Robert K. McAtee
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robert K. McAtee.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2001
Sofia Perea; Jose L. Lopez-Ribot; William R. Kirkpatrick; Robert K. McAtee; Rebecca A. Santillán; Marcos Martinez; David Calabrese; Dominique Sanglard; Thomas F. Patterson
ABSTRACT Molecular mechanisms of azole resistance in Candida albicans, including alterations in the target enzyme and increased efflux of drug, have been described, but the epidemiology of the resistance mechanisms has not been established. We have investigated the molecular mechanisms of resistance to azoles inC. albicans strains displaying high-level fluconazole resistance (MICs, ≥64 μg/ml) isolated from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. The levels of expression of genes encoding lanosterol 14α-demethylase (ERG11) and efflux transporters (MDR1 and CDR) implicated in azole resistance were monitored in matched sets of susceptible and resistant isolates. In addition,ERG11 genes were amplified by PCR, and their nucleotide sequences were determined in order to detect point mutations with a possible effect in the affinity for azoles. The analysis confirmed the multifactorial nature of azole resistance and the prevalence of these mechanisms of resistance in C. albicans clinical isolates exhibiting frank fluconazole resistance, with a predominance of overexpression of genes encoding efflux pumps, detected in 85% of all resistant isolates, being found. Alterations in the target enzyme, including functional amino acid substitutions and overexpression of the gene that encodes the enzyme, were detected in 65 and 35% of the isolates, respectively. Overall, multiple mechanisms of resistance were combined in 75% of the isolates displaying high-level fluconazole resistance. These results may help in the development of new strategies to overcome the problem of resistance as well as new treatments for this condition.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2000
William R. Kirkpatrick; Robert K. McAtee; Annette W. Fothergill; Michael G. Rinaldi; Thomas F. Patterson
ABSTRACT Voriconazole (VRC) was evaluated in an immunosuppressed-guinea pig model of invasive aspergillosis. VRC was more effective than amphotericin B or similar doses of itraconazole in the clearance ofAspergillus from tissues. VRC treatment regimens improved survival and significantly reduced tissue colony counts compared with those of controls.
Clinical Infectious Diseases | 1998
Sanjay G. Revankar; Olga P. Dib; William R. Kirkpatrick; Robert K. McAtee; Annette W. Fothergill; Michael G. Rinaldi; Spencer W. Redding; Thomas F. Patterson
Signs and symptoms of oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) were correlated with microbiology and clinical response to fluconazole in a cohort of patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and recurrent OPC. Sixty-four HIV-infected patients with a median CD4 cell count of < 50/mm3 (range, 3-318/mm3) who presented with OPC were enrolled in a longitudinal study. Specimens for cultures were taken weekly until clinical resolution. Therapy with fluconazole was increased weekly as required to a maximum daily dose of 800 mg until resolution of symptoms and oral lesions. Resistant or dose-dependent susceptible yeasts, defined as a minimum inhibitory concentration of > or = 16 micrograms/mL, were detected in 48 (31%) of 155 episodes. Clinical resolution with fluconazole therapy occurred in 107 (100%) of 107 episodes with susceptible yeasts vs. 44 (92%) of 48 episodes with resistant or dose-dependent susceptible strains (P = .008). Patients from whom fluconazole-resistant yeasts were isolated required longer courses of therapy and higher doses of fluconazole for response, but overall, excellent responses to fluconazole were seen in patients with advanced HIV infection.
The American Journal of Medicine | 1998
Sanjay G. Revankar; William R. Kirkpatrick; Robert K. McAtee; Olga P. Dib; Annette W. Fothergill; Spencer W. Redding; Michael G. Rinaldi; Susan G. Hilsenbeck; Thomas F. Patterson
PURPOSE The effects of continuous or intermittent therapy with fluconazole on the recurrence of and the development of fluconazole resistance are not known. PATIENTS AND METHODS We studied human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients with CD4 cell count <350 x 10(6)/L and oropharyngeal candidiasis in a prospective, randomized study. After initial treatment, 20 patients (16 of whom completed 3 months of follow-up) received continuous fluconazole at 200 mg/day, and 48 patients (28 of whom completed follow-up) received intermittent therapy at the time of symptomatic relapses. Oral samples were obtained weekly during episodes of infection and quarterly as surveillance cultures. Development of resistance was defined as a fourfold rise in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to at least 16 microg/mL from the initial culture in the same species, the emergence of new, resistant (MIC > or =16 microg/mL) species, or a significant increase in the proportion of resistant isolates. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 11 months, median annual relapse rates were lower in patients on continuous therapy (0 episodes/year) than in patients on intermittent therapy (4.1 episodes/year; P <0.001). Sterile cultures were seen in 6 of 16 (38%) patients on continuous therapy compared with 3 of 28 (11%) on intermittent therapy (P = 0.04). Microbiological resistance developed in 9 of 16 (56%) patients on continuous treatment, compared with 13 of 28 (46%) on intermittent treatment (P = 0.75). However, despite isolates with increased MICs, 42 of 44 patients responded to fluconazole in doses up to 800 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS In patients with frequent recurrences, continuous suppressive therapy significantly reduced relapses and colonization. Resistance occurred with both continuous and intermittent therapy; however, therapeutic responses were excellent.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2000
William R. Kirkpatrick; Robert K. McAtee; Annette W. Fothergill; David Loebenberg; Michael G. Rinaldi; Thomas F. Patterson
ABSTRACT SCH56592 (SCH) was evaluated in an immunosuppressed rabbit model of invasive aspergillosis. SCH was more effective than similar doses of itraconazole and as effective as amphotericin B in the clearance ofAspergillus spp. from tissues. Compared with controls, SCH regimens reduced mortality, improved survival, and significantly reduced tissue colony counts.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2005
William R. Kirkpatrick; Ana C. Vallor; Robert K. McAtee; Neil S. Ryder; Annette W. Fothergill; Michael G. Rinaldi; Thomas F. Patterson
ABSTRACT Antagonistic effects of combination therapy using amphotericin B (AmB) with agents which block ergosterol synthesis are a concern. Terbinafine was evaluated with AmB to assess antagonism or synergy in a rabbit model of invasive aspergillosis. Terbinafine had relatively little activity but did not demonstrate antagonism against AmB in our model.
Neurology | 1993
S. Kittner; C. Joseph; S. Havstad; S. R. Levine; K. Sawaya; L. Salowich-Palm; J. Carey; M. Deegan; Robin L. Brey; William Davis; J. Kaste; David L. McGlasson; Robert K. McAtee; E. Feldmann; K. Friedberg; B. Stern; C. Sewell; P. Karanjia; S. Jacobson
Journal of Clinical Microbiology | 1998
William R. Kirkpatrick; Sanjay G. Revankar; Robert K. McAtee; Jose L. Lopez-Ribot; Annette W. Fothergill; Dora I. McCarthy; Stephen E. Sanche; Rebecca A. Cantu; Michael G. Rinaldi; Thomas F. Patterson
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 1998
Jose L. Lopez-Ribot; Robert K. McAtee; Linda N. Lee; William R. Kirkpatrick; Theodore C. White; Dominique Sanglard; Thomas F. Patterson
Journal of Clinical Microbiology | 1999
Spencer W. Redding; Richard Zellars; William R. Kirkpatrick; Robert K. McAtee; Marta Caceres; Annette W. Fothergill; Jose L. Lopez-Ribot; Cliff W. Bailey; Michael G. Rinaldi; Thomas F. Patterson
Collaboration
Dive into the Robert K. McAtee's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs