Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert J. Winchell is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert J. Winchell.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 1998

Lethal injuries and time to death in a level I trauma center

José A. Acosta; Jack C. Yang; Robert J. Winchell; Richard K. Simons; Dale Fortlage; Peggy Hollingsworth-Fridlund; David B. Hoyt

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to identify the causes and time to death of all trauma victims who died at a level I trauma center during an 11-year period. STUDY DESIGN Autopsies were performed on all patients who died secondary to trauma. Retrospective review of these autopsies was carried out and appended to existing trauma registry data. Standard definitions were used to attribute the cause of death in each case. Preventable deaths were determined by a standardized peer review process. RESULTS Between January 1985 and December 1995, a total of 900 trauma patients died. This represented 7.3% of all major trauma admissions (12,320). Seventy percent of these patients died within the first 24 hours of admission. Thoracic vascular and central nervous system (CNS) injuries were the most common causes of death in the first hour after admission to the hospital. CNS injuries were the most common causes of death within the 72 deaths after admission. Acute inflammatory processes (multiple organ failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and pneumonia) and pulmonary emboli were the leading causes of death after the first 72 hours. Overall, 43.6% (393 of 900) of all trauma deaths were caused by CNS injuries, making this the most common cause of death in our study. The preventable death rate was 1%. CONCLUSIONS The first 24 hours after trauma are the deadliest for these patients. Primary and secondary CNS injuries are the leading causes of death. Prevention, early identification, and treatment of potentially lethal injuries should remain the focus of those who treat trauma patients.Background: The purpose of this study was to identify the causes and time to death of all trauma victims who died at a level I trauma center during an 11-year period. Study Design: Autopsies were performed on all patients who died secondary to trauma. Retrospective review of these autopsies was carried out and appended to existing trauma registry data. Standard definitions were used to attribute the cause of death in each case. Preventable deaths were determined by a standardized peer review process. Results: Between January 1985 and December 1995, a total of 900 trauma patients died. This represented 7.3% of all major trauma admissions (12,320). Seventy percent of these patients died within the first 24 hours of admission. Thoracic vascular and central nervous system (CNS) injuries were the most common causes of death in the first hour after admission to the hospital. CNS injuries were the most common causes of death within the 72 deaths after admission. Acute inflammatory processes (multiple organ failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and pneumonia) and pulmonary emboli were the leading causes of death after the first 72 hours. Overall, 43.6% (393 of 900) of all trauma deaths were caused by CNS injuries, making this the most common cause of death in our study. The preventable death rate was 1%. Conclusions: The first 24 hours after trauma are the deadliest for these patients. Primary and secondary CNS injuries are the leading causes of death. Prevention, early identification, and treatment of potentially lethal injuries should remain the focus of those who treat trauma patients.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 1998

Original Scientific ArticlesLethal Injuries and Time to Death in a Level I Trauma Center 1

José A. Acosta; Jack C. Yang; Robert J. Winchell; Richard K. Simons; Dale Fortlage; Peggy Hollingsworth-Fridlund; David B. Hoyt

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to identify the causes and time to death of all trauma victims who died at a level I trauma center during an 11-year period. STUDY DESIGN Autopsies were performed on all patients who died secondary to trauma. Retrospective review of these autopsies was carried out and appended to existing trauma registry data. Standard definitions were used to attribute the cause of death in each case. Preventable deaths were determined by a standardized peer review process. RESULTS Between January 1985 and December 1995, a total of 900 trauma patients died. This represented 7.3% of all major trauma admissions (12,320). Seventy percent of these patients died within the first 24 hours of admission. Thoracic vascular and central nervous system (CNS) injuries were the most common causes of death in the first hour after admission to the hospital. CNS injuries were the most common causes of death within the 72 deaths after admission. Acute inflammatory processes (multiple organ failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and pneumonia) and pulmonary emboli were the leading causes of death after the first 72 hours. Overall, 43.6% (393 of 900) of all trauma deaths were caused by CNS injuries, making this the most common cause of death in our study. The preventable death rate was 1%. CONCLUSIONS The first 24 hours after trauma are the deadliest for these patients. Primary and secondary CNS injuries are the leading causes of death. Prevention, early identification, and treatment of potentially lethal injuries should remain the focus of those who treat trauma patients.Background: The purpose of this study was to identify the causes and time to death of all trauma victims who died at a level I trauma center during an 11-year period. Study Design: Autopsies were performed on all patients who died secondary to trauma. Retrospective review of these autopsies was carried out and appended to existing trauma registry data. Standard definitions were used to attribute the cause of death in each case. Preventable deaths were determined by a standardized peer review process. Results: Between January 1985 and December 1995, a total of 900 trauma patients died. This represented 7.3% of all major trauma admissions (12,320). Seventy percent of these patients died within the first 24 hours of admission. Thoracic vascular and central nervous system (CNS) injuries were the most common causes of death in the first hour after admission to the hospital. CNS injuries were the most common causes of death within the 72 deaths after admission. Acute inflammatory processes (multiple organ failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and pneumonia) and pulmonary emboli were the leading causes of death after the first 72 hours. Overall, 43.6% (393 of 900) of all trauma deaths were caused by CNS injuries, making this the most common cause of death in our study. The preventable death rate was 1%. Conclusions: The first 24 hours after trauma are the deadliest for these patients. Primary and secondary CNS injuries are the leading causes of death. Prevention, early identification, and treatment of potentially lethal injuries should remain the focus of those who treat trauma patients.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2008

Advanced trauma life support, 8th edition, the evidence for change.

John B. Kortbeek; Saud A. Al Turki; Jameel Ali; Jill A. Antoine; Bertil Bouillon; Karen J. Brasel; Fred Brenneman; Peter R. Brink; Karim Brohi; David Burris; Reginald A. Burton; Will Chapleau; Wiliam Cioffi; Francisco de Salles Collet e Silva; Art Cooper; Jaime Cortés; Vagn Eskesen; John J. Fildes; Subash Gautam; Russell L. Gruen; Ron Gross; K S. Hansen; Walter Henny; Michael J. Hollands; Richard C. Hunt; Jose M. Jover Navalon; Christoph R. Kaufmann; Peggy Knudson; Amy Koestner; Roman Kosir

The American College of Surgeons Committee on Traumas Advanced Trauma Life Support Course is currently taught in 50 countries. The 8th edition has been revised following broad input by the International ATLS subcommittee. Graded levels of evidence were used to evaluate and approve changes to the course content. New materials related to principles of disaster management have been added. ATLS is a common language teaching one safe way of initial trauma assessment and management.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1994

Death in the operating room: An analysis of a multi-center experience

David B. Hoyt; Bulger Em; Margaret M. Knudson; James L. Morris; Ierardi R; Sugerman Hj; Shackford; Landercasper J; Robert J. Winchell; Jurkovich G

To characterize causes of death in the operating room (OR) following major trauma, a retrospective review of admissions to eight academic trauma centers was conducted to define the etiology of death and challenges for improvement in outcome. Five hundred thirty seven OR deaths of 72,151 admissions were reviewed for mechanism of injury, physiologic findings, resuscitation, patterns of injury, surgical procedures, cause of death, and preventability. Blunt injuries accounted for 61% of all injuries, gunshot wounds (GSW) accounted for 74% of penetrating injuries. Sixty two percent of all patients arrived in shock. Average blood pressure (BP) was 52 mm Hg at the scene and 60 mm Hg on admission, with the period of shock > 10 minutes in 74%. Only 56% were resuscitated to a BP > 90 mm Hg before surgery. Average time to the OR was 30.1 minutes and mean best postresuscitation pH was 7.18. Mean best OR temperature was 32.2 degrees C. Recurrent injury patterns judged as the primary cause of patient death included head/neck injury (16.4%), chest injury (27.4%), and abdominal injury (53.4%). Actual cause of death was bleeding (82%), cerebral herniation (14.5%), and air emboli (2.2%). A different strategy for improved outcome was identified in 54 patients with the following conclusions: (1) delayed transfer to the OR remains a problem with significant BP deterioration during delay, particularly following interfacility transfer; (2) staged injury isolation and repair to allow better resuscitation and warming may lead to improved results; (3) combined thoraco-abdominal injuries, particularly with thoracic aortic disruption, often require a different sequence of management; (4) aggressive evaluation of retroperitoneal hematomas is essential; (5) OR management of severe liver injuries remains a technical challenge with better endpoints for packing needed; and (6) resuscitative thoracotomy applied to OR patients in extremis from exsanguination offers little.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1996

A prospective evaluation of abdominal ultrasound in blunt trauma: is it useful?

Mark A. Healey; Richard K. Simons; Robert J. Winchell; Barbara B. Gosink; Giovanna Casola; John T. Steele; Bruce Potenza; David B. Hoyt

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility and feasibility of abdominal ultrasound (US) in blunt trauma patients. DESIGN This prospective study examined the operational issues and the diagnostic accuracy of US in selected blunt trauma patients triaged to a Level 1 trauma center. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients were evaluated by an attending trauma surgeon and our usual criteria for objective evaluation of the abdomen were applied. US was performed by US technicians and interpreted by the trauma surgeon. We prospectively evaluated the availability (time to arrival), the ease with which the US could be integrated into the resuscitation (minutes to start after arrival), and the time required to perform the study. The US results were compared to diagnostic peritoneal lavage and computed tomography findings, clinical course, operative findings, and to repeat US examinations to determine sensitivity, specificity, and usefulness. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS A total of 800 US studies were performed over 15 months. In four cases (0.5%), the US was incomplete for technical reasons. The results in the remaining 796 studies were as follows: [table: see text] The average time to arrival of the US was 17.3 minutes (range 0-120) and the average minutes to start after arrival was 7.0 (range 1-49). The average time required to perform the study was 10.6 minutes (range 2-26). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that US can be obtained rapidly, integrated into the resuscitation, and completed quickly. US provides a highly accurate, noninvasive method to evaluate the abdomen in the blunt trauma patient, and has supplanted the previously used methods at this institution.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1998

Trauma in Pregnancy: Maternal and Fetal Outcomes

Richard K. Simons; Troy L. Holbrook; Dale Fortlage; Robert J. Winchell; David B. Hoyt

OBJECTIVE Pregnancy imposes significant physiologic demands that may confuse and complicate the evaluation, resuscitation, and definitive management of pregnant women who sustain trauma. Accurate prediction of fetal outcome after trauma remains elusive. The objective of this study was to characterize patterns of injury in pregnant women, to determine if pregnancy affects maternal morbidity and mortality after trauma, and to identify predictors of fetal death. METHODS We performed a retrospective, case-control analysis of all injured pregnant patients admitted to the Trauma Service at the University of California San Diego Medical Center from 1985 to 1995. RESULTS We identified 114 injured pregnant patients. Motor vehicle crashes accounted for 70% of injuries, and of these, 46% of patients were not using seat belts or helmets. Violence accounted for 12% of injuries. Injured pregnant women with Injury Severity Scores > 8 demonstrated similar mortality, morbidity, and length of stay to matched nonpregnant control patients. Pregnant women were more likely to sustain serious abdominal injury and were less likely to sustain severe head injury. Identified risk factors for fetal loss include maternal death, overall maternal injury severity, the presence of severe abdominal injury, and the presence of hemorrhagic shock. CONCLUSION There appears to be a group of pregnant women in San Diego at high risk for traumatic injury who should be targeted for preventative strategies including improved seat belt use. Pregnancy does not increase mortality or morbidity after trauma but influences the pattern of injury. Maternal death, high Injury Severity Score, serious abdominal injury, and hemorrhagic shock are risk factors for fetal loss.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1999

Penetrating esophageal injuries: Multicenter study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma

Juan A. Asensio; Santiago Chahwan; Walter Forno; Robert C. Mackersie; Matthew J. Wall; Jeffrey Lake; Gayle Minard; Orlando C. Kirton; Kimberly Nagy; Riyad Karmy-Jones; Susan I. Brundage; David B. Hoyt; Robert J. Winchell; Kurt A. Kralovich; Marc J. Shapiro; Robert E. Falcone; Emmett McGuire; Rao R. Ivatury; Michael C. Stoner; Jay A. Yelon; Anna M. Ledgerwood; Fred A. Luchette; C. William Schwab; Heidi L. Frankel; Bobby Chang; Robert Coscia; Kimball I. Maull; Dennis Wang; Erwin F. Hirsch; Jorge I. Cue

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to define the period of time after which delays in management incurred by investigations cause increased morbidity and mortality. The outcome study is intended to correlate time with death from esophageal causes, overall complications, esophageal related complications, and surgical intensive care unit length of stay. METHODS This was a retrospective multicenter study involving 34 trauma centers in the United States, under the auspices of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-institutional Trials Committee over a span of 10.5 years. Patients surviving to reach the operating room (OR) were divided into two groups: those that underwent diagnostic studies to identify their injuries (preoperative evaluation group) and those that went immediately to the OR (no preoperative evaluation group). Statistical methods included Fishers exact test, Students T test, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The study involved 405 patients: 355 male patients (86.5%) and 50 female patients (13.5%). The mean Revised Trauma Score was 6.3, the mean Injury Severity Score was 28, and the mean time interval to the OR was 6.5 hours. There were associated injuries in 356 patients (88%), and an overall complication rate of 53.5%. Overall mortality was 78 of 405 (19%). Three hundred forty-six patients survived to reach the OR: 171 in the preoperative evaluation group and 175 in the no preoperative evaluation group. No statistically significant differences were noted in the two groups in the following parameters: number of patients, age, Injury Severity Score, admission blood pressure, anatomic location of injury (cervical or thoracic), surgical management (primary repair, resection and anastomosis, resection and diversion, flaps), number of associated injuries, and mortality. Average length of time to the OR was 13 hours in the preoperative evaluation group versus 1 hour in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001). Overall complications occurred in 134 in the preoperative evaluation group versus 87 in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001), and 74 (41%) esophageal related complications occurred in the preoperative evaluation group versus 32 (19%) in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.003). Mean surgical intensive care unit length of stay was 11 days in the preoperative evaluation group versus 7 days in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.012). Logistic regression analysis identified as independent risk factors for the development of esophageal related complications included time delays in preoperative evaluation (odds ratio, 3.13), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale grade >2 (odds ratio, 2.62), and resection and diversion (odds ratio, 4.47). CONCLUSION Esophageal injuries carry a high morbidity and mortality. Increased esophageal related morbidity occurs with the diagnostic workup and its inherent delay in operative repair of these injuries. For centers practicing selective management of penetrating neck injuries and transmediastinal gunshot wounds, rapid diagnosis and definitive repair should be made a high priority.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1997

Analysis of Heart-rate Variability: A Noninvasive Predictor of Death and Poor Outcome in Patients with Severe Head Injury

Robert J. Winchell; David B. Hoyt

BACKGROUND Analysis of heart-rate variability (HRV) is a promising new technique for noninvasive quantification of autonomic function. We measured HRV in patients with severe head injury to assess its potential as a monitoring tool. METHODS Analysis of HRV was prospectively done on all intensive care unit patients. Concurrent data on intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were collected. Registry data were reviewed to identify patients with severe head injury, defined as Head/Neck Abbreviated Injury Scale score > or = 4. Mortality, likelihood of discharge to home, ICP, and CPP were compared between patients with abnormal HRV and those without. RESULTS Low HRV was associated with increased mortality and decreased rate of discharge to home. Abnormal HRV was associated with episodes of increased ICP and decreased CPP. CONCLUSION Assessment of HRV is a noninvasive method that can be widely used. Abnormal HRV was associated with poor outcome and altered cerebral perfusion. Monitoring of HRV may improve outcome by allowing earlier detection and treatment of intracranial pathology.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1994

Risk Factors Associated With Pulmonary Embolism Despite Routine Prophylaxis: Implications For Improved Protection

Robert J. Winchell; David B. Hoyt; Jon Walsh; Richard K. Simons

Despite prophylaxis, pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a major cause of posttraumatic morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients. We studied injury-related risk factors associated with the occurrence of PE despite routine prophylaxis. A review of 9721 trauma patients discharged from January 1, 1985 through December 31, 1992, identified 36 patients (0.4%) who suffered clinically evident PE despite a policy of routine prophylaxis against deep venous thrombosis that included use of prophylactic inferior vena caval filters. (Twenty-nine patients had an inferior vena caval filter placed for prophylaxis against PE.) A detailed analysis of injury-related risk factors was performed. Four high-risk patterns of injury were identified, representing common combinations of significant risk factors. These patient groups have an absolute risk of PE despite prophylaxis ranging from 1.5% to 3.8%. The relative risk is approximately ten times that of control patients. Identification of appropriate high-risk groups is necessary to allow optimization of prophylactic measures, including placement of inferior vena caval filter.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1999

Traumatic brain injury: patterns of failure of nonoperative management.

Nirav Y. Patel; David B. Hoyt; Peter Nakaji; Lawrence F. Marshall; Troy L. Holbrook; Raul Coimbra; Robert J. Winchell; Andrew W. Mikulaschek

OBJECTIVE The circumstances of failure for nonoperative management of blunt traumatic brain injury have been poorly defined. In this study, all trauma patients identified over a 12-year period with progression of neurologic injury requiring craniotomy were retrospectively reviewed. METHODS Data collected included demographic information, mechanism of injury, field and admission vital signs, and Glasgow Coma Scale score, medications, associated injuries, and coagulopathy. Head computed tomographic scans were reviewed, and anatomic findings were correlated with clinical changes (change in mental status or elevation of intracranial pressure) that led to subsequent CT scan and craniotomy. RESULTS Of 20,100 patients, there were 852 who had computed tomographic scans with acute intracranial injuries on admission; 462 patients were managed nonoperatively. Fifty-seven patients had progression of neurologic injury (34 < 24 hours = early; 23 > 24 hours = late) that required surgery. CONCLUSION Of the variables investigated, only anatomic location of injury was found to be predictive of early failure of nonoperative management. Frontal intraparenchymal hematomas are particularly prone to early failure. Clinical examination and intracranial pressure monitoring are equally important in detecting failure and should be an integral part of nonoperative management.

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert J. Winchell's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David B. Hoyt

American College of Surgeons

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard K. Simons

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dale Fortlage

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Raul Coimbra

University of California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge