J. Orth; Susan W. Williams

Abstract Despite the recent advances in seagrass ecology over the last ten years, there are still numerous aspects of the ecological and biological interactions that occur in seagrass ecosystems that remain poorly understood. We have attempted, here, to place into perspective one interrelationship that could have important implications in the production and vigor of seagrasses. This is the relationship between epiphytic fouling by macroalgae and periphyton and the grazers which consume them as a food source while leaving the leaves intact. Our approach to this review was first to describe the relationships between macroalgae, periphyton and the seagrass host in terms of physical benefits, biochemical interactions, factors which reduce fouling on the host, and the effects of epiphytism on seagrass photosynthesis. We then examined the importance of epiphytes as a food source for those herbivores found in seagrass beds, and looked at the consequences of this grazing and removal of epiphytes for the seagrass host. Based on the potential impact of epiphytes on seagrass and grazers on epiphytes, we developed a hypothetical model that describes the effect of increasing epiphytic fouling on seagrass production in the presence and absence of grazers. From this model, we have made predictions on the direction of seagrass decline with diminishing light along depth and estuarine gradients. Lastly, we touched briefly on the problem of eutrophication and how it affects the balance of these interrelationships, and the management options to insure the health and survival of seagrass habitats in the face of increasing stress by man on these critically important ecosystems.

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert J. Orth's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott R. Marion

Virginia Institute of Marine Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David J. Wilcox

Virginia Institute of Marine Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gary A. Kendrick

University of Western Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jacques van Montfrans

Virginia Institute of Marine Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth L. Heck

Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William C. Dennison

University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew C. Harwell

Virginia Institute of Marine Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tim J. B. Carruthers

University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge