Robert Levin

The Importance of Water Quality and Haemodialysis Fluid Composition

Treatment of renal failure by haemodialysis uses dialysis fluid to facilitate the normalization of electrolyte and acid base abnormalities and the removal of low molecular weight uraemic compounds present in the plasma such as urea. The dialysis fluid is a continuously produced blend of treated tap water and a concentrated solution containing electrolytes, buffer, and glucose. The water used originates as drinking water but undergoes additional treatment. Recent surveys have indicated that the chemical and microbiological content of such water frequently fails to meet the requirements of established standards, and its bacterial content arising from the presence of a biofilm in the water distribution network or the hydraulic circuit of the dialysis machine is a contributory factor to the chronic inflammatory state in patients undergoing regular dialysis. The composition of the dialysis fluid plays an important role in the modulation of complications associated with end-stage renal disease, as well as those associated with the treatment itself. The avoidance of complications arising from water contaminants requires a constant and vigorous attention to water quality, whilst with the composition of electrolytes and buffer there is a trend towards greater individualization to provide a high degree of treatment tolerance.

RENAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE SYMPOSIUM: The Implications of Water Quality in Hemodialysis

Water used in dialysis requires additional treatment to minimize patient exposure to potential contaminants that may be present in drinking water. Although standards for the chemical purity of water are in existence and have eliminated many of the problems seen in renal units in the 1970s, some problems remain, and the importance of newer contaminants arising from changes in water treatment at the municipal level are being recognized. Despite this, recent surveys have indicated considerable shortcomings in compliance with chemical standards. The water quality used in the preparation of dialysis fluid also requires minimal bacterial content. Staff working in renal units are frequently unaware of the level of microbiologic contamination in their dialysis fluid arising from the presence of biofilm in the dialysis machines and the water distribution network. Bacterial fragments generated by such biofilms are able to cross the dialysis membrane and stimulate an inflammatory response in the patient. Such inflammation has been implicated in the mortality and morbidity associated with dialysis. The desire to improve treatment outcomes has led to the application of more stringent standards for the microbiologic purity of dialysis fluid and to the introduction of ultraclean dialysis fluid into clinical practice.

Impact of Water Quality and Dialysis Fluid Composition on Dialysis Practice

An essential but frequently neglected aspect of dialysis treatment is the dialysis fluid produced by blending treated tap water with concentrated solutions containing electrolytes and buffer. Chemical and microbiological contaminants as well as the electrolyte and buffer composition of the dialysis fluid play major roles in the induction or modulation of morbidity associated with regular dialysis therapy.

Clinical Waste Generation from Renal Units: Implications and Solutions

The treatment of end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) makes extensive use of presterilized disposable items which, after use, are contaminated by blood. The preferred route of disposal of such items is by incineration. Disposal costs have risen and this increase in costs has not been matched by waste management programs in renal units. Many of the waste items generated also contain polyvinyl chloride (PVC) whose incineration is environmentally sensitive. Furthermore blood tubing sets contain plasticizers such as di(2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), which is known to pose health risks to specific groups of patients. The generation of clinical waste in a dialysis unit is analyzed, issues associated with disposal are discussed, and approaches toward a cost‐effective, environmentally sustainable clinical waste management program are reviewed.

How do changes in water quality and dialysate composition affect clinical outcomes

Dialysis relies upon the transfer of waste products and electrolytes across a semi-permeable membrane contained in the dialyser facilitated by the dialysis fluid, a fast-flowing electrolyte solution prepared continuously by the mixing of treated water with a concentrated electrolyte solution. Both the water, the buffer and electrolyte composition play important roles in modulating complications associated with treatment. With respect to water, historically the focus was on chemical contaminant content, but more recently has shifted to microbiological quality due to the role that such quality plays in the pro-inflammatory state. The composition of the dialysis fluid is crucial in normalization of electrolyte composition of plasma water, homeostasis and acid-base balance, and should be individualized to the patients’ requirements in the same way as blood and dialysate flow rates are individualized to ensure optimal comfort and minimal complications associated with the procedure.

Water Treatment for Dialysis: Technology and Clinical Implications

The dialytic process utilizes high volumes of water in the preparation of the dialysis fluid. Improvements in water treatment equipment have resulted in improvements in chemical quality. Awareness that endotoxin and bacterial fragments present in the water distribution loop within the dialysis, are able to cross the dialyser membrane, has resulted in an increased focus on this aspect of water quality. Practically, the age of many water treatment plants, extensions of distribution systems and suboptimal cleaning procedures have prevented the achievement of optimal microbiological quality on a routine basis. When achieved and maintained, clear benefits to the patient have been demonstrated. Hemodialysis patients are also subject to increased oxidative stress which may also contribute to their morbidity and mortality. Recent clinical studies using dialysis fluid made with electrolytereduced water have demonstrated benefits to antioxidant status of dialysis patients, offering a further technological solution to the problem of increased cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients.

Water for Haemodialysis and Related Therapies: Recent Standards and Emerging Issues

Dialysis is a well-established and widely used procedure. For a number of years, the focus has been on ensuring that water used in the preparation of dialysis fluid meets the required chemical and microbiological quality and complies with national or international standards which have recently been updated. Continued vigilance is required, in particular when new chemicals such as silver-stabilized hydrogen peroxide and chlorine dioxide are used to prevent growth of Legionella bacteria in hospital water systems, since residues are harmful to patients receiving dialysis. To achieve the required quality, large volumes of water are processed, and a substantial portion is sent to waste via the municipal sewer systems with little attempt to reuse such water on site. In view of concern about global warming and climate change, there is a need to adopt a more environmentally conscious attitude requiring dialysis providers to focus on this aspect of water usage.

On-line clearance: A useful tool for monitoring the effectiveness of the reuse procedure

Reprocessing of a dialyzer for repeated use in the same patient is widely practiced. The dialyzer fiber bundle volume (FBV) is monitored as an indicator of the dialyzer’s suitability for continued use, with standards for reprocessed dialyzers requiring a FBV of greater than 80% of a new dialyzer to be maintained. We have used on-line measurement of clearance of sodium (OLC module, Fresenius Medical Care, Walnut Creek, CA) to assess small molecule clearance changes during and between treatments for a group of 29 chronic hemodialysis patients who reused high flux polysulfone dialyzers (F80, Fresenius Medical Care, Lexington, MA) reprocessed using citric acid and heat (95°C). Data pertaining to the initial, 5th, 10th, and 15th uses were analyzed and showed that, within a single dialysis session, there was a trend for the clearance to reduce throughout the treatment (p < 0.001). Overall, there was also a trend for clearances to decline with increasing number of reuses (p < 0.008). Changes in FBV occurred, but such changes remained within the guidelines suggested by standards. It is concluded that on-line clearance measurements provide a simple noninvasive method to monitor dialyzer performance over each use and between uses.

How Should Dialyzers Be Reprocessed

modialyzera. in Stutidwds and Rccor,irnr,irled Pmcrkrs. Vol. 3: Dinlysiu. ANSVAAMI RD 37. Arlington, VA, A\rociation for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, I993 I964 X. National Kidney Foundation revised standards for reuse of hernodialy7rrs. i l m J Kidney Di.r 3:36&468. I983 9. National Kidney Foundatiorl report on dialyzer reuse. Am .I Kidrwv D~.T 1 I . Shaldon S, Silva H, Rosen SM: Technique of refrtgerated coil preservation haemodialysi? with femoral venous catheterization. Br Mrd J 241 1413,