Robert Königsberg

Detection of EpCAM positive and negative circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer patients

Abstract Background. Immunomagnetic EpCAM based methods are used to enrich circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients. EpCAM negative CTCs may be missed. We addressed the question of the reliability of an EpCAM dependent assay to enrich CTCs. Methods. To elucidate this issue, our study has been designed to assess two different CTC enrichment technologies (i) in EpCAM positive (+) and EpCAM negative cell lines and (ii) in mBC patients in dependency on their respective EpCAM expression. These two technologies encompass one anti-EpCAM immunomagnetic enrichment technology, MACS HEA MicroBeads® (MACS), and one EpCAM independent density centrifugation method, OncoQuick® plus (OQ+). Furthermore, the coherence between EpCAM expression in the primary tumor tissue of mBC patients and the CTC detection rates in the corresponding patients is analyzed. Results. (i) MACS recovered significantly more EpCAM (+) than EpCAM (−) tumor cells (p < 0.001) in spiked blood samples. With OQ+ no significantly different recovery rates between EpCAM (+) and EpCAM (−) tumor cells (p = 0.796) were detected. (ii) In mBC patients MACS yielded a significantly higher (p = 0.024) detection rate of EpCAM (+) CTCs. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.070) was found concerning the EpCAM status-based detection rate of CTCs by OQ+. (iii) CTC detection rates are independent of the primary tumors’ EpCAM expression. Conclusions. EpCAM (−) CTCs can not be detected by immunomagnetic EpCAM dependent enrichment methods. EpCAM independent enrichment technologies seem to be superior to detect the entire CTC population. Evaluation of CTCs as prognostic marker should compromise EpCAM (+) and (−) subpopulations.

Circulating tumor cells in metastatic colorectal cancer: Efficacy and feasibility of different enrichment methods

Comprehensive in vitro and in vivo studies comparing EpCAM-based methods with other cytometric CTC enrichment technologies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients are lacking. We compare four manual cytometric methods to detect CTCs in vitro and in mCRC patients. The EpCAM-based technology, MACS HEA MicroBeads((R)), showed a significant better tumor cell recovery rate compared to other cytometric methods (p-value<0.0001). CTCs of 38 mCRC patients were enriched with MACS HEA MicroBeads(R). Progression-free survival did significantly differ between mCRC patients without detectable and with >or= 1 CTCs (p=0.007). CTC enrichment with EpCAM coupled antibodies is superior to other cytometric methods and is a feasible method for CTC detection in mCRC patients.

Coexpression of the melatonin receptor 1 and nestin in human breast cancer specimens

Abstract:  Activation of the G‐protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) for melatonin (MT1) suppresses breast cancer cell growth in experimental models. To elucidate whether MT1 might play a role in cancer cells positive for the stem cell marker nestin, we assessed paired carcinomatous (Ca) and adjacent noncancerous (NCa) samples from 42 patients with primary breast cancer for MT1 and nestin by double immunofluorescence staining and quantitative image analysis with Tissue‐Quest® software. MT1 was located in luminal and myoepithelial cells in milk ducts and in tumor cells in 40/42 and 39/42 of NCa and Ca specimens, respectively, independent of hormone receptor and HER‐2 status. Nestin was located together with MT1 in myoepithelial cells in 38 NCa specimens (total n = 42) and in 18 Ca specimens with intact milk ducts. Quantitative evaluation of selected 16 NCa and Ca samples revealed that MT1 levels were higher in invasive Ca sections than in NCa specimens in eight and lower in six cases. Specimens from higher tumor stages (TII/III) with a higher risk of relapse were associated with MT1/nestin co‐staining in more than 10% of tumor cells, whereas a lack of co‐staining correlated with lower tumor stages. Abundant expression of MT1 and, particularly, coexpression of MT1 with nestin in invading tumor cells in more advanced tumors suggest an important role for this GPCR in the pathogenesis of breast cancer.

Impact of body mass index on estradiol depletion by aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer

Background:Body mass index (BMI) has an impact on survival outcome in patients treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Obesity is associated with an increased body aromatisation and may be a cause of insufficient estradiol depletion.Methods:Sixty-eight postmenopausal oestrogen receptor-positive patients with early breast cancer were prospectively included in this study. Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol were analysed immediately in the clinical routine lab and in a dedicated central lab before (T1) and 3 months after start with aromatase inhibitors (T2).Results:A total of 40 patients were normal or overweight (non-obese: BMI 18.5–29.9 kg m−2) and 28 were obese (BMI⩾30 kg m−2). Aromatase inhibitors significantly suppressed estradiol serum levels (T1: 19.5 pg ml−1, T2: 10.5 pg ml−1, P<0.01) and increased FSH serum levels (T1: 70.2 mIU ml−1, T2: 75.7 mIU ml−1, P<0.05). However, after 3 months of AI treatment, estradiol levels of obese patients were nonsignificantly higher compared with non-obese patients (12.5 pg ml−1 vs 9.0 pg ml−1, P=0.1). This difference was reflected by significantly lower FSH serum levels in obese compared with non-obese patients (65.5 mIU ml−1 vs 84.6 mIU ml−1, P<0.01). The significant effects of BMI on FSH serum levels could be detected both in the routine as well as in the dedicated central lab.Conclusion:Aromatase inhibitors are less efficient at suppressing estradiol serum levels in obese when compared with non-obese women.

Impact of AdipoR1 expression on breast cancer development.

OBJECTIVE Adiponectin serum levels have been shown to be inversely correlated with breast cancer risk. The protein is believed to act through adiponectin receptor 1 (AdipoR1) and has been suggested to play an important role in cancer development. While AdipoR1 is known to be expressed in invasive tumors, its role in DCIS remains elusive. We therefore investigated AdipoR1 expression in both invasive and preinvasive breast cancer. METHODS Tissue microarrays were established from paraffin-embedded archived tissues which contained 104 invasive breast cancers with adjacent preinvasive component (DCIS) as well as 96 preinvasive breast cancers. AdipoR1 expression was investigated by immunohistochemistry and correlated with clinical and tumor parameters. RESULTS AdipoR1 was detected in stromal and epithelial components of both invasive and preinvasive breast cancer. However, stromal and epithelial immunoreactivity for AdipoR1 was significantly higher in invasive breast cancer compared to preinvasive DCIS (p<0.001 and p=0.009). Within DCIS, AdipoR1 expression was inversely correlated with tumor size (r=-0.238, p=0.033). Menopausal status showed no influence on AdipoR1 expression. CONCLUSIONS The altered expression of AdipoR1 in invasive breast cancer compared to DCIS suggests that the receptor-binding protein adiponectin might exert growth inhibitory effects that are overcome in transformation of preinvasive to invasive breast cancer.

Tumor characteristics and recurrence patterns in triple negative breast cancer: A comparison between younger (<65) and elderly (⩾65) patients

BACKGROUND In an aging population an increasing number of breast cancers is diagnosed in elderly women. Tumor characteristics and patterns of metastasation have been extensively elucidated in younger triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, but data regarding TNBC in elderly women are missing. The goal of this investigation was to compare clinical pathological characteristics of younger and elderly TNBC patients in order to assess their relevance for TNBC in an aging population. METHODS Data of TNBC patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2004 were retrospectively analyzed by computer based chart information. Baseline tumor characteristics, patient demographics and patterns of metastasation were compared between younger (<65 years) and elderly (≥65 years) TNBC patients. RESULTS Out of 254 TNBC patients 75.6% were <65 years and 24.4% were ≥65 years. Mean tumor size, tumor grade and number of positive lymph nodes did not differ significantly (p=0.865, 0.115 and 0.442, respectively) between both age groups. Distant visceral metastases occurred significantly more often than bone metastases in both age groups (p<0.001). Local recurrences, bone and secondary lymph node metastases were observed at significantly higher numbers in younger patients (p=0.035, 0.025 and 0.041, respectively). Elderly TNBC patients received significantly less chemotherapy than younger patients (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS TNBC of elderly patients is an aggressive breast cancer subtype claiming as much attention as TNBC in younger patients, thus warranting chemotherapeutic intervention irrespectively of age.

Cell cycle dysregulation influences survival in high risk breast cancer patients.

Background: Cell cycle progression is regulated by cyclin dependent kinases (cdk) and cdk inhibitors. Recent immunohistological studies suggested that dysregulation of cyclin A, cyclin D, cyclin E, p16ink4, p21waf1/cip1, and p27kip1 are of prognostic value in patients with breast cancer. Our study represents the first comprehensive immunohistochemical cell cycle marker analysis for cdc25A, cyclin A, cyclin D, cyclin E, p16ink4, p21waf1/cip1, p27kip1, and pRb in tumor tissue and adjacent benign breast tissue from 69 primarily untreated breast cancer patients. Methods: Immunhistochemistry using primary monoclonal antibodies to detect cdc 25A, cyclin A, cyclin D, cyclin E, p16ink4, p21waf1/cip1, p27kip1, and pRb has been performed. Results: Sixty-nine patients with untreated, invasive breast cancer (n = 69) were divided into a low/ intermediate and a high risk group according to the St. Gallen 2005 consensus conference. High risk patients (n = 22) had a significantly (p = 0.003) shorter mean and median survival (282.85 weeks; 383.0 weeks, respectively) than low/intermediate risk patients (375.41 weeks; not reached yet, respectively). A subgroup of high risk breast cancer patients characterized in addition by overexpression of cdc25A, cyclin A, cyclin E, p16ink4a, and p27kip1 experienced a shortened mean survival of 222.03, 235.71, 257.25, 239.18, and 261.94 weeks, respectively. Regarding benign breast tissue adjacent to breast cancer tissue, 59.4% of the patients investigated overexpressed cdc25A, 23.2% overexpressed pRb, and 63.2% exerted dysregulation of p27kip1 while they proved to be negative for immunohistochemical staining regarding all other markers tested. Conclusion: The immunohistological analyses of cdc25A, cyclin A, cyclin E, p16ink4a, and p27kip1 have the potential for further refining the risk assessment in patients with untreated breast cancer who belong to the high risk category defined according to the St. Gallen 2005 consensus conference. These cell cycle markers define a subgroup of high risk patients with even higher risk of metastazation and shortened survival. For confirmation a prospective study using standardized laboratory procedures in a larger population is needed.

Melatonin receptors, melatonin metabolizing enzymes and cyclin D1 in human breast cancer

Background. Melatonin suppresses breast cancer cell proliferation by inhibiting the upregulation of estrogen-induced cyclin D1 via its G-protein-coupled receptor MT1. Additionally, melatonin stimulates the expression of the estrogen sulfotransferase, SULT1E1. However, metabolism of melatonin via 6-hydroxylation by CYP1A1/1A2 and subsequent sulfonation by SULT1A1/1A3 decreases its intracellular concentration. This could have a negative impact on its oncostatic action in breast cancer. Patients and methods. In this pilot study, we performed immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of MT1 and cyclin D1 in breast cancer specimens from 33 patients. Also, we investigated the expression of CYP1A1/1A2, SULT1A1/1A3/1E1, and cyclin D1 in cancer (CANC) and adjacent non-cancer (NCANC) specimens from 10 representative breast cancer patients using quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Results. CYP1A1-mRNA-expression was found only in three CANC and in one NCANC. CYP1A2 mRNA was below the detection limit in all patients. SULT1A1 was observed only in two of the 10 CANC and one of the 10 NCANC specimens. But, all 10 CANC and NCANC samples showed high SULT1A3 levels. Cyclin D1 mRNA levels were found in all 10 CANC and NCANC specimens. Furthermore, IHC-staining of cyclin D1 was observed in 27 of 33 CANC and correlated positively with estrogen receptor positivity (p = 0.015). Conclusion. The low or even absent expression of CYP1A1 or CYP1A2 in breast cancer specimens suggested that melatonin might be involved in cell cycle arrest.

Combined chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced inoperable transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder and/or in patients ineligible for surgery: a phase I trial

BACKGROUND We conducted a phase I trial of gemcitabine (gem) with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BC) ineligible for surgery or cisplatin or refusing organ loss. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with urothelial cancer, cT2-T4, cN0-1, M0, ineligible for surgery due to local tumor extension, PS, age or co-morbidities or who refused surgery were included. After maximal transurethral resection, the treatment schedule included: twice-weekly i.v. infusion of gem [dose levels (DL) 1-6: 20, 27, 30, 33, 50 and 40 mg/m(2), respectively] for 30 min and concurrent radiotherapy (RT) to the bladder with 55.5 Gy. The primary end point was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose recommended (RD) for further studies of this gem schedule. The secondary end point was late toxicity. The MTD was defined by dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in 2 or more of 6 patients, discontinuation of RT and/or gem for >1 week in 2 or more of 6 patients due to grade (G) 3/4 acute and/or late toxicity in more than 2 of 18 patients. RESULTS Thirty-five of 44 patients were assessable for toxicity and thus the primary end point. DLTs occurred in two of five patients at dose level 5: one G3 alanine aminotransferase elevation and one G3 fatigue. The MTD, therefore, was 50 mg/m(2) gem twice weekly. At DL 6 with 40 mg/m(2), the RD was established: only one of six patients developed G3 fatigue and diarrhea. Late toxicity was rare and of low grade (only G1-2). The 2-year locoregional failure rate was 32% (9/28); 10 of 28 patients (38%) were alive with an intact bladder and no evidence of recurrent disease, 9 patients developed distant metastases and 6 died of their disease. CONCLUSIONS Gemcitabine in combination with RT is well tolerated in BC patients ineligible for surgery and/or cisplatin. The RD of gemcitabine for subsequent trials is 40 mg/m(2) twice weekly with concurrent radiation.BACKGROUND We conducted a phase I trial of gemcitabine (gem) with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BC) ineligible for surgery or cisplatin or refusing organ loss. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with urothelial cancer, cT2-T4, cN0-1, M0, ineligible for surgery due to local tumor extension, PS, age or co-morbidities or who refused surgery were included. After maximal transurethral resection, the treatment schedule included: twice-weekly i.v. infusion of gem [dose levels (DL) 1-6: 20, 27, 30, 33, 50 and 40mg/m2, respectively] for 30min and concurrent radiotherapy (RT) to the bladder with 55.5Gy. The primary end point was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose recommended (RD) for further studies of this gem schedule. The secondary end point was late toxicity. The MTD was defined by dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in 2 or more of 6 patients, discontinuation of RT and/or gem for >1 week in 2 or more of 6 patients due to grade (G) 3/4 acute and/or late toxicity in more than 2 of 18 patients. RESULTS Thirty-five of 44 patients were assessable for toxicity and thus the primary end point. DLTs occurred in two of five patients at dose level 5: one G3 alanine aminotransferase elevation and one G3 fatigue. The MTD, therefore, was 50mg/m2 gem twice weekly. At DL 6 with 40mg/m2, the RD was established: only one of six patients developed G3 fatigue and diarrhea. Late toxicity was rare and of low grade (only G1-2). The 2-year locoregional failure rate was 32% (9/28); 10 of 28 patients (38%) were alive with an intact bladder and no evidence of recurrent disease, 9 patients developed distant metastases and 6 died of their disease. CONCLUSIONS Gemcitabine in combination with RT is well tolerated in BC patients ineligible for surgery and/or cisplatin. The RD of gemcitabine for subsequent trials is 40mg/m2 twice weekly with concurrent radiation.

Clinical and Economic Aspects of KRAS Mutational Status as Predictor for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

Treatment of metastasized colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed monoclonal antibodies is driven by the results of the KRAS mutational status (wild type [WT]/mutated [MUT]). To find out as to what extent the treatment selection based on the KRAS status had impact on overall costs, a retrospective analysis was performed. Of 73 mCRC patients 31.5% were MUT carriers. Costs of EGFR inhibitor treatment for WT patientswere significantly higher compared to those for patients with MUT (p = 0.005). Higher treatment costs in WT carriers reflect a significantly higher number of treatment cycles (p = 0.012) in this cohort of patients. Savings of drug costs minus the costs for the determination of KRAS status accounted for EUR 779.42 (SD ±336.28) per patient per cycle. The routine use of KRAS screening is a cost-effective strategy. Costs of unnecessary monoclonal EGFR inhibitor treatment can be saved in MUT patients.