Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert J. Stachler is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert J. Stachler.


Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery | 2011

Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss

Robert J. Stachler; Sujana S. Chandrasekhar; Sanford M. Archer; Richard M. Rosenfeld; Seth R. Schwartz; David M. Barrs; Steven R. Brown; Terry D. Fife; Peg Ford; Theodore G. Ganiats; Deena B. Hollingsworth; Christopher A. Lewandowski; Joseph J. Montano; James E. Saunders; Debara L. Tucci; Michael Valente; Barbara E. Warren; Kathleen Yaremchuk; Peter J. Robertson

Objective. Sudden hearing loss (SHL) is a frightening symptom that often prompts an urgent or emergent visit to a physician. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients who present with SHL. The guideline primarily focuses on sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) in adult patients (aged 18 and older). Prompt recognition and management of SSNHL may improve hearing recovery and patient quality of life (QOL). Sudden sensorineural hearing loss affects 5 to 20 per 100,000 population, with about 4000 new cases per year in the United States. This guideline is intended for all clinicians who diagnose or manage adult patients who present with SHL. Purpose. The purpose of this guideline is to provide clinicians with evidence-based recommendations in evaluating patients with SHL, with particular emphasis on managing SSNHL. The panel recognized that patients enter the health care system with SHL as a nonspecific, primary complaint. Therefore, the initial recommendations of the guideline deal with efficiently distinguishing SSNHL from other causes of SHL at the time of presentation. By focusing on opportunities for quality improvement, the guideline should improve diagnostic accuracy, facilitate prompt intervention, decrease variations in management, reduce unnecessary tests and imaging procedures, and improve hearing and rehabilitative outcomes for affected patients. Results. The panel made strong recommendations that clinicians should (1) distinguish sensorineural hearing loss from conductive hearing loss in a patient presenting with SHL; (2) educate patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) about the natural history of the condition, the benefits and risks of medical interventions, and the limitations of existing evidence regarding efficacy; and (3) counsel patients with incomplete recovery of hearing about the possible benefits of amplification and hearing-assistive technology and other supportive measures. The panel made recommendations that clinicians should (1) assess patients with presumptive SSNHL for bilateral SHL, recurrent episodes of SHL, or focal neurologic findings; (2) diagnose presumptive ISSNHL if audiometry confirms a 30-dB hearing loss at 3 consecutive frequencies and an underlying condition cannot be identified by history and physical examination; (3) evaluate patients with ISSNHL for retrocochlear pathology by obtaining magnetic resonance imaging, auditory brainstem response, or audiometric follow-up; (4) offer intratympanic steroid perfusion when patients have incomplete recovery from ISSNHL after failure of initial management; and (5) obtain follow-up audiometric evaluation within 6 months of diagnosis for patients with ISSNHL. The panel offered as options that clinicians may offer (1) corticosteroids as initial therapy to patients with ISSNHL and (2) hyperbaric oxygen therapy within 3 months of diagnosis of ISSNHL. The panel made a recommendation against clinicians routinely prescribing antivirals, thrombolytics, vasodilators, vasoactive substances, or antioxidants to patients with ISSNHL. The panel made strong recommendations against clinicians (1) ordering computerized tomography of the head/brain in the initial evaluation of a patient with presumptive SSNHL and (2) obtaining routine laboratory tests in patients with ISSNHL.


Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery | 2009

Clinical practice guideline: Hoarseness (Dysphonia)

Seth R. Schwartz; Seth M. Cohen; Seth H. Dailey; Richard M. Rosenfeld; Ellen S. Deutsch; M. Boyd Gillespie; Evelyn Granieri; Edie R. Hapner; C. Eve Kimball; Helene J. Krouse; J. Scott McMurray; Safdar Medina; Daniel R. Ouellette; Barbara J. Messinger-Rapport; Robert J. Stachler; Steven W Strode; Dana M. Thompson; Joseph C. Stemple; J. Paul Willging; Terrie Cowley; Scott McCoy; Peter G. Bernad; Milesh M. Patel; Fort Monroe

Objective: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on managing hoarseness (dysphonia), defined as a disorder characterized by altered vocal quality, pitch, loudness, or vocal effort that impairs communication or reduces voice-related quality of life (QOL). Hoarseness affects nearly one-third of the population at some point in their lives. This guideline applies to all age groups evaluated in a setting where hoarseness would be identified or managed. It is intended for all clinicians who are likely to diagnose and manage patients with hoarseness. Purpose: The primary purpose of this guideline is to improve diagnostic accuracy for hoarseness (dysphonia), reduce inappropriate antibiotic use, reduce inappropriate steroid use, reduce inappropriate use of anti-reflux medications, reduce inappropriate use of radiographic imaging, and promote appropriate use of laryngoscopy, voice therapy, and surgery. In creating this guideline the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation selected a panel representing the fields of neurology, speech-language pathology, professional voice teaching, family medicine, pulmonology, geriatric medicine, nursing, internal medicine, otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, pediatrics, and consumers. Results The panel made strong recommendations that 1) the clinician should not routinely prescribe antibiotics to treat hoarseness and 2) the clinician should advocate voice therapy for patients diagnosed with hoarseness that reduces voice-related QOL. The panel made recommendations that 1) the clinician should diagnose hoarseness (dysphonia) in a patient with altered voice quality, pitch, loudness, or vocal effort that impairs communication or reduces voice-related QOL; 2) the clinician should assess the patient with hoarseness by history and/or physical examination for factors that modify management, such as one or more of the following: recent surgical procedures involving the neck or affecting the recurrent laryngeal nerve, recent endotracheal intubation, radiation treatment to the neck, a history of tobacco abuse, and occupation as a singer or vocal performer; 3) the clinician should visualize the patients larynx, or refer the patient to a clinician who can visualize the larynx, when hoarseness fails to resolve by a maximum of three months after onset, or irrespective of duration if a serious underlying cause is suspected; 4) the clinician should not obtain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the patient with a primary complaint of hoarseness prior to visualizing the larynx; 5) the clinician should not prescribe anti-reflux medications for patients with hoarseness without signs or symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease; 6) the clinician should not routinely prescribe oral corticosteroids to treat hoarseness; 7) the clinician should visualize the larynx before prescribing voice therapy and document/communicate the results to the speech-language pathologist; and 8) the clinician should prescribe, or refer the patient to a clinician who can prescribe, botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of hoarseness caused by adductor spasmodic dysphonia. The panel offered as options that 1) the clinician may perform laryngoscopy at any time in a patient with hoarseness, or may refer the patient to a clinician who can visualize the larynx; 2) the clinician may prescribe anti-reflux medication for patients with hoarseness and signs of chronic laryngitis; and 3) the clinician may educate/counsel patients with hoarseness about control/preventive measures. Disclaimer: This clinical practice guideline is not intended as a sole source of guidance in managing hoarseness (dysphonia). Rather, it is designed to assist clinicians by providing an evidence-based framework for decision-making strategies. The guideline is not intended to replace clinical judgment or establish a protocol for all individuals with this condition, and may not provide the only appropriate approach to diagnosing and managing this problem.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1997

Mastication and swallowing in patients with postirradiation xerostomia

Sandra Hamlet; Jennifer Faull; Barbara Klein; Amr Aref; James Fontanesi; Robert J. Stachler; Falah Shamsa; Lewis Jones; Mark Simpson

PURPOSE Very little objective data has been reported on mastication and swallowing in xerostomic patients, which would substantiate presumed causal relationships between xerostomia and patient complaints. The purpose was to elucidate which components of mastication and swallowing were abnormal, and most directly related to xerostomia, and which appeared unaffected. METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective analysis of timing events in mastication and swallowing was done using videofluoroscopic data for 15 cancer patients with xerostomia, and 20 normal controls. Scintigraphy was also used to determine oropharyngeal residue after a water swallow. Cancer treatment modalities included radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy. RESULTS For barium liquid and paste substances, timing measures were equivalent for controls and patients. Xerostomic patients took 46% longer to masticate a shortbread cookie, and timing for the initiation of swallowing was shorter, but duration of swallowing appeared unaffected. Oral and pharyngeal residues following the swallow were greater in the patient group. CONCLUSIONS Xerostomia primarily affected mastication and oral manipulation of a dry, absorbent food material. Increased oral and pharyngeal residues after a water swallow are ambiguously related to xerostomia. The initiation and duration of the pharyngeal swallow was not abnormal.


Laryngoscope | 1996

Scintigraphic quantification of aspiration reduction with the Passy-Muir valve.

Robert J. Stachler; Sandra Hamlet; Jinho Choi; Susan Fleming

The Passy‐Muir “speaking” tracheostomy valve has been noted to aid in swallowing, based on videofluoroscopy to assess aspiration. In this study scintigraphy was used to quantify the amount of material aspirated.


Dysphagia | 1996

Normal adult swallowing of liquid and viscous material: scintigraphic data on bolus transit and oropharyngeal residues.

Sandra Hamlet; Jinho Choi; Michele M. Zormeier; Falah Shamsa; Robert J. Stachler; Jaroslaw Muz; Lewis Jones

Scintigraphic data are provided for 20 normal control subjects, 39–65 years of age. Each subject swallowed 10 cc of water and 10 cc of a more viscous material (1,100 centipoise) consisting of apple juice thickened with Thick-It, a commercial food thickener. The test substances were combined with 2.5 mCi Tc-99m sulfur colloid. Scintigraphic data were acquired in dynamic mode for 10 sec at 25 frames/sec as the subjects swallowed. Time-activity (TA) data were used to compute transit times, percentage residues in the mouth and pharynx, percent ingested, and a derived swallow efficiency score. The liquid was ingested in a single swallow by all subjects, and 9 cc was actually tranferred to the esophagus. In contrast, for the viscous material, 11/20 subjects performed a second clearing swallow within the 10-sec interval. On the first swallow with the viscous substance, an average of 7 cc was transferred to the esophagus. Scintigraphy offers an excellent technique for determining natural and preferred volumes for swallowing a variety of bolus consistencies, since it can quantify the volume of each swallow or partial swallow. In this group of subjects the oral discharge time was shorter with the viscous material than with the water, but the pharyngeal transit times were not significantly different for the two bolus consistencies. Numerical efficiency scores were lower for the viscous material, indicating that such a measure is bolus dependent.


Laryngoscope | 2013

Mortality and major morbidity after tonsillectomy

Julie L. Goldman; Reginald F. Baugh; Louise Davies; Margaret L. Skinner; Robert J. Stachler; Jean Brereton; Lee D. Eisenberg; David W. Roberson; Michael J. Brenner

To report data on death or permanent disability after tonsillectomy.


Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery | 2001

Craniocervical Necrotizing Fasciitis: An 11-Year Experience

Samer J. Bahu; Terry Y. Shibuya; Robert J. Meleca; Robert H. Mathog; George H. Yoo; Robert J. Stachler; James G. Tyburski

OBJECTIVE: We review our experience and present our approach to treating craniocervical necrotizing fasciitis (CCNF). STUDY DESIGN: All cases of CCNF treated at Wayne State University/Detroit Receiving Hospital from January 1989 to April 2000 were reviewed. Patients were analyzed for source and extent of infection, microbiology, co-morbidities, antimicrobial therapy, hospital days, surgical interventions, complications, and outcomes. RESULTS: A review of 250 charts identified 10 cases that met the study criteria. Five cases (50%) had spread of infection into the thorax, with only 1 (10%) fatality. An average of 24 hospital days (7 to 45), 14 ICU days (6 to 21), and 3 surgical procedures (1 to 6) per patient was required. CONCLUSION: Aggressive wound care, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and multiple surgical interventions resulted in a 90% (9/10) overall survival and 80% (4/5) survival for those with thoracic extension. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the largest single institution report of CCNF with thoracic extension identified to date.


Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology | 2003

Cymetra injection for unilateral vocal fold paralysis.

Andrew N. Karpenko; Robert J. Meleca; James Paul Dworkin; Robert J. Stachler

Cymetra has shown excellent tissue biocompatibility, a low rate of resorption, and no tissue reactivity when injected for treatment of facial wrinkling. On the basis of these findings, we hypothesize that injection of Cymetra into the thyroarytenoid muscle for treatment of glottal incompetence may demonstrate similar findings and lead to long-term improvement in voice quality and glottal gap closure. Ten patients with breathy dysphonia caused by unilateral vocal fold paralysis underwent transoral injection of Cymetra into the thyroarytenoid muscle. Each subject underwent preoperative and postoperative acoustic analysis, aerodynamic measures, taped voice sampling, and videostroboscopy. Significant improvements were identified in maximum phonation time, relative glottal area, and subjective judgment of glottal competency. These results were not maintained at the 3-month study interval. No significant change in quantitative or subjective voice quality was noted for the study group during the investigation. Resorption of Cymetra may play a significant role in contributing to these findings.


Laryngoscope | 2001

Functional Outcomes After Supracricoid Laryngectomy

Mark A. Zacharek; Raza Pasha; Robert J. Meleca; James Paul Dworkin; Robert J. Stachler; John R. Jacobs; Steven C. Marks; Ilene Garfield

Objectives Local control and 5‐year survival rates are similar for patients undergoing total laryngectomy and supracricoid laryngectomy for the treatment of advanced‐stage laryngeal carcinoma. However, comprehensive studies of functional outcomes after supracricoid laryngectomy are lacking.


Dysphagia | 2006

Swallowing Function Outcomes Following Nonsurgical Therapy for Advanced-Stage Laryngeal Carcinoma

James Paul Dworkin; Samuel L. Hill; Robert J. Stachler; Robert J. Meleca; Danny Kewson

The purposes of this study were to (1) evaluate swallowing function using both subjective and objective measures in patients treated nonsurgically for stages III and IV laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, (2) assess the effect of time from treatment completion on swallowing function, and (3) assess sequelae associated with modality of treatment. To achieve these objectives, a retrospective study of 14 patients was conducted. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was performed and evaluated by three independent judges for seven functional criteria: standing secretions, valleculae spillage, valleculae residue, postcricoid residue, laryngeal penetration, aspiration, and cough. Patient interviews were performed to establish patient perception of swallowing and his/her current posttreatment diet. Results revealed that each patient exhibited swallowing abnormalities in at least one of the seven objective functional categories studied. Ten patients suffered from variable degrees of dysphagia, ranging from mild to severe, on all measures. No significant differences were noted between those patients with less than or greater than 12 months posttreatment. Common treatment sequelae included PEG tube placement for nutritional supplementation, tracheostomy placement for airway security and/or pulmonary toilet, repeated episodes of aspiration pneumonia requiring hospital admission, and radiation-induced oropharyngeal stricture. Further studies using subjective and objective swallowing function measures for patients treated with alternative chemoradiation regimens versus surgery (with or without adjuvant therapies) for advanced stage laryngeal cancer are needed.

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert J. Stachler's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lewis Jones

Wayne State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Seth R. Schwartz

Virginia Mason Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tamer Ghanem

Henry Ford Health System

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge