Robert L. Durham
University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robert L. Durham.
Journal of Traumatic Stress | 1999
Charles C. Benight; Gail Ironson; Robert L. Durham
This brief report describes the psychometric properties of an instrument designed to measure Hurricane Coping Self-Efficacy (HCSE). Survivors of Hurricane Andrew (n = 165) and Hurricane Opal (n = 63) completed the HCSE and assessments of optimism, social support, distress, and resource loss. Principal components factor analyses revealed a unidimensional structure for the HCSE. Internal consistency of the HCSE was strong. In both samples, HCSE was positively associated with optimism and social support, but negatively associated with general psychological distress, trauma related distress, and resource loss. Finally, hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that the HCSE explained a significant amount of experimental variance for intrusive thoughts and avoidance after controlling for social support, lost resources, and optimism.
Psychological Reports | 1994
Frederick L. Coolidge; Lee A. Becker; David C. DiRito; Robert L. Durham; Melanie M. Kinlaw; Peter Philbrick
McCrae and Costa since 1986 have proferred a five-factor personality model as a lingua franca among different psychometric test users, and they suggest that their operationalization of the five-factor model, the NEO Personality Inventory, may also be useful in the clinical assessment of the abnormal personality. The present study examined the inventory and its relationship to the 11 personality disorders of Axis II of DSM-III—R in a sample of 180 adults. Correlational multivariate analyses appear to indicate a limited usefulness of the five-factor model in the understanding of personality disorders, and four major objections are offered. Further research with clinical samples, other models of personality, and other measures of personality disorders are encouraged.
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment | 2002
Daniel A. Fuselier; Robert L. Durham; Sandra K. Wurtele
College students and members of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA) were compared as to their beliefs and attitudes concerning perpetrators of child sexual abuse. Analyses of a 44-item inventory (assessing beliefs about an abusers demographics and attitudes concerning an abusers cognitions and behaviors) indicated that the groups differed on perceived demographic descriptors (e.g., students believed perpetrators to be older when they first begin offending, more educated, and more likely to be gay than the professionals) and behaviors (e.g., students believed that the perpetrator was more likely to use force to gain the childs compliance). In addition, 2 subscales (Cognitive Distortions and Perceived Social Functioning) were identified. Compared to professionals, students were less likely to believe perpetrators use cognitive distortions and were more likely to believe perpetrators function at a lower interpersonal level. Results are discussed in terms of the efforts to educate the public about the characteristics of child sexual abusers.
Computers in Human Behavior | 2016
Arjun Bhalla; Robert L. Durham; Nadia Al-Tabaa; Carolyn Yeager
Participant attrition and non-adherence are common issues within eHealth interventions. There is need for a better understanding of who has interest in using these technologies. The current study developed and psychometrically evaluated the eHealth Readiness scale, which assesses user preparedness to engage in eHealth interventions. Construction of scale items was informed by the theory of self-efficacy, as well as the eHealth and eLearning literature. An initial validation was conducted with an undergraduate sample (N=195, Aged 1851, M=21.53, SD=5.16). Continued validation of the scale was done with a sample of military mental health providers (N=64, Aged 2980, M=49.30, SD=11.97) in a randomized controlled trial for an eHealth intervention. Results illustrated that scale items demonstrated good internal reliability (Cronbachs =. 81 and 0.83), and a stable one-factor solution. Results also established construct validity for the scale. Results of an independent samples t-test indicated no significant difference in eHealth readiness scores between those who did and did not engage with the eHealth intervention, but scores for those who engaged were marginally higher. Current findings provide preliminary support for the psychometric properties of the eHealth readiness scale. Scale was developed to assess preparedness to engage with eHealth interventions.Results provide initial support for our scale as a brief, reliable and valid tool.Future study should substantiate the scale as a screening tool and factor structure.
Journal of Special Education Technology | 1981
Robert L. Durham
A video-tape modeling and peer counseling program was utilized to teach recreational skills to younger handicapped youths and employment skills to adolescent handicapped youths. Twelve video tapes were developed to teach the adolescent youths (trainer) job skills relevant to both the specific job and general skills relevant to generic jobs. The trainers then used 29 recreational video tapes to teach the younger children (trainees) specific recreational skills. Resuts indicated that, as a function of video tape modeling and peer tuspring, trainees spent approximately 80% of their time engaged in talk specific (i.e., tape-modeled) behavior. Trainers evidenced significant increases in rated behavioral scales over the 12 week course of the study. Additionally, trainers scored significantly higher than randomly matched controls on a Job Skills Inventory (JSI) over the course of the study. Predicted similar differences in self-concept, as measured by the Piers-Harris Self Concept Scale for Children, were not obtained. Results were discussed in terms of the practicality of using video tape as a means to teach recreational and job skills to handicapped youths.
Child Abuse & Neglect | 2008
Dominique Simons; Sandra K. Wurtele; Robert L. Durham
Clinical Neuropsychologist | 1999
Simeon N. Feldstein; Frederick R. Keller; Rebecca E. Portman; Robert L. Durham; Kelli J. Klebe; Hasker P. Davis
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology | 1994
Michael Schmidt; William Trueblood; Michelle Merwin; Robert L. Durham
Journal of Traumatic Stress | 2004
Charles C. Benight; Alexandra S. Harding-Taylor; Amanda M. Midboe; Robert L. Durham
Psychology | 2011
Frederick L. Coolidge; Gina M. Tambone; Robert L. Durham; Daniel L. Segal